Shoulder Coordination During Full-Can and Empty-Can Rehabilitation Exercises

Shoulder muscle activation during scapular protraction exercise with arm rotation

BACKGROUND

The role of the serratus anterior is to maintain scapular stability. To strengthen this muscle, scapular protraction exercises are typically performed. Although the angle of arm rotation leads to changes in shoulder muscle activation, the arm rotation position is not normally determined.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate if scapular muscle activations were changed by combining arm external rotation during scapular protraction exercises.

METHODS

Thirty-four healthy men were enrolled in this study. Participants were instructed to perform scapular protraction exercises at 90∘ and 120∘ of shoulder flexion while in the standing and supine positions. Two different arm rotation angles were used: the thumb-up position (neutral position) and the maximum arm external rotation (ER) position. The percentages of maximum voluntary contractions (%MVCs) were measured, and %MVCs in the neutral and arm ER positions were compared.

RESULTS

Muscle activities of the middle serratus anterior (MSA) and lower serratus anterior (LSA) in the arm ER position were significantly higher than those in the neutral position during all tasks. The highest MSA and LSA positions were observed with the arm ER position of 120∘ while standing.

CONCLUSIONS

Scapular protraction exercises with arm ER resulted in a higher serratus anterior activity.

Comparative study of the differences in shoulder muscle activation according to arm rotation angle

BACKGROUND

Scapular muscle exercise is important for patients with shoulder disorders. Distal variance leads to changes in shoulder muscle activation. Here, we aimed to determine whether scapular muscle activation is affected by different arm rotation angles.

METHODS

Overall, 30 healthy men participated in this study. The subjects were asked to keep their arms at 120 degrees of shoulder flexion while holding a 1.0-kg dumbbell in palms down (pronation) and palms up (supination) positions. Electromyography was used to measure anterior, middle, posterior deltoid, serratus anterior, upper, and lower trapezius muscle activation during the task. The muscle activations of each shoulder were compared between the pronation and supination positions.

RESULTS

Anterior deltoid and serratus anterior activations were significantly higher in supination than in pronation (p < .05). Alternatively, posterior deltoid and lower trapezius muscles were significantly more activated in pronation than in supination (p < .05).

CONCLUSION

Scapular muscle activation changed with arm rotation angle. Arm rotation angle should be assessed to estimate scapular muscle activation during exercise and motion analysis in clinical practice.

Accuracy and repeatability of single-pose calibration of inertial measurement units for whole-body motion analysis

Portable inertial measurement units (IMUs) are suitable for motion analysis outside the laboratory. However, IMUs depend on the calibration of each body segment to measure human movement. Different calibration approaches have been developed for simplicity of use or similarity to laboratory motion analysis, but they have not been extensively examined. The main objective of the study was to determine the accuracy and repeatability of two common single-pose calibrations (N-pose and T-pose) under different conditions of placement (self-placement and passive placement), as well as their similarity to laboratory analysis based on anatomical landmarks. A further aim of the study was to develop two additional single-pose calibrations (chair-pose and stool-pose) and determine their accuracy and repeatability. Postures and movements of 12 healthy participants were recorded simultaneously with a full-body IMU suit and an optoelectronic system as the criterion measure. Three repetitions of the T-pose and the N-pose were executed by self-placement and passive placement, and three repetitions of the chair-pose and stool-pose were also performed. Repeatability for each single-pose calibration showed an average intraclass correlation coefficient for all axes and joints between 0.90 and 0.94 and a standard error of measurement between 1.5° and 2.1°. The T-pose with passive placement is recommended to reduce longitudinal axis offset error and to increase similarity to laboratory motion analysis. Finally, the chair-pose obtained the least longitudinal axis offset error amongst the tested poses, which shows potential for IMU calibration.

Scapulohumeral rhythm relative to active range of motion in patients with symptomatic rotator cuff tears

BACKGROUND

Some patients with rotator cuff tears feel pain without functional limitation, whereas others show a decrease in range of motion. To investigate this distinction, the scapulohumeral rhythm was used to conduct a functional evaluation of shoulder joints' coordination. The objective was to characterize patients according to their active range of motion without pain and their scapulohumeral rhythm compared with healthy individuals.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fourteen patients with rotator cuff tears and 14 healthy individuals were set up with 35 reflective markers on the trunk and upper limb tracked by an optoelectronic system to measure the scapulohumeral rhythm. Five scapular plane maximal arm elevations were executed without pain. Patients were separated by maximal arm elevation of 85° (category A) and 40° (category B). Three-way mixed-design analysis of variance with factors of group (patients and healthy), arm elevation, and motion direction was applied to the scapulohumeral rhythm.

RESULTS

A main effect of group (P = .032) was observed in patients in category A, who showed inferior scapulohumeral rhythm. An interaction between group and arm elevation (P = .044) was observed for patients in category B, where their scapulohumeral rhythm increased more during arm elevation than in the healthy individuals.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who reached at least 85° compensated for the loss of glenohumeral motion by increased scapulothoracic contribution, suggesting that structural damage interferes with motion mechanics. In contrast, patients who reached less range of motion underused the scapulothoracic joint, which is likely to create subacromial impingement at low arm elevation. A patient's maximal range of motion without pain may indicate a pattern of scapulohumeral rhythm alteration.

3D shoulder kinematics for static vs dynamic and passive vs active testing conditions

Shoulder motion analysis provides clinicians with references of normal joint rotations. Shoulder joints orientations assessment is often based on series of static positions, while clinicians perform either passive or active tests and exercises mostly in dynamic. These conditions of motion could modify joint coordination and lead to discrepancies with the established references. Hence, the objective was to evaluate the influence of static vs dynamic and passive vs active testing conditions on shoulder joints orientations. Twenty asymptomatic subjects setup with 45 markers on the upper limb and trunk were tracked by an optoelectronic system. Static positions (30°, 60°, 90° and 120° of thoracohumeral elevation) and dynamic motion both in active condition and passively mobilised by an examiner were executed. Three-dimensional sternoclavicular, acromioclavicular, scapulothoracic and glenohumeral joint angles (12 in total) representing the distal segment orientation relative to the proximal segment orientation were estimated using a shoulder kinematical chain model. Separate four-way repeated measures ANOVA were applied on the 12 joint angles with factors of static vs dynamic, passive vs active, thoracohumeral elevation angle (30°, 60°, 90° and 120°) and plane of elevation (frontal and sagittal). Scapulothoracic lateral rotation progressed more during arm elevation in static than in dynamic gaining 4.2° more, and also in passive than in active by 6.6°. Glenohumeral elevation increased more during arm elevation in active than in passive by 4.4°. Shoulder joints orientations are affected by the testing conditions, which should be taken into consideration for data acquisition, inter-study comparison or clinical applications.