1
|
Schröder J, Kampulz T, Bajaj SK, Hellwig AG, Winking M. PEEK Cages versus Titanium-Coated PEEK Cages in Single-Level Anterior Cervical Fusion: A Randomized Controlled Study. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2024; 85:262-268. [PMID: 37506743 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1770694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The implantation of a spacer is a common practice after anterior diskectomy in cervical spine. Polyether ether ketone (PEEK) cages have replaced titanium implants due to their better radiologic visibility and appearance in postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. However, PEEK showed apparently higher nonunion rates than titanium cages. The aim of the study was to evaluate the fusion behavior of plain PEEK cages in comparison to titanium-coated PEEK (TiPEEK) cages. METHOD We randomized 104 patients with single-level cervical radiculopathy or mild myelopathy. They were divided into two groups of 52 patients each, receiving either a PEEK cage or the titanium-coated variant of the same cage type. The 1- and 2-year follow-ups were completed by 43 patients in the PEEK group and by 50 patients in the TiPEEK group. Fusion was determined by plain X-ray and lateral functional X-ray. RESULTS Two years after surgery, a complete fusion was observed in 37 patients of the PEEK group (86%). Six cases were considered as nonunions. In the TiPEEK group, we found 41 fusions (82%) and 9 nonunions at this time. The difference was not considered significant (p = 0.59). The clinical evaluation of the two groups showed no difference in the neurologic examination as well in the pain scores over the time period. CONCLUSIONS Despite some assumptions about an advantage of TiPEEK over PEEK cages for fusion in cervical spine surgery, this prospective randomized controlled study did not find an accelerated or improved fusion using TiPEEK for anterior cervical diskectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Thomas Kampulz
- ZW-O Zentrum für - Wirbelsäulenchirurgie, Osnabrück, Germany
| | | | | | - Michael Winking
- ZW-O Zentrum für - Wirbelsäulenchirurgie, Osnabrück, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Muthiah N, Yolcu YU, Alan N, Agarwal N, Hamilton DK, Ozpinar A. Evolution of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and titanium interbody devices for spinal procedures: a comprehensive review of the literature. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2022; 31:2547-2556. [PMID: 35689111 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-022-07272-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2022] [Revised: 04/22/2022] [Accepted: 05/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Interbody fusion is commonly utilized for arthrodesis and stability among patients undergoing spine surgery. Over the last few decades, interbody device materials, such as titanium and polyetheretherketone (PEEK), have been replacing traditional autografts and allografts for interbody fusion. As such, with the exponential growth of bioengineering, a large variety cage surface technologies exist. Different combinations of cage component materials and surface modifications have been created to optimize interbody constructs for surgical use. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of common surface technologies, their performance in the clinical setting, and recent modifications and material combinations. MATERIALS AND METHODS We performed a comprehensive review of the literature on titanium and PEEK as medical devices between 1964 and 2021. We searched five major databases, resulting in 4974 records. Articles were screened for inclusion manually by two independent reviewers, resulting in 237 articles included for review. CONCLUSION Interbody devices have rapidly evolved over the last few decades. Biomaterial and biomechanical modifications have allowed for continued design optimization. While titanium has a high osseointegrative capacity, it also has a high elastic modulus and is radio-opaque. PEEK, on the other hand, has a lower elastic modulus and is radiolucent, though PEEK has poor osseointegrative capacity. Surface modifications, material development advancements, and hybrid material devices have been utilized in search of an optimal spinal implant which maximizes the advantages and minimizes the disadvantages of each interbody material.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nallammai Muthiah
- School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 200 Lothrop St, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| | | | - Nima Alan
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 200 Lothrop St, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| | - Nitin Agarwal
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - David Kojo Hamilton
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 200 Lothrop St, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| | - Alp Ozpinar
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 200 Lothrop St, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mobbs RJ, Amin T, Ho D, McEvoy A, Lovric V, Walsh WR. Integral fixation titanium/polyetheretherketone cages for cervical arthrodesis: Two-year clinical outcomes and fusion rates using β-tricalcium phosphate or supercritical carbon dioxide treated allograft. JOURNAL OF CRANIOVERTEBRAL JUNCTION AND SPINE 2021; 12:368-375. [PMID: 35068818 PMCID: PMC8740808 DOI: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_129_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2021] [Accepted: 11/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Context: Despite increasing promising reports regarding composite titanium (Ti)/PolyEtherEtherKetone (PEEK) cages, further longer-term, quality research is required. Synthetic bone graft substitutes are another rapidly developing area of spinal surgical research. Aims: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of an integral fixation composite Ti/PEEK cage for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and compare a synthetic bone graft substitute (β-tricalcium phosphate; [βTCP]) with allograft processed using supercritical fluid technology. Methods and Design: Data from 195 consecutive patients were prospectively collected from a single centre. Indications were largely degenerative. Allograft and βTCP were used in a 3:1 randomization protocol. Patients were followed up for a minimum of 6 months and up to 48 months. Clinical outcomes included visual analogue scale and neck oswestry disability index. Radiographic outcomes included fusion rates, subsidence rates and implant complications. Results: Graft sub-cohorts were largely comparable and included 133 and 52 patients in the allograft and βTCP sub-cohorts, respectively. Clinical outcomes overall significantly improved (P < 0.001), with no significant inter-cohort differences. There were no implant-related complications. Overall fusion rate was 94.1% (175/186). The allograft cohort produced a significantly greater fusion rate of 97.7% (126/129) compared to 77.6% (38/49) for the βTCP cohort (P = 0.001). Conclusions: This study demonstrates the viability of an integral fixation composite Ti/PEEK ACDF device in effectively and safely improving patient outcomes and achieving fusion. Allograft is more effective in achieving fusion compared to βTCP, though both were similarly efficacious in improving clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ralph J Mobbs
- NeuroSpine Surgery Research Group (NSURG), Sydney, Australia.,Neuro Spine Clinic, Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Randwick, UNSW Sydney, Australia.,Prince of Wales Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Australia.,Surgical and Orthopaedic Research Labs (SORL), Prince of Wales Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Tajrian Amin
- NeuroSpine Surgery Research Group (NSURG), Sydney, Australia.,Neuro Spine Clinic, Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Randwick, UNSW Sydney, Australia.,Prince of Wales Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Australia
| | - Daniel Ho
- NeuroSpine Surgery Research Group (NSURG), Sydney, Australia.,Neuro Spine Clinic, Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Randwick, UNSW Sydney, Australia.,Prince of Wales Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Australia
| | - Aidan McEvoy
- Matrix Medical Innovations, Randwick, Sydney, Australia
| | - Vedran Lovric
- NeuroSpine Surgery Research Group (NSURG), Sydney, Australia.,Surgical and Orthopaedic Research Labs (SORL), Prince of Wales Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - William R Walsh
- NeuroSpine Surgery Research Group (NSURG), Sydney, Australia.,Surgical and Orthopaedic Research Labs (SORL), Prince of Wales Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Murthy NK, Dahdaleh NS. Commentary: Nonunion Rates After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Comparison of Polyetheretherketone vs Structural Allograft Implants. Neurosurgery 2021; 89:E13-E14. [PMID: 33822188 DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyab102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2021] [Accepted: 01/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Nikhil K Murthy
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Nader S Dahdaleh
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kumar N, Ramakrishnan SA, Lopez KG, Madhu S, Ramos MRD, Fuh JYH, Hallinan J, Nolan CP, Benneker LM, Vellayappan BA. Can Polyether Ether Ketone Dethrone Titanium as the Choice Implant Material for Metastatic Spine Tumor Surgery? World Neurosurg 2021; 148:94-109. [PMID: 33508491 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.01.059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2020] [Revised: 01/14/2021] [Accepted: 01/15/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Instrumentation during metastatic spine tumor surgery (MSTS) provides stability to the spinal column in patients with pathologic fracture or iatrogenic instability produced while undergoing extensive decompression. Titanium is the current implant material of choice in MSTS. However, it hinders radiotherapy planning and generates artifacts, with magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography scans used for postoperative evaluation of tumor recurrence and/or complications. The high modulus of elasticity of titanium (110 GPa) results in stress shielding, which may lead to construct failure at the bone-implant interface. Polyether ether ketone (PEEK), a thermoplastic polymer, is an emerging alternative to titanium for use in MSTS. The modulus of elasticity of PEEK (3.6 GPa) is close to that of cortical bone (17-21 GPa), resulting in minimal stress shielding. Its radiolucent and nonmetallic properties cause minimal interference with magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography scans. PEEK also causes low-dose perturbation for radiotherapy planning. However, PEEK has reduced bioactivity with bone and lacks sufficient rigidity to be used as rods in MSTS. The reduced bioactivity of PEEK may be addressed by 1) surface modification (introducing porosity or bioactive coating with hydroxyapatite [HA] or titanium) and 2) forming composites with HA/titanium. The mechanical properties of PEEK may be improved by forming composites with HA or carbon fiber. Despite these modifications, all PEEK and PEEK-based implants are difficult to handle and contour intraoperatively. Our review provides a comprehensive overview of PEEK and modified PEEK implants, with a description of their properties and limitations, potentially serving as a basis for their future development and use in MSTS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naresh Kumar
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National University Health System, Singapore.
| | | | - Keith Gerard Lopez
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National University Health System, Singapore
| | - Sirisha Madhu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National University Health System, Singapore
| | | | - Jerry Ying Hsi Fuh
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - James Hallinan
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, National University Hospital, Singapore
| | - Colum P Nolan
- Department of Neurosurgery, National Neuroscience Institute, Singapore
| | - Lorin M Benneker
- Department of Orthopaedics, Spine Surgery, Sonnenhofspital, Bern, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|