Pharmacotherapy of Acute Bipolar Depression in Adults: An Evidence Based Approach

Use of antipsychotics and the risk of acute respiratory failure among adults: A disease risk score-matched nested case-control study

AIMS

Evidence on acute respiratory failure (ARF) from antipsychotics is scant, and only 1 population-based study examined this drug safety issue in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients. Antipsychotics have been frequently prescribed off-label in adults, but whether antipsychotic use carries an increased ARF risk among adult patients is uncertain.

METHODS

We adopted a nested case-control study analysing 716 493 adults aged ≥20 years, identified from the Taiwan nationwide healthcare claims records between January 2000 and December 2013. Among the study cohort, 7084 adults with ARF and 12,785 disease risk scored-matched randomly selected controls were analysed. Multivariable logistic regression models were employed to estimate odds ratios of ARF with antipsychotic usages.

RESULTS

Current, recent, and recent past use of antipsychotics was associated with a 2.33-fold (95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.06-2.64), 1.79-fold (95% CI = 1.43-2.25) and 1.41-fold (95% CI = 1.20-1.66) increased risk of ARF, respectively, compared with nonuse, while antipsychotics discontinued >90 days carried no risk. A dose-dependent association was observed with current therapy of antipsychotics (test for trend, P < .001), in which antipsychotic use at >1 defined daily dose yielded the highest risk of 6.53-fold (95% CI = 3.33-12.79). The findings were robust to using carbamazepine as an active comparator.

CONCLUSION

Antipsychotic use was associated with an increased risk of ARF in adult patients. The risk was dose-dependent and markedly higher with current use of antipsychotic agents at doses of 1 defined daily dose and above, <10% of this cohort. Physicians should be vigilant about any respiratory symptoms in patients currently receiving antipsychotics at such dose.

Mixed States in Bipolar Disorder: Etiology, Pathogenesis and Treatment

Many bipolar disorder patients exhibit mixed affective states, which portend a generally more severe illness course and treatment resistance. In the previous renditions of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual mixed states were narrowly defined in the context of bipolar I disorder, but with the advent of DSM-5 the term “mixed episode” was dropped and replaced by “mixed features” specifier which could be broadly applied to manic, hypomanic and depressive episodes in both the bipolar spectrum and major depressive disorders. This paradigm shift reflected their significance in the prognosis and overall management of mood disorders, so that the clinicians should thoroughly familiarize themselves with the contemporary notions surrounding these conditions. The purpose of this manuscript is to bring to light the current conceptualizations regarding the etiology, pathogenesis and treatment of mixed states. To achieve this goal, in June 2016 an extensive literature search was undertaken using the PubMed database. Some exploratory terms utilized included “mixed states”, “mixed episodes”, “switching”, “rapid cycling” cross referenced with “bipolar disorder”. Focusing on the most relevant and up to date studies, it was revealed that mixed states result from genetic susceptibility in the circadian and dopamine neurotransmission apparatuses and disturbance in the intricate catecholamine-acetylcholine neurotransmission balance which leads to mood fluctuations. The management of mixed states is challenging with atypical antipsychotics, newer anticonvulsants and electroconvulsive therapy emerging as the foremost treatment options. In conclusion, while progress has been made in the neurobiological understanding of mixed states, the currently available therapeutic modalities have only shown limited effectiveness.