Paroxetine in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Pilot Open-Label Study

Metabolic kinetics of 5-hydroxytryptamine and the research targets of functional gastrointestinal disorders

5-Hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) is an important neurotransmitter in both the central and enteric nervous systems. It has diverse functions in regulating gastrointestinal motility and visceral sensitivity, emotion, appetite, pain and sensory perception, cognition, sexual activity and sleep. These functions are mainly associated with the metabolic kinetics of 5-HT in different tissues. Tryptophan hydroxylase is the rate-limiting enzyme and modulates serotonin synthesis. Vesicular monoamine transporter 1 plays a role in 5-HT storage and release. Degradation of 5-HT is mediated by monoamine oxidase-A. All these factors influence the action of 5-HT in vivo. Functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs) are characterized by a series of symptoms including abdominal pain, diarrhea, constipation, anxiety and depression, in the absence of identifiable structural or biochemical abnormalities. They are frequently accompanied by changed gut motility or visceral sensitivity. An increasing body of research has found FGIDs to be closely associated with 5-HT, and drugs such as citalopram, paroxetine, venlafaxine, alosetron, tegaserod, prucalopride and mosapride have all been developed or discovered from the perspective of the metabolic kinetics of 5-HT. This review discusses the relationship between the metabolic kinetics of 5-HT and research targets in the field of FGIDs and suggests areas of future study that may be useful for understanding these disorders and identification of potential therapeutic targets.

Bulking agents, antispasmodics and antidepressants for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome

BACKGROUND

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common chronic gastrointestinal disorder. The role of pharmacotherapy for IBS is limited and focused mainly on symptom control.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy of bulking agents, antispasmodics and antidepressants for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Computer assisted structured searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane library, CINAHL and PsychInfo were conducted for the years 1966-2009. An updated search in April 2011 identified 10 studies which will be considered for inclusion in a future update of this review.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials comparing bulking agents, antispasmodics or antidepressants with a placebo treatment in patients with irritable bowel syndrome aged over 12 years were considered for inclusion. Only studies published as full papers were included. Studies were not excluded on the basis of language. The primary outcome had to include improvement of abdominal pain, global assessment or symptom score.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently extracted data from the selected studies. Risk Ratios (RR) and Standardized Mean Differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. A proof of practice analysis was conducted including sub-group analyses for different types of  bulking agents, spasmolytic agents or antidepressant medication. This was followed by a proof of principle analysis where only the studies with adequate allocation concealment were included.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 56 studies (3725 patients) were included in this review. These included 12 studies of bulking agents (621 patients), 29 of antispasmodics (2333 patients), and 15 of antidepressants (922 patients). The risk of bias was low for most items. However, selection bias is unclear for many of the included studies because the methods used for randomization and allocation concealment were not described. No beneficial effect for bulking agents over placebo was found for improvement of abdominal pain (4 studies; 186 patients; SMD 0.03; 95% CI -0.34 to 0.40; P = 0.87), global assessment (11 studies; 565 patients; RR 1.10; 95% CI 0.91 to 1.33; P = 0.32) or symptom score (3 studies; 126 patients SMD -0.00; 95% CI -0.43 to 0.43; P = 1.00). Subgroup analyses for insoluble and soluble fibres also showed no statistically significant benefit. Separate analysis of the studies with adequate concealment of allocation did not change these results. There was a beneficial effect for antispasmodics over placebo for improvement of abdominal pain (58% of antispasmodic patients improved compared to 46% of placebo; 13 studies; 1392 patients; RR 1.32; 95% CI 1.12 to 1.55; P < 0.001; NNT = 7), global assessment (57% of antispasmodic patients improved compared to 39% of placebo; 22 studies; 1983 patients; RR 1.49; 95% CI 1.25 to 1.77; P < 0.0001; NNT = 5) and symptom score (37% of antispasmodic patients improved compared to 22% of placebo; 4 studies; 586 patients; RR 1.86; 95% CI 1.26 to 2.76; P < 0.01; NNT = 3). Subgroup analyses for different types of antispasmodics found statistically significant benefits for cimteropium/ dicyclomine, peppermint oil, pinaverium and trimebutine. Separate analysis of the studies with adequate allocation concealment found a significant benefit for improvement of abdominal pain. There was a beneficial effect for antidepressants over placebo for improvement of abdominal pain (54% of antidepressants patients improved compared to 37% of placebo; 8 studies; 517 patients; RR 1.49; 95% CI 1.05 to 2.12; P = 0.03; NNT = 5), global assessment (59% of antidepressants patients improved compared to 39% of placebo; 11 studies; 750 patients; RR 1.57; 95% CI 1.23 to 2.00; P < 0.001; NNT = 4) and symptom score (53% of antidepressants patients improved compared to 26% of placebo; 3 studies; 159 patients; RR 1.99; 95% CI 1.32 to 2.99; P = 0.001; NNT = 4). Subgroup analyses showed a statistically significant benefit for selective serotonin releasing inhibitors (SSRIs) for improvement of  global assessment and for tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) for improvement of abdominal pain and symptom score. Separate analysis of studies with adequate allocation concealment found a significant benefit for improvement of symptom score and global assessment. Adverse events were not assessed as an outcome in this review.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is no evidence that bulking agents are effective for treating IBS.  There is evidence that antispasmodics are effective for the treatment of IBS. The individual subgroups which are effective include: cimetropium/dicyclomine, peppermint oil, pinaverium and trimebutine. There is good evidence that antidepressants are effective for the treatment of IBS. The subgroup analyses for SSRIs and TCAs are unequivocal and their effectiveness may depend on the individual patient. Future research should use rigorous methodology and valid outcome measures.

The treatment of irritable bowel syndrome

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a highly prevalent functional bowel disorder routinely encountered by healthcare providers. Although not life-threatening, this chronic disorder reduces patients' quality of life and imposes a significant economic burden to the healthcare system. IBS is no longer considered a diagnosis of exclusion that can only be made after performing a battery of expensive diagnostic tests. Rather, IBS should be confidently diagnosed in the clinic at the time of the first visit using the Rome III criteria and a careful history and physical examination. Treatment options for IBS have increased in number in the past decade and clinicians should not be limited to using only fiber supplements and smooth muscle relaxants. Although all patients with IBS have symptoms of abdominal pain and disordered defecation, treatment needs to be individualized and should focus on the predominant symptom. This paper will review therapeutic options for the treatment of IBS using a tailored approach based on the predominant symptom. Abdominal pain, bloating, constipation and diarrhea are the four main symptoms that can be addressed using a combination of dietary interventions and medications. Treatment options include probiotics, antibiotics, tricyclic antidepressants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and agents that modulate chloride channels and serotonin. Each class of agent will be reviewed using the latest data from the literature.

Duloxetine in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome: an open-label pilot study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of duloxetine for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS).

METHODS

We conducted an open-label 12-week trial of duloxetine 60 mg daily in 15 patients with IBS without concurrent major depressive disorder. The primary outcome measure was average abdominal pain. Secondary measures included IBS symptoms, Clinical Global Impression-Severity, Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, IBS Quality-of-Life Scale, and Sheehan Disability Scale. We analyzed changes using random regression and one-sample t-tests.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients completed at least one post-baseline evaluation; eight completed the study. Duloxetine was associated with significant improvement (p < 0.05) in pain, severity of illness, quality of life, loose stool, work and family disability, and anxiety. However, duloxetine did not improve hard stool. Although we found no evidence of serious duloxetine toxicity, seven participants withdrew over the course of the study because of adverse drug events.

CONCLUSIONS

In this small, open-label study, duloxetine appeared to be effective for many features of IBS, but its adverse effects, most notably constipation, limited its use. Since our study excluded individuals with concurrent major depression, it appears that duloxetine may benefit IBS independently of its antidepressant effects. These encouraging but preliminary open-label findings support further investigation of duloxetine treatment in placebo-controlled trials of IBS.

Childhood abuse and treatment response in patients with irritable bowel syndrome: a post-hoc analysis of a 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of paroxetine controlled release

OBJECTIVE

Although irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is frequently comorbid with childhood trauma, information on the clinical implications of this comorbidity is limited. We investigated whether a history of abuse was associated with response to treatment in a double blind, randomized, placebo controlled trial of paroxetine controlled release (CR) in IBS.

METHODS

Seventy-two IBS subjects were randomized to receive paroxetine CR (dose 12.5-50 mg/day) or placebo for 12 weeks. Subject selection was independent of abuse history. Sixty-one subjects completed the Sexual and Physical Abuse Questionnaire about their childhood abuse history. IBS symptoms were recorded using the Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS). Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) and Clinical Global Impression (CGI) were also measured. The primary outcome was treatment response defined as > or =25% reduction in composite pain scores (CPS) on the IVRS from randomization to end of treatment.

RESULTS

The rate of abuse history was 50.8% (n = 31/61). Baseline demographic clinical characteristics (CPS, BDI, BAI, PSS, CGI scores) were not associated with abuse history. After 12 weeks of treatment, subjects with abuse history showed significantly higher CPS (t = 2.422, P = 0.018) than subjects without a history and less mean change of CPS (t = 3.506, P = 0.001). In a logistic regression analysis, history of abuse did not predict treatment response as measured by > or =25% reduction in CPS (OR = 0.481, CI = 0.164-1.406, P = 0.181), while the drug status (paroxetine CR) was significantly associated with treatment response as defined by a CGI improvement score of 1-2 (OR = 12.121, CI = 2.923-50.271, P = 0.001). Abuse history did not predict CGI-I (Fisher's exact, P = 0.500) improvements during the trial.

CONCLUSIONS

History of abuse did not appear to have any significant clinical correlates at baseline and did not predict treatment response. Further studies are needed to confirm whether SSRIs are effective in IBS patients irrespective of their abuse history.

A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of paroxetine controlled-release in irritable bowel syndrome

BACKGROUND

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a functional gastrointestinal (GI) disease that causes significant impairment in quality of life and accounts for $8 billion per year to the healthcare system and loss of productivity in the workplace.

OBJECTIVE

The authors examined the efficacy and safety of paroxetine controlled-release (paroxetine-CR) in patients with IBS.

METHOD

Seventy-two patients with IBS participated in a 12-week, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of paroxetine-CR (12.5 mg-50 mg/day). Efficacy was measured by Composite Pain Scores (primary outcome) and the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) and Severity (CGI-S) ratings.

RESULTS

In intent-to-treat analyses, there were no significant differences between paroxetine-CR (N=36) and placebo (N=36) on reduction in Composite Pain Scores, although the proportion of responders on CGI-I was significantly higher in the paroxetine-CR group. The treatment was well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

The study did not demonstrate a statistically significant benefit for paroxetine-CR over placebo on the primary outcome measure, although there was improvement in secondary outcome measures. Overall, paroxetine-CR seems to have potential benefit in IBS. Studies with adequate samples may clarify the role of paroxetine-CR in IBS.

The genetics of the serotonin transporter and irritable bowel syndrome

Serotonin transporter (SERT) mediates the intracellular reuptake of released serotonin, thus regulating its biological functions. Abnormalities in serotonin reuptake can alter enteric serotonergic signalling, leading to sensory, motor and secretory gut dysfunctions, which contribute to the pathophysiology of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). This relationship has fostered the use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in the treatment of IBS. Current data on the efficacy of SSRIs in IBS, association of the SERT gene promoter polymorphism 5-HTTLPR with IBS and the expression pattern of SERT in the intestinal mucosa of IBS patients are conflicting. Recent molecular studies have raised critical questions about multiple SERT mRNA transcripts in the human gut, the role of polymorphic SERT promoter in the regulation of enteric SERT expression and the ability of 5-HTTLPR to affect human SERT gene transcription. The present review highlights recent advances in SERT genetics, discusses their implications for potential therapeutic applications of SSRIs in IBS and presents original suggestions for future investigations.

Updates on treatment of irritable bowel syndrome

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a highly prevalent gastrointestinal disorder characterized by abdominal pain and discomfort in association with altered bowel habits. It is estimated to affect 10%-15% of the Western population, and has a large impact on quality of life and (in)direct healthcare costs. IBS is a multifactorial disorder involving dysregulation within the brain-gut axis, and it is frequently associated with gastrointestinal motor and sensory dysfunction, enteric and central nervous system irregularities, neuroimmune dysregulation, and post-infectious inflammation. As with other functional medical disorders, the treatment for IBS can be challenging. Conventional therapy for those with moderate to severe symptoms is largely unsatisfactory, and the development of new and effective drugs is made difficult by the complex pathogenesis, variety of symptoms, and lack of objective clinical findings that are the hallmark of this disorder. Fortunately, research advances over the past several decades have provided insight into potential mechanisms responsible for the pathogenesis of IBS, and have led to the development of several promising pharmaceutical agents. In recent years there has been much publicity over several of these new IBS medications (alosetron and tegaserod) because of their reported association with ischemic colitis and cardiovascular disease. While these agents remain available for use under restricted prescribing programs, this highlights the need for continued development of safe and effective medication for IBS. This article provides a physiologically-based overview of recently developed and frequently employed pharmaceutical agents used to treat IBS, and discusses some non-pharmaceutical options that may be beneficial in this disorder.

History of depressive and anxiety disorders and paroxetine response in patients with irritable bowel syndrome: post hoc analysis from a placebo-controlled study

OBJECTIVE

Although irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is highly comorbid with depressive and anxiety disorders, information on the clinical implications of this comorbidity is limited. We investigated whether a history of depressive and/or anxiety disorders was associated with response to treatment in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of paroxetine controlled release (CR) in IBS.

METHOD

Seventy-two IBS subjects (diagnosed using Rome II criteria) were recruited from August 2003 to November 2005 and randomly assigned to receive flexibly dosed paroxetine CR (dose, 12.5-50 mg/day) or placebo for 12 weeks. The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI-Plus version) was used to ascertain current (exclusionary) or past diagnoses of depressive and anxiety disorders. Subjective depression, anxiety, and stress were assessed at entry and throughout the trial using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), and Perceived Stress Scale (PSS). Severity of IBS symptoms was determined by the Composite Pain Score (CPS), administered via Interactive Voice Response System, and the Clinical Global Impressions scale (CGI). The primary outcome was treatment response defined as ≥ 25% reduction in CPS from randomization to end of treatment. A post hoc analysis (multivariate logistic regression) was done to evaluate whether a history of depressive and/or anxiety disorder was associated with response to medication.

RESULTS

Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics (CPS, BDI, BAI, PSS, CGI scores) were similar between groups (history of depressive/anxiety disorder vs. no history). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, treatment response was not predicted by history of depressive and/or anxiety disorder (OR = 0.58, CI = 0.29 to 1.68, p = .32) or drug status (paroxetine CR vs. placebo) (OR = 1.26, CI = 0.68 to 3.21, p = .19). Drug status was significantly associated with the secondary outcome variable of treatment response as defined by a CGI improvement score of 1 to 2 (OR = 12.14, CI = 2.9 to 48.4, p < .001). Paroxetine CR was safe and well tolerated during the study.

CONCLUSIONS

History of depressive and/or anxiety disorder was not associated with response of IBS symptoms to paroxetine CR. Conclusions are limited due to insufficient statistical power. Further research is needed to clarify the role of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in the treatment of IBS and to elucidate the treatment ramifications of comorbid psychiatric disorders.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00610909.

Irritable bowel syndrome in psychiatric perspectives: a comprehensive review

We comprehensively reviewed the irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) in terms of pathogenesis, psychiatric implications, general management and appropriate role of antidepressants, in particular selective serotonin uptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in the treatment of IBS. English language papers cited in MEDLINE and PychInfo from January 2000 to July 2006 were searched with a combination of the following key words: irritable bowel syndrome, 5-HT, pathogenesis, comorbid, psychiatry, treatment, psychotropic drugs, antidepressant, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (fluoxetine, paroxetine, sertraline, fluvoxamine, citalopram and sertraline), tricyclic antidepressants, review, meta-analysis and placebo. The papers on IBS describing the clinical features, pathophysiology, evaluation, management, and clinical trials [randomised placebo-controlled trial (RCT), open-label study or case report] were selected for this review. Further literatures were also detected from references of the identified papers. The epidemiology, diagnostic criteria, pathophysiology, general management, bidirectional comorbidity, summary of currently available RCTs and open-label studies investigating antidepressant efficacy (focusing on SSRIs), and suggestions for SSRI use in IBS were relevantly synthesised based on through review of identified data. This article summarised an up-to-date clinical overview of IBS in psychiatric perspectives as well as to position a current role of SSRIs in the treatment of IBS. From this review, the routine use of SSRIs for IBS treatment cannot be conclusive due to a paucity of RCTs, although a handful of RCTs suggested a potentially beneficial effect of SSRIs over placebo.

The serotonin signaling system: from basic understanding to drug development for functional GI disorders

Serotonin is an important gastrointestinal signaling molecule. It is a paracrine messenger utilized by enterochromaffin (EC) cells, which function as sensory transducers. Serotonin activates intrinsic and extrinsic primary afferent neurons to, respectively, initiate peristaltic and secretory reflexes and to transmit information to the central nervous system. Serotonin is also a neurotransmitter utilized by a system of long descending myenteric interneurons. Serotonin is synthesized through the actions of 2 different tryptophan hydroxylases, TpH1 and TpH2, which are found, respectively, in EC cells and neurons. Serotonin is inactivated by the serotonin reuptake transporter (SERT)-mediated uptake into enterocytes or neurons. The presence of many serotonin receptor subtypes enables selective drugs to be designed to therapeutically modulate gastrointestinal motility, secretion, and sensation. Current examples include tegaserod, a 5-HT(4) partial agonist, which has been approved for treatment of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) with constipation in women and for chronic constipation in men and women. The 5-HT(3) antagonists, granisetron and ondansetron, are useful in combating the nausea associated with cancer chemotherapy, and alosetron is employed in the treatment of IBS with diarrhea. Serotonergic signaling abnormalities have also been putatively implicated in the pathogenesis of functional bowel diseases. Other compounds, for which efficacy has not been rigorously established, but which may have value, include tricyclic antidepressants and serotonin selective reuptake inhibitors to combat IBS, and 5-HT(1) agonists, which enhance gastric accommodation, to treat functional dyspepsia. The initial success encountered with serotonergic agents holds promise for newer and more potent insights and therapies of brain-gut disorders.

Treatment of Functional GI Disorders With Psychotropic Medicines: A Review of Evidence With a Practical Approach

Functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs) are complex in their physiology and clinical presentation. With no known biologic marker, investigators and clinicians use the Rome criteria to make a positive diagnosis. Psychosocial factors, although not part of these criteria, do contribute to illness presentation, severity, healthcare-seeking behavior and response to treatment. In this regard, psychoactive drugs are valuable in the management of FGIDs, particularly for patients with severe symptoms. The appropriate selection of antidepressants based on predominant symptom, side-effect profile, and psychological condition is an integral part of a successful management program.

Prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome in obsessive-compulsive disorder

INTRODUCTION

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) occurs more frequently in psychiatric patients, especially those with anxiety and mood disorders.

METHODS

We sought to determine the prevalence and phenomenology of IBS in patients diagnosed with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). A semi-structured diagnostic interview was administered to patients seeking treatment for OCD in outpatient settings. Structured questions regarding gastrointestinal functioning and IBS symptoms were administered. IBS was diagnosed by a gastroenterologist using Rome I criteria.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients (35.1%) with OCD met criteria for IBS. Of these, 53.8% had IBS with both diarrhea and constipation, 30.8% had diarrhea-predominant IBS, and 15.4% had constipation-predominant IBS. The prevalence rate of IBS in an age- and sex-matched control group (n=40) of medical patients in a family practice was 2.5%. IBS prevalence rates were significantly higher for OCD patients than control subjects (P=.0002).

CONCLUSION

IBS and psychiatric illness have high rates of bi-directional comorbidity. This study shows that 35.1% of patients with OCD satisfied criteria for IBS in contrast to 2.5% of the controlled subjects. In most patients the IBS was characterized by both diarrhea and constipation. While taking the initial history clinicians should inquire about bowel symptoms in patients presenting with psychiatric illnesses, including OCD. SSRIs could potentially worsen such symptoms and lead to non-adherence.

Paroxetine for somatic pain associated with physical illness: a review

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article is to review the prevalence of somatic pain with and without depression or anxiety and the pharmacologic effects of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor paroxetine on pain in physical conditions with and without comorbid depression or anxiety.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE and PsychLIT/PsycINFO database. Keywords included depression, anxiety, pain, somatic, antidepressants, and paroxetine. Only English-language publications and abstracts were considered.

STUDY SELECTION

More than 100 articles that reflected the prevalence of somatic pain in patients with physical illness with and without comorbid depression or anxiety and that evaluated the efficacy of antidepressants in this population were identified and reviewed.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Nearly two thirds of patients with major depressive disorder suffer from a physical illness, and about one fifth of patients with chronic physical illness are depressed. Both of these comorbidities pose diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Therapeutic effects of antidepressants on pain improvement in patients with chronic physical illnesses and comorbid depression/anxiety have been attributed to the antidepressant or anxiolytic properties of these drugs. However, tricyclic antidepressants have demonstrated analgesic properties in patients with physical illness both with and without depression. The review looks at evidence for the efficacy of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor paroxetine on pain in physical illness with and without depression and the mechanisms for the relief of pain and depression.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of paroxetine for depression and anxiety comorbid with physical illness looks promising. Studies also allude to evidence linking the analgesic properties of paroxetine with its serotonergic and noradrenergic activity. Large randomized controlled trials within specific antidepressant classes and also comparing dualaction antidepressants are warranted that could shed some light on the unique advantage of paroxetine over other antidepressants.

Irritable bowel syndrome: a syndrome in evolution

As a group, functional gastrointestinal disorders are the most common gastrointestinal disorder seen by both generalists and specialists. These disorders can be frustrating to both patients and physicians as they are usually chronic in nature and difficult to treat. These disorders are associated with frequent healthcare visits, the scheduling of multiple, expensive diagnostic tests, and the use of both over-the-counter and prescription medications. All of these factors lead to a significant economic burden to society. In addition, functional gastrointestinal disorders are associated with a reduction in quality of life for the patient. Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is the most common of the functional gastrointestinal disorders. This syndrome has been the focus of a large number of research studies over the past two decades. These studies have resulted in a number of significant changes in our definition of IBS. In addition, these research studies have produced considerable changes in our understanding of the etiology and pathogenesis of IBS. In this section, we will review some of the evolutionary changes that have occurred in IBS. We will discuss how the definition of IBS has changed, consider our evolving strategies to evaluate and diagnose IBS, and finally, provide a brief overview of treatment options for this common disorder.