CMV Management with Specific Immunoglobulins: A Multicentric Retrospective Analysis on 92 Allotransplanted Patients

Application of CMV-IVIg as prophylaxis against cytomegalovirus reactivation in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation patients

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation remains one of the major and life-threatening complications after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Yet, there is still a lack of safe and effective ways to prevent CMV reactivation in allo-HSCT patients. Here, we retrospectively analyzed a cohort of patients who underwent HSCT at our transplant center between 2018 and 2022 to evaluate the efficacy of prophylactic CMV-specific intravenous immunoglobulin (CMV-IVIg) against CMV reactivation. After Propensity Score Matching, the CMV reactivation rate was significantly decreased in the CMV-IVIg group (HR, 2.952; 95% CI,1.492-5.841; P = .002) compared with the control group. Additionally, the time duration of CMV reactivation (P = .001) and bacterial infection rate (P = .013) were significantly lower in the CMV-IVIg group. Moreover, prophylactic CMV-IVIg was more effective in CMV seropositive patients who received ATG as part of GVHD prevention (HR, 8.225; 95% CI,1.809-37.39; P = .006). In conclusion, CMV-IVIg is considered an effective and safe way to prevent CMV reactivation in HSCT recipients, which may be related to the acceleration of immune reconstitution in the early stage after transplantation.

Role of Preemptive Cytomegalovirus Hyperimmunoglobulin in Cytomegalovirus Viremia Following Stem Cell Transplant: An Integrative Review

Introduction

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in stem cell transplant (SCT) patients. Cytomegalovirus hyperimmunoglobulin (CMV-HIG) therapy has been described in the solid organ transplant setting. However, no review has focused on preemptive use of intravenous CMV immunoglobulins in the SCT setting. This review aims to consolidate findings regarding the preemptive use of CMV-HIG for CMV viremia in SCT patients.

Methods

PubMed and Scopus were searched using specific search criteria for publications from 2011 to 2021. Search terms were: cytomegalovirus, CMV, immunoglobulins, immunoglobulin, IVIG, CMVIG, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and stem cell. Included studies discussed stem cell transplantation, immunoglobulins, and cytomegalovirus. 366 articles were identified from the search. Five articles met the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Results

Preemptive CMV-HIG resulted in an overall response in 65% to 100% of patients with a clearance time of 14 to 21 days. Early use of CMV-HIG may shorten clearance time. No treatment-related mortality or serious adverse events were associated.

Conclusion

CMV-HIG is an effective treatment option in SCT patients that is as safe as antivirals alone. Preemptive CMV-HIG with antivirals may provide the added advantage of reduced time to viremia clearance without adding renal injury. Larger, prospective studies are needed to evaluate CMV-HIG's impact on time to viremia clearance and the effectiveness of preemptive CMV-HIG use with antivirals.

A successfully cured case of cytomegalovirus multiple organ infection after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A case report

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is one of the most common infectious complications following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT); however, cases involving multiple organs at the same time are rare. The present study describes a case of CMV pneumonia combined with CMV DNAemia and CMV cystitis after HSCT. A 33-year-old male patient with acute myeloid leukemia was treated with HSCT. The first month after HSCT, the patient developed a cough and shortness of breath. At 2 months post-HSCT, the patient developed hematuria. The CMV DNA levels in the blood and urine were elevated; bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) was also positive for CMV DNA. Heterotypic cells exhibiting a large nuclear morphology were observed in the BALF and bronchial brushes. Recurrent and progressive ground-glass opacities were evident on chest computed tomography. The patient was diagnosed with CMV pneumonia complicated by CMV DNAemia and CMV cystitis, and was treated with a combination of ganciclovir and foscarnet, along with immunoglobulin therapy. The patient was cured and discharged. It was determined that the CMV DNA in the blood was inconsistent with that in the BALF, which delayed the early diagnosis of CMV pneumonia. The association between T-cell immune function and the therapeutic efficacy for CMV multi-organ infection following HSCT is known to be significant. Moreover, the timely administration of ganciclovir and foscarnet in combination with immunoglobulin therapy demonstrated favorable clinical outcomes.

CMV hyperimmune globulin as salvage therapy for recurrent or refractory CMV infection in children undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a major cause of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT)-related morbidity and mortality. Treatment failure continues to be a major issue in patients with CMV infection due to both drug resistance and intolerance. This single-center brief retrospective analysis of a case series aims to investigate the safety and efficacy of CMV-hyperimmune globulin as salvage therapy for CMV infection in children undergoing HSCT. Fifteen pediatric patients received human CMV-specific immunoglobulin (CMVIG) between July 2018 and December 2021 as a salvage therapy for refractory or recurrent CMV infection. At the time of CMVIG prescription, eight children presented with recurrent CMV infection and seven with refractory CMV infection. The overall response rate was 67% at 50 days from the CMVIG administration [95% confidence interval (CI): 44-88]. Overall survival (OS) from CMVIG administration at 100 days was 87% (95% CI: 56-96), and OS from HSCT at 1 year was 80% (95% CI: 50-93). Four patients died, three unrelated to CMV infection and one due to CMV pneumonia. CMVIG as salvage therapy was well tolerated, and no infusion-related adverse events were observed.

Efficacy of Cytomegalovirus Specific Immunoglobulins to Reduce CMV Reactivation in Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a serious complication of pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). To date, antiviral therapy has been the mainstay of prophylaxis, with conflicting results regarding the benefits of CMV-specific immunoglobulins (CMV-Ig). After introducing prophylactic CMV-Ig to HSCT recipients at risk (seropositive recipient and/or donor), we conducted a single-center retrospective study comparing the incidence and severity of CMV infection with and without CMV-Ig. We identified 49 'at risk' recipients from 76 consecutive HSCTs over 3.5 years, in addition to standard antiviral prophylaxis, 10 patients received CMV-Ig and 39 did not. There was no significant difference in donor type, cell source, conditioning, or CMV status between the groups. We observed a potential trend toward reduction of incidence of CMV reactivation in patients exposed to CMV-Ig (30%) compared with those who weren't (38.4%). Besides, no symptomatic or lethal infection was observed in the CMV-Ig group, and time to recovery seemed shorter (21 [±7] vs 51.4 [±55] days) and peak titers lower (4578 [±4788] vs 24131 [±49257]) with CMV-Ig. No adverse events were noted. The statistical significance of the results was limited by the small sample size. These data raise interest in prophylactic CMV-Ig as a safe way of potentially reducing the severity and duration of CMV reactivation in HSCT.

Diagnosis and treatment for the early stage of cytomegalovirus infection during hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection remains a frequent complication after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and causes significant morbidity and mortality in transplantation recipients. In this review, we highlight the role of major risk factors that are associated with the incidence of CMV infection. Advances in immunosurveillance may predict CMV infection, allowing early interventions to prevent severe infection. Furthermore, numerous therapeutic strategies against CMV infection after HSCT are summarized. A comprehensive understanding of the current situation of CMV treatment may provide a hint for clinical practice and even promote the development of novel strategies for precision medicine.

Effectiveness of Prophylactic Human Cytomegalovirus Hyperimmunoglobulin in Preventing Cytomegalovirus Infection following Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a common infection occurring in patients undergoing solid organ transplantation (SOT) or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). CMV-specific hyperimmunoglobulin (CMVIG) has been used for the past four decades and is typically administered either prophylactically or pre-emptively. The present meta-analysis evaluated CMV infection rates in SOT patients who received prophylactic CMVIG. PubMed and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies published up to October 2021. The primary endpoint was CMV infection rate. Thirty-two SOT studies were identified (n = 1521 CMVIG-treated and n = 1196 controls). Prophylactic CMVIG treatment was often associated with a lower risk of CMV infection in transplant recipients. The average CMV infection rate was 35.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 33.4−38.2%) in patients treated prophylactically with CMVIG and 41.4% (95% CI: 38.6−44.2%) in the control group not receiving CMVIG (p = 0.003). Similar results were observed in analyses limited to publications evaluating currently available CMVIG products (Cytotect CP and Cytogam; p < 0.001). In combination with the established safety profile for CMVIG, these results suggest that prophylactic CMVIG treatment in patients undergoing solid organ transplantation may be beneficial, particularly in those at high risk of CMV infection or disease.

Human cytomegalovirus infection: A considerable issue following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is an opportunistic virus, whereby recipients are most susceptible following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). With the development of novel immunosuppressive agents and antiviral drugs, accompanied with the widespread application of prophylaxis and preemptive treatment, significant developments have been made in transplant recipients with human (H)CMV infection. However, HCMV remains an important cause of short- and long-term morbidity and mortality in transplant recipients. The present review summarizes the molecular mechanism and risk factors of HCMV reactivation following allo-HSCT, the diagnosis of CMV infection following allo-HSCT, prophylaxis and treatment of HCMV infection, and future perspectives. All relevant literature were retrieved from PubMed and have been reviewed.

Cytomegalovirus reactivation after hematopoietic stem cell transplant with CMV-IG prophylaxis: A monocentric retrospective analysis

Human cytomegalovirus (CMV) represents the most common viral infection after hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), mainly occurring as reactivation from latency in seropositive patients, with a different prevalence based on the extent and timing of seroconversion in a specific population. Here, we retrospectively analyzed a cohort of patients who underwent HSCT at our Institution between 2013 and 2018, all of whom were prophylactically treated with CMV-IG (Megalotect Biotest®), to define the incidence and clinical outcomes of CMV reactivation and clinically significant infection. CMV infection occurred in 69% of our patient series, mainly resulting from reactivation, and CMV clinically significant infection (CS-CMVi) occurred in 48% of prophylactically treated patients. CMV infection and CS-CMVi impacted neither on relapse incidence nor on overall survival nor on relapse-free survival. Moreover, a very low incidence of CMV end-organ disease was documented. CMV-IG used alone as prophylactic therapy after HSCT does not effectively prevent CMV reactivation.

CMV retinitis in a stem cell transplant recipient treated with foscarnet intravitreal injection and CMV specific immunoglobulins

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis (CMVR) has been reported rarely in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). In addition, little is known about strategies for ophthalmic surveillance and adequate antiviral treatment of CMVR. A case of CMVR in an allogeneic HSCT recipient is described, including clinical signs and therapy. An adult patient received HSCT from a matched unrelated donor for treatment of a Burkitt lymphoma. Donor and recipients were both CMV positive. Starting on day +40, the patient presented multiple CMV reactivation, treated with valganciclovir, foscarnet and a combination of both. On day +160, the patient started complaining of conjunctival hyperaemia and a decrease in visual acuity. Fundoscopy revealed retinal lesions consistent with CMVR, although whole blood CMV DNAemia was negative. Aqueous humor biopsy showed the presence of CMV infection (CMV DNA 230400 UI/ml). CMVR was treated with foscarnet (180 mg i.v. and 1.2 mg intravitreal injection) combined with anti CMV immunoglobulin at 0.5 ml/kg every 2 weeks. After 4 weeks of systemic therapy, 20 weekly doses of intravitreal foscarnet and six cycles of immunoglobulins, a significant improvement of visual acuity was observed. The treatment was well tolerated with no side effect. In conclusion, our case suggests that systemic and local antiviral treatment combined with CMV-specific-IVIG, may reduce CMV load in the eye of patients with CMVR, leading to a consistent improvement of visual acuity. Systematic ophthalmologic examination should be recommended in HSCT recipients with multiple CMV reactivations and high peak CMV DNA levels.

Advances in CMV Management: A Single Center Real-Life Experience

CMV infection is a major challenge in allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). The changing landscape in CMV management includes the introduction of letermovir in prophylaxis of high-risk patients and the source of CMV DNA monitoring (plasma—PL vs. whole blood—WB), for pre-emptive therapy (PET) initiation. We report here how our real-life experience in CMV management evolved, following letermovir registration. We focus on: (i) the effects of systematic use of letermovir for CMV prophylaxis in high-risk patients, (ii) the results of a longitudinal comparison of CMV DNAemia monitoring in PL and WB. From December 2018 to April 2020, 60 allo-SCTs have been performed in our center (LET ERA), of whom 45 received letermovir in prophylaxis from day 0 to day + 100, because of recipient positivity of anti CMV IgG. These patients were compared with a cohort of 41 allo-SCTs performed between November 2017 and November 2018 (NO LET ERA). Firstly, the incidence of CMV clinically significant infections, CMV disease, bacterial infections, proven/probable fungal infections, hospital re-admissions after allo-SCT by day + 100 in the two ERA were 8 vs. 44% (p = 0.0006), 2 vs. 12% (p = 0.02), 37 vs. 56% (p = 0.05), 8 vs. 19% (p = 0.09), and 23 vs. 39% (p = 0.09), respectively. By day + 180 these differences were 17 vs. 68% (p < 0.00001), 2 vs. 12% (p = 0.02), 45 vs. 78% (p = 0.09), 8 vs. 22% (p = 0.05), and 40 vs. 66% (p = 0.01), respectively. Secondly, from February to May 2019, we comparatively measured CMV DNA from WB and PL and we confirmed that there is a linear correlation between CMV DNA level in WB and PL (Spearman’s test r = 0.86). Moreover, CMV DNAemia at the time of PET in the 12 patients with a clinically significant CMV infection was higher in WB vs. PL (5.202 vs. 4.981 copies/ml, p = 0.1). Our real-life experience confirms that: (i) letermovir is highly effective, leading to a significant drop in CMV clinically significant infections and CMV-related complications by day + 100 and + 180 after allo-SCT; (ii) WB may be an effective alternative to PL as a source for CMV DNA monitoring, as a linear correlation of DNAemia was confirmed between WB and PL, even if the CMV DNAemia at PET initiation was comparable in the two sources.