Patients Referred for Bleeding Symptoms of Unknown Cause: Does Evaluation of Thrombin Generation Contribute to Diagnosis?

Utility of Global Hemostatic Assays in Patients with Bleeding Disorders of Unknown Cause

Bleeding disorder of unknown cause (BDUC) is a diagnosis of exclusion after exhaustive evaluation of plasmatic coagulation and platelet function. This review explores the utility of global hemostatic assays as confirmatory tests and in elucidating the pathophysiology of BDUC. Unlike traditional hemostatic tests that focus on coagulation factors, global assays are conducted both in plasma and also whole blood. These assays provide a more comprehensive understanding of the cell-based model of coagulation, aid in the identification of plasmatic factor abnormalities that may reduce hemostatic capacity, and allow for the assessment of impaired platelet-endothelial interactions under shear stress, as well as hyperfibrinolytic states. While clinical tests such as skin bleeding time and global assays such as PFA-100 exhibit limited diagnostic capacity, the role of viscoelastic testing in identifying hemostatic dysfunction in patients with BDUC remains unclear. Thrombin generation assays have shown variable results in BDUC patients; some studies demonstrate differences compared with healthy controls or reference values, whereas others question its clinical utility. Fibrinolysis assessment in vitro remains challenging, with studies employing euglobulin clot lysis time, plasma clot lysis time, and fluorogenic plasmin generation yielding inconclusive or conflicting results. Notably, recent studies suggest that microfluidic analysis unveils shear-dependent platelet function defects in BDUC patients, undetected by conventional platelet function assays. Overall, global assays might be helpful for exploring underlying hemostatic impairments, when conventional hemostatic laboratory tests yield no results. However, due to limited data and/or discrepant results, further research is needed to evaluate the utility of global assays as screening tools.

Switch to pdVWF:pdFVIII concentrate for prophylaxis in a paediatric patient with Type 3 von Willebrand disease: a case report

OBJECTIVES

To report the long-term prophylaxis management of a child with type 3 von Willebrand disease by switching to Wilate (Octapharma AG), a plasma-derived, double virus-inactivated concentrate of freeze-dried of a 1 to 1 ratio of active Von Willebrand Factor and Factor VIII (pdVWF:pdFVIII) recently marketed as Eqwilate in France.

METHODS

This is a case report of 12.6-year-old boy with congenital Type 3 VWD who had a history of frequent bleeds. Prophylaxis started at the age of 38 months with FVIII-poor pdVWF concentrate (Wilfactin, LFB) and FVIII (Wilstart, LFB). Pharmacokinetics and thrombin generation assay were performed. Annualized bleeding rate was derived from the bleeding episodes documented in the medical record during a 24-month period before and after starting pdVWF:pdFVIII concentrate.

RESULTS

Both product injections promptly raised the endogenous thrombin potential (ETP). However, the maximal concentration of formed thrombin was higher following pdVWF:pdFVIII injection. Due to a high bleeds frequency and better results regarding FVIII levels and thrombin generation, the prophylaxis regimen was changed to the same dose and frequency of pdVWF:pdFVIII concentrate (42 IU/kg per day, three times a week). During the last 24 months, annualized total, trauma, and spontaneous bleeding rates were 7.5, 4.5, and 3, respectively. These rates decreased to 2, 1.5, and 0.5 respectively during the next two years. The mother reported a marked improvement in the quality of life of his son and hers.

CONCLUSION

Switch to pdVWF:pdFVIII concentrate for long-term prophylaxis in a young type 3 VWD patient was safe and effective in reducing bleeds.

Investigating patients for bleeding disorders when most of the "usual" ones have been ruled out

A State of the Art lecture titled "Investigating Patients for Bleeding Disorders When Most of the Usual Ones Have Been Ruled Out" was presented at the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis Congress in 2023. Mild to moderate bleeding disorders (MBDs) in patients in whom no diagnosis of an established disorder, such as platelet function defect, von Willebrand disease, or a coagulation factor deficiency, can be identified are classified as bleeding disorders of unknown cause (BDUCs). Prospective data from the Vienna Bleeding Biobank and other studies have revealed a high proportion of BDUCs of up to 70% among patients with MBD who have a similar bleeding phenotype as other MBDs. As BDUC is a diagnosis of exclusion, the accuracy of the diagnostic workup is essential. For example, repeated testing for von Willebrand disease should be considered if von Willebrand factor values are <80 IU/dL. Current evidence does not support the clinical use of global assays such as thromboelastography, platelet function analyzer, or thrombin generation potential. Rare and novel bleeding disorders due to genetic variants in fibrinolytic factors or natural anticoagulants are rare and should only be analyzed in patients with specific phenotypes and a clear family history. In BDUC, blood group O was identified as a risk factor for increased bleeding severity and bleeding risk after hemostatic challenges. Future studies should improve the phenotypical characterization and ideally identify novel risk factors in BDUC, as a multifactorial pathogenesis is suspected. Finally, we summarize relevant new data on this topic presented during the 2023 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis Congress.

Bleeding disorder of unknown cause: Results from Iranian study

BACKGROUND

Definite diagnosis of patients with mild to moderate bleeding is challenging. Some studies reported that even more than 50% of their patients remained undiagnosed which is classified as a Bleeding disorder of unknown cause (BDUC). This study aims to document the clinical characteristics and proportion of patients with BDUC in the Iranian Comprehensive Hemophilia Care Center (ICHCC) one of the referral centers for diagnosis of congenital bleeding disorder in Iran.

METHODS

This study was conducted on 397 patients who were referred with a bleeding manifestation to ICHCC from 2019 to 2022. Demographic and laboratory data were documented for all patients. Bleeding questionnaires including ISTH-Bleeding Assessment tool (ISTH-BAT) and the Molecular and Clinical Markers for the Diagnosis and Management of Type 1 (MCMDM-1 (ISTH-BAT, MCMDM-1, and the Pictorial Bleeding Assessment Chart (PBLAC) were filled out for all patients. The data were analyzed by the statistical package for social science (SPSS version 22, SPSS, Chicago, Illinois, USA).

RESULTS

BDUC was diagnosed in 200 patients and 197 patients reached the final diagnosis. Hemophilia, von Willebrand disease (VWD), factor (F) VII deficiency, and platelet functional disorders (PFDs) were confirmed in 54, 49, 34, and 15 of the patients, respectively. No significant difference was found in bleeding scores between patients with BDUC and those with confirmed disease. In contrast, after setting cut-off (ISTH-BAT for males ≥ 4 and females ≥ 6 and MCMDM-1 for males ≥ 3 and females ≥ 5) clinically significant difference was found. There was no association between having a positive consanguineous marriage and setting a diagnosis; however, significant associations were seen for having a positive family history of bleeding. Age (OR =0.977, 95% CI.965-0.989), gender (BDUC female, 151/200; final diagnosis female, 95/197) (OR=3.3, 95% CI 2.16-5.06), family history (OR = 3.19, 95% CI 1.99-5.11), and consanguineous marriage (OR=1.59, 95% CI 1.03-2.45) were considered as a risk factor for categorizing the patients with BDUC or final diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

The findings are mainly in line with previous studies about BDUC patients. The large number of patients with BDUC underlines the incompleteness of available routine laboratory tests and shows the necessity of progress in the development of reliable diagnostic tools to identify underlying bleeding disorders.

Thrombin generation assays to personalize treatment in bleeding and thrombotic diseases

Treatment of bleeding and thrombotic disorders is highly standardized and based on evidence-based medicine guidelines. These evidence-based treatment schemes are well accepted but may lead to either insufficient treatment or over-dosing, because the individuals' hemostatic properties are not taken into account. This can potentially introduce bleeding or thrombotic complications in individual patients. With the incorporation of pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) parameters, based on global assays such as thrombin generation assays (TGAs), a more personalized approach can be applied to treat either bleeding or thrombotic disorders. In this review, we will discuss the recent literature about the technical aspects of TGAs and the relation to diagnosis and management of bleeding and thrombotic disorders. In patients with bleeding disorders, such as hemophilia A or factor VII deficiency, TGAs can be used to identify patients with a more severe bleeding phenotype and also in the management with non-replacement therapy and/or bypassing therapy. These assays have also a role in patients with venous thrombo-embolism, but the usage of TGAs in patients with arterial thrombosis is less clear. However, there is a potential role for TGAs in the monitoring of (long-term) antithrombotic therapy, for example with the use of direct oral anticoagulants. Finally this review will discuss controversies, limitations and knowledge gaps in relation to the introduction of TGAs to personalize medicine in daily medical practice.

How I treat. Bleeding Disorder of Unknown Cause (BDUC)

Recent studies have demonstrated that only 30% of patients referred for assessment of a possible bleeding tendency will eventually be diagnosed with a mild bleeding disorder (MBD) such as von Willebrand disease (VWD) or platelet function defect (PFD). Rather, the majority of such patients will be diagnosed with Bleeding Disorder of Unknown Cause (BDUC). There remains an important unmet need to define consensus regarding the clinical and laboratory criteria necessary for a formal BDUC diagnosis. Nevertheless, BDUC already accounts for more than 10% of patients registered in some Haemophilia Comprehensive Care centres. Accumulating recent data suggest that BDUC is also being diagnosed with increasing frequency. Increased BAT scores are widely utilized to differentiate significant from trivial symptoms in patients with mucocutaneous bleeding. Objective assessment of bleeding phenotype using a standardised bleeding assessment tool (BAT) therefore represents a fundamental first step in the diagnosis of BDUC. Since BDUC is a diagnosis by exclusion, accurate quantification of bleeding phenotype is critical as this will be the primary determinant upon which a diagnosis of BDUC is reached. Importantly, BAT scores suggest that patients with BDUC display bleeding phenotypes comparable to those seen in patients with VWD or PFD respectively. Despite the prevalence of BDUC, diagnosis and management of these patients commonly pose significant clinical dilemmas. In this manuscript, we consider these challenges in the context of a number of typical case studies, discuss the available evidence and outline our approach to the management of these patients.

Bleeding of unknown cause and unclassified bleeding disorders; diagnosis, pathophysiology and management

Bleeding of unknown cause (BUC), also known as unclassified bleeding disorders (UBD), has been defined as a clear bleeding tendency in the presence of normal haemostatic tests. There are challenges in the diagnosis and management of these patients. BUC/UBD encompasses a heterogenous group of disorders which may include undiagnosed rare monogenic diseases, polygenic reasons for bleeding; and patients without a clear bleeding disorder but with a previous bleeding event. Nevertheless, these patients may have heavy menstrual bleeding or be at risk of bleeding when undergoing surgical procedures, or childbirth; optimizing haemostasis and establishing a mode of inheritance is important to minimize morbidity. The bleeding score has been used to clinically assess and describe these patients, but its value remains uncertain. In addition, accurate distinction between normal and pathological bleeding remains difficult. Several studies have investigated cohorts of these patients using research haemostasis tests, including thrombin generation and fibrinolytic assays, yet no clear characteristics have consistently emerged. Thus far, detailed genetic analysis of these patients has not been fruitful in unravelling the cause of bleeding. There is a need for standardization of diagnosis and management guidelines for these patients. This review gives an overview of this field with some suggestions for future research.

Fundamentals for a Systematic Approach to Mild and Moderate Inherited Bleeding Disorders: An EHA Consensus Report

Healthy subjects frequently report minor bleedings that are frequently ‘background noise’ of normality rather than a true disorder. Nevertheless, unexpected or unusual bleeding may be alarming. Thus, the distinction between normal and pathologic bleeding is critical. Understanding the underlying pathologic mechanism in patients with an excessive bleeding is essential for their counseling and treatment. Most of these patients with significant bleeding will result affected by non-severe inherited bleeding disorders (BD), collectively denominated mild or moderate BD for their relatively benign course. Unfortunately, practical recommendations for the management of these disorders are still lacking due to the current state of fragmented knowledge of pathophysiology and lack of a systematic diagnostic approach. To address this gap, an International Working Group (IWG) was established by the European Hematology Association (EHA) to develop consensus-based guidelines on these disorders. The IWG agreed that grouping these disorders by their clinical phenotype under the single category of mild-to-moderate bleeding disorders (MBD) reflects current clinical practice and will facilitate a systematic diagnostic approach. Based on standardized and harmonized definitions a conceptual unified framework is proposed to distinguish normal subjects from affected patients. The IWG proposes a provisional comprehensive patient-centered initial diagnostic approach that will result in classification of MBD into distinct clinical-pathological entities under the overarching principle of clinical utility for the individual patient. While we will present here a general overview of the global management of patients with MBD, this conceptual framework will be adopted and validated in the evidence-based, disease-specific guidelines under development by the IWG.

Update on diagnostic testing for platelet function disorders: What is practical and useful?

INTRODUCTION

Platelet function disorders (PFD) are an important group of bleeding disorders that require validated and practical laboratory strategies for diagnosis.

METHODS

This review summarizes the authors' experiences, current literature, and an international survey to evaluate the practices of diagnostic laboratories that offer tests for PFD.

RESULTS

Blood counts, blood film review, and aggregation tests are the most commonly performed investigations for PFD and help determine whether there is thrombocytopenia and/or defective platelet function due to a variety of causes. The performance characteristics of tests for PFD, and the level of evidence that these tests detect bleeding problems, are important issues to determine where tests are useful for diagnostic or correlative purposes, or research only uses. Platelet aggregation assays, and quantitative analysis of platelet dense granule numbers, are tests with good performance characteristics that detect abnormalities associated with increased bleeding in a significant proportion of individuals referred for PFD investigations. Lumiaggregometry estimates of platelet adenosine triphosphate release show greater variability which limits the diagnostic usefulness. Diagnostic laboratories report that fiscal and other constraints, including a lack of high-quality evidence, limit their ability to offer an expanded test menu for PFD.

CONCLUSION

PFD are clinically important bleeding disorders that remain challenging for diagnostic laboratories to investigate. While some PFD tests are well validated for diagnostic purposes, gaps in scientific evidence and resource limitations influence diagnostic laboratory decisions on which PFD tests to offer.