Clinical profile, conversion rate, and suicidal thinking and behaviour in children and adolescents at ultra-high risk for psychosis: a theoretical perspective

Suicidal thinking and behavior in young people at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis: Psychopathological considerations and treatment response across a 2-year follow-up study

INTRODUCTION

Suicidal ideation has high rates among individuals at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis (CHR-P). CHR-P mental states are currently defined as attenuated psychotic symptoms, brief intermittent psychotic symptoms, or genetic risk and functioning deterioration syndrome. However, the relationship between psychotic experiences and suicidality in CHR-P subjects is still not fully understood. Research emphasizes the need to address suicidality in CHR-P individuals due to its incidence and severe socio-economic impact. This study aimed to assess the baseline prevalence and 2-year incidence rates of suicidal thinking and behaviors in an Italian CHR-P sample, investigate the stability of suicidal ideation over 2 years, and examine its associations with treatment outcomes, sociodemographic characteristics, and clinical factors.

METHODS

CHR-P participants were treated in an "Early Intervention in Psychosis" program and completed the PANSS and the GAF scale at baseline and every 12 months.

RESULTS

180 CHR-P individuals were enrolled (92 with suicidal ideation [SI+]). SI+ subjects had a higher baseline prevalence of past suicide attempts. Over 2 years, a decrease in suicidal ideation severity was observed in the total group. Longitudinal improvement in disorganized symptoms was a key predictor of the decrease in suicidal ideation. Participants with a history of suicide attempts were more likely to attempt again.

CONCLUSION

Addressing disorganization is crucial for suicide prevention in the CHR-P population. Continuous risk monitoring and preventive actions are needed for those with past suicide attempts.

Patterns of Care for Adolescent With Schizophrenia: A Delphi-Based Consensus Study

BACKGROUND

The current conceptualization of schizophrenia as neurodevelopmental disorder should lead to innovative public health policies in terms of a reorganization of the mental health care systems, particularly in the transition from adolescence to adulthood, to reduce personal, familiar, and social costs and burdens. The purpose of the project was to perform a survey among a panel of Italian schizophrenia experts, to share evidence-based information on adolescent schizophrenia and explore the degree of consensus among professionals in the following four macro-areas: early diagnosis; pharmacological treatment; health care system organization and transition process from adolescent to adulthood; and psychosocial interventions.

METHODS

The consensus process consisted of a two-step web-based Delphi method, which took place between June and November 2021. The survey was developed by a panel of four psychiatrists and four child neuropsychiatrists, identified as key opinion leaders (KOLs). The KOLs identified 21 statements involving a total of 70 items with a major need of clarification on early-onset schizophrenia (EOS). The survey was distributed to 86 specialists in psychiatry and child neuropsychiatry.

RESULTS

The results revealed a large agreement among the expert group on all the investigated areas of adolescent schizophrenia patterns of care and management. Consensus was ultimately reached for 67 items of the Delphi survey (95.7%), while negative consensus was reached for 2 items and no consensus was reached for 1 item.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, results showed a significant gap between the acquired scientific knowledge and clinical practice. In this scenario, it should be necessary to plan specific initiatives at a multiple level, to edit recommendations on clinical decision-making, as well as to prompt changes at the political and organizational levels, also involving scientific societies, patients, and family associations, to overcome the barriers that delay the implementation process.