Renal Cancer in Recipients of Kidney Transplant

Benefits of Routine Screening for Renal Cell Carcinoma of Native Kidney in Renal Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Renal-cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common solid organ cancer in kidney transplantation recipients (KTRs).

BACKGROUND

Analyze the incidence, prognosis, and evolution of primitive kidney RCC in KTRs at our institution.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Observational descriptive retrospective study in which all KTRs from January 2000 to December 2022 were included. We performed an annual abdominal ultrasound in all KTRs. Demographic and clinical data were collected. The surgical approach, location, size, histologic type, and tumor grade were analyzed. We assessed the coexistence of risk factors. We reported the appearance of tumors in other locations, changes in immunosuppressants (IS) after the diagnosis, and survival and recurrence rates observed during follow-up.

RESULTS

Eighteen RCCs of native kidneys were diagnosed with an incidence in our population of 1.08%. The majority were men (77.8%), with a mean age of 59.9 years. The pathologic analysis revealed 11 clear cell carcinomas, 6 papillary carcinomas, and 1 chromophobe cell carcinoma. The median tumor size was 2.7 cm. TNM stage was T1aN0M0 in 15 cases. Laparoscopy was performed to remove the tumor in most cases. All our patients underwent changes in IS therapy, with conversion to mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors when possible and reduction of IS in all of them. After a mean follow-up of 78.6 months, survival was 100% without tumor recurrence. Seven of the patients were diagnosed with a new tumor in another location.

CONCLUSION

In our experience, annual abdominal ultrasound in KTRs may be an option for the early detection of RCC in native kidneys.

Spontaneous regression of a metastatic carcinoma transmitted by a kidney graft

Transmission of a malignancy from a donor's organ to the recipient of the graft is a rare event, though it is a severe complication that can result in a poor outcome. Usually, immunosuppressive therapy is discontinued and the allograft is removed. However, treatment of patients with the disseminated cancers implies that after the graft removal and cessation of the immunosuppression, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or immunotherapy with alpha-interferon (INF-α) or interleukin-2 (IL-2) are required. The case report presents a clinical case of a transmitted kidney graft with multiple metastases (MTS) in a 31-year-old woman with the spontaneous regression of the metastatic cancer after transplantectomy and cancellation of the immunosuppressive therapy. Obviously, the determining factor is the recognition of the tumor by the effectors of the antitumor immunity due to the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatch between the donor and the recipient. Therefore, cancellation of the immunosuppressive therapy in cases of transferal of a malignancy with a transplanted organ allows the effectors of the immune system to distinguish the tumor as a foreign tissue and effectively eliminate this neoplasm.

Image-Guided Thermal Ablation in De Novo Renal Tumor Arising in Kidney Allograft: 3-Year Follow-Up. A Case Report

De novo tumors in renal allograft recipients are a severe complication during long-term follow-up after transplantation and may require transplantectomy. Herein we present a case of de novo renal tumor arising in the renal allograft, treated with the less invasive image-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with long-term follow-up. A tumor was detected during the routine annual follow-up in a patient with good renal function who underwent renal transplantation in 1989. Computed tomography (CT) showed a mass in the allograft whose shape, vascularization, and density suggested the presence of a solid, malignant mass, located in the upper renal pole, that measured 17 mm. CT-guided RFA was performed successfully, and the outcome was verified by an immediate control CT after the intervention. No residual pathologic tissue, major bleeding, or damage to the adjacent parenchyma was evidenced. The patient was discharged with stable renal function. CT scan and ultrasound were performed 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months after RFA. No signs of change in renal function, recurrence, neovascularization, or damage to the adjacent microcirculation were observed during the 3-year follow-up. In conclusion, percutaneous RFA of small renal tumors occurring in renal allografts can be considered a function-sparing, safe, and effective therapeutic option when difficult surgical removal may be anticipated. Our experience also supports the need for yearly renal allograft ultrasound follow-up for early identification of small neoplasm than can be treated less invasively.

Renal Cell Carcinoma with Clear Cell Papillary Features: Perspectives of a Differential Diagnosis

Thirty-one cases of low-grade renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with clear cells and tubulopapillary/papillary architecture were analyzed retrospectively with immunohistochemical and genetic markers to gain more experience with the differential diagnosis of such cases. All samples coexpressed CK7 and CA9; the TFE3 or TFEB reactions were negative; the CD10 and the AMACR stainings were negative in 27 cases and 30 cases, respectively. The FISH assays for papillary RCC, available in 27 cases, and deletion of chromosome 3p, available in 29 cases, gave negative results. The results for 3p deletion, VHL gene mutation or VHL gene promoter region hypermethylation testing, along with the diffuse CD10-positivity in 2 cases confirmed 21 cases as clear cell papillary RCC (CCPRCC; CK7+, CA9+; no 3p loss, no VHL abnormality) and 10 cases as clear cell RCC (CCRCC; CK7+, CA9+; no 3p loss, VHL abnormality mutation/hypermethylation present). In CCPRCCs, the representative growth pattern was branching tubulo-acinar, commonly accompanied by cyst formation. The linear nuclear arrangement or cup-shaped staining of CA9 did not necessarily indicate CCPRCC, and the absence of these did not exclude the diagnosis of CCPPRC. One tumor infiltrated the renal sinus; the others exhibited pT1 stage; and metastatic outcome was not recorded. The CCRCC cases were in pT1 stage; 6 exhibited cup-shaped staining of CA9, and 1 displayed lymph node metastasis at the time of surgery. Distant metastatic disease was not observed. In summary, the VHL abnormalities distinguished the subset of CCRCC with diffuse CK7-positivity and no 3p loss from cases of CCPRCC.

Perioperative Outcomes of Laparoscopic Radical Nephrectomy for Renal Mass in Patients on Dialysis or with Renal Transplant in Place Compared to Normal Controls

Background: The risk of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) development in the native kidney of patients on dialysis or with a renal transplant is increased compared to the general population. This study examines perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LN) in dialysis patients or renal transplant patients compared to normal controls. Methods: Four hundred twelve consecutive LN were evaluated (July 2007 to October 2018). Patients were divided into three groups (control, dialysis, and transplant). Perioperative outcomes, including operating room time (OT), postoperative complications, hospital length of stay, and 90-day readmission rates, were evaluated for the three groups. Results: There were 62 patients in the dialysis group, 20 renal transplants, and 330 normal controls. Dialysis patients were younger (median: 58 years versus 67 years; P = .002) and predominantly male (73% versus 59%, P = .047). Dialysis patients compared to controls had shorter total OT (median: 133 versus 149; P = .022), more papillary RCC (27% versus 10%; P < .001), and fewer high grade tumors (73% [8/11] versus 94% [100/106]; P = .038). Renal transplant patients had a higher rate of 90-day readmission (20% versus 6%; P = .034) and more papillary RCC (30% versus 10%; P = .016) compared to controls. Conclusion: LN on dialysis patients does not alter expected perioperative outcomes compared to a large cohort of control LN. LN on renal transplant patients carries a higher 90-day readmission rate than control LN.

Malignancies after renal transplantation: experience of a Mexican referral center

OBJECTIVE

To report the incidence of cancer after renal transplantation at a referral center in a developing country.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Consecutive patients receiving renal transplantations during a 48-year period at Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion Salvador Zubiran were analyzed. The standardized incidence ratio (SIR) was calculated based on data from GLOBOCAN 2012.

RESULTS

From 1257 patients, 98 (8%) developed 143 malignancies. The SIR of all the cohort was 4.1 (95% CI 3.2-5.1). The relative risks of male and female transplant recipients were 4.6 and 3.5 times greater than the risk of cancer of the general population, respectively. The most common malignancy was non-melanoma skin cancer (52%). The malignancy that associated with the greater relative risk was Kaposi sarcoma (SIR: 200), followed by lymphomas (SIR: 30). A multivariate analysis comparing patients with cancer and controls confirmed that receiving a three-drug regimen as final treatment, prolonged immunosuppression, and patients undergoing a second renal transplantation were factors associated with increased cancer development.

CONCLUSION

To date, there is paucity of data from developing countries. We reported the results from a National Health Institute in Mexico including a large cohort with a long follow-up, demonstrating differences within frequencies and risks compared to other regions of the world.

Allograft renal cell carcinoma in pediatrics transplantation: A mini-review

Renal cell carcinoma in the pediatric age group is a rare event, and its occurrence in the allograft (recipient) kidney is an uncommon event. There is no published review study in RCC of allograft kidneys in children and adolescents. In this study, we thoroughly searched English literature (PubMed, Google Scholar, and Google) in order to find all the reported allograft kidney RCCs in the patients who have been transplanted below the age of 18. There have been 12 reports of allograft RCC in this age group. Our result showed that the age of tumor detection according to donor age is lower comparing to non-allograft RCCs, and there is a significant male preponderance. RCC in the allografts is smaller and shows low nuclear grade and has a good prognosis. These findings emphasize the importance of routine allograft ultrasonography which results in earlier detection of RCC with smaller size and better outcome.

Incidence and Mortality of Renal Cell Carcinoma after Kidney Transplantation: A Meta-Analysis

Background: The incidence and mortality of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) after kidney transplantation (KTx) remain unclear. This study’s aims were (1) to investigate the pooled incidence/incidence trends, and (2) to assess the mortality/mortality trends in KTx patients with RCC. Methods: A literature search was conducted using the MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases from inception through October 2018. Studies that reported the incidence or mortality of RCC among kidney transplant recipients were included. The pooled incidence and 95% CI were calculated using a random-effect model. The protocol for this meta-analysis is registered with PROSPERO; no. CRD42018108994. Results: A total of 22 observational studies with a total of 320,190 KTx patients were enrolled. Overall, the pooled estimated incidence of RCC after KTx was 0.7% (95% CI: 0.5–0.8%, I² = 93%). While the pooled estimated incidence of de novo RCC in the native kidney was 0.7% (95% CI: 0.6–0.9%, I² = 88%), the pooled estimated incidence of RCC in the allograft kidney was 0.2% (95% CI: 0.1–0.4%, I² = 64%). The pooled estimated mortality rate in KTx recipients with RCC was 15.0% (95% CI: 7.4–28.1%, I² = 80%) at a mean follow-up time of 42 months after RCC diagnosis. While meta-regression analysis showed a significant negative correlation between year of study and incidence of de novo RCC post-KTx (slopes = −0.05, p = 0.01), there were no significant correlations between the year of study and mortality of patients with RCC (p = 0.50). Egger’s regression asymmetry test was performed and showed no publication bias in all analyses. Conclusions: The overall estimated incidence of RCC after KTX was 0.7%. Although there has been a potential decrease in the incidence of RCC post-KTx, mortality in KTx patients with RCC has not decreased over time.

Simultaneous living donor orthotopic renal transplantation and bilateral nephrectomy for recurrent renal cell carcinoma and renal failure: case report and review of literature

Background

We report the case of a 43-year-old female patient with systemic lupus erythematosus, class III lupus nephritis, with predialysis creatinine levels around 350 μmol/L (3.95 mg/dL) after partial resection of the left kidney with histologically verified papillary carcinoma in 2010. Preoperative computed tomography of the abdomen revealed a small 8 mm tumor in the left upper kidney pole. The patient was indicated for simultaneous bilateral nephrectomy and orthotopic renal transplantation with the aim to minimize invasiveness of the procedure as well as for curable tumor removal.

Method

The procedure was performed under the full anesthesia trough upper middle laparotomy. As the first step, bilateral transperitoneal nephrectomy was performed. The live donor surgery started in a parallel theater to shorten the cold ischemic time of the graft. The renal graft had singe vessels and ureter; it was placed into the recipient’s right orthotopic position. End-to-end anastomosis of the right renal vein and artery anastomosis were performed; ureter was anastomosed end-to-end using recipient’s ureter.

Results

The postoperative period was uneventful with repeatedly excellent ultrasonography check-up of the graft’s perfusion. The patient was discharged after 13 days with a good renal function of the graft (urea: 15 mmol/L, creatinine 160 μmol/L [1.80 mg/dL]).

Conclusion

Orthotopic renal transplantation is a technically challenging but valid alternative for patients who are unsuitable candidates for heterotopic renal transplantation or in cases where there is a clear benefit of orthotopic renal transplantation.