1
|
Trollip A, Gadde R, Datema T, Gatwechi K, Oskam L, Katz Z, Whitelaw A, Kinyanjui P, Njukeng P, Wendifraw DA, Mugerwa I, Najjuka G, Dayie N, Opintan JA, Albert H. Implementation of a customised antimicrobial resistance laboratory scorecard in Cameroon, Ethiopia and Kenya. Afr J Lab Med 2022; 11:1476. [PMID: 35811751 PMCID: PMC9257829 DOI: 10.4102/ajlm.v11i1.1476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2020] [Accepted: 03/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In low-resource settings, antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is detected by traditional culture-based methods and ensuring the quality of such services is a challenge. The AMR Scorecard provides laboratories with a technical assessment tool for strengthening the quality of bacterial culture, identification, and antimicrobial testing procedures. Objective To evaluate the performance of the AMR Scorecard in 11 pilot laboratory evaluations in three countries also assessed with the Stepwise Laboratory Quality Improvement Process Towards Accreditation (SLIPTA) checklist. Methods Pilot laboratory evaluations were conducted in Cameroon, Ethiopia and Kenya between February 2019 and March 2019. Assessors with previous SLIPTA and microbiology experience were trained. Assessors performed the laboratory assessments using the SLIPTA and AMR Scorecard tools. Results Weaknesses in technical procedures and the quality management systems were identified in all areas and all laboratories. Safety had the highest mean performance score (SLIPTA: 68%; AMR Scorecard: 73%) while management review had the lowest (SLIPTA: 32%; AMR Scorecard: 8%) across all laboratories. The AMR Scorecard scores were generally consistent with SLIPTA scores. The AMR Scorecard identified technical weaknesses in AMR testing, and SLIPTA identified weaknesses in the quality management systems in the laboratories. Conclusion Since the AMR Scorecard identified important gaps in AMR testing not detected by SLIPTA, it is recommended that microbiology laboratories use SLIPTA and the AMR Scorecard in parallel when preparing for accreditation. Expanding the use of the AMR Scorecard is a priority to address the need for quality clinical microbiology laboratory services in support of optimal patient care and AMR surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- André Trollip
- Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics (FIND) South Africa, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Renuka Gadde
- Becton, Dickinson & Company, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey, United States
| | | | | | | | - Zachary Katz
- Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics (FIND), Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Andrew Whitelaw
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, South Africa
- National Health Laboratory Service, Tygerberg Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Peter Kinyanjui
- National Public Health Laboratory, Kenyatta National Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya
| | | | - Dawit A. Wendifraw
- National Clinical Bacteriology and Mycology Reference Laboratory, Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Ibrahimm Mugerwa
- Ministry of Health, National Health Laboratories and Diagnostic Services-AMR-National Coordination Centre, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Grace Najjuka
- National Health Laboratories and Diagnostic Services, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Nicholas Dayie
- Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Ghana Medical School, Accra, Ghana
| | - Japheth A. Opintan
- Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Ghana Medical School, Accra, Ghana
| | - Heidi Albert
- Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics (FIND) South Africa, Cape Town, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Makokha EP, Ondondo RO, Kimani DK, Gachuki T, Basiye F, Njeru M, Junghae M, Downer M, Umuro M, Mburu M, Mwangi J. Enhancing accreditation outcomes for medical laboratories on the Strengthening Laboratory Management Toward Accreditation programme in Kenya via a rapid results initiative. Afr J Lab Med 2022; 11:1614. [PMID: 35747559 PMCID: PMC9210179 DOI: 10.4102/ajlm.v11i1.1614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2021] [Accepted: 03/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Since 2010, Kenya has used SLIPTA to prepare and improve quality management systems in medical laboratories to achieve ISO 15189 accreditation. However, less than 10% of enrolled laboratories had done so in the initial seven years of SLMTA implementation. Objective We described Kenya’s experience in accelerating medical laboratories on SLMTA to attain ISO 15189 accreditation. Methods From March 2017 to July 2017, an aggressive top-down approach through high-level management stakeholder engagement for buy-in, needs-based expedited SLIPTA mentorship and on-site support as a rapid results initiative (RRI) was implemented in 39 laboratories whose quality improvement process had stagnated for 2–7 years. In July 2017, SLIPTA baseline and exit audit average scores on quality essential elements were compared to assess performance. Results After RRI, laboratories achieving greater than a 2-star SLMTA rating increased significantly from 15 (38%) at baseline to 33 (85%) (p < 0.001). Overall, 34/39 (87%) laboratories received ISO 15189 accreditation within two years of RRI, leading to a 330% increase in the number of accredited laboratories in Kenya. The most improved of the 12 quality system essentials were Equipment Management (mean increase 95% CI: 5.31 ± 1.89) and Facilities and Biosafety (mean increase [95% CI: 4.05 ± 1.78]) (both: p < 0.0001). Information Management and Corrective Action Management remained the most challenging to improve, despite RRI interventions. Conclusion High-level advocacy and targeted mentorship through RRI dramatically improved laboratory accreditation in Kenya. Similar approaches of strengthening SLIPTA implementation could improve SLMTA outcomes in other countries with similar challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ernest P Makokha
- Laboratory Services Branch, Division of Global HIV & TB, United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Raphael O Ondondo
- Laboratory Services Branch, Division of Global HIV & TB, United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Daniel K Kimani
- Laboratory Services Branch, Division of Global HIV & TB, United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Thomas Gachuki
- National HIV Reference Laboratory, Division of Public Health Laboratories, Ministry of Health, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Frank Basiye
- Laboratory Services Branch, Division of Global HIV & TB, United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Mercy Njeru
- Laboratory Services Branch, Division of Global HIV & TB, United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Muthoni Junghae
- Laboratory Services Branch, Division of Global HIV & TB, United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Marie Downer
- Laboratory Services Branch, Division of Global HIV & TB, United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Mamo Umuro
- National HIV Reference Laboratory, Division of Public Health Laboratories, Ministry of Health, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Margaret Mburu
- Laboratory Services Branch, Division of Global HIV & TB, United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Jane Mwangi
- Laboratory Services Branch, Division of Global HIV & TB, United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Nairobi, Kenya
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Begg S, Wright A, Small G, Kirby M, Moore S, Koudou B, Kisinza W, Abdoulaye D, Moore J, Malima R, Kija P, Mosha F, Edi C, Bates I. Multi-site comparison of factors influencing progress of African insecticide testing facilities towards an international Quality Management System certification. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0259849. [PMID: 34780512 PMCID: PMC8592480 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2021] [Accepted: 10/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Insecticidal mosquito vector control products are vital components of malaria control programmes. Test facilities are key in assessing the effectiveness of vector control products against local mosquito populations, in environments where they will be used. Data from these test facilities must be of a high quality to be accepted by regulatory authorities, including the WHO Prequalification Team for vector control products. In 2013-4, seven insecticide testing facilities across sub-Saharan Africa, with technical and financial support from Innovative Vector Control Consortium (IVCC), began development and implementation of quality management system compliant with the principles of Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) to improve data quality and reliability. METHODS AND PRINCIPLE FINDINGS We conducted semi-structured interviews, emails, and video-call interviews with individuals at five test facilities engaged in the IVCC-supported programme and working towards or having achieved GLP. We used framework analysis to identify and describe factors affeting progress towards GLP. We found that eight factors were instrumental in progress, and that test facilities had varying levels of control over these factors. They had high control over the training programme, project planning, and senior leadership support; medium control over infrastructure development, staff structure, and procurement; and low control over funding the availability and accessibility of relevant expertise. Collaboration with IVCC and other partners was key to overcoming the challenges associated with low and medium control factors. CONCLUSION For partnership and consortia models of research capacity strengthening, test facilities can use their own internal resources to address identified high-control factors. Project plans should allow additional time for interaction with external agencies to address medium-control factors, and partners with access to expertise and funding should concentrate their efforts on supporting institutions to address low-control factors. In practice, this includes planning for financial sustainability at the outset, and acting to strengthen national and regional training capacity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Begg
- Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Alex Wright
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel St, Bloomsbury, London, United Kingdom
| | - Graham Small
- Innovative Vector Control Consortium, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Matt Kirby
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel St, Bloomsbury, London, United Kingdom
- KCMUCo-PAMVERC, KCMUCo-PAMVERC Test Facility, Moshi, Tanzania
| | - Sarah Moore
- Ifakara Health Institute, Off Mlabani Passage, Ifakara, Tanzania
| | - Ben Koudou
- Centre Suisse de Recherches Scientifques en Côte D’Ivoire, Route de Dabou, Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire
| | - William Kisinza
- National Institute of Medical Research, Amani Centre, Amani Medical Research Centre, Muheza, Tanzania
| | - Diabate Abdoulaye
- Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Bobo-Dioulasso, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso, Côte d’Ivoire
| | - Jason Moore
- Ifakara Health Institute, Off Mlabani Passage, Ifakara, Tanzania
| | - Robert Malima
- National Institute of Medical Research, Amani Centre, Amani Medical Research Centre, Muheza, Tanzania
| | - Patrick Kija
- National Institute of Medical Research, Amani Centre, Amani Medical Research Centre, Muheza, Tanzania
| | - Frank Mosha
- KCMUCo-PAMVERC, KCMUCo-PAMVERC Test Facility, Moshi, Tanzania
| | - Constant Edi
- Centre Suisse de Recherches Scientifques en Côte D’Ivoire, Route de Dabou, Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire
| | - Imelda Bates
- Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Robinson C, Johnson J, Yao K, Bui H. Critical success factors for Vietnamese laboratories striving to implement quality management systems. Afr J Lab Med 2020; 9:937. [PMID: 33392047 PMCID: PMC7757014 DOI: 10.4102/ajlm.v9i1.937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2020] [Accepted: 08/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Accurate laboratory reporting is crucial to patient diagnosis and treatment. This study identified critical success factors (CSF) for implementing a laboratory quality management system (QMS). This descriptive research used qualitative and quantitative methods to collect and analyze data from laboratory managers and staff employed in Vietnamese hospital laboratories implementing a QMS. The top five CSFs identified were: (1) staff QMS knowledge, (2) manager leadership, (3) staff commitment, (4) mentorship, and (5) hospital administration support. Identifying CSFs is critical to successful planning and implementation of QMS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cathy Robinson
- International Consulting Services, Louisiana State University Alexandria, Alexandria, Louisiana, United States
| | - James Johnson
- School of Health Sciences, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, Michigan, United States
| | - Katy Yao
- Division of Global HIV and TB Program, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States
| | - Hien Bui
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Hanoi, Vietnam
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Datema TAM, Oskam L, Broerse JEW, Klatser PR. Review of the Stepwise Laboratory Quality Improvement Process Towards Accreditation (SLIPTA) version 2:2015. Afr J Lab Med 2020; 9:1068. [PMID: 33240798 PMCID: PMC7669969 DOI: 10.4102/ajlm.v9i1.1068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2019] [Accepted: 08/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In 2011 the Stepwise Laboratory Quality Improvement Process Towards Accreditation (SLIPTA) was launched, aimed at strengthening the quality and competence of African clinical, public health and reference laboratories. We reviewed the first version of the SLIPTA checklist in 2011. The continued development and publication of a new version of the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 15189 standard demands a renewed review. Objective This study aimed to determine the suitability of SLIPTA in guiding laboratories towards ISO 15189:2012 compliance and accreditation and provide recommendations for further SLIPTA improvement. Methods The study was conducted between September 2018 and April 2019. Coverage of ISO 15189:2012 by SLIPTA checklist version 2:2015 was determined and the point distribution of the scoring system over the different sections of the SLIPTA checklist was re-investigated. These findings were compared with the review of the first version of the SLIPTA checklist (based on ISO 15189:2007) and with findings published on SLIPTA implementation and roll-out. Results The coverage of ISO 15189 by the SLIPTA checklist has increased, even though ISO 15189:012 is more extensive than ISO 15189:2007. The point distribution is still skewed towards sections related to quality planning rather than quality control and improvement. Although to date 314 laboratories have been assessed, barriers for laboratories to participate in SLIPTA are high. Sustainability of SLIPTA results is insufficiently studied. Conclusion SLIPTA checklist version 2:2015 has improved compared to earlier versions. We recommend increasing accessibility for laboratories to participate and increasing guidance for ISO-based quality management system implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jacqueline E W Broerse
- Department of Science Communication, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Paul R Klatser
- Athena Institute, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gumba H, Waichungo J, Lowe B, Mwanzu A, Musyimi R, Thitiri J, Tigoi C, Kamui M, Berkley JA, Ngetich R, Kavai S, Kariuki S. Implementing a quality management system using good clinical laboratory practice guidelines at KEMRI-CMR to support medical research. Wellcome Open Res 2019; 3:137. [PMID: 30607370 PMCID: PMC6305232 DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.14860.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/14/2019] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Good Clinical Laboratory Practice (GCLP) is a standard that helps ensure the quality and reliability of research data through principles of Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) and Good Clinical Practice (GCP). The implementation of GCLP includes careful documentation of procedures, competencies and safety measures. Implementation of GCLP is influenced by existing resources and quality systems, thus laboratories in low- and middle-income countries may face additional challenges. Methods: This paper describes implementation of GCLP at the Kenya Medical Research Institute-Center for Microbiology Research (KEMRI-CMR) as part of a quality system to support medical research. This study employed assessment, twinning (institutional mentorship) model, conducting relevant training workshops and Kaizen 5S approaches to implement an effective quality management system using GCLP standard. This was achieved through a collaboration between the KEMRI/Wellcome Trust Research Programme (KWTRP) and KEMRI-CMR. The aim was compliance and continuous monitoring to meet international GCLP standards in a way that could be replicated in other research organizations. Results: Following a baseline assessment in March 2017, training, mentorship and a cycle of quality audit and corrective action using a Kaizen 5S approach (sorting, setting in order, shining, standardizing and sustaining) was established. Laboratory personnel were trained in writing standard operating procedures and analytical plans, microbiological techniques, and good documentation practice. Mid-term and exit assessments demonstrated significant declines in non-conformances across all GCLP elements. KEMRI-CMR achieved GCLP accreditation in May 2018 by Qualogy Ltd (UK). Conclusions: Involving all the laboratory personnel in implementation of quality management system processes is critical to success. An institutional mentorship (twinning) approach shows potential for future collaborations between accredited and non-accredited organizations to accelerate the implementation of high-quality management systems and continuous improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Horace Gumba
- KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programe, Kilifi, Coast, 80108, Kenya
| | - Joseph Waichungo
- KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programe, Kilifi, Coast, 80108, Kenya
| | - Brett Lowe
- KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programe, Kilifi, Coast, 80108, Kenya
- Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, University of Oxford, London, UK
| | - Alfred Mwanzu
- KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programe, Kilifi, Coast, 80108, Kenya
| | - Robert Musyimi
- KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programe, Kilifi, Coast, 80108, Kenya
- The Childhood Acute Illness & Nutrition (CHAIN) Network, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Johnstone Thitiri
- KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programe, Kilifi, Coast, 80108, Kenya
- The Childhood Acute Illness & Nutrition (CHAIN) Network, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Caroline Tigoi
- KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programe, Kilifi, Coast, 80108, Kenya
- The Childhood Acute Illness & Nutrition (CHAIN) Network, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Martin Kamui
- KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programe, Kilifi, Coast, 80108, Kenya
- The Childhood Acute Illness & Nutrition (CHAIN) Network, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - James A. Berkley
- KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programe, Kilifi, Coast, 80108, Kenya
- The Childhood Acute Illness & Nutrition (CHAIN) Network, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Ronald Ngetich
- KEMRI-Centre for Microbiology and Research, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Susan Kavai
- KEMRI-Centre for Microbiology and Research, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Samuel Kariuki
- KEMRI-Centre for Microbiology and Research, Nairobi, Kenya
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gumba H, Waichungo J, Lowe B, Mwanzu A, Musyimi R, Thitiri J, Tigoi C, Kamui M, Berkley JA, Ngetich R, Kavai S, Kariuki S. Implementing a quality management system using good clinical laboratory practice guidelines at KEMRI-CMR to support medical research. Wellcome Open Res 2018; 3:137. [PMID: 30607370 PMCID: PMC6305232 DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.14860.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/25/2018] [Indexed: 05/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Good Clinical Laboratory Practice (GCLP) is a standard that helps ensure the quality and reliability of research data through principles of Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) and Good Clinical Practice (GCP). The implementation of GCLP includes careful documentation of procedures, competencies and safety measures. Implementation of GCLP is influenced by existing resources and quality systems, thus laboratories in low- and middle-income countries may face additional challenges. Methods: This paper describes implementation of Good Clinical Laboratory Practice (GCLP) at the Kenya Medical Research Institute-Center for Microbiology Research (KEMRI-CMR) as part of a quality system to support medical research. This study employed assessment, twinning (institutional mentorship) model, conducting relevant training workshops and Kaizen 5S approaches to implement an effective quality management system using GCLP standard. This was achieved through a collaboration between the KEMRI/Wellcome Trust Research Programme (KWTRP) and KEMRI-CMR. The aim was compliance and continuous monitoring to meet international GCLP standards in a way that could be replicated in other research organizations. Results: Following a baseline assessment in March 2017, training, mentorship and a cycle of quality audit and corrective action using a Kaizen 5S approach (sorting, setting in order, shining, standardizing and sustaining) was established. Laboratory personnel were trained in writing standard operating procedures and analytical plans, microbiological techniques, and good documentation practice. Mid-term and exit assessments demonstrated significant declines in non-conformances across all GCLP elements. KEMRI-CMR achieved GCLP accreditation in May 2018 by Qualogy Ltd (UK). Conclusions: Involving all the laboratory personnel in implementation of quality management system processes is critical to success. An institutional mentorship (twinning) approach shows potential for future collaborations between accredited and non-accredited organizations to accelerate the implementation of high-quality management systems and continuous improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Horace Gumba
- KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programe, Kilifi, Coast, 80108, Kenya
| | - Joseph Waichungo
- KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programe, Kilifi, Coast, 80108, Kenya
| | - Brett Lowe
- KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programe, Kilifi, Coast, 80108, Kenya
- Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, University of Oxford, London, UK
| | - Alfred Mwanzu
- KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programe, Kilifi, Coast, 80108, Kenya
| | - Robert Musyimi
- KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programe, Kilifi, Coast, 80108, Kenya
- The Childhood Acute Illness & Nutrition (CHAIN) Network, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Johnstone Thitiri
- KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programe, Kilifi, Coast, 80108, Kenya
- The Childhood Acute Illness & Nutrition (CHAIN) Network, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Caroline Tigoi
- KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programe, Kilifi, Coast, 80108, Kenya
- The Childhood Acute Illness & Nutrition (CHAIN) Network, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Martin Kamui
- KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programe, Kilifi, Coast, 80108, Kenya
- The Childhood Acute Illness & Nutrition (CHAIN) Network, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - James A. Berkley
- KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programe, Kilifi, Coast, 80108, Kenya
- The Childhood Acute Illness & Nutrition (CHAIN) Network, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Ronald Ngetich
- KEMRI-Centre for Microbiology and Research, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Susan Kavai
- KEMRI-Centre for Microbiology and Research, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Samuel Kariuki
- KEMRI-Centre for Microbiology and Research, Nairobi, Kenya
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Luman ET, Yao K, Nkengasong JN. A comprehensive review of the SLMTA literature part 2: Measuring success. Afr J Lab Med 2014; 3:276. [PMID: 29043201 PMCID: PMC5637800 DOI: 10.4102/ajlm.v3i2.276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2014] [Accepted: 09/21/2014] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Since its introduction in 2009, the Strengthening Laboratory Management Toward Accreditation (SLMTA) programme has been implemented in 617 laboratories in 47 countries. Objective We completed a systematic review of the published literature on SLMTA. The review consists of two companion papers; this article examines quantitative evidence presented in the publications along with a meta-analysis of selected results. Methods We identified 28 published articles with data from SLMTA implementation. The SLMTA programme was evaluated through audits based on a standard checklist, which is divided into 12 sections corresponding to the 12 Quality System Essentials (QSEs). Several basic service delivery indicators reported by programmes were also examined. Results for various components of the programme were reviewed and summarised; a meta-analysis of QSE results grouped by the three stages of the quality cycle was conducted for 126 laboratories in 12 countries. Results Global programme data show improved quality in SLMTA laboratories in every country, with average improvements on audit scores of 25 percentage points. Meta-analysis identified Improvement Management as the weakest stage, with internal audit (8%) and occurrence management (16%) showing the lowest scores. Studies documented 19% – 95% reductions in turn-around times, 69% – 93% reductions in specimen rejection rates, 76% – 81% increases in clinician satisfaction rates, 67% – 85% improvements in external quality assessment results, 50% – 66% decreases in nonconformities and 67% increases in staff punctuality. Conclusions The wide array of results reported provides a comprehensive picture of the SLMTA programme overall, suggesting a substantive impact on provision of quality laboratory services and patient care. These comprehensive results establish a solid data-driven foundation for program improvement and further expansion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth T Luman
- International Laboratory Branch, Division of Global HIV/AIDS, Center for Global Health, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States
| | - Katy Yao
- International Laboratory Branch, Division of Global HIV/AIDS, Center for Global Health, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States
| | - John N Nkengasong
- International Laboratory Branch, Division of Global HIV/AIDS, Center for Global Health, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Luman ET, Yao K, Nkengasong JN. A comprehensive review of the SLMTA literature part 1: Content analysis and future priorities. Afr J Lab Med 2014; 3:265. [PMID: 29043200 PMCID: PMC5637796 DOI: 10.4102/ajlm.v3i2.265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2014] [Accepted: 09/21/2014] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Since its introduction in 2009, the Strengthening Laboratory Management Toward Accreditation (SLMTA) programme has been implemented widely throughout Africa, as well as in the Caribbean, Central and South America, and Southeast Asia. Objective We compiled results from local, national and global studies to provide a broad view of the programme and identify directions for the future. The review consists of two companion papers; this paper focuses on content analysis, examining various thematic components of the SLMTA programme and future priorities. Methods A systematic literature search identified 28 published articles about implementing the SLMTA programme. Results for various components of the SLMTA programme were reviewed and summarised. Results Local and national studies provide substantial information on previous experiences with quality management systems; variations on SLMTA implementation; building human resource capacity for trainers, mentors and auditors; the benefits and effectiveness of various types of mentorship; the importance of management buy-in to ensure country ownership; the need to instill a culture of quality in the laboratory; success factors and challenges; and future directions for the programme. Conclusions Local, national and global results suggest that the SLMTA programme has been overwhelmingly successful in transforming laboratory quality management. There is an urgent need to move forward in four strategic directions: progression (continued improvement in SLMTA laboratories), saturation (additional laboratories within countries that have implemented SLMTA), expansion (implementation in additional countries), and extension (adapting SLMTA for implementation beyond the laboratory), to lead to transformation of overall health systems and patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth T Luman
- International Laboratory Branch, Division of Global HIV/AIDS, Center for Global Health, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States
| | - Katy Yao
- International Laboratory Branch, Division of Global HIV/AIDS, Center for Global Health, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States
| | - John N Nkengasong
- International Laboratory Branch, Division of Global HIV/AIDS, Center for Global Health, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Audu RA, Onubogu CC, Nwokoye NN, Ofuche E, Baboolal S, Oke O, Luman ET, Idigbe EO. Improving quality in national reference laboratories: The role of SLMTA and mentorship. Afr J Lab Med 2014; 3:200. [PMID: 29043183 PMCID: PMC5637787 DOI: 10.4102/ajlm.v3i2.200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2014] [Accepted: 07/08/2014] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The Nigerian Institute of Medical Research houses two reference laboratories: the virology and tuberculosis laboratories. Both were enrolled in the Strengthening Laboratory Management Toward Accreditation (SLMTA) programme. Objective To describe the impact of SLMTA and discuss factors affecting the results, with an emphasis on mentorship. Methods The SLMTA programme was implemented from April 2010 through November 2012. Participants attended three workshops and executed quality improvement projects; laboratory auditors evaluated performance using a standard checklist. The virology laboratory did not receive mentorship; however, the tuberculosis laboratory had an international mentor who visited the laboratory four times during the programme, spending two to four weeks embedded within the laboratory during each visit. Results There was an overall improvement in the performance of both laboratories, with the virology laboratory increasing 13% (from 80% at baseline to 93% at exit audit) and the tuberculosis laboratory increasing 29% (from 66% to 95%). These scores were maintained nine months later at the surveillance audit. Conclusion The SLMTA programme resulted in improved and sustained quality management performance for both laboratories. Mentoring was a possible factor in the substantial improvement made by the tuberculosis laboratory and should be considered in order to augment the training received from the SLMTA workshops.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosemary A Audu
- Human Virology Laboratory, Nigerian Institute of Medical Research, Nigeria
| | - Catherine C Onubogu
- National Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory, Nigerian Institute of Medical Research, Nigeria
| | - Nkiru N Nwokoye
- National Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory, Nigerian Institute of Medical Research, Nigeria
| | - Eke Ofuche
- AIDS Prevention Initiative in Nigeria, Nigeria
| | | | - Odafen Oke
- US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Nigeria
| | | | - Emmanuel O Idigbe
- National Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory, Nigerian Institute of Medical Research, Nigeria
| |
Collapse
|