Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Janus Kinase Inhibitors and Secukinumab in Patients with Active Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors and secukinumab have been demonstrated to be effective treatments for ankylosing spondylitis (AS). However, there have been no head-to-head trials comparing the effectiveness and safety characteristics of JAK inhibitors with secukinumab. This study aimed to evaluate the relative effectiveness and safety of JAK inhibitors and secukinumab in patients with active AS.

SUMMARY

A Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted using direct and indirect data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that examined the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib 5 mg, upadacitinib 15 mg, filgotinib 200 mg, and secukinumab 150 mg in patients with active AS who had a poor response or intolerance to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and were tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor-naïve. Data from six RCTs comprising 937 patients were analyzed. The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society 20 (ASAS20) response rates were significantly higher in the JAK inhibitors and secukinumab groups than in the placebo group. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA)-based ranking probability based on the ASAS20 response rate suggested that tofacitinib 5 mg had the highest likelihood of being the best treatment for achieving the ASAS20 response rate, followed by filgotinib 200 mg, upadacitinib 15 mg, secukinumab 150 mg, and placebo. The SUCRA-based ranking probability based on the ASAS20 response rate suggested that tofacitinib 5 mg had the highest likelihood of being the best treatment for achieving the ASAS40 response rate, followed by upadacitinib 15 mg, secukinumab 150 mg, filgotinib 200 mg, and placebo.

KEY MESSAGES

Tofacitinib 5 mg was the most effective treatment for AS, whereas JAK inhibitors and secukinumab 150 mg were effective treatments in patients with active AS who had a poor response or intolerance to NSAIDs and were TNF inhibitor-naïve.

Comparative efficacy and safety of secukinumab and ixekizumab in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis

OBJECTIVE

Evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of secukinumab and ixekizumab in active ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients.

METHODS

A Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted using direct and indirect data from five randomized controlled trials that examined the efficacy and safety of secukinumab 150 mg every 4 weeks and ixekizumab 80 mg every 2 weeks (IXEQ2W) or every 4 weeks (IXEQ4W) in active AS patients.

RESULTS

Data from 1433 patients were analyzed. The Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society evaluation 20% response rates (ASAS20) were significantly higher with secukinumab 150 mg, IXEQ2W, IXEQ2W, and adalimumab 40 mg (odds ratio [OR] 2.75, 95% Bayesian credible interval [CrI] 2.04-3.69; OR 2.59, 95% CrI 1.69-3.98; OR 2.45, 95% CrI 1.60-3.75; and OR 1.94, 95% CrI 1.13-3.37, respectively) compared to the placebo group. Efficacies of secukinumab and ixekizumab were numerically higher compared to adalimumab 40 mg, although there was no significant difference in the ASAS20 response rates. The ASAS40 response rate showed a pattern of distribution similar to the ASAS20 response rate, with the exception of the ixekizumab group, which was associated with the most favorable surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) for the ASAS40 response rate. Based on the SUCRA rating, secukinumab 150 mg had the highest probability of being the best ASAS20 response rate therapy, followed by IXEQ2W, IXEQ4W, adalimumab 40 mg, and placebo. There was no significant difference between the treatments regarding the number of serious adverse events (SAEs).

CONCLUSION

Secukinumab and ixekizumab were effective in active AS treatment, without the risk of SAEs.