Diagnosis and management of primary malignant tumors in the upper extremity

Systematic review of 99 extremity bone malignancy survival prediction models

BACKGROUND

Various prediction models have been developed for extremity metastasis and sarcoma. This systematic review aims to evaluate extremity metastasis and sarcoma models using the utility prediction model (UPM) evaluation framework.

METHODS

We followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane to identify articles presenting original prediction models with 1-year survival outcome for extremity metastasis and 5-year survival outcome for sarcoma. Identified models were assessed using the UPM score (0-16), categorized as excellent (12-16), good (7-11), fair (3-6), or poor (0-2). A total of 5 extremity metastasis and 94 sarcoma models met inclusion criteria and were analyzed for design, validation, and performance.

RESULTS

We assessed 5 models for extremity metastasis and 94 models for sarcoma. Only 4 out of 99 (4%) models achieved excellence, 1 from extremity metastasis and 3 from sarcoma. The majority were rated good (62%; 61/99), followed by fair (31%, 31/99) and poor (3%, 3/99).

CONCLUSIONS

Most predictive models for extremity metastasis and sarcoma fall short of UPM excellence. Suboptimal study design, limited external validation, and the infrequent availability of web-based calculators are main drawbacks.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

This study is classified as Level 2a evidence according to the Oxford 2011 Levels of Evidence. Trial registration This study was registered in PROSEPRO (CRD42022373391, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=373391 ).

Estimating Recent US Limb Loss Prevalence and Updating Future Projections

Objective

To estimate limb loss prevalence in the United States (US) by etiology and anatomical position and the trends of limb loss over 40 years.

Design

We used the National Inpatient Sample, Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project to estimate current and future limb loss prevalence in the US and by anatomical location. Prevalence estimates were based on the incidence and duration of the disease. Lastly, we use a linear regression to estimate future projections of limb loss prevalence.

Setting

Open-sourced data from the National Inpatient Sample, Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project.

Participants

Persons who have undergone an amputation at a community hospital participating in the National Inpatient Sample database. We define community hospitals as all nonfederal, short-term, general, and other specialty hospitals, excluding hospital units of institutions.

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

The current prevalence of limb loss.

Results

The total estimated number of people living with limb loss in the US was 2,309,000. In total, ∼91% of persons underwent lower extremity amputation, while only 9.2% underwent upper extremity amputations. By 2060, we projected a 145% increase in people living with limb loss in the US. Most of these are caused by vascular disease and diabetes which are projected to increase by 36% and 67%, respectively, by 2060. The number of people living with limb loss will double by 2050, while the number of people with diabetes will double by 2040.

Conclusions

Our updated estimate for the prevalence of limb loss in 2019 was comparable to previous projections for 2020; however, our projected estimates are markedly increased relative to those of other studies. Our increased values are caused by the increased prevalence of diabetes and peripheral vascular diseases resulting in amputation. These results highlight the importance of research directed at both limb preservation and amputation optimization and the allocation of health care resources.

Tricks and pitfalls in the surgical treatment of malignant bone tumours of the forearm in children and adolescents

Malignant bone tumours around the forearm are rare. Nowadays, oncological and surgical management of bone sarcomas of this region has improved significantly. Although the anatomical features are complex, limb-sparing surgery is possible with wide surgical resection. Biological reconstruction methods are promising in this anatomically unique region. In addition, meticulous soft-tissue reconstruction yields good functional results in the hand and wrist. This study reviews malignant bone tumours of the forearm and their oncological and surgical management. Malignant bone tumours should be treated with a multidisciplinary approach based on chemotherapy, radiotherapy and limb salvage procedures.