1
|
Webb T, Verduzco-Aguirre HC, Rao AR, Ramaswamy A, Noronha V. Addressing the Needs of Older Adults With Cancer in Low- and Middle-Income Settings. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2022; 42:1-10. [PMID: 35427187 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_349829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
The number of older adults in the world is projected to increase steeply over the next 30 years; most older adults will live in low- and middle-income countries. This will have a direct impact on the global cancer burden, as cancer is largely a disease of aging. A revolution in the way we care for older adults in low- and middle-income settings is needed to meet rapidly rising demands. Regardless of a nation's relative wealth or resources, implementing the geriatric assessment in cancer care has presented a challenge because of omission of the principles of geriatric oncology from formal training and continuing education, lack of time, and a shortage of qualified personnel. To meet the challenge of caring for older adults globally, we must: (1) re-imagine aging-focused training for providers and nurses, (2) create and strengthen collaborations/partnerships between geriatric oncology teams and aging-service organizations, and (3) increase advocacy for age-friendly health care policy. By harnessing technology, the reach of specialized oncology education and care can be extended even-or especially-to low- and middle-income settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tracy Webb
- Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, NC
| | | | - Abhijith Rajaram Rao
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Anant Ramaswamy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Vanita Noronha
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
A systematic rapid review on quality of care among non-communicable diseases (NCDs) service delivery in South Asia. PUBLIC HEALTH IN PRACTICE 2021; 2:100180. [PMID: 36101571 PMCID: PMC9461576 DOI: 10.1016/j.puhip.2021.100180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2021] [Revised: 07/09/2021] [Accepted: 07/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background At present, poor quality of care (QoC) surrounding non-communicable diseases (NCDs) service provision poses a threat to South Asia. This systematic rapid review aims to highlight the available approaches to improve QoC in NCD services in South Asian countries. Methods Three electronic databases (Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library) were used to identify relevant literature. Studies published from January 1, 1990 to December 31, 2020 were included. Studies published in English in the South Asian context following any research design about four major NCDs (cancer, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, chronic respiratory disease), and interventions to achieve QoC were included. Data extraction was done using a pre-specified form. A narrative synthesis was conducted for analyzing the extracted information. This systematic rapid review is registered in PROSPERO (International prospective register of systematic reviews) - CRD42020157401. Results Among 829 identified studies, 13 were included in the review for in-depth analysis. Most of the studies focused on cancer followed by diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Community and clinic-based screening, NCD care education, NCD specialized corner or hospital, and a follow-up system ensure patient satisfaction, accessibility, early detection, timely referral, and help to reduce disease severity, mortality rate, and incidence of the new disease. Conclusions Effective interventions for improving QoC surrounding NCD services can be scaled up in different settings in South Asia to reduce the burden of NCDs. There are knowledge gaps in quality of care among Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs) service delivery. Community and clinic-based screening, NCD care education, and NCD specialized hospitals may improve the quality of care. More research on quality of care is required as there are limited number of experimental studies.
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Psycho-oncology has completed 25 years. There is growing recognition of the psychosocial needs of persons living with cancer and the role of sociocultural factors in addressing the needs. This review addresses the research in developing countries relating to distress associated with living with cancer and psychosocial care. RECENT FINDINGS There is growing recognition of the emotional needs, understanding of the sociocultural aspects of the emotional responses of persons, caregivers, role of resilience and posttraumatic growth and spirituality in cancer care. Psychosocial aspects of cancer are largely influenced by social, economic, cultural, religious and health systems. A number of innovative approaches to care like use of yoga, financial and material support and involvement of caregivers have been implemented. A positive development is the increasing professional attention to document and develop innovative care programmes. SUMMARY A significant proportion of the general population are living with cancer. There are significant psychosocial needs largely influenced by social, economic, cultural, religious aspects of the communities. There are a wide range of interventions from self-care to professional care to address the needs. In developing countries, there is need for longitudinal studies of psycho-social experiences, develop interventions that are culturally appropriate, along with enhanced use of information technology along with evaluation of interventions.
Collapse
|
6
|
Kessel KA, Vogel MME, Kessel C, Bier H, Biedermann T, Friess H, Herschbach P, von Eisenhart-Rothe R, Meyer B, Kiechle M, Keller U, Peschel C, Bassermann F, Schmid R, Schwaiger M, Combs SE. Cancer clinical trials - Survey evaluating patient participation and acceptance in a university-based Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC). Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2018; 13:44-49. [PMID: 30345398 PMCID: PMC6192009 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2018.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2018] [Revised: 09/23/2018] [Accepted: 10/01/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
>50% of patients are willing to participate in clinical trials, only 18% are currently enrolled. The top reason to participate in trials was to serve medical progress and cancer research. Reasons for refusing were extensive travel time, no therapeutic advantage and too time-consuming. Good information strategies need to be implemented, and doctors need to be aware of running trials. Trial concepts must include patients’ needs, e.g. number of appointments, risk-benefit profile.
Introduction Prospective clinical trials are essential to translate new therapy concepts or rather any scientific development into the medical routine. Besides a sophisticated trial protocol, the success of clinical trials depends on patient recruitment and participation. Patient recruitment remains a challenge and depends on several factors. To get a current picture of the patients’ attitude, we conducted the present survey. Methods We designed a survey with seven questions, which was given to all oncological patients treated within a timeframe of three months between Mai and July 2017. Participation was voluntary and anonymous. The questionnaire mainly inquires patients’ participation in clinical trials in a university-based setting, their attitude towards clinical trials regarding risks and benefits, and their source of information in this context. Results 771 patients (1:1 male/female) participated with a median age of 61 years (range 18–91 years) with a response rate of 71.5%. Of all, 17.8% (137/771) were participating in a clinical trial. The most mentioned reason was to serve medical progress and cancer research. Out of the patients not currently participating in a trial, 79 (12.7%, 79/623) refusers named the following main reasons: extensive travel time to the clinic, no therapeutic advantage, and too time-consuming. Out of the patients not offered to take part in a trial, 265 (51.0%, 265/520) would participate if offered. Of all patients, 8.3% (64/771) used the clinics' homepage as a source of information, of those 79.7% (51/64) were satisfied with its content. To enhance patient recruitment strategies, we asked how patients wish to be informed about possible trials: More than half (52.0%) of the questioned patients preferred an individual medical consultation with their physician. We further analyzed the trial participation depending on age, gender, unit, and tumor entity. We could show a significant influence of age (p < 0.001) but not for gender (p = 0.724). The trial participation was also significantly associated with the treating unit (p < 0.001) and tumor entity (p = 0.001). Conclusion Patients are willing to participate in clinical trials. Better information strategies need to be implemented. Physicians need to be aware of running trials within their department and must counseling counsel patients effectively to improve recruitment. Trial concepts should keep in mind patients’ needs including an adequate number of appointments, positive risk-benefit profiles, and information material.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kerstin A Kessel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, Munich, Germany.,Institute for Innovative Radiotherapy (iRT), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, Neuherberg, Germany.,Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), DKTK Partner Site Munich, Germany
| | - Marco M E Vogel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, Munich, Germany.,Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), DKTK Partner Site Munich, Germany
| | - Carmen Kessel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, Munich, Germany.,Onkologisches Zentrum im RHCCC am Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, Munich, Germany.,Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), DKTK Partner Site Munich, Germany
| | - Henning Bier
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), DKTK Partner Site Munich, Germany.,Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, Munich, Germany
| | - Tilo Biedermann
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), DKTK Partner Site Munich, Germany.,Department of Dermatology and Allergy Biederstein, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Biedersteiner Straße 29, Munich, Germany
| | - Helmut Friess
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), DKTK Partner Site Munich, Germany.,Department of Surgery, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Herschbach
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), DKTK Partner Site Munich, Germany.,Roman Herzog Comprehensive Cancer Center (RHCCC), Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Trogerstraße 26, Munich, Germany
| | - Rüdiger von Eisenhart-Rothe
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), DKTK Partner Site Munich, Germany.,Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, Munich, Germany
| | - Bernhard Meyer
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), DKTK Partner Site Munich, Germany.,Department of Neurosurgery, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, Munich, Germany
| | - Marion Kiechle
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), DKTK Partner Site Munich, Germany.,Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, Munich, Germany
| | - Ulrich Keller
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), DKTK Partner Site Munich, Germany.,3rd Department of Internal Medicine (Hematology and Oncology), Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Peschel
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), DKTK Partner Site Munich, Germany.,3rd Department of Internal Medicine (Hematology and Oncology), Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, Munich, Germany
| | - Florian Bassermann
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), DKTK Partner Site Munich, Germany.,3rd Department of Internal Medicine (Hematology and Oncology), Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, Munich, Germany
| | - Roland Schmid
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), DKTK Partner Site Munich, Germany.,Department of Gastroentereology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, Munich, Germany
| | - Markus Schwaiger
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), DKTK Partner Site Munich, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, Munich, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, Munich, Germany.,Institute for Innovative Radiotherapy (iRT), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, Neuherberg, Germany.,Onkologisches Zentrum im RHCCC am Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, Munich, Germany.,Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), DKTK Partner Site Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|