Primary total hip arthroplasty: a comparison of the lateral Hardinge approach to an anterior mini-invasive approach

Functional Outcomes and Gait Analysis of Total Hip Arthroplasty Through Lateral Hardinge Approach and Gluteus Medius-Sparing Approach: A Prospective Study

Background and objective Hip degenerative joint disease is a common and debilitating musculoskeletal disorder. Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a reconstructive hip procedure to relieve this condition through various surgical approaches. This study aimed to compare the functional outcomes between patients undergoing THA using the lateral Hardinge approach and the lateral gluteus medius-sparing approach. Material and methods This prospective study was carried out at a tertiary care institution. Thirty patients with arthritic hip joints were managed with total hip replacement (THR). The patients were allocated into two treatment groups; in group A, 14 patients received a THR by the lateral Hardinge approach, whereas in group B, 16 patients were managed by the lateral gluteus medius-sparing approach. Functional outcomes were assessed by the Harris Hip Score (HHS), and gait analysis was performed. Results The mean age of group A was 39.79 ±14.01 years and that of group B was 37.00 ±14.81 years. The mean length of incision was significantly lower in group B (p=0.001), whereas the mean duration of surgery (p=0.018) and mean contralateral pelvic tilt were found to be significantly lower in group A (p=0.009). No significant difference was found in abductor muscle strength, limb length discrepancy, HHS, pelvic obliquity, and pelvic rotation. Conclusion While functional outcomes were similar in both groups, the group that underwent THA with the gluteus medius-sparing approach had better gait based on lower pelvic tilt.

Clinical outcomes of modified direct lateral approach of Hardinge for total hip arthroplasty

The aim of the study was to evaluate a modified direct lateral approach for total hip arthroplasty in terms of clinical and functional outcomes, rate of complications and hospitalization. We retrospectively reviewed the data of 526 patients with THA operated in our department between January 2017 and December 2021. Clinical examination, functional outcome and radiographic evaluation were performed during follow-up. Patients were evaluated at the following time points: preoperatively and postoperatively at 3 days, 6 weeks, 12 weeks and 1 year and we registered surgery related data, complications, Visual Analogue Scale pain score, Harris Hip Score, the Western Ontario McMaster Osteoarthritis Index. Low intraoperative blood loss, short operation time, short hospitalization, early mobilization of the patient and good range of motion imposed the modified direct lateral approach as a valuable procedure for the patients with THA. VAS score evaluated at 3 days and 6 weeks indicated a very good overall postoperative experience. The HHS and Womac scores were evaluated at 6 weeks, 12 weeks and 1 year and showed excellent results. Trendelenburg gait and abductor weakness, traditionally related with direct lateral approach, were not significant statistically and complete reversible. We registered a very low complication rates with good functional outcome. The modified direct lateral approach can lead to superior outcomes, improved quality of life, with reduced intra and postoperative complications rate.

Preoperative radiographs to predict component malposition in direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

There is conflicting evidence as to whether or not patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) via the direct anterior approach (DAA) have increased risk of component malposition. The aim of this study was to investigate whether specific preoperative radiographic features were predictive of postoperative component malposition in DAA THA.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We examined 204 THA operations performed for osteoarthritis via the DAA at a single institution. Preoperative radiographs were analysed with numerous pre-specified measurements and classifications being recorded. Postoperative radiographs were analysed to determine if any of these preoperative radiographic factors correlated with component malposition in regard to cup inclination, cup version, femoral stem coronal alignment, leg-length discrepancy (LLD) and femoral offset discrepancy.

RESULTS

Numerous preoperative factors were associated with component malposition. Coxa profunda was found to be a significant predictor of cup anteversion being outside of the target range (p = 0.0089) and an increased centre-edge angle was a significant predictor for a postoperative LLD (p = 0.0134). A decreased neck-shaft angle (p = 0.0007) and a lower preoperative LLD (p = 0.0019) were both predictive of femoral stem coronal malalignment.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative radiographs can be a valuable tool for surgeons in predicting patients at risk of component malposition in DAA THA.

Cement Mantle Quality and Stem Alignment in Cemented Collarless Polished Tapered Stems Implanted via the Direct Anterior and Direct Lateral Approaches: A Single Institution Experience

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare the stem alignment and the quality of cement mantle of collarless polished tapered cemented stems inserted through the direct anterior approach (DAA) and the direct lateral approach (DLA).

METHODS

A comparative retrospective study of 232 hybrid total hip arthroplasties using a cemented collarless polished tapered stem through either the DAA (n = 147) or DLA (n = 85) was performed. Radiographic evaluation included stem alignment, cement mantle quality, and cement mantle thickness.

RESULTS

On anteroposterior radiographs, stems implanted through the DLA were more likely to be in neutral alignment, than those implanted through the DAA (83.5%[n = 71] versus 71.4% [n = 105]; P = <.001). No difference between approaches was noted for stem alignment on lateral radiographs or cement mantle quality. Multivariate analysis revealed factors associated with suboptimal cement mantle and included Dorr type B or C femur as well as male gender. A mean cement mantle thickness ≥2mm was achieved in all Gruen zones for both approaches.

CONCLUSION

In our series, the DAA was associated with a higher incidence of coronal plane stem malalignment compared to the DLA when using cemented tapered polished femoral components for total hip arthroplasty. No difference in lateral stem alignment or cement mantle quality was found.

The ABLE Anterior-Based Muscle-Sparing Approach: A Safe and Effective Option for Total Hip Arthroplasty

Background

The direct anterior and posterior approaches are well-researched options in total hip arthroplasty (THA). The less-studied anterior-based muscle-sparing approach, also known as the ABLE advanced anterior approach, centers on minimizing surgical trauma and medical costs while maintaining or improving patient outcomes.

Material and methods

THAs performed using the ABLE approach by 3 surgeons at a single institution between January 2013 and August 2020 were retrospectively assessed for outcomes pertaining to safety and performance intraoperatively, perioperatively, and postoperatively. Additionally, intraoperative and postoperative complications were evaluated, and patient-reported outcome measures and radiographic outcomes out to 1-year follow-up.

Results

There were 6251 THAs (5433 patients) eligible for inclusion. The mean surgical time was 65 minutes, mean intraoperative blood loss was 204 mL, and the transfusion rate was 0.5%. Patients had a mean length of stay of 1.4 days. Overall, 93.4% of patients were discharged home, 1.9% visited the emergency department within 30 days, and 2.9% had an unplanned readmission to the hospital within 90 days. The overall major surgical complication rate was 1.18%, with a dislocation rate of 0.13%, a deep infection rate of 0.19%, and a postoperative periprosthetic fracture rate of 0.37%.

Conclusions

The minimally invasive ABLE approach is a safe and effective surgical approach for patients undergoing THA. It can be performed efficiently and with limited complications, making it an appealing option for surgeons to utilize during this era of value-based care.

Factors influencing the outcomes of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review

Introduction

The present systematic review investigated possible factors which may influence the surgical outcome of minimally invasive surgery for total hip arthroplasty (MIS THA).

Methods

In January 2022, the Embase, Google Scholar, PubMed, and Scopus databases were accessed. All the clinical trials investigating the clinical outcome of MIS THA were considered.

Results

Data from 9486 procedures were collected. Older age was moderately associated with greater Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (P = 0.02) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) (P = 0.009) at last follow-up, and shorter surgical duration (P = 0.01). Greater body mass index (BMI) at baseline was moderately associated with greater cup anteversion (P = 0.0009), Oxford Hip Score (OHS) at last follow-up (P = 0.04), longer surgical duration (P = 0.04), increased leg length discrepancy (P = 0.02), and greater rate of infection (P = 0.04). Greater VAS at baseline was weakly associated with greater VAS at last follow-up (P < 0.0001), total estimated blood lost (P = 0.01), and lower value of Harris Hip Score (HHS) (P = 0.0005). Greater OHS at baseline was associated with greater post-operative VAS (P = 0.01). Greater WOMAC at baseline was associated with lower cup anteversion (P = 0.009) and greater VAS (P = 0.02). Greater HHS at baseline was associated with shorter hospitalisation (P = 0.001).

Conclusion

Older age and greater BMI may represent negative prognostic factors for MIS THA. The clinical outcome is strongly influenced by the preoperative status of patients.

Incidence of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve lesions after direct anterior approach primary total hip arthroplasty - a literature review

INTRODUCTION

Lesions of the lateral cutaneous femoral nerve are a reported complication of the direct anterior approach (DAA) for total hip arthroplasty (THA). Little is known about the incidence rates of this lesion. The goal of this study was to answer the following questions: (1) Is the true incidence rate of LFCN lesions after DAA THA known? (2) What are the reasons for the wide range of reported incidence rates in the literature? (3) Are surgeons increasingly aware of the significance of LFCN lesions?

METHODS

A US Medical Library of Medicine database search was performed for DAA THA. In total, 1261 search results were screened for reported LFCN lesions.

RESULTS

Forty-five studies were included reporting LFCN lesions rates of 0-83%. Subgroup analysis for studies with (group A, 6 studies, n=1113 cases) and without (group B, 39 studies n=16,741) primary focus on the LFCN lesions was performed. Incidence in group A ranged from 14.8-81% (mean 31%) and 0-83% (mean 3.8%) in group B. The difference between the groups was significant (p=0.005). No uniform and time sensitive definition of postoperative LFCN lesions was found in the literature. An analysis of the publication year and the discovered incidence rate showed an increase of incidence rates [rs=0.521 (p<0.001, two-tailed)] over time.

CONCLUSION

Despite the absence of a uniform definition: LFCN lesions after DAA THA are a frequent and, in the past, often underestimated complication.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV; systematic review of level II to level IV studies.

Comparisons between Direct Anterior Approach and Lateral Approach for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty in Postoperative Orthopaedic Complications: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The direct anterior approach (DAA) are attracting increasing attention from orthopedic arthroplasty surgeons, due to the less blood loss, mild soft tissue invasion, rapid rehabilitation and shorter length of stay. However, the longer learning curve in DAA can give rise to several complications, such as intraoperative femoral fracture, lateral femoral cutaneous nerve injury, wound‐healing problem, premature revision and so on. This meta‐analysis was performed to compare the rate of postoperative orthopedic complications between the DAA and the lateral approach (LA). All studies involving the comparison of postoperative orthopedic complications after THA between the DAA and LA group were searched in 7 databases prior to October 2020. The odds ratio (OR) with the 95% confidence intervals (CI) for each outcome was calculated by using the RevMan 5.3. The methodological bias of included studies was evaluated and the potential heterogeneity sources were analyzed. Thirteen comparative studies including a total of 24853 hips (9575 hips in the DAA group and 15278 hips in the LA group) were eligible for this meta‐analysis. There was no significant difference in the rate of surgical site infection [2.59% vs 2.14% (OR = 0.98; 95% CI: 0.59‐1.61, P = 0.93)], heterotopic ossification [12.16% vs 26.47% (OR = 0.46; 95% CI: 0.20‐1.07, P = 0.07)] and reoperation [2.70% and 2.11% respectively (OR = 0.93; 95% CI: 0.68‐1.26, P = 0.64)] between the DAA and LA groups. Although a lower rate in prosthesis malposition [36.19% vs 54.86% (OR = 0.50; 95% CI: 0.35‐0.73, P = 0.0003)], leg length discrepancy [1.87% vs 2.37% (OR = 2.35; 95% CI: 1.30‐4.25, P = 0.005)] and Trendelenburg gait [1.68% vs 4.78% (OR = 0.29; 95% CI: 0.13‐0.65, P = 0.003)] was observed in the DAA group, a higher rate in dislocation [0.77% vs 0.18% (OR = 3.73; 95% CI: 2.35‐5.94, P< 0.00001)], periprosthetic fracture [1.05% vs 0.41% (OR = 2.38; 95% CI: 1.58‐3.58, P< 0.0001)], prosthesis loosening [0.61% vs 0.37% (OR = 1.66; 95% CI: 1.05‐2.62, P = 0.03)] and nerve injury [0.95% vs 0% (OR = 7.12; 95% CI: 1.66‐30.48, P = 0.008)] was found in the DAA group. This meta‐analysis demonstrated several evidences indicating that the DAA exhibited the advantages in the accurate prosthesis placement and less damage of surrounding hip musculature. However, a higher rate in dislocation, periprosthetic fracture, prosthesis loosening and nerve injury in the DAA group should be paid more attention, due to the limited exposure and a longer learning curve, compared to the LA.

The intraoperative use of a calliper predicts leg length and offset after total hip arthroplasty. Component subsidence influences the leg length

Background

The purpose of total hip arthroplasty (THA) post-surgery and proper physiotherapy is positive recovery for the patient. Consideration is given to hip replacement biomechanics by ensuring no discrepancies in limb length (LL) and a stable prosthesis. Therefore, the patient must have proper preoperative planning and communication and a clear understanding of what to expect.

Methods

A prospective series of 59 THA operated by a single surgeon via Hardinge approach was studied, using an intraoperative calliper (CAL) to predict the change of LL and offset. We compared the results of the intraoperative changes before and after THA implantation with the reference of these values on anteroposterior x-ray pelvis. The importance of leg length balance and a good offset restoration is questioned, and the effect of component subsidence on leg length is considered.

Results

The average preoperative leg length discrepancy was −6.0 mm, postoperatively +3.6 mm. There was a strong correlation between the CAL measurements and the values on the x-ray (LL, r=0.873, p<0.01; offset, r=0.542, p<0.01). Reliability is better for limb length than for offset. These results are comparable within the literature and the statistical results from other studies reviewed. In addition, we evaluate the importance of subsidence of the prosthesis components for long-term results.

Conclusion

The intraoperative use of CAL gives excellent results in predicting the final LL and offset after THA. Considering subsidence of prosthesis components, a target zone around +5 mm might be more suitable for leg length directly postoperatively. Moreover, surgeons must discuss the topic of leg length discrepancy (LLD) intensively with the patient pre-operatively.

Level of evidence

Level 4, prospective cohort study

Comparison of short-term outcomes between direct anterior approach (DAA) and SuperPATH in total hip replacement: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Two minimally invasive approaches showed some advantages in outcomes compared to conventional approaches (CAs)-the direct anterior approach (DAA) and the supercapsular percutaneously assisted approach in THA (SuperPATH). To the best of our knowledge, DAA and SuperPATH have never been compared, neither in clinical studies, nor in a meta-analysis. To conduct a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing short-term outcomes of DAA and SuperPATH in total hip joint arthroplasty (THA).

METHODS

A systematic literature search up to May 2020 was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing SuperPATH with CAs and DAA with CAs in THA. We measured surgical, functional, and radiological outcomes. A network meta-analysis, using frequentist methods, was performed to assess treatment effects between DAA and SuperPATH. Information was borrowed from the above-mentioned RCTs, using the CA group as a common comparator.

RESULTS

A total of 16 RCTs involving 1392 patients met the inclusion criteria, three trials with a level I evidence, 13 trials with a level II evidence. The overall network meta-analysis showed that SuperPATH reduced operation time (fixed effect model: MD = 12.8, 95% CI 9.9 to 15.7), incision length (fixed effect model: MD = 4.3, 95% CI 4.0 to 4.5; random effect model: MD = 4.3, 95% CI 0.2 to 8.4), intraoperative blood loss (fixed effect model: MD = 58.6, 95% CI 40.4 to 76.8), and early pain intensity (VAS 1 day postoperatively with a fixed effect model: MD = 0.8, 95% CI 0.4 to 1.2). The two approaches did not differ in acetabular cup positioning angles and in functional outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Our overall findings suggested that the short-term outcomes of THA through SuperPATH were superior to DAA. SuperPATH showed better results in decreasing operation time, incision length, intraoperative blood loss, and early pain intensity. DAA and SuperPATH were equal in functional outcome and acetabular cup positioning.

Nerve palsy, dislocation and revision rate among the approaches for total hip arthroplasty: a Bayesian network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is one of the most performed intervention in orthopaedics surgery. Currently, there is no unanimous approval concerning the best approach for THA in terms of nerve palsies, dislocations and further revisions. Hence, a Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted.

METHODS

The present study was conducted according to the PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of healthcare interventions. The literature search was performed in September 2019. The NMA was performed through the STATA Software/MP routine for Bayesian hierarchical random-effects model analysis.

RESULTS

Data from 10,675 THA were collected. The mean follow-up was 10 months. The anterior approach reported the lowest risk to incur a post-operative dislocation (overall inconsistency P = 0.99). The posterolateral approach reported the lowest risk to incur a nerve palsy (overall inconsistency P = 0.77). The funnel plot revealed a low risk of publication bias. The lateral approach was found to have the lowest risk of resulting in a revision surgery (overall inconsistency P = 0.90).

CONCLUSION

According to our network comparisons, the posterolateral approach for THA represent the favourable exposure with regards to nerve palsy, further dislocations and revision surgeries.

Direct anterior versus posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty: a multicentre, prospective, randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

The ideal approach for a total hip arthroplasty (THA) would be kind to soft tissues, have the lowest complication rates and be easily reproducible. Although there have been several attempts to find the best approach for THA in the last decade, a definitive answer has not been found. We performed a prospective study to compare the direct anterior and posterior approaches for THA in terms of hospital length of stay, functional outcome, pain, implant position, complications and surgical time.

METHODS

A prospective, randomized, multicentre clinical study was conducted between February 2011 and July 2013, with an average follow-up of 55 months. Patients undergoing the direct anterior or posterior approach for THA were enrolled. Hospital length of stay, surgical time and complications were documented. The Harris Hip Score and visual analogue scale were used to monitor functional outcome and pain until 5 years postoperatively. Radiologic analysis was used to assess implant position.

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients (28 undergoing the direct anterior approach, 27 undergoing the posterior approach) were enrolled in this study. Length of stay, functional outcome, pain, implant position and complications were similar for the 2 approaches. There was a trend toward a better functional outcome for patients who underwent the direct anterior approach in the first 3 months postoperatively, with a peak at 4 weeks (Harris Hip Score 76.7 v. 68.7; p = 0.08). Average surgical time for the direct anterior approach was significantly longer (69.9 v. 45.7 min; p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

The direct anterior approach for THA appears to be a safe and effective option. However, there is no significant difference in hospital length of stay or postoperative recovery between the 2 approaches.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov, no. NCT03673514.

Orthostatic retractor placement reduces operating time and post-operative inflammatory response during the learning curve of anterior approach THA

Introduction

Handheld retractor placement (HHRP) is prone to repetitive repositioning. This could lead to muscle damage especially during a procedure with a steep learning curve. In an attempt to minimize retractor repositioning during the learning curve of direct anterior approach (DAA) total hip arthroplasty (THA), we used a table mounted orthostatic retractor placement (ORP) device.

Purpose

To investigate whether ORP would reduce the extent of muscle damage, OR-time and post-operative inflammatory response.

Materials and methods

29 Patients were operated by 2 surgeons who randomly used HHRP or ORP during their learning curve of DAA THA. There were 14 patients in a control group who were operated by an experienced surgeon. Blood levels of Creatine Kinase (CK), C-Reactive Protein (CRP), Hemoglobin (Hb), Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) were measured at 1 h pre- and 24 and 48 h post-operatively.

Results

The mean OR-time was 67 and 50 min in the HHRP and ORP cohort, respectively (p < 0,001). Post-operative CRP levels were significantly higher in the HHRP cohort at 24 h (HHRP 60.64 mg/L (25.20-143.20); ORP 34.67 mg/L (9.30-71.20)) (p = 0.003) and 48 h post-operatively (HHRP 154.54 mg/L (65.90-369.00); ORP 81.60 mg/L (21.30-219.40) (p = 0.004). The post-operative Hb-levels were significantly lower in the HHRP cohort at 24 h (HHRP 11.11 g/dL (9.10-12.30); ORP 11.37 g/dL (8.80-14.00)) (p = 0.0008) and 48 h (HHRP 10.86 g/dL (9.50-12.00); ORP 11.25 g/dL (8.60-14.10)) (p = 0.03). Post-operative ESR levels were significantly higher in the HHRP cohort 48 h post-op (HHRP 45.21 mm/h (14.00-83.00); ORP 23.73 mm/h (2.00-73.00)) (p = 0.004). No significant differences were found for the CK and LDH levels at any time postoperatively. There were no complications in any group.

Conclusion

The use of an orthostatic retractor placement device allows for reducing the OR-time, post-operative blood loss and post-operative inflammatory response during the learning curve of DAA THA.

A Comparison of the Incidences of Venous Thromboembolism after Total Hip Arthroplasty between the Direct Anterior Approach and the Direct Lateral Approach, Especially in the Early Period after Introduction of the Direct Anterior Approach

OBJECTIVE

To compare the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after total hip arthroplasty (THA) using the direct anterior approach (DAA) with that using the direct lateral approach (DLA). In addition, patient background characteristics and the incidence of VTE were compared between the first half and the latter half of the period after introducing DAA and against DLA.

METHOD

This was a retrospective, multicenter study involving 109 patients (116 hips) who had undergone primary unilateral THA. Thirty-six hips underwent THA using DAA and 80 hips underwent THA using DLA. Patient information including sex, age, and preoperative diagnosis was collected. The incidence of VTE was compared between DAA and DLA. Moreover, the patients who underwent THA using DAA were divided into 2 groups (first half and latter half groups), and sex, age, body mass index (BMI), and surgical time were compared between the 2 groups. Moreover, the incidence of VTE was compared among the 3 groups (first half of DAA, latter half of DAA, and DLA).

RESULTS

The incidence of VTE in the DAA group was significantly higher than that in the DLA group (p=0.014). The incidence of VTE in the first half group was significantly higher than in the latter half group and the DLA group (p=0.035 and p=0.001, respectively), and there was no difference in the incidence of VTE between the latter half group and the DLA group (p=0.923). Surgical time was significantly longer in the first half group than in the latter half group (p=0.046).

CONCLUSIONS

In the first half of the period after introducing the DAA, more VTEs occurred than in the DLA. It may be important to shorten the surgical time in the early stage of introducing the DAA, and aggressive anticoagulation therapy may be required until the surgeon becomes familiar with the procedure.

Disadvantage during Perioperative Period of Total Hip Arthroplasty Using the Direct Anterior Approach: a Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to analyze complications of complete hip arthroplasty through systematic review and network meta-analysis of comparative studies of direct anterior approach (DAA), anterolateral approach (LA), and posterolateral approach (PA).

METHODS

Prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-experimental designs evaluating clinical outcomes of DAA, LA, and PA for complete hip arthroplasty are valid if they meet the following criteria: 1) Comparison of clinical outcomes between the three methods for main complete hip arthroplasty (total hip arthroplasty, THA); 2) Compared at least one of the following outcomes: blood loss, operating time, and transfusion volume; 3) Sufficient data were available to extract and pool, i.e., mean reported, standard deviation and number of subjects. A network meta-analysis was used to determine the results of treatment across various surgical approaches. Indirect comparisons between the two surgical approaches was made by borrowing details from the standard comparator (i.e., the posterior approach).

RESULTS

Eight prospective RCTs were included in the meta-analysis of the network. The operation time of the LA was longer than that of PA (standardized mean difference [SMD], 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74-1.18; P < 0.001). DAA also had significantly longer operation time than PA (SMD, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.24-0.66; P < 0.001). However, blood loss of the DAA was the highest compared to other approaches (SMD, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.39-0.82; P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

When performing THA with DAA, we should pay attention to increased operation time and blood loss.

Are physical therapy pain levels affected by surgical approach in total hip arthroplasty? A randomized controlled trial

The main objective of this study was to evaluate the difference in pain levels during postoperative physical therapy pathways in patients who underwent a cement less total hip replacement either through a muscle sparing direct anterior approach (DAA), or the classic trans-gluteal lateral approach (LA). One hundred and twelve (112) patients were randomized into two equal groups. Baseline values of myoglobin levels were acquired prior to surgery and repeated at 6 hours postoperatively as a biomarker for muscle damage. Pain levels during the first passive and consecutive 3 active physical therapy sessions were noted using a visual analogue-numeric scale (VAS). Pain levels were also acquired at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year, following a 20-meter (65.6 feet) walking test. Postoperative myoglobin (ng/mL) levels were significantly higher (p< 0.05) in the LA group (335.05±83.54) then the DAA group (237.71±57.54). Pain levels were significantly lower (p<0.001) in the DAA group for both passive (2.5±1.45 vs. 4.28±2.19) and active physical therapy sessions and there was a positive correlation between postoperative myoglobin levels and pain levels until 6 postoperative weeks. There was no significant difference in demographics between the two groups except for gender distribution. The direct anterior approach’s main advantage of being a minimally invasive muscle sparing technique is showing a better rehabilitation experience with lower pain levels during passive and active physical therapy when compared to the classic trans-gluteal lateral approach.

Heterotopic ossification and clinical results after total hip arthroplasty using the anterior minimally invasive and anterolateral approaches

INTRODUCTION

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is considered the gold standard in the treatment of advanced osteoarthritis of the hip. The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of heterotopic ossification (HO), the quality of life and the function in two groups of patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA), performed using the anterior minimally invasive (MIS) and the anterolateral approaches.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 597 patients who underwent THA in 2009-2013 was performed. In all 597 cohort data on medical history were retrieved. HO occurrence was recorded for 331 patients and was evaluated based on Brooker's scale in the X-ray scan. Functional and quality of life scores were obtained for 238 patients. The following scales were used for the survey: Harris Hip Score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, Visual Analogue Scale, and Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Satisfaction Scale.

RESULTS

Patients operated on from the MIS approach had statistically significantly (p < 0.05) better results with all the clinical scales used, except the Visual Analogue Scale (p > 0.05). HO was slightly more common after the MIS approach (52.5%) compared to the anterolateral approach (49.76%), though the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The MIS approach was associated with better clinical and functional outcomes. In the aspect of HO, we were not able to show the superiority of the MIS approach in terms of incidence.

Algorithmic soft tissue femoral release in anterior approach total hip arthroplasty

Although the anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty has gained increasing utilization, some studies have suggested a higher risk of femoral complications, as well as difficulty with femoral exposure. Techniques of soft tissue releases have been described to offer better femoral exposure, and to help mitigate complications. The purpose of the study is to describe an algorithmic soft tissue femoral release in direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty and to assess the clinical outcomes of patients upon which this algorithm of femoral soft tissue releases was utilized. Clinical outcomes with the Harris Hip Score, reoperation rates, component survivorship, and complications were analyzed.

Component Placement in Direct Lateral vs Minimally Invasive Anterior Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Radiographic Outcomes From a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

End-stage coxarthrosis is increasingly common; however, limited evidence exists on the effect of direct lateral approach (DLA) and minimally invasive direct anterior approach (MIDA) on component placement in total hip arthroplasty (THA). We therefore conducted a prospective, randomized controlled trial to determine the component placement in DLA vs MIDA in THA.

METHODS

Between January 2012 and June 2013, 164 patients with clinically and radiologically confirmed coxarthrosis aged 20-80 years were randomized to either DLA or MIDA (active comparator). Excluded were patients with previous ipsilateral hip surgery, a body mass index >35 kg/m², and/or mental disability. Primary clinical outcomes have been published elsewhere. Secondary outcomes included radiographic assessment of the acetabular component (cement-mantle thickness, inclination, and anteversion), femoral stem position (varus/valgus and THA index), offset restoration, and leg length discrepancy.

RESULTS

The mean cement-mantle was significantly thicker in zone 1 in the MIDA group (mean difference = 0.51 mm, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.09-0.93, P = .018), and the mean degrees of inclination and anteversion were higher in the MIDA group (mean difference = 2.5°, 95% CI 0.3-4.6, P = .023 and mean difference = 3.6°, 95% CI 2.2-5.0, P < .0001, respectively). According to the defined reference range, cup inclination was more often adequate in the DLA group (67.9% (53/78) in the DLA group vs 52.4% (43/82) in the MIDA group, P = .045). There were no differences in frontal or lateral femoral stem position, global offset restoration, or leg length discrepancy.

CONCLUSION

In this population of Norwegian patients with coxarthrosis, radiographic assessment showed limited differences in component placement between MIDA and DLA. The findings suggest that component placement is similar in the 2 surgical approaches.

Comparative outcomes between collared versus collarless and short versus long stem of direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and indirect meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Early research shows several advantages of the direct anterior approach (DAA) in THA that claimed to be as effective but less invasive than the posterior approach. However, due to the difficult femoral exposure and possible complications related to femoral preparation, this approach may result in a higher rate of undersized stems when compared to other approaches. The present authors believe that the femoral implant design (collar or collarless stem, short or long stem) in a collared femoral stem may relate to lower rates of stem subsidence and limb length discrepancy (LLD) in mid-term to long-term follow-up when compared to collarless femoral stems. However, currently, there is no consensus as to which femoral implant design is the most suitable for DAA in THA.

METHODS

This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to assess and compare postoperative complications (neurapraxia, wound infection, LFCN, hematoma, artery injury, cup malposition, embolism, fracture and implant loosening) and revision rates due to dislocation, periprosthetic fracture and implant migration after DAA using collared compared to collarless femoral stem and short femoral stem compared to long femoral stem in THA. These clinical outcomes consist of the postoperative complications and revision femoral stem due to neurapraxia, wound, LFCN and LLD. This systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

RESULTS

Relevant studies that reported postoperative complications and revision of either implant were identified from Medline and Scopus from inception to June 6, 2018. Thirty-four studies were included for the analysis of DAA in THA; 23 studies were retrospective cohorts, four studies were prospective cohorts, and seven studies were RCTs. Thirty-one studies and three studies were included for analysis of collarless and collared femoral stems. Twenty-six studies were long femoral stems and eight studies were short femoral stems. Overall, there were 6825 patients (6457 in the collarless group and 368 in the collared group, 4280 in long stem and 2545 in short stem). A total of 469 and 66 patients had complications and revisions in the collarless group, and no patient had complications and revisions in the collared stem group. The total complication and revision rate per patient were 5% (95%CI 3.3%, 7%) and 0.9% (95%CI 0.6%, 1.2%) in all patients. The complication rate and revision rate were 5.7% (95%CI 3.8%, 7.7%) and 0.9% (95%CI 0.6, 1.2) in the collarless group. There was no prevalence of complications and revisions in the collared stem group. The complication rate and revision rate were 10.2% (95%CI 9%, 11.4%), 0.7% (95%CI 0.3%, 1%) and 5.2% (95%CI 3.1, 7.2), 1.5% (95%CI 1%, 2%) in short and long femoral stems, respectively. Indirect meta-analysis shows that collared femoral stem provided a lower risk of complications of 0.02 (95%CI 0.001, 0.30) when compared to collarless femoral stem. Long femoral stems had a lower risk of having complications of 0.57 (95%CI 0.48, 0.68) when compared to short femoral stems. In terms of revision, there is no statistically significant difference in collared femoral stem compared to collarless femoral stem and long femoral stem compared to short femoral stem.

CONCLUSION

In DAA THA, collared femoral stem and long femoral stem had decreased complication rates when compared to collarless femoral stem and short femoral stem by both direct and indirect meta-analysis methods. However, in terms of revision rates, there were no differences between all femoral stems (short versus long and collared versus collarless). Prospective randomized controlled studies are needed to confirm these findings as the current literature is still insufficient.

[Surgical repair of gluteus medius muscle in hip replacement surgery]

Injury of gluteus medius muscle is a serious often complication after hip replacement surgery followed by pain, claudication and significant deterioration of the quality of life. Prevention of intraoperative injury of this muscle is especially relevant in young patients. Normal function of this muscle provides rapid rehabilitation and early postoperative recovery. However, hip replacement surgery through Hardinge's direct lateral approach is accompanied by fatty degeneration of gluteus medius muscle in 12-20% of cases. Moreover, two or more redo procedures lead to fatty degeneration of almost 70% of anterior and 40% of central muscular segment. Currently, there are many methods of surgical treatment of this complication including transosseous muscle fixation, endoscopic procedures, repair using Achilles tendon, gluteus maximus muscle, lateral head of quadriceps muscle and allografts. However, various publications devoted to this problem have certain disadvantages including short follow-up period, small sample size and often unsatisfactory outcomes. Therefore, the question of surgical repair of hip abductor function remains open.

Do Postoperative Results Differ in a Randomized Trial Between a Direct Anterior and a Direct Lateral Approach in THA?

BACKGROUND

The direct lateral approach to THA provides good exposure and is associated with a low risk of dislocations, but can result in damage to the abductor muscles. The direct anterior approach does not incise muscle, and so recovery after surgery may be faster, but it has been associated with complications (including fractures and nerve injuries), and it involves a learning curve for surgeons who are unfamiliar with it. Few randomized trials have compared these approaches with respect to objective endpoints as well as validated outcome scores.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

The purpose of this study was to compare the direct anterior approach with the direct lateral approach to THA with respect to (1) patient-reported and validated outcomes scores; (2) frequency and persistence of abductor weakness, as demonstrated by the Trendelenburg test; and (3) major complications such as infection, dislocation, reoperation, or neurovascular injury.

METHODS

We performed a randomized controlled trial recruiting patients from January 2012 to June 2013. One hundred sixty-four patients with end-stage osteoarthritis were included and randomized to either the direct anterior or direct lateral approach. Before surgery and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months, a physiotherapist recorded the Harris hip score (HHS), 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), and performed the Trendelenburg test directly after the 6MWD. The patients completed the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and the EQ-5D. The groups were not different at baseline with respect to demographic data and preoperative scores. Both groups received the same pre- and postoperative regimes. Assessors were blinded to the approach used. One hundred fifty-four patients (94%) completed the 2-year followup; five patients from each group were lost to followup.

RESULTS

There were few statistical differences and no clinically important differences in terms of validated or patient-reported outcomes scores (including the HHS, 6MWD, OHS, or EQ-5D) between the direct anterior and the lateral approach at any time point. A higher proportion of patients had a persistently positive Trendelenburg test 24 months after surgery in the lateral approach than the direct anterior approach (16% [12 of 75] versus 1% [one of 79]; odds ratio, 15; p = 0.001). Irrespective of approach, those with a positive Trendelenburg test had statistically and clinically important worse HHS, OHS, and EQ-5D scores than those with a negative Trendelenburg test. There were four major nerve injuries in the direct anterior group (three transient femoral nerve injuries, resolved by 3 months after surgery, and one tibial nerve injury with symptoms that persist 24 months after surgery) and none in the lateral approach.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our findings, no case for superiority of one approach over the other can be made, except for the reduction in postoperative Trendelenburg test-positive patients using the direct anterior approach compared with when using the direct lateral approach. Irrespective of approach, patients with a positive Trendelenburg test had clinically worse scores than those with a negative test, indicating the importance of ensuring good abductor function when performing THA. The direct anterior approach was associated with nerve injuries that were not seen in the group treated with the lateral approach.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, therapeutic study.

Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty: An Adjunct to an Enhanced Recovery Pathway: Outcomes and Learning Curve Effects in Surgeons Transitioning From Other Surgical Approaches

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to investigate whether the direct anterior approach (DAA) to total hip arthroplasty (THA) resulted in a shorter length of stay (LOS) in surgeons new to the approach when compared to their previously used approach. Perioperative complications were also assessed.

METHODS

We examined 93 DAA THA performed by 3 hip arthroplasty surgeons at a single institution comparing these to their previous 166 operations performed using the lateral or posterior approach.

RESULTS

Fixed-effects generalized linear modeling demonstrated that patients who underwent THA by the DAA had 26% shorter LOS than those who were operated on using lateral or posterior approaches (adjusted risk ratio = 0.74; 95% confidence interval = 0.65-0.84; P < .001). A greater proportion of DAA patients were discharged directly home (98% vs 87%, F (1,233) = 8.12, P = .005) and complication rates were comparable between groups.

CONCLUSION

The DAA can reduce patient LOS and may be a valuable addition to enhanced recovery pathways. Our findings also suggest that surgeons transitioning to the DAA do not have an increased complication rate when compared to their previous approach.

The direct anterior approach in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature

AIMS

The most effective surgical approach for total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains controversial. The direct anterior approach may be associated with a reduced risk of dislocation, faster recovery, reduced pain and fewer surgical complications. This systematic review aims to evaluate the current evidence for the use of this approach in THA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Following the Cochrane collaboration, an extensive literature search of PubMed, Medline, Embase and OvidSP was conducted. Randomised controlled trials, comparative studies, and cohort studies were included. Outcomes included the length of the incision, blood loss, operating time, length of stay, complications, and gait analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 42 studies met the inclusion criteria. Most were of medium to low quality. There was no difference between the direct anterior, anterolateral or posterior approaches with regards to length of stay and gait analysis. Papers comparing the length of the incision found similar lengths compared with the lateral approach, and conflicting results when comparing the direct anterior and posterior approaches. Most studies found the mean operating time to be significantly longer when the direct anterior approach was used, with a steep learning curve reported by many. Many authors used validated scores including the Harris hip score, and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index. These mean scores were better following the use of the direct anterior approach for the first six weeks post-operatively. Subsequently there was no difference between these scores and those for the posterior approach.

CONCLUSION

There is little evidence for improved kinematics or better long-term outcomes following the use of the direct anterior approach for THA. There is a steep learning curve with similar rates of complications, length of stay and outcomes. Well-designed, multi-centre, prospective randomised controlled trials are required to provide evidence as to whether the direct anterior approach is better than the lateral or posterior approaches when undertaking THA. Cite this article: Bone JointJ 2017;99-B:732-40.

The less invasive anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty: a comparison to other approaches and an evaluation of the learning curve - a systematic review

There is still discussion about possible advantages and disadvantages of the less invasive anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of our systematic review was to evaluate literature regarding the anterior approach in comparison to other approaches. Furthermore, we investigated if there is a description of a learning curve for the anterior approach.Data were obtained from EMBASE, Cochrane, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web-of-Science, Scopus, Google scholar, and PubMed since their inception up to June 2015. 2 reviewers independently selected the studies and independently conducted the quality assessment. Because studies were considered heterogeneous regarding outcome measures, determinants studied, and methodological quality, we decided to perform a "best evidence synthesis". A total of 64 studies met the inclusion criteria.Strong evidence for no difference in component placement between the anterior approach and other approaches was found. Also, strong evidence for faster postoperative recovery and less need for assistive devices after the anterior approach were found. All other studied parameters only demonstrated conflicting evidence. Although the learning curve for the anterior approach is not yet clear, this learning curve should not to be neglected.In conclusion, the less invasive anterior approach provides benefits in the early postoperative period only, when compared to other approaches.

Transitioning to the Direct Anterior Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Is It Safe in the Current Health Care Climate?

BACKGROUND

The direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty has recently gained interest for its quicker short-term recovery despite concerns about increased complications and operative time, especially during the steep learning curve period. The primary goal of this study was to determine if the transition from a posterior approach to a direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty can be achieved without harming patient safety.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort single-surgeon study of consecutive primary total hip arthroplasties performed over a transition period from posterior to direct anterior (DA) approach.

RESULTS

A total of 412 patients (211 anterior, 201 posterior) were included with no significant demographic differences between cohorts. There were no significant differences between the DA and posterior group in 30-day readmission rates (2.84% vs 2.49%, P = .823), 90-day readmission rates (4.27 vs 5.97, P = .432), complication rate (6.16% vs 3.48%, P = .206), or revision rate (1.90% vs 2.99%, P = .535). The DA group had a significantly lower percentage of cases outside the goal abduction angle range (35°-50°) than the posterior group (9.52%, n = 20 vs 19.6%, n = 39, P < .01). The number of cases outside the goal leg length discrepancy range (±10 mm) was not significantly different (P = .846) between the DA (12.9%) and posterior (13.6%) groups.

CONCLUSION

This single-surgeon study demonstrates that the DA approach can be transitioned to safely with no significant increase in complications or readmissions over a high-volume experienced surgeon's first 200 cases. Furthermore, our results endorse the consistency of the DA approach during the learning curve period in regard to component positioning compared to posterior approach.

Hip Arthroplasty in Obese Patients: Rising Prevalence-Standard Procedures?

We examined our experience and, in particular, complications associated with total hip arthroplasty in obese and morbidly obese patients. We prospectively gathered 50 patients in a matched control series including 25 obese and morbidly obese patients. All patients were operated using the direct lateral approach and standard postoperative protocols. Operating room time, complications, dislocations, blood loss, cup position and clinical parameters using the Harris Hip Score and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index results were compared. Although there were some significant differences in clinical outcomes, standard procedures yielded good overall results and an acceptable rate of complications. Details approaching this patient entity are being discussed.

Functional and clinical outcomes following anterior hip replacement: a 5-year comparative study versus posterior approach

BACKGROUND

With the evolution of total hip joint replacement techniques, there has been a trend towards minimally invasive surgery. The anterior approach (AA) to total hip arthroplasty has been widely associated with less soft tissue damage. The aim of our study was to compare clinical and 1-year functional outcomes for AA hip arthroplasty versus a posterior approach (PA).

METHOD

We retrospectively reviewed 92 (50 anterior and 42 posterior) total hip replacements performed at our centre between 2006 and 2011. Clinical outcomes were recorded from hospital medical records and clinical audit system. Range of motion analysis, Harris hip score (HHS) and Short Form-12 score were recorded pre-operatively and at the 12-month follow-up marks. Additionally, we reviewed operative time, length of stay, discharge destination, complications, return to theatre and readmission rates.

RESULTS

The results of our study revealed significantly shorter average hospital length of stay for the AA versus PA (4.2 versus 6.0 days, P = 0.004). Interestingly, our study also showed significantly shorter operating time with the AA (83.0 versus 91.8 min, P = 0.048) and lower return to theatre rates (0 versus 9.5%, P = 0.026). Finally, multivariate analysis showed AA to be associated with higher HHS and pre-operative body mass index to be associated with lower HHS at 12-month post-operation (P = 0.02 and <0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed improved HHS at 12 months as well as reduced hospital length of stay, operating time and return to theatre with an AA when compared with a PA.

Direct anterior total hip arthroplasty: Comparative outcomes and contemporary results

Direct anterior total hip arthroplasty has become increasingly more popular among arthroplasty surgeons, in large part due to the use of an intramuscular interval and desire to reduce soft tissue damage. Several studies have now been published comparing the anterior intramuscular to other commonly used approaches, and many studies have published complication rates on large series of patients. Review of comparative studies indicates direct anterior hips tend towards shorter hospital stays and high rates of patients discharged to home. Although some studies show evidence of early benefit in functional outcomes, there is no strong evidence that the anterior approach provides any long term functional improvements compared to other approaches. Additionally, evidence to support reduced damage to soft tissue may not translate to certain clinical significance. Rates of intra-operative femur fracture, operative time and blood loss rates are notably higher for those developing familiarity with this approach. However, when surgeons have performed a modest number of procedures, the complication rates tend to markedly decrease in most studies to levels comparable to other approaches. Accuracy of component positioning also favors the anterior approach in some studies. This review summarizes the available literature comparing the direct anterior to other approaches for total hip arthroplasty and provides a comprehensive summary of common complications.

Comparison of Direct Anterior and Lateral Approaches in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA)

The direct anterior approach (DAA) to total hip arthroplasty has been promoted as a minimally invasive alternative to the lateral approach, which we sought to verify by systematically reviewing and meta-analyzing the literature comparing clinical, radiographic, and surgical outcomes. Two reviewers independently searched PubMed, OVID, and Web of Science databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies comparing the DAA and lateral approach for total hip arthroplasty. Quality of RCTs was assessed using the Jadad scoring system, quality of cohort studies, using the Minors system. Data were extracted and meta-analyzed or qualitatively synthesized for primary outcomes (function, complications, and hospitalization time) and several secondary outcomes. Data were extracted from 12 trials involving 4901 arthroplasty procedures. Meta-analysis showed that DAA was associated with significantly shorter hospitalization than the lateral approach, as well as greater functional rehabilitation and lower perceived pain during the early postoperative period. On the other hand, DAA was associated with longer surgery time. The 2 approaches were associated with similar rates of perioperative surgical complications and transfusions, as well as similar radiographic analysis results. Although DAA may provide shorter hospitalization and faster recovery during the early postoperative period, the available evidence is still insufficient to conclude whether the DAA or lateral approach is superior for total hip arthroplasty. More high-quality studies and subsequent meta-analyses are needed.

The anterior supine intermuscular approach for total hip arthroplasty: reducing the complication rate by improving the procedure

This study describes specific complications noticed during the first unselected cases operated by anterior approach for THA in our hospital and specific adjustments that were applied on the procedure to prevent these complications. We retrospectively analysed the differences between 202 patients who were operated by a standardised approach and 248 patients who were operated after adjustments were implemented with the procedure. Injury to the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN), fractures of the greater trochanter and dislocation were specific complications that were noticed with the initial technique.Prevalence of injury to the LFCN decreased from 7.9% to 0.8% (p<0.001), fractures of the greater trochanter decreased from 5.4% to 0.8% (p = 0.004) and the incidence of dislocation decreased from 4.5% to 1.6% (p = 0.074).

Adverse effects associated with the direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty: a Bayesian meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The direct anterior approach (DAA) is an increasingly popular technique for performing total hip arthroplasty (THA). This muscle-sparing approach may yield functional benefits. However, DAA has been associated with an increased risk incidence (RI) of intra- and postoperative complications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review of the published literature was conducted to document the cumulative RI of intra- and postoperative complications, as well as the presence of a learning curve in subjects undergoing THA with a DAA. Study selection and data extraction were carried out independently in duplicate. A Bayesian zero-inflated random-effect model was used to calculate pooled estimates for the different endpoints.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight studies (6485 patients) were analysed. RIs of 0.8 % [95 % confidence interval (CI): 0.4-1.6 %] and 0.5 % (95 % CI: 0.3-0.9 %) were found for intra-operative trochanter and femoral fractures, respectively, and of 0.9 % (95 CI: 0.3-2.6 %) for postoperative transient lateral cutaneous femoral nerve (LCFN) impairment. A clear RI for early revisions (2.1 %; 95 % CI: 1.4-2.8 %) and other surgical re-interventions (1.3 %; 95 % CI: 0.7-1.9 %) was present, but these values do not differ from reported RIs for THA overall. The RI for dislocation was low (0.6 %; 95 % CI: 0.4-0.9 %) compared with the reported literature.

CONCLUSIONS

DAA is a technically demanding procedure, with outcomes possibly indicative of surgeon learning curve. A risk for intra-operative fractures and LCFN is evident, although the risk for other adverse effects is comparable to those with other approaches.

Which patient characteristics influence length of hospital stay after primary total hip arthroplasty in a ‘fast-track’ setting?

After implementation of a ‘fast-track’ rehabilitation protocol in our hospital, mean length of hospital stay for primary total hip arthroplasty decreased from 4.6 to 2.9 nights for unselected patients. However, despite this reduction there was still a wide range across the patients’ hospital duration. The purpose of this study was to identify which specific patient characteristics influence length of stay after successful implementation of a ‘fast-track’ rehabilitation protocol. A total of 477 patients (317 female and 160 male, mean age 71.0 years; 39.3 to 92.6, mean BMI 27.0 kg/m2;18.8 to 45.2) who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty between 1 February 2011 and 31 January 2013, were included in this retrospective cohort study. A length of stay greater than the median was considered as an increased duration. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify potential factors associated with increased durations. Median length of stay was two nights (interquartile range 1), and the mean length of stay 2.9 nights (1 to 75). In all, 266 patients had a length of stay ≤ two nights. Age (odds ratio (OR) 2.46; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.72 to 3.51; p <  0.001), living situation (alone vs living together with cohabitants, OR 2.09; 95% CI 1.33 to 3.30; p = 0.002) and approach (anterior approach vs lateral, OR 0.29; 95% CI 0.19 to 0.46; p <  0.001) (posterolateral approach vs lateral, OR 0.24; 95% CI 0.10 to 0.55; p < 0.001) were factors that were significantly associated with increased length of stay in the multivariable logistic regression model.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:19–23.

Influence of surgical experience in the learning curve of a new approach in hip replacement: anterior mini-invasive vs. standard lateral

There is conflicting evidence regarding the potential benefit of minimally invasive surgery for total hip arthroplasty (THA), especially during the 'learning curve' of individual surgeons. Sixty patients who underwent THA between January and December 2010 were evaluated. The aim was to assess the anterior mini-invasive (MI) approach performed in 30 patients during the learning curve of a single experienced hip surgeon compared with the results of 30 patients operated upon through a standard lateral approach by the same surgeon. Operation and hospitalisation times, blood loss, number of transfusions, peri-operative complications and femoral/acetabular component placement were monitored. Harris Hip Score (HHS) and Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) were analysed before and 12 months after surgery. Pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was also recorded 1 week and 1 month after surgery. Hospitalisation, blood loss, number of transfusions and VAS score 1 week postoperatively were significantly lower and operative time was significantly longer in the anterior MI approach. Similar functional outcomes 1 year after surgery, component positioning and complication rates were observed in both groups. The results suggest that anterior MI approach is a safe procedure during the learning curve of an experienced hip surgeon.

[Nerve lesions after minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty]

Although there is no clear evidence, minimally invasive hip arthroplasty seems to be associated with slightly higher complication rates compared to standard procedures. Major nerve palsy is one of the least common but most distressing complications. The key for minimizing the incidence of nerve lesions is to analyze preoperative risk factors, accurate knowledge of the anatomy and minimally invasive techniques. Once clinical signs of nerve injury are evident, the first diagnostic steps are localization of the lesion and quantification of the damage pattern. Therefore, clinical assessment of the neurological deficits should be performed as soon as possible. Apart from rare cases of isolated transient conduction blockade or complete transection, the damage pattern is mostly combined. Thus, there can be evidence for dysfunction of nerve conduction (neuropraxia) and structural nerve damage (axonotmesis or neurotmesis) simultaneously. Because the earliest signs of denervation are detectable via electromyography after 1 week, it is not possible to make any reliable prognosis within the first days after nerve injury using electrophysiological methods. This review article should serve as a guideline for prevention, diagnostics and therapy of neural lesions in minimally invasive hip arthroplasty.

[Minimally invasive anterior approach]

The minimally invasive direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty (THA) was first published in 1985. Since then the technique has been further improved and the indications have been extended. The approach utilizes the muscle gap between the tensor fasciae latae muscle on the lateral side and the sartorius muscle on the medial side. This muscle gap allows a direct and quick approach to the hip joint with good muscle preservation. During preparation of the femur the tensor fasciae latae muscle is at risk of being damaged. The lateral cutaneous nerve of the thigh (NCFL) and its branches are also in danger of being damaged during skin incision and dissection of the subcutaneous tissue. In this article the technique, risks and current clinical results of THA using the minimally invasive direct anterior approach are described. The results from the literature, as well as own results are compared to the traditional transgluteal lateral Bauer approach and discussed. Reviewing the literature, special attention has been given to the incidence of NCFL lesions, damage of the tensor fasciae latae muscle and positioning of the cup. Especially for the latter, the general view is hindered in the minimally invasive technique.