10-year trends in the diagnosis and treatment of hepatitis C and concomitant mental health disorders: 1995 to 2005

Regional differences in treatment rates for patients with chronic hepatitis C infection: Systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Treatment rates with interferon-based therapies for chronic hepatitis C have been low. Our aim was to perform a systematic review of available data to estimate the rates and barriers for antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis C.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis searching MEDLINE, SCOPUS through March 2016 and abstracts from recent major liver meetings for primary literature with available hepatitis C treatment rates. Random-effects models were used to estimate effect sizes and meta-regression to test for potential sources of heterogeneity.

RESULTS

We included 39 studies with 476,443 chronic hepatitis C patients. The overall treatment rate was 25.5% (CI: 21.1-30.5%) and by region 34% for Europe, 28.3% for Asia/Pacific, and 18.7% for North America (p = 0.008). On multivariable meta-regression, practice setting (tertiary vs. population-based, p = 0.04), region (Europe vs. North America p = 0.004), and data source (clinical chart review vs. administrative database, p = 0.025) remained significant predictors of heterogeneity. The overall treatment eligibility rate was 52.5%, and 60% of these received therapy. Of the patients who refused treatment, 16.2% cited side effects, 13.8% cited cost as reasons for treatment refusal, and 30% lacked access to specialist care.

CONCLUSIONS

Only one-quarter of chronic hepatitis C patients received antiviral therapy in the pre-direct acting antiviral era. Treatment rates should improve in the new interferon-free era but, cost, co-morbidities, and lack of specialist care will likely remain and need to be addressed. Linkage to care should even be of higher priority now that well-tolerated cure is available.

Increase in nonhepatic diagnoses among persons with hepatitis C hospitalized for any cause, United States, 2004-2011

Although persons with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection may experience nonhepatic illnesses, little is known about the frequency of and trends in such conditions in a population-based sample of HCV-infected persons. Using hospitalization data collected during 2004-2011 from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, we examined trends in comorbidities among all hospitalizations that included either a principal or secondary HCV diagnostic code (i.e., HCV was not necessarily the cause for hospitalization). We also compared comorbidities among all persons aged 45-64 years hospitalized with and without principal or secondary HCV diagnostic codes. The estimated number of hospitalizations among persons with HCV infection increased from 850,490 in 2004-2005 to 1,178,633 in 2010-2011; mean age at hospitalization was 50 years in 2004-2005 and 52.5 years in 2010-2011. There were significant increases in the prevalence of most medical and psychiatric comorbidities; the largest were for lipid disorders, chronic kidney disease and obesity. Among HCV-infected aged 45-64 persons hospitalized for any cause, the prevalence of alcohol /substance abuse, mental disorders, chronic kidney disease, pneumonia, hepatitis B virus infection and HIV infection were significantly higher than those aged 45-64 persons hospitalized without HCV infection (P < 0.001 for all). The prevalence of cryoglobulinaemia, vasculitis, nephrotic syndrome or membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis and porphyria cutanea tarda among hospitalizations with HCV infection was consistently low during the study period (i.e., <0.5%). The increase we observed in nonhepatic comorbidities associated with a high risk of HCV-related complications has important implications for the current HCV treatment recommendations in a greatly expanded treatment population.

Health-related quality of life (HRQL) for individuals with self-reported chronic physical and/or mental health conditions: panel survey of an adult sample in the United States

Background

In the US, approximately 53% of adults have at least one chronic condition. Comorbid physical and mental health conditions often have an incremental negative impact on health-related quality of life (HRQL). Primary study objectives were to quantify the impact on HRQL of a) ≥ 1 physical condition , b) ≥ 1 comorbid mental health conditions added to a physical one, c) ≥ 1 mental health condition, and d) ≥ 1 comorbid physical conditions added to at least one related to mental health. Decrements were based on a “Healthy” reference group reporting no chronic conditions.

Methods

Participants were sampled (n = 3877) from the US adult population as part of a 2009 normative survey. Demographics, number/ type of chronic conditions, and HRQL data were self-reported. HRQL was defined through SF-36v2® Physical Component Summary (PCS) scores and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores. Participant “morbidity” groupings included Healthy; Physical Health Condition only, Mental Health Condition only, and Physical and Mental Health (Comorbid). PCS and MCS scores were also analyzed by physical disease clusters (e.g., cardiovascular, gastrointestinal). Multivariate regression models were used for all analyses.

Results

81% of participants were Caucasian; 9% African American. Males and females were about equally represented; 63% were ≥ 45 years old. The average number of reported chronic conditions was 2.4 (SD = 2.4). Relative to the Healthy group, the Physical Condition group scored 6.4 (males) and 7.5 (females) points lower on PCS. The addition of a comorbid mental health condition resulted in a total reduction of 11 points in PCS and 15 points in MCS. Compared to the Healthy group, ≥ 1 mental health conditions was associated with MCS decrements of 11–12 points. A physical comorbidity led to additional decrements of 3–4 points for MCS, with a total of 15 points. Incremental HRQL burden defined by both MCS and PCS scores was relatively similar across the 5 defined physical disease clusters.

Conclusion

Results provide quantitative information for US adults on specific PCS and MCS score decrements associated with a comorbid condition related to mental health, as well as a comorbid condition related to physical health.

Individualisation of antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis C

The combination of pegylated-interferon (PEG-IFN)/ribavirin is currently the standard of care antiviral treatment for chronic hepatitis C (CHC), but optimal results require an individual approach. Key issues are to deliver doses that confer optimal antiviral efficacy against hepatitis C virus (HCV) for a time sufficient to minimise relapse. Viral monitoring during therapy guides the subsequent treatment course, particularly HCV RNA results at 4 weeks (rapid viral response [RVR]) and 12 weeks (complete early viral response [cEVR]). There is strong evidence that for most patients with genotypes 2 or 3 HCV infection, RVR allows truncation of treatment to 16 weeks, provided ribavirin dose is weight-based. However, those patients with cirrhosis, insulin resistance/diabetes or older than 50 years need 6-12 months treatment. For "difficult-to-treat" CHC (genotypes 1 and 4), RVR is infrequent (approximately 15% in European studies), but allows treatment to be truncated from 48 to 24 weeks. Without RVR, there is some evidence that longer treatment (72 weeks) improves sustained viral response (SVR). However, "induction dosing" first 12 weeks of PEG-IFN clearly does not improve SVR. To prevent dose reductions and complete therapy, it is critical to detect and treat depression and other disabling side-effects, including judicious use of growth factors for severe anemia or neutropenia and possibly, thrombocytopenia. Another potentially important aspect may be attempts to counter central obesity and insulin resistance, which confer suboptimal antiviral response with any HCV genotype. Treatment partnerships with specialist nurses, psychological therapists and other healthcare workers are also essential for optimal individual management of patients with CHC.

Clinical outcomes in a prospective study of community-acquired hepatitis C virus infection in Northern Norway

OBJECTIVE

Knowledge on the natural course of the morbidity of unselected community-acquired hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is limited. The aim of our study was to characterize the clinical outcomes of both hepatic and extrahepatic morbidity in patients infected with HCV in a community-based setting in Northern Norway.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This prospective cohort study included 1010 HCV-positive patients diagnosed by recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA), between 1 January 1990 and 1 January 2000. Questionnaires were sent to those physicians in Northern Norway who had requested the RIBA tests during the relevant period. Data were collected from medical records in the period between 1 January 2004 and 30 June 2006. Access to confidential information was obtained from the Norwegian Directorate of Health.

RESULTS

Median age at follow-up was 39 and 41 years in females and males, respectively. In patients with positive HCV RNA status following results were found: Alanine aminotransferase was elevated in 27.4%, decompensated liver disease in 2.9% and hepatocellular carcinoma in 0.4%. Median observation period from estimated acquisition of the disease to follow-up in these patients was 26 years. Depression was reported in 10.7% of chronic infected subjects. Renal failure caused by membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis occurred in 0.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

In an unselected HCV-RNA positive population severe liver disease developed in a sub-group of patients. These observations suggest that chronic HCV disease in relatively young subjects may cause a substantial burden on the health system in the future.

Treatment of psychological co-morbidities in common gastrointestinal and hepatologic disorders

Anxiety and depressive disorders frequently coexist with gastrointestinal and hepatologic conditions. Despite their high prevalence, approach to treating these co-morbidities is not always straightforward. This paper aims to review the current literature into etiology of psychological co-morbidities and their treatment in three conditions commonly encountered at gastroenterology outpatient clinics, namely inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and chronic hepatitis C (HepC). The paper demonstrates that although psychotherapy (and cognitive-behavioural therapy in particular) has been established as an effective treatment in IBS, more studies are needed in HepC and IBD. Antidepressants have been recognized as an effective treatment for psychological and somatic symptoms in IBS and for depression in HepC, but good quality studies in IBD are lacking despite the promising preliminary findings from animal models and case studies. Further studies in this area are needed.

Context of clinical care: the case of hepatitis C in underserved communities--a report from the Primary Care Multiethnic Network (PRIME Net) Consortium

BACKGROUND

The importance of Hepatitis C (HCV) as a public and individual health concern is well established. However, national groups differ in their recommendations to primary care clinicians about screening people at high risk for HCV. The purpose of this study was to explore the context of care within which primary care clinicians decide to detect and initially manage HCV.

METHODS

The Primary Care Multiethnic Network conducted a web- and paper-based survey of primary care clinicians who largely practice in low-income, medically underserved communities in 3 regions across the country.

RESULTS

A total of 494 clinicians participated, for a response rate of 61%. Most (68%) clinicians view HCV as an important problem; more than half (59%) consider screening for HCV to be important when compared with other conditions they screen for in practice. With regard to reported screening habits for risk factors, 54% of clinicians routinely ask new patients whether they have used intravenous drugs and 28% inquire about blood transfusions before 1992. Sixty-one percent order an alanine aminotransferase test when patients present with other risk factors for HCV. The majority of clinicians (54%) refer 75% or fewer of their patients with HCV for treatment; nearly one-fifth (18%) provide antiviral treatment themselves. Key factors influencing clinician HCV decision making are patient comorbidities (74% reported this as a factor), access to treatment (55% reported this as a factor), and tolerance (44% reported this as a factor) of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

In the face of conflicting national guideline recommendations about screening people at high risk for HCV, clinicians have varied views and practice habits influenced by multiple patient, access, and treatment issues.