Comparison of respiratory mechanics between sevoflurane and propofol-remifentanil anesthesia for laparoscopic colectomy

Unveiling the protective role of sevoflurane in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery associated-acute lung injury: Inhibition of ferroptosis

Acute lung injury (ALI) frequently occurs after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Ferroptosis is implicated in several lung diseases. Therefore, the disparate effects and underlying mechanisms of the two commonly used anesthetics (sevoflurane (Sev) and propofol) on VATS-induced ALI need to be clarified. In the present study, enrolled patients were randomly allocated to receive Sev (group S) or propofol anesthesia (group P). Intraoperative oxygenation, morphology of the lung tissue, expression of ZO-1, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione (GSH), Fe2+, glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4), and phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (AKT)/nuclear factor erythroid-2-related factor 2 (Nrf2)/heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) pathway in the lung tissue as well as the expression of TNF-α and IL-6 in plasma were measured. Postoperative complications were recorded. Of the 85 initially screened patients scheduled for VATS, 62 were enrolled in either group S (n = 32) or P (n = 30). Compared with propofol, Sev substantially (1) improved intraoperative oxygenation; (2) relieved histopathological lung injury; (3) increased ZO-1 protein expression; (4) decreased the levels of TNF-α and IL-6 in both the lung tissue and plasma; (5) increased the contents of GSH and SOD but decreased Fe2+ concentration; (6) upregulated the protein expression of p-AKT, Nrf2, HO-1, and GPX4. No significant differences in the occurrence of postoperative outcomes were observed between both groups. In summary, Sev treatment, in comparison to propofol anesthesia, may suppress local lung and systemic inflammatory responses by activating the PI3K/Akt/Nrf2/HO-1 pathway and inhibiting ferroptosis. This cascade of effects contributes to the maintenance of pulmonary epithelial barrier permeability, alleviation of pulmonary injury, and enhancement of intraoperative oxygenation in patients undergoing VATS.

Volatile anesthetics versus intravenous anesthetics for noncardiac thoracic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

We performed this meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to investigate two types of anesthetics for noncardiac thoracic surgery regarding their effects on clinical outcomes and the inflammatory response.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We searched Cochrane Library, PubMed and EMBASE for RCTs comparing volatile anesthetics to intravenous anesthetics for noncardiac thoracic surgery.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

This study reviewed 16 RCTs with 1467 patients. Volatile anesthetics reduced postoperative complications and the length of intensive care unit stay for lung surgery. They also lowered the concentrations of interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, IL-8 and tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) in the airways of patients undergoing noncardiac thoracic surgery. However, there was no difference in short-term mortality; postoperative complications after esophagectomy; IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8 or TNF-α concentrations in the blood; IL-10 level in either the airway or the blood; overall monocyte chemoattractant protein-1.

CONCLUSIONS

In lung surgery, but not esophagectomy, volatile anesthetics may be a better choice than intravenous anesthetics, possibly because volatile anesthetics reduce airway inflammation.

Comparative Effect of Propofol and Volatile Anesthetics on Postoperative Pulmonary Complications After Lung Resection Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

The effect of general anesthetics (propofol and volatile anesthetics) on pulmonary outcome after lung resection surgery with one-lung ventilation (OLV) is yet undetermined. We evaluated the effect of intravenous anesthesia (propofol) and volatile anesthesia (sevoflurane or desflurane) regimens on postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) in patients undergoing lung resection surgery.

METHODS

This prospective, randomized controlled trial enrolled 555 adult patients scheduled for lung resection surgery with OLV. Participants were randomized to 1 of 3 general anesthetic regimens (propofol, sevoflurane, or desflurane). Standard anesthesia and ventilation protocols were followed in all groups. The primary outcome was a composite of PPCs in the first 7 postoperative days. Secondary outcomes included the severity of PPCs and major postoperative complications classification. Intergroup difference in the primary outcome was assessed for significance using the Pearson χ2 test.

RESULTS

Of 837 patients who were assessed for eligibility, 555 were randomized and 545 were analyzed. One hundred and seventy-nine patients were assigned to the propofol group, 182 in the sevoflurane group, and 184 in the desflurane group. The incidence of PPCs did not differ between the combined volatile anesthetics (sevoflurane and desflurane) group and the propofol group (21.9% vs 24.0%; odds ratio, 0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.58-1.35; P = .570). The PPCs grade and Clavien-Dindo scores did not differ significantly across groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing lung resection surgery with OLV, general anesthesia with volatile anesthetics (sevoflurane or desflurane) did not reduce PPCs compared with propofol. No difference in secondary outcomes was observed.

Attenuation of increased intraocular pressure with propofol anesthesia: A systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

Attenuation of an increase in intraocular pressure (IOP) is crucial to preventing devastating postoperative visual loss following surgery. IOP is affected by several factors, including the physiologic alteration due to pneumoperitoneum and patient positioning and differences in anesthetic regimens. This study aimed to investigate the effects of propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) and volatile anesthesia on IOP. We searched multiple databases for relevant studies published before October 2019. Randomized controlled trials comparing the effects of propofol-based TIVA and volatile anesthesia on IOP during surgery were considered eligible for inclusion. Twenty studies comprising 980 patients were included. The mean IOP was significantly lower in the propofol-based TIVA group after intubation, pneumoperitoneum, Trendelenburg positioning, and lateral decubitus positioning. Moreover, mean arterial pressure and peak inspiratory pressure were also lower after intubation in the propofol-based TIVA group. Trial sequential analyses for these outcomes were conclusive. Propofol-based TIVA is more effective than volatile anesthesia during surgery at attenuating the elevation of IOP and should be considered, especially in at-risk patients.

The Effect of sevoflurane, desflurane and propofol on respiratory mechanics and integrated pulmonary index scores in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. A randomized trial

Objectives:

To compare the effects of sevoflurane, desflurane, and propofol on respiratory mechanics, and integrated pulmonary index (IPI) scores in patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.

Methods:

A total of 60 patients with a body mass index of ≥40 kg/m², who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy between September 2015 and September 2016 at Fatih Sultan Mehmet Health Application and Research Center, Istanbul, Turkey were included in this randomized prospective study. After induction, anesthesia was maintained by sevoflurane in group S, desflurane in group D, and propofol in group P. Peak inspiratory pressure (PIP), plateau pressure (P_plateau), compliance (Cdyn), respiratory resistance (Rrs), and IPI values were recorded. Mann-Whitney U, Kruskal-Wallis, Dunn’s, Friedman, and Fisher-Freeman-Halton tests were performed for statistical analysis. A p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results:

A significant increase was found in PIP in group S (T₁: 25; T₂: 27 cmH₂O), and group D (T₁: 25; T₂: 29,5 cmH₂O) during pneumoperitoneum. Dynamic compliance decreased in all groups during pneumoperitoneum. In group S, the decrease in Cdyn was also statistically significant after pneumoperitoneum (T₁: 43.65; T₅: 41.25 ml/cmH₂O). Comparison between groups the values of PIP, P_plateau, Cdyn, Rrs, and IPI were similar.

Conclusion:

In morbidly obese patients, sevoflurane, desflurane, and propofol are similar in terms of the intraoperative respiratory mechanics, and perioperative respiratory parameters provided with IPI.

Anaesthesia for laparoscopic surgery

Laparoscopic surgery has become increasingly common with reduced postoperative pain and faster recovery. Clinicians managing patients undergoing abdominal laparoscopic surgery should appreciate the physiological changes which mainly arise from patient positioning and the effects of pneumoperitoneum.

Effect of different depths of anesthesia on postoperative cognitive function in laparoscopic patients: a randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

Postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) is caused by many factors. This work was conducted to investigate the effect of different depths of anesthesia during combined intravenous-inhalational anesthesia on postoperative cognitive function in young and middle-aged laparoscopic patients.

METHODS

A total of 192 patients scheduled for gynecologic laparoscopic operations were randomly divided into three groups. Anesthesia was maintained with inhalation of sevoflurane and infusion of remifentanil, which was adjusted to maintain bispectral index (BIS) at 30 < BIS ≤ 40 in Group I, 40 < BIS ≤ 50 in Group II and 50 < BIS ≤ 60 in Group III. The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Trail-Making Test (TMT) were used to assess cognitive function on the day before anesthesia and the day after surgery.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in age, body mass index, educational level and surgery time. On the day before anesthesia, the average MMSE scores and TMT completion times in the three groups were not significantly different. On the day after surgery, Group II had a significantly higher average MMSE score (29.00 ± 0.89) than Group I (28.36 ± 1.42, p = 0.010) and Group III (28.45 ± 1.27, p = 0.035) and lower TMT completion time (33.68 ± 10.34) than Group I (39.45 ± 13.99, p = 0.027) and Group III (39.50 ± 12.50, p = 0.026).

CONCLUSION

These results indicated that the depth of anesthesia, 40 < BIS ≤ 50, under combined intravenous-inhalational anesthesia yielded milder influence on postoperative cognitive function in young and middle-aged laparoscopic patients.