Treatment of Early Stages Hodgkin Lymphoma During Pregnancy

Management of Hodgkin Lymphoma during pregnancy, review of the literature and description of an homogenous expectative attitude associated with excellent outcome

Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) occuring during pregnancy is a rare condition, and management relies on sparse literature. The specificity of pregnancy requires the clinician to take into account the clinical emergency, the stage of the lymphoma, the trimester of pregnancy, and the patient's choices. The main objective is twofold: to limit the risk of toxicity and adverse events for both mother and fetus, without reducing the chances of a successful outcome. Current literature data suggest that the use of ABVD-type polychemotherapy (adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine) is associated with obstetrical events and long-term fetal toxicity. We report here the results of a homogeneous management considering wait-and-see, vinblastine monotherapy and ABVD polychemotherapy options. The outcomes in terms of obstetrical complications, response rate, and overall survival (100 %) reinforce the idea that strategies that do not involve the use of multidrug therapy are possible and are associated with very good results.

Immunochemotherapy for life-threatening haematological malignancies in pregnancy: a systematic review of the literature and cross-sectional analysis of clinical trial eligibility

The management of potentially life-threatening malignancies in pregnancy is complicated by a lack of robust safety and efficacy evidence. This data shortage stems from a historical exclusion of women of childbearing potential from prospective clinical trials due to concerns around potential teratogenicity and toxicity of investigational agents. We conducted a systematic review of published data on immunochemotherapeutic treatment of life-threatening haematological malignancies in pregnancy between 2010 and 2022, and the maternal and neonatal outcomes. We then performed a cross-sectional observational study of clinical trial protocols on ClinicalTrials.gov, between 2016 and 2022, recruiting women of childbearing potential with potentially life-threatening haematological malignancies, collecting trial demographic data, and documenting whether pregnant or lactating women were explicitly excluded, along with the type and duration of contraception required for women of childbearing potential. We included 17 studies for analysis in our systematic review. A total of 595 women were treated with immunochemotherapy during pregnancy, with a median age of 29 years (range 14-48). Of these, 81 women (14%) were treated in the first trimester, and 514 (86%) were treated in the second and third trimesters collectively. In total, 68 trials for acute myeloid leukaemia, acute lymphocytic leukaemia, high-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and Hodgkin lymphoma (40%, 26%, 21%, and 13%, respectively) were included in our ClinicalTrials.gov analysis. Most protocols (66 [97%]) explicitly excluded pregnant women, with 40 (69%) not providing a rationale for exclusion. The potential harm to the fetus from anti-cancer therapy has historically been given greater moral precedence than a pregnant woman's autonomy. This pattern is reflected in the lack of rigorous evidence for immunochemotherapy in pregnancy and a universal exclusion of pregnant and lactating women from clinical trial protocols in this study. Nonetheless, the administration of systemic chemotherapy in the second and third trimesters was not associated with an increased rate of congenital malformations or perinatal mortality in our systematic review cohort, with maternal outcomes broadly comparable to those of the non-pregnant population.

Unusual Presentation of Hodgkin's Lymphoma in Pregnancy: A Case Report and Systematic Review of Literature

Diseases occurring during pregnancy create a dilemma of managing the patient without causing harm to the unborn child. Three percent of the peak incidence of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is congruent with the reproductive period, particularly with pregnancy. Pregnant patients with HL always require a team of medical experts ranging from a medical oncologist, high-risk obstetrician, and neonatologist. Effective communication with both the patient and family is also necessary. The treatment goal for these patients should focus on achieving complete remission for the mother while permitting the delivery of a healthy child. Pregnant patients diagnosed with HL should undergo similar clinical investigations as other non-pregnant patients with accurate disease staging and appropriate non-radiation imaging such as ultrasound while avoiding invasive procedures.

Transplacental Passage and Fetal Effects of Antineoplastic Treatment during Pregnancy

Simple Summary

In this paper we perform an introduction about pregnancy-associated cancer (PAC) and transplacental passage of antineoplastic agents. Furthermore, we describe therapeutic use and potential toxic effects of chemotherapeutic drug (alkylating agents, antimetabolites agents, anthracyclines, topoisomerase inhibitors, antimitotic agents, actinomycin-D, bleomycin) and targeted agents during pregnancy. This manuscript may be a useful and practical guide for the management of PAC, which is a challenge for clinicians that have to consider alike maternal benefits and fetal potential risks correlated to the antineoplastic treatment.

Abstract

The incidence of PAC is relatively infrequent among pregnant women. However, it has gradually increased in recent years, becoming a challenging area for clinicians that should take into account in the same way maternal benefits and fetal potential risks correlated to the antineoplastic treatment. None of the antineoplastic drugs is completely risk-free during the pregnancy, the timing of exposure and transplacental transfer properties influence the toxicity of the fetus. Despite the lack of guidelines about the management of PAC, several studies have described the use and the potential fetal and neonatal adverse events of antineoplastic drugs during pregnancy. We provide a review of the available literature about the transplacental passage and fetal effects of chemotherapy and targeted agents, to guide the clinicians in the most appropriate choices for the management of PAC.

Lymphoma Occurring During Pregnancy: Current Diagnostic and Therapeutic Approaches

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Pregnancy-associated lymphoma (PAL) is an uncommon entity that lacks detailed prospective data. It poses significant management challenges that incorporate maternal and fetal risks associated with treatment or delayed intervention. Herein, we review the current literature for the diagnosis, management, and supportive care strategies for PAL.

RECENT FINDINGS

Establishment of a multidisciplinary team, including hematology-oncology, maternal-fetal medicine, and neonatology, is critical in the management of PAL. For staging, ultrasound and MRI are preferred modalities with use of computerized tomography in select situations. Data for the safety and effectiveness of therapy for PAL is largely based on retrospective studies. The timing of lymphoma-directed antenatal systemic therapy depends on the trimester, gestational age, lymphoma subtype and aggressiveness, and patient wishes. Therapy in the first trimester is usually not advocated, while treatment in the second and third trimesters appears to result in similar outcomes for PAL compared with non-pregnant patients with lymphoma. An overarching goal in most PAL cases should be to plan for delivery at term (i.e., gestational age > 37 weeks). For supportive care, most antiemetics, including agents such as neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists, have been used safely during pregnancy. For prevention or treatment of infections, particular antibiotics (i.e., macrolides, cephalosporins, penicillins, metronidazole), antivirals (i.e., acyclovir, valacyclovir, famciclovir), and antifungals (amphotericin B) have demonstrated safety and with use of growth factors reserved for treatment of neutropenia (vs. primary prophylaxis). Therapy for PAL should be individualized with goals of care that balance maternal and fetal well-being, which should include a multidisciplinary care team and overall intent for term delivery in most cases.

Maternal ABVD chemotherapy for Hodgkin lymphoma in a dichorionic diamniotic pregnancy: a case report

Background

Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is the most common hematological malignancy during pregnancy. The first-line treatment for HL in pregnancy is the standard ABVD regimen without any drug and/or dose adjustment. However, data on chemotherapy during twin pregnancies are sparse, and a better understanding of the mechanisms involved in exposure to and the toxic effects of anticancer drugs in the fetuses is needed.

Case presentation

A 41-year-old dichorionic diamniotic pregnant patient was given ABVD treatment for HL at a gestational age of 28 weeks and 3 days. The patient received 2 cycles of chemotherapy with a 15-day therapeutic window including an actual 25 mg/m² dose of doxorubicin per cycle. Unlike the female twin, the male twin presented four days after birth a left cardiac dysfunction. Doxorubicin cardiotoxicity in the male newborn was also supported by high blood levels of troponin. At one month of age, echocardiography findings were normal. We investigated literature data on physiological aspects of pregnancy that may influence doxorubicin pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic data on the use of doxorubicin in pregnancy. We detailed the role of the transporters in doxorubicin placenta distribution, and tried to understand why only one fetus was affected.

Conclusions

Fetal safety depends at least on maternal doxorubicin pharmacokinetics.Because of drug interactions (i.e. drug metabolism and drug transport), care should always be taken to avoid maternal pharmacokinetic variability. The toxic effects were discrepant between the dizygotic twins, suggesting additional fetus-specific pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic factors in doxorubicin toxicity.

Cancer in Pregnancy

Cancer in pregnancy may be increasing in incidence with advancing maternal age and higher rates of obesity. The diagnosis of cancer in pregnancy provokes complex management issues balancing short- and long-term risks for both mother and baby. Every case needs to be individualized, with a multidisciplinary team of midwives, obstetricians, oncologists, surgeons, radiation oncologists, and neonatologists assisting the family to make informed decisions regarding the best treatment course for the mother and baby. The present article reviews the evidence regarding the safety of diagnostic imaging, procedures and treatment modalities for cancer for the pregnant woman and fetus. The efficacy of novel anticancer therapies highlight the need for International Registries to accumulate safety data for these agents in pregnancy as expeditiously as possible.

Current treatment of lymphoma in pregnancy

Introduction: Lymphoproliferative diseases occurring during pregnancy present the treating physician with unique diagnostic and therapeutic challenges, aiming to achieve maternal cure without impairing fetal health, growth, and survival. Due to the rarity of this complication, there is limited data to guide clinical decision-making, especially regarding the safety of novel emerging therapies. Areas covered: The presented review describes the current practice of treatment for Hodgkin's (HL) and non-Hodgkin's (NHL) lymphoma in the pregnant patient, according to disease stage and trimester of pregnancy. Novel agents for treatment of lymphoma in the setting of pregnancy are discussed. Therapeutic dilemmas and areas of uncertainty are illuminated. Expert opinion: HL and NHL are potentially curable diseases in the pregnant patient with generally good outcomes for the mother and the offspring, when tailoring the treatment according to the individual patient. The complexity of the situation merits shared decision-making with the patient and her family, explicitly outlining the risks and benefits. The pregnant patient is best managed by a multidisciplinary team, familiar with the intricacies of the gestational period, and providing the necessary support and sensitivity. Further studies are needed regarding the safety of novel agents in pregnancy.

Management of cancer during pregnancy and current evidence of obstetric, neonatal and pediatric outcome: a review article

The diagnosis of cancer during pregnancy imposes a medical-ethical dilemma in weighing the risks of both mother and child. Increasing awareness of the feasibility of chemotherapy during pregnancy results in more pregnant patients receiving treatment for cancer. Information on obstetric and pediatric outcome of these high-risk pregnancies is greatly needed to guide physicians in patient counseling. In this review we present reported evidence for the incidence, diagnostic options, therapeutic management, obstetric risks, and neonatal outcome when cancer treatment is initiated during pregnancy. Decision-making when a cancer is diagnosed in a pregnant patient should be multidisciplinary, always taking the patient's perspective into account. Cancer treatment during pregnancy is associated with low birth weight and preterm delivery, therefore frequent obstetric follow-up during oncological treatment in a specialized center is mandatory. Short-term clinical, cardiac, and cognitive outcome of children pre-natally exposed to cancer treatment is overall reassuring. Long-term follow-up of children is warranted to define the possible effect of pre-natal cancer treatment on general health, fertility outcome, and the risk of secondary cancers.

Dyspnea in Pregnancy: A Case Report of a Third Trimester Mediastinal Mass in Pregnancy

BACKGROUND Dyspnea in pregnancy is common and attributable to a variety of etiologies including normal physiology. The obstetric provider is challenged with distinguishing between physiologic versus pathologic dyspnea. CASE REPORT A 31-year-old G2 P1001 female at 34 weeks gestation presented with dyspnea, tachycardia, and inability to lie supine. Imaging revealed a large heterogeneous anterior mediastinal mass (14.8×11.5 cm). Multidisciplinary coordinated care led to diagnosis of B cell lymphoma, delivery via cesarean section under regional anesthesia in steep Trendelenberg position, followed by chemotherapy postpartum. CONCLUSIONS Dyspnea in pregnancy is common but might represent underlying pathology. While an obstetrician is knowledgeable of physiologic pregnancy changes, he or she should remain vigilant for underlying pathologic causes of dyspnea, including malignancy. Anterior mediastinal masses propose unique anesthetic challenges including respiratory impairment and cardiopulmonary collapse requiring collaborative care and planning.