1
|
Mao Y, Patel AA, Meade S, Benzel E, Steinmetz MP, Mroz T, Habboub G. Review of mechanisms of expandable spine surgery devices. Expert Rev Med Devices 2024; 21:381-390. [PMID: 38557229 DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2024.2337295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2024] [Accepted: 03/27/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Expandable devices such as interbody cages, vertebral body reconstruction cages, and intravertebral body expansion devices are frequently utilized in spine surgery. Since the introduction of expandable implants in the early 2000s, the variety of mechanisms that drive expansion and implant materials have steadily increased. By examining expandable devices that have achieved commercial success and exploring emerging innovations, we aim to offer an in-depth evaluation of the different types of expandable cages used in spine surgery and the underlying mechanisms that drive their functionality. AREAS COVERED We performed a review of expandable spinal implants and devices by querying the National Library of Medicine MEDLINE database and Google Patents database from 1933 to 2024. Five major types of mechanical jacks that drive expansion were identified: scissor, pneumatic, screw, ratchet, and insertion-expansion. EXPERT OPINION We identified a trend of screw jack mechanism being the predominant machinery in vertebral body reconstruction cages and scissor jack mechanism predominating in interbody cages. Pneumatic jacks were most commonly found in kyphoplasty devices. Critically reviewing the mechanisms of expansion and identifying trends among effective and successful cages allows both surgeons and medical device companies to properly identify future areas of development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuncong Mao
- Center for Spine Health, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Arpan A Patel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Seth Meade
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Edward Benzel
- Center for Spine Health, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Michael P Steinmetz
- Center for Spine Health, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Thomas Mroz
- Center for Spine Health, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Ghaith Habboub
- Center for Spine Health, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tassemeier T, Haversath M, Brandenburger D, Schutzbach M, Serong S, Jäger M. [Atraumatic fractures of the spine : Current strategies for diagnosis and treatment]. DER ORTHOPADE 2019; 48:879-896. [PMID: 31511916 DOI: 10.1007/s00132-019-03804-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Atraumatic fractures of the spine are a common orthopedic disease condition that can be asymptomatic or associated with complaints of varying intensity and quality. The risk factors for such fracture forms are often metabolic and genetic diseases, which have a direct or indirect effect on bone metabolism and therefore secondarily affect the stability of the spinal vertebrae. Furthermore, benign and malignant tumors as well as infectious diseases can also be causative for atraumatic spinal fractures; however, those factors that are attributable to lifestyle habits should also not be underestimated. The treatment of affected patients is complex and nearly always interdisciplinary. In addition to purely symptom-oriented treatment concepts, orthoses in particular and when indicated surgical treatment procedures can be implemented. This article summarizes the important clinical, diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of atraumatic spinal fractures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Tassemeier
- Universitätsklinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Universität Duisburg Essen, Essen, Deutschland.
| | - M Haversath
- Universitätsklinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Universität Duisburg Essen, Essen, Deutschland
| | - D Brandenburger
- Universitätsklinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Universität Duisburg Essen, Essen, Deutschland
| | - M Schutzbach
- Universitätsklinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Universität Duisburg Essen, Essen, Deutschland
| | - S Serong
- Klinik für Orthopädie und Orthopädische Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg, Deutschland
| | - M Jäger
- Universitätsklinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Universität Duisburg Essen, Essen, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tassemeier T, Haversath M, Jäger M. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with expandable cages: Radiological and clinical results of banana-shaped and straight implants. JOURNAL OF CRANIOVERTEBRAL JUNCTION AND SPINE 2018; 9:196-201. [PMID: 30443140 PMCID: PMC6187892 DOI: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_56_18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Expandable titanium transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) devices are a relatively new group of implants allowing restoration of lumbar lordosis (LL) and thus improvement of sagittal alignment. The purpose of our study is to compare clinical and radiological results of two different expandable TLIF devices. Materials and Methods In a retrospective study, patients who underwent TLIF surgery with a banana-shaped or straight TLIF cage in our spine center were analyzed. Primary outcome was change of disc height (DH), segmental lordosis angle (SLA), and lumbar lordotic angle (LLA). Moreover, basic patients parameters and cage subsidence were evaluated. Results Sixty-one patients were studied (33 banana-shaped and 28 straight cages). DH changed in the banana group from 4.8 mm (standard deviation SD 2.5) to 10.4 (SD 2.4) and in the straight cage group from 6.2 mm (SD 2.5) to 9.6 mm (SD 1.7). The difference was statistically significant (P = 0.03). In addition, SLA correction was higher in the banana group with 5.8° (SD 5.0)-3.7° (SD 3.6), but not significant. LLA improved in the straight group with 5.2 (SD 6.4) compared to 3.7° (SD 5.8) in the banana group. We found subsidence in four patients (6.6%) in the banana-shaped group and nine cases (14.8%) in the other group. Conclusions Expandable titanium implants show similar improvements in restoring segmental and global lordosis. Banana-shaped expandable cages offer higher potency restoring the intervertebral DH and show less rates of subsidence compared to straight expandable cages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tjark Tassemeier
- Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, University of Duisburg-Essen, D-45247 Essen, Germany
| | - Marcel Haversath
- Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, University of Duisburg-Essen, D-45247 Essen, Germany
| | - Marcus Jäger
- Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, University of Duisburg-Essen, D-45247 Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|