Effectiveness of Intraluminal Air Decompression on Postcolonoscopic Pain According to Reinsertion Site

Effects of Hot Pack Therapy on Post-Colonoscopy Pain: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study

BACKGROUND

Post-colonoscopy pain (PCP) is a negative condition that causes physical and psychological distress to patients and may lead to noncompliance with treatment and follow-up. The most common hypothesis for the cause of PCP is the inflation of the lumen with air to examine the mucosa. There are no previous studies that have examined the effects of thermal therapy in patients with PCP.

AIMS

In this study, we aimed to investigate the effects of the Hot Pack (HP) method in patients with PCP.

DESIGN

Randomized, controlled, prospective study.

METHODS

Patients were randomized 1:1 into 2 groups of HP and control. In the HP group, hot packs of 40-45°C, kept in a hydrocollator heating unit for 30-35 minutes and wrapped in towels, were applied to the umbilical and hypogastric region of patients in the supine position for 30 minutes. Visual analog scale (VAS) scores were used to measure the pain after colonoscopy. Visual analog scores at 1, 6, and 24 hours were recorded and compared in both groups.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference in the presence and severity of pain between the two groups at 1 and 6 hours after colonoscopy (p < .001 and p = .004, respectively). There was no significant difference in pain scores at 24 hours between two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that the application of HP to patients after colonoscopy is effective in reducing pain in the early period.

Modifiable factors associated with patient-reported pain during and after screening colonoscopy

OBJECTIVE

Pain associated with colonoscopy is a major burden for patients. We investigated modifiable factors associated with patient-reported pain during and after colonoscopy.

DESIGN

This cross-sectional analysis included database records from 23 centres participating in a population-based colonoscopy screening programme in Poland. Colonoscopies were performed under three sedation modalities: none, benzodiazepine-opioid sedation or propofol sedation. We used Gastronet (a validated tool) to assess patients' pain during and after colonoscopy; pain was scored on a four-point scale (no, little, moderate or severe pain), with moderate to severe defined as painful. We used multivariate logistic regression models to estimate ORs for painful colonoscopy and calculated risk-adjusted ratios of painful colonoscopies per endoscopist and compared it to the mean rate.

RESULTS

Of 35 216 screening colonoscopies in 2014 and 2015 included in our study, 22 725 (64.5%) patients returned valid Gastronet questionnaires. The proportion of examinations described as causing pain during (after) the procedure was 22.5% (14.2%) for unsedated, 19.9% (13.5%) for benzodiazepine-opioid sedation and 2.5% (7.5%) for propofol sedation. Propofol sedation, higher case volume of endoscopists, newest endoscope generation and adequate bowel preparation were significantly associated with lower odds of painful colonoscopy. Pain scores after colonoscopy showed similar associations. Adjusted pain rates during and after colonoscopy varied 11 and over 23-fold, respectively, between endoscopists.

CONCLUSION

We identified several independent, modifiable factors associated with pain during and after colonoscopy, of which individual endoscopist was the most important. Dedicated training should be considered to decrease variability among endoscopists.