Does Intravenous Administration of Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Ischemic Stroke can Cause Inferior Myocardial Infarction?

Coronary aspiration thrombectomy after using intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator in a patient with acute ischemic stroke: a case report

The complication of myocardial infarction after using intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) in patients with acute ischemic stroke is rare. Several of these cases have been reported in the first 3 hours after infusion of rt-PA. There is controversy on how to manage treatment of the coronary artery, such as intravenous anticoagulants and antiplatelets, at the same time. We introduce a new strategy for treatment of a patient who had ischemic stroke and developed myocardial infarction after intravenous rt-PA therapy. Our case had coronary and cerebral intervention in combination with low-dose intravenous rt-PA. He was successfully treated for coronary occlusion with aspiration thrombectomy.

Thrombolytic therapy-associated acute myocardial infarction in patients with acute ischemic stroke: A treatment dilemma

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is uncommon in the acute phase of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and occurs in approximately 1% of the population. Here, we report a paradoxical case of AMI during tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) infusion for AIS. We review and analyze the previously reported cases. We found that only patients with AMI which occurred after thrombolytic therapy for AIS who received an adequate combination of anticoagulation plus percutaneous coronary intervention survived their events. Several mechanisms have been proposed for the development of AMI after thrombolytic therapy. These mechanisms include fragmented intra-cardiac thrombus, intensified platelet aggregation that may lead to an increased potential for intra-cardiac thrombus formation, and a reduction in clot-associated plasminogen that may lead to a paradoxical hypercoagulable state of the coronary arteries. Currently, there is no consensus regarding this specific scenario. We propose that the therapeutic benefit and the potential risk of hemorrhagic complications should be further investigated and individualized. In patients who receive thrombolytic therapy for AIS and who then develop post-thrombolytic AMI, we suggest that the maximum treatment for the subsequent AMI be instituted promptly to avoid short-term mortality.