Efficacy of postoperative drainage in total knee arthroplasty: Review of the literature

How to monitor and discriminate the causes of lower limb swelling during home-based rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty? A delphi study

PURPOSE

Swelling in the lower limbs after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) affects surgical outcomes. Prolonged swelling requires monitoring and remote management during home-based rehabilitation. Causes of swelling vary but, so far, no indicators are available to monitor and identify causes of lower limb swelling, making it difficult to implement targeted interventions. This study aimed to find the indicators to monitor and identify the causes of lower limb swelling during home-based rehabilitation after TKA by literature research and consulting experts from various disciplines.

METHODS

The Delphi method was used. Based on literature research and analysis, a set of candidate indicators was developed. Fifteen experts from different disciplines evaluated the validity of the indicators and provided modification suggestions.

RESULTS

After two rounds of Delphi consultations, consensus was reached. Agreement scores ranged from 4.40 to 5.00, with low variability (standard deviation 0.00-0.91) and high consistency (coefficient of variation 0.00-0.20). P was less than 0.05 in Kendall's W with an agreement rate of 80.00-100%. In the final set of indicators, there were five primary indicators (representing four swelling causes and a general category), along with 23 secondary indicators and 40 tertiary indicators.

CONCLUSIONS

This study preliminarily established indicators for at-home identification of post-TKA swelling caused by four distinct reasons. Further research is needed to validate the value of these indicators in distinguishing the causes of swelling.

Low molecular weight heparin dosing regimens after total joint arthroplasty: a prospective, single-center, randomized, double-blind study

BACKGROUND

Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) has been the standard treatment for preventing venous thromboembolism after total joint arthroplasty. However, the evidence supporting specific LMWH dosing regimens is limited.

OBJECTIVES

This study assessed the efficacy and safety of three enoxaparin dosing regimens to prevent venous thromboembolism.

METHODS

Participants undergoing hip or knee replacement were randomly assigned to receive 20 mg of enoxaparin 6 h postoperatively (Group A), 40 mg 6 h postoperatively (Group B), or 40 mg 12 h postoperatively (Group C). The primary outcomes included thromboembolic and major bleeding events within 3 months, while the secondary outcomes comprised ecchymosis, wound exudation, drainage volume, allogeneic red blood cell transfusion, and first postoperative day hemoglobin levels.

RESULTS

A total of 536 patients were analyzed. The occurrence of thromboembolic events was comparably low across all groups. Group C exhibited the lowest postoperative ecchymosis rate at 19.3%, significantly less than Group A (32.8%, p = 0.004) and Group B (37.7%, p < 0.001). Ecchymosis rates were about double in Group A and 1.5 times higher in Group B compared to Group C. Significant differences were also observed in 24-hour and total postoperative drainage volumes, with Group B having higher volumes than the other groups.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial was prospectively registered at the China Clinical Trials Registry (registration date: November 14, 2021; registration number: ChiCTR2100053191).

CONCLUSION

No significant differences in venous thromboembolism rates were seen between the tested enoxaparin dosing regimens after total joint arthroplasty. The 40 mg dose administered 12 h after surgery was associated with reduced postoperative ecchymosis and drainage volumes without an increased thrombosis risk, suggesting it is a safer and more effective option than earlier or lower dosages.

Suction drain usage has no benefit following revision total hip and knee arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

The use of drains after primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA) has shown little benefit. Few studies have investigated drain usage after revision TJA. The purpose of this study was to determine whether utilizing suction drains is beneficial for patients undergoing revision arthroplasty.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a comprehensive literature review utilizing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines from the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. Inclusion criteria of this review were all original articles written in English investigating the efficacy and safety of closed suction drainage in revision TKA or THA, reporting at least one of the following outcome measures: (1) estimated blood loss (EBL), (2) perioperative hemoglobin change, (3) needs for transfusion, (4) postoperative infection, and (5) wound complications. Articles were excluded if they are not available in English or they included case reports, systematic reviews, comments, editorials, surveys, or animal studies prior to July 22, 2023. A total of six studies met inclusion criteria. In total, 655 patients had a drain while 1765 patients did not have a drain after revision total hip or knee arthroplasty. Primary outcomes included for meta-analysis included estimated blood loss (EBL), postoperative hemoglobin, need for transfusion. Other data extracted includes postoperative infections, and wound complications.

RESULTS

Six studies met the inclusion criteria. In total, 655 patients had drains, while 1765 patients did not after revision total hip or knee arthroplasty. The average age of the patients was 66.1+/- 3.4 years, and the average BMI was 30.3 +/-0.8. There was no difference in postoperative infections (p = 0.14), wound complications (p = 0.621) or need for transfusion (p = 0.521) between the two groups. There was also no difference in EBL (Hedges' g CI[-3.52, 2.77]) or postoperative Hb (Hedges' g CI[-1.65, 2.41]) between patients with and without drains.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results do not show any benefit from drain placement after revision total hip or knee arthroplasty. With the increased cost, time and need for drain removal, this is likely an unnecessary intervention.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, systematic review and meta-analysis.

Non-drainage Offers Faster Proprioceptive and Functional Recovery, and More Clinical Benefits for Patients following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Compared to Drainage

BACKGROUND

Although a non-drainage procedure following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is becoming more acceptable in enhanced recovery after surgery, postoperative drainage is still commonly used in TKA surgeries. This study aimed to compare the non-drainage to the drainage during the early postoperative stage regarding proprioceptive and functional recovery, and postoperative outcomes of TKA patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A prospective, single-blind, randomized, controlled trial was carried out on 91 TKA patients, who were randomly allocated into the non-drainage group (NDG) or the drainage group (DG). Patients were evaluated regarding knee proprioception, functional outcomes, pain intensity, range of motion, knee circumference, and anesthetic consumption. Outcomes were assessed at the time of charge, at postoperative 7th day, and at postoperative 3rd month.

RESULTS

There were no differences between groups at baseline (p > 0.05). During the inpatient period, the NDG experienced superior pain relief (p < 0.05), had a higher Hospital for Special Surgery knee score (p = 0.001), demanded lower assistance from a sitting position to a standing position (p = 0.001) and walking for 4.5 m (p = 0.034), and performed the Timed Up and Go test in a shorter duration (p = 0.016) compared to the DG. The NDG gained the actively straight leg raise earlier (p = 0.009), needed lower anesthetic consumption (p < 0.05), and showed improved proprioception (p < 0.05) compared to the DG during the inpatient period.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings support that a non-drainage procedure would be a better option to provide a faster proprioceptive and functional recovery, and beneficial results for patients following TKA. Therefore, the non-drainage procedure should be the first choice in TKA surgery rather than drainage.

Comparative Efficacy of iPACK vs Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Block for Pain Management Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Analysis

Introduction Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is associated with severe acute postoperative pain. The use of tourniquets and drains (T/D) is common in TKA but may have an influence on postoperative pain and muscular strength. The infiltration of local anesthetic between the popliteal artery and capsule of the knee (iPACK block) is a motor-sparing block that provides analgesia to the posterior aspect of the knee. However, evidence regarding its efficacy is scarce. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of iPACK block and the impact of T/D use on pain and muscular strength after TKA. Material and methods A retrospective study was carried out including patients who underwent TKA from January 2020 to April 2023. Patients were allocated into groups according to the peripheral nerve block performed and T/D use. Results We included 415 patients in this study. No differences were found in pain at rest or the need for rescue analgesia between patients who received an iPACK block or sciatic nerve block (SNB) with T/D applied. Patients who received a SNB reported lower pain scores on movement (p = 0.019), but with a higher prevalence of motor block (p < 0.001). Patients who underwent surgery without using T/D reported lower pain scores on movement (p = 0.021) and reduced need for rescue analgesia (p = 0.041). Conclusion These findings indicate that iPACK block can facilitate early mobilization after TKA without significant impact on postoperative muscle strength. Furthermore, the use of a T/D may be a source of postoperative pain that could compromise early rehabilitation.

Perioperative blood management programme in Jehovah's witnesses undergoing total knee arthroplasty: clinical results and cost-benefit analysis

Introduction

Total knee arthroplasties have the purpose to improve quality of life from joint-related pain. On the other hand, it may represent a risky surgical procedure in people who refuse blood products due to their religious beliefs, such as Jehovah's Witnesses (JW). Preoperative optimization protocols of these patients allow performing arthroplasties in a safer manner avoiding allogeneic blood transfusion.

Methods

In our retrospective study, 2 groups of patients were evaluated. Group 1, included JW patients who underwent a preoperative Hb optimisation programme; group 2 included non-JW patients authorizing transfusion in case of necessity.

Results

Differences in Hb levels were: before surgery (JW 13,63±1,26 vs. non-JW 12,83±1,21, p-value=0,22), after surgery (day 1 Hb: JW 12,26±1,47 vs. non-JW 10,88±1,87, p-value=0,1; day 3 Hb: JW 10±2,97 vs. non-JW 9,23±1,07 p-value=0,64). In the JW group the mean Hb concentration decreased from 13,63±1,26 g/dL preoperatively to 12,26±1,47 g/dL (day 1) while in non-JW group fell from 12,83± g/dL to 10,88± g/dL. There was no statistically-difference between the 2 groups. Moreover, cost-effectiveness strategies were evaluated in both groups.

Conclusion

Our findings support that PBM programs represent a safe and good strategy in knee prosthetic surgery, decreasing costs, risks and transfusion overuse.

Is it time to resume elective knee arthroplasty surgery? A multidisciplinary experience in a Sardinian center during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic

Background

Starting in January 2020, the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic caused changes in the nation's health systems. The hospital's reorganization led to a near-total stop of non-urgent, elective surgeries across all specialties, including hip and knee arthroplasty. However, in May 2020, a gradual elective surgery restarting was possible. Considering the risk of COVID-19 infections, the European Knee Associates suggest the need to implement specific protocols for a safe return to orthopaedic elective surgery.

Methods

A retrospective analysis regarding all patients who underwent primary knee arthroplasty (TKA) between March 1st and October 1st, 2020 using an institutional database was performed. The study time was divided into 2 periods: Pandemic (from March 2020 to May 2020), Post Pandemic (from June 2020 to October 2020). A specific protocol was designed to safeguard the health of patients and healthcare workers during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.

Results

A total of 147 patients underwent total knee replacement surgery in the analyzed period. The mean surgical time was 77.6 (+/-18.9). The intraoperative mean blood loss was 54 (+/-28) ml. The mean hospital stay was 3-4 days. Among the treated patients no case of COVID-19 infection was observed.

Conclusion

The use of our protocol, developed ad hoc for the management of elective orthopedic patients, allowed the restart of elective orthopedic surgery in a safe and reproducible way with an average increase of 374% on surgical activity between the pandemic and post-pandemic periods without record cases of contagion among the treated patients.

Ceramic-on-ceramic versus ceramic-on-polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty: a comparative study at a minimum of 13 years follow-up

BACKGROUND

Nowadays hip replacement is one of the most successful surgery in terms of clinical outcome and patient's satisfaction. Therefore, the choice of biomaterials in hip replacement is increasingly important with the aim of obtaining a long-term satisfaction of patient and a greater survivorship of the implants. Ceramic-on-polyethylene (COP) and ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) bearings are two common coupling used in total hip arthroplasty. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare clinical and radiological outcomes between patients treated using CoC and CoP THA at a mean follow-up of 15 years.

METHODS

86 patients, average age 65.6, were included in the study: 43 in group A bearing CoC and 43 in group B bearing CoP. Minimum follow-up was 13 years. Primary outcome was a clinical evaluation assessed by HOOS and SF-12 questionnaires. Secondary outcome was a radiological evaluation on a A-P pelvis x-ray calculating acetabular cup inclination and anteversion and detecting osteolysis.

RESULT

After a multivariate analysis was performed, our results show clinical outcomes in group B significantly better than in group A: statistically significant value (p < 0,05) was found in the mean HOOS-symptoms subscale (83.0 ± 15.4 in Group A vs 90.3 ± 12.2 in group B) in the SF-12 physical component score (39.7 ± 11.0 in Group A vs 48.1 ± 10.1 in group B) and in HOOS (79.0 ± 16 in Group A vs 87.0 ± 16 in group B). 3 squeaking was found in group A. The calculated mean acetabular cup inclination value was 44,87 in group A and 44,5 in group B and the mean socket version was 17,54 in group A and 15,10 in group B. No significant statistically relationship between radiographic parameters analyzed and clinical outcomes was noted.

CONCLUSION

The current results provide us important information about the THA long-term outcome. CoP offered significantly better results compared with CoC at long-term follow up, and thus it should be considered in the choose of bearing in THA.

The Comparison of Inflammatory Cytokines between Spinal and General Anesthesia following Changes in Ischemic Reperfusion due to Tourniquet during Lower Limb Surgery

Methods

In this randomized controlled clinical trial, 34 patients with lower limb surgery admitted at the orthopedic ward of Imam Reza Hospital, Birjand, Iran, were selected by the available sampling method. They were randomly divided into two groups as follows: general anesthesia (n = 17) and spinal anesthesia (n = 17). Venous blood samples were taken from the patients of both groups at baseline (before the use of tourniquet) and 12 and 24 hours after reperfusion. Interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrotizing factor-α (TNF-α), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), and ferritin were measured and recorded. The data were analyzed using independent t-test, chi-square, and repeated measure at the significant level of 0.05.

Results

The results showed that hs-CRP and IL-6 significantly increased during the study (p < 0.001); however, the mean changes of TNF-α and ferritin were not significant during the study. Moreover, none of the inflammatory cytokines indicated significant differences between these two study groups (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

According to the results, the use of tourniquet can lead to inflammation, and the inflammation is similar in both groups.