Differences in ex-vivo Chemosensitivity to Anthracyclines in First Line Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Ex Vivo Chemosensitivity Profiling of Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Its Correlation With Clinical Response and Outcome to Chemotherapy

We evaluated the predictive value of the ex-vivo PharmaFlow PM platform in measuring the pharmacological activity of drug combinations consisting of 20 different chemotherapy regimens (20 Tx) administered in 104 acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. The predicted sensitivities of alternative treatments for each patient were ranked in five 20% categories, from resistant to sensitive (Groups 1–5). The complete remission (CR) rates of the five groups were 0%, 12.5%, 38.5%, 50.0%, and 81.3%, respectively. The heat map showed a good relationship between drug sensitivity with CR (Group 4 + 5 vs. Group 1 + 2+3: 77.5% vs. 27.3%, p = 0.002) and the European Leukemia Net risk group (22.6% vs. 63.6%, p = 0.015). The predicted coincidence rate was 90.9% in Group 1 + 2 and 81.3% in Group 5. According to the recommendations of the PharmaFlow PM platform, the CR rate would have increased by about 16.3% in one cycle. The overall survival (OS) was shorter in patients predicted to be resistant (Group 1 + 2 vs. Group 3 + 4+5, p = 0.086). In multivariable analysis, CR after one cycle was an independent prognostic factor for OS [p = 0.001; 95% CI 0.202 (0.080–0.511)], and ex-vivo chemosensitivity was a potential predictive factor for OS [p = 0.078; 95% CI 0.696 (0.465–1.041)]. To conclude, the PharmaFlow PM platform is a rapid and valuable tool for predicting clinical response and outcomes in AML patients.

Precision medicine in acute myeloid leukemia: where are we now and what does the future hold?

INTRODUCTION

Precision medicine has revolutionized the diagnostic and therapeutic management of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), from standardized schemes based on chemotherapy to tailored approaches according to molecular and genetic profile and targeted therapy.

AREAS COVERED

The main topics of precision medicine in AML were reviewed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register databases, and future directions in this therapeutic area were addressed. This review included targeted therapies, drug-sensitivity tests and predictive biomarkers, and genetic studies employing pharmacogenetic and deep sequencing strategies.

EXPERT OPINION

Precision medicine has opened the door to personalized therapy for specific AML patient populations with promising results. Several targeted therapies have been approved or are being tested for specific mutations (i.e. FLT3, IDH, BCL-2, TP53), obtaining improvements in clinical outcomes and less toxicity as compared with intensive treatment, allowing potential combination therapy. Ongoing trials and real data will establish the role of these molecules in monotherapy or combined in different AML settings (front-line, relapsed/refractory, or post-transplant). Experience in drug-sensitivity predictors and pharmacogenetic biomarkers is encouraging and could be useful tools in the next years, but we need a better understanding of AML biology and pathogenesis as well as confirmatory studies to demonstrate the utility in clinical practice.