Escitalopram-Induced Amenorrhea and False Positive Urine Pregnancy Test

False-positive urine pregnancy screening tests are uncommon in the hospital setting among patients with bowel-containing urinary tract reconstruction

PURPOSE

False-positive urine pregnancy screening tests (UPST) have been reported among patients with bowel-containing urinary reconstruction (BCUR). However, the true frequency of such inaccurate results, which have been attributed to urinary mucous or other proteins interfering with or mimicking the binding of beta-HCG in the assay, is unknown in this population. We sought to determine the incidence of false-positive pregnancy screening tests among this patient population at our institution.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using existing databases of patients with spina bifida, bladder exstrophy, and genitourinary rhabdomyosarcoma, we identified female patients with BCUR who had UPST over a 10-year period as screening prior to procedures or imaging. Patient and test result information was recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 120 patients with a history of BCUR were identified: 33 with spina bifida, 73 within the exstrophy-epispadias complex (EEC), and 14 with genitourinary rhabdomyosarcoma. Of this group, 46 patients (38%) had at least one UPST during the study period; 15 had 1 UPST, 6 had 2 UPSTs, 4 had 3 UPSTs, and 21 had greater than 3 UPSTs, for a total of 244 UPST in this cohort. UPSTs used at our institution included Sure-Vue brand and Alere brand (HCG sensitivity 20 mIU/ml). Types of BCUR included ileal enterocystoplasty in 25 patients, colon enterocystoplasty in 6, stomach enterocystoplasty in 5, composite enterocystoplasty in 7, and continent catheterizable channel alone (e.g. Yang-Monti, appendicovesicostomy) in 3 patients. Of the 244 UPSTs in patients with BCUR, zero (0%) were positive.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite reports in the literature that false-positive UPST are common among patients with bowel-containing urinary diversions, we found no positive UPST among patients with BCUR in the healthcare setting. False-positive UPST in the home setting may be due to variability in sensitivity thresholds, binding agents, technical errors in test technique, kit quality control, or other factors.

Vortioxetine-Induced Amenorrhea: A Case Report

BACKGROUND

Vortioxetine is a novel multimodal antidepressant for the treatment of major depressive disorders and is widely used in clinical practice. Vortioxetine has a safe profile. However, there are case reports of other adverse effects in the literature. In this article, a case of amenorrhea due to vortioxetine is presented.

CASE

The patient is 36 years old, married, female, and is an anesthesiologist. She applied to the psychiatric outpatient clinic with symptoms of major depression. Vortioxetine was initiated at 10 mg/d and then gradually increased to 20 mg/d. She had regular menstruation until now. However, she did not menstruate after taking vortioxetine. The patient used vortioxetine for 3 months and never had a period. Pregnancy test and other tests to investigate organic etiology were normal. Two weeks after discontinuation of vortioxetine, the patient had a menstrual period.

CONCLUSIONS

Further research is needed on the relationship and possible mechanisms between vortioxetine and amenorrhea.

A Case of a False-Positive Urine Pregnancy Test and Delayed Diagnosis of Obstructive Pyelonephritis

Patient: Female, 28-year-old

Final Diagnosis: Obstructive pyelonephritis

Symptoms: Dysuria • epigastric pain • flank pain

Medication: —

Clinical Procedure: —

Specialty: General and Internal Medicine