Assessment of Interleukin 17 in Egyptian Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients as a Biomarker in Disease Activity

INTRODUCTION

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic idiopathic systemic autoimmune disorder with dysregulation of adaptive and innate immune systems. Interleukin (IL)-17 is the prototypical pro-inflammatory cytokine of T helper 17 (Th17) cells. Therefore, it contributes to the pathogenesis of human SLE.

AIM

The aim of the research paper was the evaluation of IL-17 level as a biomarker in the SLE cohort and its relation to disease activity and analysis of IL-17 concentration in patients with lupus nephritis and non-lupus nephritis.

METHODS

The research enrolled 45 SLE patients according to Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics Classification Criteria (SLICC), and age and sex-matched. The patients underwent full history, clinical examination, laboratory investigation, and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) calculation.

RESULTS

The mean age ± SD of the participants equaled 32 ± 11 years, and serum IL-17 in SLE cases was statistically significantly high (p < 0.001). No statistically significant correlations were reported between disease activity according to SLEDAI and IL-17. In addition, a statistically significant positive correlation was reported between IL-17 and ESR, and a high statistically significant negative correlation was reported between IL-17 and C3 and C4 (P < 0.001). A statistically significant positive correlation was reported between IL-17 and 24-hour urinary proteins with a Pvalue of 0.01.

CONCLUSION

SLE cases demonstrated higher levels of serum IL-17, contributing to SLE pathogenesis. However, no statistically significant difference was reported between IL-17 and Lupus nephritis. IL-17 and SLE activity (SLEDAI) did not correlate. A statistically significant positive relation was reported between IL-17 and 24-hour urinary proteins. Additionally, a high statistically significant negative correlation was reported between IL-17 and C3 and C4.

A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing the effectiveness and safety of voclosporin or tacrolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil as induction treatment for lupus nephritis

AIM

This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of voclosporin + mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), tacrolimus + MMF, and monotherapy with MMF or cyclophosphamide as induction treatment for lupus nephritis.

METHODS

The study included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the effectiveness and safety of voclosporin + MMF, tacrolimus + MMF, and monotherapy for induction treatment in patients with lupus nephritis. To incorporate direct and indirect evidence from RCTs, we used a Bayesian network meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Four RCTs, including 936 participants, met the inclusion criteria. Tacrolimus + MMF substantially increased the incidence of complete remission relative to that following monotherapy (odds ratio [OR] 2.85; 95% credible interval [CrI] 1.87-4.39). Tacrolimus + MMF was also more effective than voclosporin + MMF (OR 1.43; 95% CrI 0.80-2.57). Tacrolimus + MMF showed the greatest chance of being the optimal treatment for overall response (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 0.942), followed by voclosporin + MMF (SUCRA = 0.558) and monotherapy (SUCRA = 0.001). In terms of safety based on severe event rates, monotherapy had the greatest chance of being the safest treatment (SUCRA = 0.903), followed by voclosporin + MMF (SUCRA = 0.517) and tacrolimus + MMF (SUCRA = 0.081).

CONCLUSION

Tacrolimus + MMF and voclosporin + MMF were more effective than monotherapy, and tacrolimus + MMF was the most effective induction treatment for lupus nephritis patients. However, tacrolimus + MMF did pose a greater risk of serious adverse events than monotherapy.

Circulating leptin level in osteoarthritis and associations between leptin receptor polymorphisms and disease susceptibility: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to systemically review the evidence on the relationship between the circulating leptin levels and osteoarthritis (OA), and the association between leptin and leptin receptor (LEPR) polymorphisms and OA susceptibility.

METHODS

To find relevant papers (up to February 2023) examining the association between circulating leptin levels, LEPR polymorphisms, and OA, the PUBMED, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched. We performed a meta-analysis to examine the levels of synovial and serum/plasma leptin in OA patients compared with healthy controls, as well as the relationship between OA and LEPR polymorphisms.

RESULTS

Data from 15 investigations, totaling 2197 patients with OA and 2546 controls, were included in the meta-analysis. There were statistically significant differences in the levels of circulating leptin between the OA and control groups (standardized mean difference [SMD] 2.178, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.208-3.139, P = 0.001). Leptin levels were also substantially greater in European, Asian, and Arab groups among OA patients. After adjusting for age, sex, and/or body mass index, the leptin levels of patients with OA were significantly higher. Similarly, regardless of sample size (n < 100 and n ≥ 100) or year of publication, leptin levels were considerably higher in the OA group. In addition, the synovial leptin level was greater in the OA group than in the control group (SMD 0.783; 95% CI 0.247-1.319, P = 0.004). In the LEPR rs1137101 polymorphism, the OA and AA genotypes were significantly associated (odds ratio 0.282, 95% CI 0.126-0.629, P = 0.002), according to the meta-analysis. Ethnic stratification revealed an association between OA and the LEPR rs1137101 AA genotype in Asian and Arab populations.

CONCLUSION

The results of this meta-analysis indicate that patients with OA had considerably greater levels of circulating leptin than did control individuals. In addition, synovial leptin levels were greater in OA patients than in healthy individuals, and the LEPR rs1137101 polymorphism was linked to an increased risk of developing OA. These results imply that leptin participates in the onset and progression of OA.

Associations between interleukin 17A and 17F polymorphisms and asthma susceptibility: A meta-analysis

Owing to their role in inflammatory reactions and immunological responses as well as their chromosomal location, interleukin (IL) 17A and 17F are regarded as candidate causal genes associated with asthma. The aim of this study was to determine whether IL17 polymorphisms are associated with susceptibility to asthma. We used the PubMed/Medline and Embase databases to search for studies reporting IL17 polymorphisms in patients with asthma and healthy controls. Meta-analyses were conducted to determine the associations between IL17A rs8193036 (-737C/T), rs2275913 (-197G/A), rs3819024 (A/G), rs3748067 (C/T), and rs4711998 (A/G) and IL17F rs763780 (7488A/G), rs2397084 (T/C), rs1889570 (C/T), rs11465553 (G/A), and rs1266828 (T/C) polymorphisms and asthma susceptibility. A total of 20 studies were included in this meta-analysis. Our results revealed the IL17A rs8193036 CC genotype was associated with asthma susceptibility (odds ratio [OR] = 1.490, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.027-2.161, p = .036). However, stratification by ethnicity indicated no association between this polymorphism and asthma in European and Asian subjects. Furthermore, no association was found between this polymorphism and asthma using the allele contrast, dominant or homozygous contrast models. No evidence of an association was found between any of the other IL17A and IL17F polymorphisms and asthma susceptibility in this meta-analysis. This meta-analysis showed that, among the studied polymorphisms, only the CC genotype of IL17A rs8193036 is associated with asthma susceptibility.

Placebo and nocebo responses in randomized controlled trials of non-tumor necrosis factor biologics and Janus kinase inhibitors in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis showing insufficient response to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the frequency and magnitude of placebo and nocebo responses in placebo-controlled RCTs of non-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) biologics and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with insufficient response to TNF inhibitors.

METHODS

A meta-analysis on rates of placebo response, adverse effects (AEs), severe AEs (SAEs), and withdrawal due to AEs in placebo-controlled RCTs of non-TNF biologics and JAK inhibitors in patients with RA and an insufficient response to TNF inhibitors was conducted.

RESULTS

In 9 RCTs containing 3442 patients the pooled incidence of ACR20 response rate in placebo-treated patients was 22.1 (95% CI 16.4-29.1%) and 27.9% (95% CI 24.5-31.6%) in RCTs of non-TNF and JAK inhibitors, respectively. Strong negative correlation was observed between ACR20 response and AE rates in the placebo arm, indicating that the greater the placebo response, the weaker the nocebo response (r = -0.762, P = 0.017). Strong positive correlation was observed between ACR20 response in the placebo and active comparator arms, indicating that the greater the placebo response, the greater the treatment response (r = 0.737, P = 0.003). The pooled estimate in placebo-treated patients with ≥1 AE was 71.8 (95% CI 57.4-82.7%) and 58.7% (95% CI 52.8-64.3%) in RCTs of non-TNF and JAK inhibitors, respectively. The pooled estimate in placebo-treated patients withdrawing due to an AE was 3.8 (95% CI 2.7-5.3%) and 4.0% (95% CI 2.7-6.0%) in RCTs of non-TNF and JAK inhibitors, respectively. Strong positive correlation was observed between AE rates in the placebo and active arms, indicating that the greater the nocebo response, the stronger the AE rate in the active arm (r = 0.855, P = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

There were higher placebo and less nocebo effects of JAK vs. non-TNF inhibitors in RA patients with an insufficient response to TNF inhibitors, and the greater the placebo response, the weaker the nocebo response and the greater the efficacy.

Interleukin 17A rs2275913 polymorphism is associated with susceptibility to systemic lupus erythematosus: A meta and trial sequential analysis

BACKGROUND

The role of cytokines in the development of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has received much attention. Interleukin-17 A upregulates several inflammation-related genes and is thought to have a crucial role in SLE development. The susceptibility to SLE development has been linked to functional genetic variations of the IL-17A gene; nevertheless, the findings have been conflicting. We conducted a meta-analysis that included previously published reports to establish a definitive conclusion on the role of the IL-17A rs2275913 polymorphism in SLE propensity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus databases were used to find eligible published articles. All analyses were conducted using Comprehensive Meta-analysis V3.1. Funnel plots and Egger's regression analysis were used to assess publication bias. Q statistics and I² test explored the heterogeneity among the included studies. Combined odds ratio, 95% confidence interval were calculated for each comparison model.

RESULTS

Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of four reports, comprising of 608 SLE patients and 815 healthy controls, were considered for the present meta-analysis. The homozygous comparison (AA vs. GG: combined odds ratio= 2.046, p = 0.005) and recessive genetic model (AA vs. GG+GA: combined odds ratio=1.901, p = 0.010) analysis revealed a significant association of rs2275913 with susceptibility to the development of SLE. However, other genetic comparisons (A vs. G, GA vs. GG, AA+GA vs. GG) failed to demonstrate such association. Furthermore, trial sequential analysis revealed a sufficient number of studies, including enough cases and controls that have already been considered to conclude the role of IL17-A rs2275913 polymorphism in SLE.

CONCLUSIONS

IL-17A rs2275913 polymorphism is associated with susceptibility to SLE development.

Metformin and its therapeutic applications in autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic disease

Metformin is a first-line therapeutic agent for type 2 diabetes. Apart from its glucose-lowering effect, metformin is attracting interest regarding possible therapeutic benefits in various other conditions. As metformin regulates cell metabolism, proliferation, growth, and autophagy, it may also modulate immune cell functions. Given that metformin acts on multiple intracellular signaling pathways, including adenosine monophosphate (AMP)-activated protein kinase (AMPK) activation, and that AMPK and its downstream intracellular signaling control the activation and differentiation of T and B cells and inflammatory responses, metformin may exert immunomodulatory and anti- inflammatory effects. The efficacy of metformin has been investigated in preclinical and clinical studies on rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, Sjögren's syndrome, scleroderma, ankylosing spondylitis, and gout. In this review, we discuss the potential mechanisms through which metformin exerts its therapeutic effects in these diseases, focusing particularly on rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis.

Placebo and nocebo responses in randomized controlled trials of Janus kinase inhibitor monotherapy for rheumatoid arthritis : A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this meta-analysis was to assess the frequency and magnitude of placebo and nocebo responses in placebo-controlled randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor monotherapy for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis on the rates of placebo response, adverse effects (AEs), severe AEs (SAEs) and withdrawal due to AEs in placebo-controlled randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of JAK inhibitor therapy for RA.

RESULTS

Five RCTs contained a total of 1422 patients (746 trial participants and 676 controls). The pooled incidence of an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response rate was 33.0% (95% CI 19.6-44.9%) in placebo-treated patients and 68.3% (95% CI 61.4-74.1%) in active drug-treated patients. A strong negative correlation was observed between drug efficacies (ACR20 response) and AE rates in the placebo arm, indicating that the stronger the placebo response, the weaker the nocebo response (r = -0.906, P = 0.034). The pooled estimate of at least one AE was 54.1% (95% CI 44.6-63.4%) in placebo-treated patients and 54.5% (95% CI 46.2-62.6%) in active drug-treated patients. The pooled SAE rate was 3.9% (95% CI 2.7-5.7%) in placebo-treated patients and 3.8% (95% CI 2.5-5.7%) in active comparator-treated patients. The pooled estimate of withdrawal owing to an AE was 4.1% (95% CI 1.4-11.3%) in placebo-treated patients and 2.1% (95% CI 0.8-5.4%) in active drug-treated patients. However, there were no differences in the pooled risk of AE, SAEs, or withdrawal owing to AEs between the active comparator and placebo groups. A strong positive correlation was observed in AE rates between the placebo and active arms, indicating that the stronger the nocebo response, the higher the AE rate in the active arm (r = 0.957, P = 0.012).

CONCLUSION

The frequency of placebo and nocebo responses was 33.0 and 54.1%, respectively, in JAK monotherapy trials for RA. The findings indicated that the strengths of placebo and nocebo responses are inversely proportional and that clinically significant differences were absent between AE, SAE, and dropout owing to AEs.

Comparative effectiveness and safety of non-tumour necrosis factor biologics and Janus kinase inhibitors in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis showing insufficient response to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors: A Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Both biologic and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor therapies have demonstrated substantial effectiveness in placebo-controlled studies in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) showing inadequate responses to tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors. The purpose of this study was to determine the relative effectiveness and safety of non-TNF biologics and JAK inhibitors in patients with RA showing insufficient response to TNF inhibitors.

METHODS

A Bayesian network meta-analysis incorporating direct and indirect data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was used to investigate the effectiveness and safety of non-TNF biologics (abatacept, rituximab, tocilizumab, salirumab and sirukumab) and JAK inhibitors (tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib and filgotinib) in patients with RA showing insufficient response to TNF inhibitors.

RESULTS

Nine RCTs, evaluating 3577 patients for 12 weeks fulfilled the inclusion requirements. JAK inhibitors and non-TNF biologics achieved a significant American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response relative to the placebo. The ranking probability based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) showed that JAK inhibitor treatment was most likely to achieve the highest ACR20 response rate, followed by non-TNF biologics and placebo. The ACR50 rate displayed similar patterns as the ACR20 response rate, but non-TNF biologics have a higher value than JAK inhibitors based on the ACR70 response rate. Adverse events did not reach statistical significance nor did serious adverse events when looking at safety over 12 weeks. The confidence intervals overlap, and there is no clinical significance to these safety data, even compared with placebo.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Both non-TNF biologics and JAK inhibitors have similar effects in patients with active RA that are refractory to anti-TNF treatment, and there were no differences with regard to safety among the treatments.

Janus kinase inhibitors for treating active ankylosing spondylitis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS).

METHODS

We conducted a Bayesian network meta-analysis using direct and indirect data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and examined the safety and efficacy of JAK inhibitors in active AS patients exhibiting inadequate response or intolerance to two or more non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).

RESULTS

RCTs included a total of 406 patients (203 experimental subjects and 203 controls) from three studies on upadacitinib, filgotinib, and tofacitinib. Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society 20% improvement (ASAS20), ASAS40, and ASAS5/6 responses were significantly higher in the JAK inhibitor group than in the placebo group. Other efficacy outcomes, such as ASAS partial remission, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI50), Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS), Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scores, and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) were also significantly higher in the JAK inhibitor group compared to the placebo group. The JAK inhibitors significantly improved disease activity (ASAS partial remission, BASDAI50, ASDAS), function (BASFI), and MRI outcomes (SPARCC MRI spine). However, the incidence of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs), and the rate of withdrawal attributed to AEs did not differ between the JAK inhibitor and placebo groups.

CONCLUSION

JAK inhibitors were effective in active AS patients exhibiting an inadequate response or intolerance to two or more NSAIDs, without the risk of SAEs; this suggests that based on our data, studies are warranted to further investigate the use of JAK inhibitors for treating AS.

Anifrolumab for the treatment of active systemic lupus erythematosus: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

We surveyed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the efficacy and safety of anifrolumab 300 mg in patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) despite receiving standard therapy, using MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, and manual searches. Meta-analysis performed to determine treatment efficacy and safety outcomes of three RCTs (459 patients and 468 controls) revealed that the BICLA responses were significantly higher in the anifrolumab group than in the placebo group (OR = 2.071, 95%CI 1.575-2.725, p < 0.001). Steroid reduction and CLASI reduction were also significantly higher in the anifrolumab group than in the placebo group (OR = 1.811, 95%CI = 1.308-2.506, p < 0.001; OR = 2.245, 95%CI = 1.437-3.506, p < 0.001). Compared with placebo, anifrolumab significantly increased the SRI7 and SRI8 responses in SLE patients (OR = 1.866, 95%CI = 1.372-2.536, p < 0.001; OR = 1.925, 95%CI = 1.387-2.672, p < 0.001). The SRI4, 5, and 6 responses also tended to be higher in the anifrolumab group than in the placebo group. Adverse event incidence was significantly higher in the anifrolumab group than in the placebo group (OR = 1.815, 95%CI = 1.262-2.611, p = 0.001); serious adverse events were significantly lower in the anifrolumab group than in the placebo group (OR = 0.679, 95%CI = 0.468-0.986, p = 0.042). Herpes zoster infection was significantly higher in the anifrolumab group than in the placebo group (OR = 4.089, 95%CI = 1.750-9.522, p = 0.001). Anifrolumab is effective for treating active SLE. However, anifrolumab increased the incidence of herpes zoster infection compared with placebo.

Comparative study of the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, and filgotinib versus methotrexate for disease-modifying antirheumatic drug-naïve patients with rheumatoid arthritis

An assessment of the relative efficacy and tolerability of tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, and filgotinib compared to those of methotrexate (MTX) was performed in disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD)-naive patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis to combine direct and indirect evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) so as to examine the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, filgotinib, and MTX in DMARD-naïve RA patients. Four RCTs comprising 2185 patients met the inclusion criteria. The ranking probability based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) indicated that upadacitinib 15 mg had the highest probability of achieving the American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response rate, followed by baricitinib 4 mg, tofacitinib 5 mg, filgotinib 200 mg, and MTX. Tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, and filgotinib treatments achieved significantly higher ACR50 and ACR70 responses compared to MTX. Tofacitinib 5 mg had the highest probability of achieving the ACR50 and ACR70 response rates, followed by upadacitinib 15 mg, baricitinib 4 mg, filgotinib 200 mg, and MTX. The safety analysis based on serious adverse events, adverse events (AEs), and withdrawals due to AEs revealed no statistically significant differences between the respective intervention groups. In conclusion, tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, and filgotinib were effective treatment options for DMARD-naïve RA patients, suggesting a difference in efficacy and safety among the different JAK inhibitors.

Comparative efficacy and safety of secukinumab and ixekizumab in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis

OBJECTIVE

Evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of secukinumab and ixekizumab in active ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients.

METHODS

A Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted using direct and indirect data from five randomized controlled trials that examined the efficacy and safety of secukinumab 150 mg every 4 weeks and ixekizumab 80 mg every 2 weeks (IXEQ2W) or every 4 weeks (IXEQ4W) in active AS patients.

RESULTS

Data from 1433 patients were analyzed. The Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society evaluation 20% response rates (ASAS20) were significantly higher with secukinumab 150 mg, IXEQ2W, IXEQ2W, and adalimumab 40 mg (odds ratio [OR] 2.75, 95% Bayesian credible interval [CrI] 2.04-3.69; OR 2.59, 95% CrI 1.69-3.98; OR 2.45, 95% CrI 1.60-3.75; and OR 1.94, 95% CrI 1.13-3.37, respectively) compared to the placebo group. Efficacies of secukinumab and ixekizumab were numerically higher compared to adalimumab 40 mg, although there was no significant difference in the ASAS20 response rates. The ASAS40 response rate showed a pattern of distribution similar to the ASAS20 response rate, with the exception of the ixekizumab group, which was associated with the most favorable surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) for the ASAS40 response rate. Based on the SUCRA rating, secukinumab 150 mg had the highest probability of being the best ASAS20 response rate therapy, followed by IXEQ2W, IXEQ4W, adalimumab 40 mg, and placebo. There was no significant difference between the treatments regarding the number of serious adverse events (SAEs).

CONCLUSION

Secukinumab and ixekizumab were effective in active AS treatment, without the risk of SAEs.