Nationwide Etoricoxib Injection Clinical Experience (NICE): Real-World Evidence in Indian Patients

Introduction Pain is a major health issue globally. Etoricoxib, a highly selective COX-2 inhibitor, given orally, has been found to be efficacious and safe in the management of acute and chronic pain. Oral etoricoxib has been extensively studied; however, there is a lack of research exploring the use of etoricoxib via alternative routes, specifically intramuscular (IM) injection. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of an innovative and novel formulation of IM etoricoxib injection 90 mg/mL in the management of patients with acute pain in India. Method This was a real-world, multicenter, retrospective, observational study to investigate the effectiveness and safety of IM etoricoxib injection in the management of patients with acute pain in India (outpatient setting). The clinical data of 383 patients from 42 centers across India were collected from November 2022 to April 2023. Following approval from the site investigator, comprehensive patient-level information encompassing demographic and clinical variables as well as comorbidities was collected and entered into a case report form. Approval from the Independent Ethics Committee (IEC) and Institutional Review Board (IRB) was sought. The safety and effectiveness at 30 minutes and 60 minutes of IM etoricoxib injection were then analyzed. Results Among the studied patients, etoricoxib was used for the management of knee arthritis, fracture, post-traumatic pain, postoperative cases, acute back pain, back injury, torn ligament, and muscle strain and sprain. Of 383 patients, 98.17% had moderate-to-severe pain at baseline on the visual analogue scale (VAS) (0 being no pain and 10 being severe unbearable pain). The percentage of patients with severe pain reduced to only 6.78% and 4.17% at 30 minutes and 60 minutes, respectively. The improvement in the VAS score was statistically significant from baseline to 30 minutes and 60 minutes, and at 60 minutes compared to 30 minutes (p < 0.0001). More than half the patients (56.91%) had no pain at the site of the injection. Most of the doctors (70.23%) opined that the IM etoricoxib injection was better than their currently used NSAID injections for pain relief. Only 12.79% of patients required rescue analgesia post-IM etoricoxib injection. IM etoricoxib injection was well tolerated as 98.69% of the patients did not experience or report any adverse events post-IM injection. Conclusion This real-world, multicenter, retrospective, observational study across India demonstrated that the innovative and novel formulation of etoricoxib (90 mg/mL IM injection) was effective and well-tolerated in the management of acute pain. Overall, this study provides valuable insights into the real-world effectiveness and safety of IM etoricoxib injections, suggesting it could be a promising therapy for the management of acute pain for optimal patient benefit.

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Tofacitinib and Apremilast in Patients with Active Psoriatic Arthritis: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

Tofacitinib and apremilast have shown considerable efficacy in placebo-controlled trials of active psoriatic arthritis, but the relative efficacy and safety remain unclear because of a lack of head-to-head comparisons.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the relative efficacy and safety of tofacitinib and apremilast at different doses in patients with active psoriatic arthritis.

METHOD

We performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis to combine evidence from randomized controlled trials for examination of the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib 10 mg, tofacitinib 5 mg, apremilast 30 mg, and apremilast 20 mg in psoriatic arthritis.

RESULTS

Eight randomized controlled trials including 3086 patients met the inclusion criteria. There were ten pairwise comparisons including six direct comparisons of five interventions. All the interventions achieved a significant American College of Rheumatology 20 response compared with placebo. Tofacitinib 10 mg and apremilast 30 mg were among the most effective treatments for active psoriatic arthritis, followed by tofacitinib 5 mg, and apremilast 20 mg. The ranking probability based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) indicated that tofacitinib 10 mg had the highest probability of being the best treatment in terms of the American College of Rheumatology 20 response rate (SUCRA = 0.785). This was followed by apremilast 30 mg (SUCRA = 0.670), tofacitinib 5 mg (SUCRA = 0.596), apremilast 20 mg (SUCRA = 0.448), and placebo (SUCRA = 0.001). We observed no significant differences in the incidence of serious adverse events after treatment with tofacitinib 10 mg, apremilast 30 mg, tofacitinib 5 mg, apremilast 20 mg, or placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with active psoriatic arthritis, tofacitinib 10 mg and apremilast 30 mg were the most efficacious interventions and were not associated with a significant risk of serious adverse events.

Investigating the possible causal association of coffee consumption with osteoarthritis risk using a Mendelian randomization analysis

This study examined whether coffee consumption is causally associated with osteoarthritis. A two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis using inverse-variance weighted (IVW) and weighted median estimates, and the MR-Egger regression method were performed. The publicly available summary statistical datasets of coffee consumption genome-wide association studies (GWASs) meta-analyses on coffee intake from eight Caucasian cohorts (n = 18,176), GWAS meta-analyses of predominately regular-type coffee consumers of European ancestry (n = up to 91,462), and a GWAS in 7410 patients with osteoarthritis in the arcOGEN study with 11,009 controls of European ancestry were evaluated. Four single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from GWASs of coffee consumption as instrumental variables (IVs) to improve inference were selected. These SNPs were located at neurocalcin delta (NCALD) (rs16868941), cytochrome p450 oxidoreductase (POR) (rs17685), cytochrome p450 family 1 subfamily A member 1 (CYP1A1) (rs2470893), and neuronal cell adhesion molecule (NRCAM) (rs382140). The IVW method (beta = 0.381, SE = 0.170, p = 0.025) and the weighted median approach (beta = 0.419, SE = 0.206, p = 0.047) showed evidence to support a causal association between coffee consumption and osteoarthritis. MR-Egger regression revealed that directional pleiotropy was unlikely to be biasing the result (intercept = 0.064; p = 0.549), but showed no causal association between coffee consumption and osteoarthritis (beta = - 0.518, SE = 1.270, p = 0.723). Cochran's Q test and the funnel plot indicated no evidence of heterogeneity between IV estimates based on the individual variants. The results of MR analysis support the observation that coffee consumption is causally associated with an increased risk of osteoarthritis.