Deflazacort versus other glucocorticoids: a comparison

Medical Management to Treat Chronic Non-healing Ulcers: A Case Series

INTRODUCTION

Chronic non-healing leg ulcers are skin defects below the knee that resist healing for more than six weeks. They cause physical, emotional, and economic burdens to patients and society.

OBJECTIVES

To introduce an innovative medical strategy that targets the chronic inflammation component in non-healing ulcers (NHUs) with rheumatic features and to evaluate its potential effectiveness in achieving complete healing.

METHODS

We employed an empirical medical therapy regimen, which combined medications like deflazacort, colchicine, dapsone, hydroxychloroquine, and azathioprine. We retrospectively selected 25 patients with chronic pedal ulcers who underwent our therapy.

RESULTS

The mean duration of ulcers was 7.84 years, and the time to heal was 5.97 months. Among 25 patients, 19 had atypical ulcers, four had venous ulcers, and two had diabetic neuropathy ulcers. Four patients with venous ulcers additionally underwent endovenous laser ablation.

CONCLUSION

Our medical strategy showed promising results in healing chronic NHUs with rheumatic features without significant steroid-induced adverse effects.

A Study of Drug Utilization Pattern and Pharmacoeconomic Analysis of Immunosuppressant Drugs in Patients With Skin Disorders in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Bihar

Aims The cost-effective therapy of immunosuppressant drugs in dermatological conditions will not only lead to adherence to rational prescribing but will also increase patient compliance with fewer dropouts due to cost factor. Thus, this study was done to determine and compare the drug utilization pattern, prescribed daily dose/defined daily dose (PDD/DDD) defined by WHO, and the cost-effectiveness ratio of different immunosuppressants.  Methods and material Prescriptions for patients with skin disorders prescribed with any one systematic or topical immunosuppressant were collected. The utilization of drugs in different skin disorders was expressed as frequency and percentage. PDD was compared with DDD as per the WHOCC-Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC)/DDD index. The pharmacoeconomic analysis was done using a cost-effectiveness ratio. Statistical analysis Descriptive statistics were used to calculate percentages, frequency, and 95% CI. The cost-effectiveness ratio in terms of SFDs (symptom-free days) was defined as the total cost of the initial antibiotic during the study period divided by the number of SFDs (cost/ SFD) and was expressed as mean±standard deviation, and the Kruskal-Wallis test was used to determine statistical significance of difference. Results Immunosuppressants were prescribed in 117 (19.12%) prescriptions out of a total of 612 prescriptions. Deflazacort was the most utilized systemic immunosuppressant prescribed in 27.18% of cases and was commonly prescribed for irritant contact dermatitis (ICD) and allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) followed by prednisolone and betamethasone. Tacrolimus was the most utilized topical immunosuppressant prescribed in 15.90% of patients and was commonly used for ICD and vitiligo followed by clobetasol and mometasone. Betamethasone, prednisolone, clobetasol, and mometasone had better cost-effectiveness. PDD/DDD of all immunosuppressants was less than one except prednisolone, which had a PDD/DDD ratio of 3.52. Conclusions The cost-effectiveness of steroids has the advantage of providing better patients' adherence to pharmacotherapy, but over-prescribing could also lead to long-term adverse effects of steroids. Pharmacovigilance research should also incorporate pharmacoeconomic analysis to determine the relation between these two aspects.

Electrospun PVA nanofiber mat for topical Deflazacort delivery: accentuated anti-inflammatory efficacy for wound healing

PURPOSE

Asses the wound healing activity of Polyvinyl alcohol - Deflazacort (PVA-DEF) nanofibers mats synthesized by electrospinning technology.

METHODS

PVA-DEF nanofiber mats were created with various PVA polymer concentrations using an electrospinning process. The morphological features and diameter of the electrospun nanofibrous mats were investigated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The in vitro DEF release rate from PVA electrospun nanofibrous mats was evaluated. In addition to assessing wound healing activity in vivo, histological, and immunochemical tests were conducted.

RESULTS

Results revealed a uniform and smooth surface of the fiber with an average diameter of the selected fibers of 533.9 nm ± 45.83. Also, PVA electrospun nanofiber mats showed an initial burst release of more than 50% of the DEF in 1 h, and the rest of the DEF was released gradually for up to 480 min. Fickian diffusion is the main DEF release mechanism from PVA electrospun nanofiber mats. In male Wistar albino rats with 1 cm2 excision wounds, in vivo studies revealed a significant improvement in wound healing rate via modulation of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression.

CONCLUSION

PVA-DEF nanofiber mats can be used effectively for improving wound healing.

Perspectives on the advances in the pharmacotherapeutic management of Duchenne muscular dystrophy

INTRODUCTION

: Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a progressive genetic disease characterized by muscular weakness with a global prevalence of 7.1 cases per 100,000 males. DMD is caused by mutations of the dystrophin gene on the X chromosome which is responsible for dystrophin protein production. Dystrophin is a cytoskeletal protein that contributes to structural support in muscle cells. DMD mutations result in dystrophin protein deficiency which leads to muscle damage and the associated clinical presentation.

AREAS COVERED

: Corticosteroids such as prednisone and deflazacort are routinely given to patients to treat inflammation, but their use is limited by the occurrence of side effects and a lack of standardized prescribing. Exon-skipping medications are emerging as treatment options for a small portion of DMD patients even though efficacy is uncertain. Many new therapeutics are under development that target inflammation, fibrosis, and dystrophin replacement.

EXPERT OPINION

: Because of side effects associated with corticosteroid use, there is need for better alternatives to the standard of care. Excessive cost is a barrier to patients receiving medications that have yet to have established efficacy. Additional therapies have the potential to help patients with DMD, although most are several years away from approval for patient use.

Comparing Deflazacort and Prednisone in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy

Deflazacort and prednisone/prednisolone are the current standard of care for patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) based on evidence that they improve muscle strength, improve timed motor function, delay loss of ambulation, improve pulmonary function, reduce the need for scoliosis surgery, delay onset of cardiomyopathy, and increase survival. Both have been used off-label for many years (choice dependent on patient preference, cost, and geographic location) before FDA approval of deflazacort for DMD in 2017. In this review, we compare deflazacort and prednisone/prednisolone in terms of their key pharmacological features, relative efficacy, and safety profiles in patients with DMD. Differentiating features include lipid solubility, pharmacokinetics, changes in gene expression profiles, affinity for the mineralocorticoid receptor, and impact on glucose metabolism. Evidence from randomized clinical trials, prospective studies, meta-analyses, and post-hoc analyses suggests that patients receiving deflazacort experience similar or slower rates of functional decline compared with those receiving prednisone/prednisolone. Regarding side effects, weight gain and behavior side effects appear to be greater with prednisone/prednisolone than with deflazacort, whereas bone health, growth parameters, and cataracts appear worse with deflazacort.

Meta-analyses of deflazacort versus prednisone/prednisolone in patients with nonsense mutation Duchenne muscular dystrophy

Aim: Compare efficacies of deflazacort and prednisone/prednisolone in providing clinically meaningful delays in loss of physical milestones in patients with nonsense mutation Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Materials & methods: Placebo data from Phase IIb (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00592553) and ACT DMD (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01826487) ataluren nonsense mutation Duchenne muscular dystrophy clinical trials were retrospectively combined in meta-analyses (intent-to-treat population; for change from baseline to week 48 in 6-min walk distance [6MWD] and timed function tests). Results: Significant improvements in change in 6-min walk distance with deflazacort versus prednisone/prednisolone (least-squares mean difference 39.54 m [95% CI: 13.799, 65.286; p = 0.0026]). Significant and clinically meaningful improvements in 4-stair climb and 4-stair descend for deflazacort versus prednisone/prednisolone. Conclusion: Deflazacort provides clinically meaningful delays in loss of physical milestones over 48 weeks compared with prednisone/prednisolone for patients with nonsense mutation Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

Standard of care versus new-wave corticosteroids in the treatment of Duchenne muscular dystrophy: Can we do better?

BACKGROUND

Pharmacological corticosteroid therapy is the standard of care in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD) that aims to control symptoms and slow disease progression through potent anti-inflammatory action. However, a major concern is the significant adverse effects associated with long term-use. MAIN: This review discusses the pros and cons of standard of care treatment for DMD and compares it to novel data generated with the new-wave dissociative corticosteroid, vamorolone. The current status of experimental anti-inflammatory pharmaceuticals is also reviewed, with insights regarding alternative drugs that could provide therapeutic advantage.

CONCLUSIONS

Although novel dissociative steroids may be superior substitutes to corticosteroids, other potential therapeutics should be explored. Repurposing or developing novel pharmacological therapies capable of addressing the many pathogenic features of DMD in addition to anti-inflammation could elicit greater therapeutic advantages.

Role of Tamsulosin with or without Deflazacort to facilitate stone clearance after ESWL: a single-center randomized controlled study

Background

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is the treatment of choice for upper tract calculi of moderate size. After ESWL, various factors affect the passage of small fragments through ureter like fragment’s size and location. To facilitate fragment passage, a lot of medications have been tried and few have stood the test of the time. In this prospective study, we evaluated the role of Tamsulosin with or without Deflazacort versus no treatment after ESWL for ureteric and renal stones in terms of requirement of the number of ESWL sessions, stone clearance rate, stone expulsion time and analgesia requirements.

Results

Patients presenting between age-groups of 18–70 years with solitary renal/ureteric calculus of size between 6 and 15 mm in major axis with Hounsfield unit less than 1000 were recruited in one of the three groups (A, B and C) randomly. Patients in Group A were prescribed Tamsulosin (0.4 mg once daily) with Deflazacort (30 mg once daily), Group B were given Tamsulosin (0.4 mg once daily), and Group C received no treatment (analgesics SOS and hydration therapy) after undergoing ESWL. Two hundred and twenty-five patients were recruited in Group A, and 240 patients were recruited in Group B and Group C each. There was an insignificant difference for required mean ESWL sessions and stone clearance rate between three groups. There was an early clearance of stone fragments in Group A than in Groups B and C, and it was statistically significant between Group A and Group C, specifically in the subgroup of stone size 10.1–15 mm. The requirement of mean analgesic tablets difference was significant between Groups A and C.

Conclusions

Tamsulosin with Deflazacort decreases the number of required ESWL sessions and improves complete stone clearance, but the difference is not significant. There were significant improvement in facilitating early stone clearance and decrease in requirement of mean analgesic tablets after ESWL with Tamsulosin and Deflazacort. Thus, Tamsulosin with Deflazacort can be used safely to facilitate stone clearance without increased complication rate.

Real-world outcomes of long-term prednisone and deflazacort use in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy: experience at a single, large care center

Aim: To assess outcomes among patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy receiving deflazacort or prednisone in real-world practice. Methods: Clinical data for 435 boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy from Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center were studied retrospectively using time-to-event and regression analyses. Results: Median ages at loss of ambulation were 15.6 and 13.5 years among deflazacort- and prednisone-initiated patients, respectively. Deflazacort was also associated with a lower risk of scoliosis and better ambulatory function, greater % lean body mass, shorter stature and lower weight, after adjusting for age and steroid duration. No differences were observed in whole body bone mineral density or left ventricular ejection fraction. Conclusion: This single center study adds to the real-world evidence associating deflazacort with improved clinical outcomes.

Skeletal Muscle Response to Deflazacort, Dexamethasone and Methylprednisolone

Glucocorticoids represent some of the most prescribed drugs that are widely used in the treatment of neuromuscular diseases, but their usage leads to side effects such as muscle atrophy. However, different synthetic glucocorticoids can lead to different muscle effects, depending upon its chemical formulation. Here, we intended to demonstrate the muscle histologic and molecular effects of administering different glucocorticoids in equivalency and different dosages. Methods: Seventy male Wistar rats distributed into seven groups received different glucocorticoids in equivalency for ten days or saline solution. The study groups were: Control group (CT) saline solution; dexamethasone (DX) 1.25 or 2.5 mg/kg/day; methylprednisolone (MP) 6.7 or 13.3mg/kg/day; and deflazacort (DC) 10 or 20 mg/kg/day. At the end of the study, the animals were euthanized, and the tibialis anterior and gastrocnemius muscles were collected for metachromatic ATPase (Cross-sectional area (CSA) measurement), Western blotting (protein expression of IGF-1 and Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK pathways) and RT-PCR (MYOSTATIN, MuRF-1, Atrogin-1, REDD-1, REDD-2, MYOD, MYOG and IRS1/2 genes expression) experiments. Results: Muscle atrophy occurred preferentially in type 2B fibers in all glucocorticoid treated groups. DC on 10 mg/kg/day was less harmful to type 2B fibers CSA than other doses and types of synthetic glucocorticoids. In type 1 fibers CSA, lower doses of DC and DX were more harmful than high doses. DX had a greater effect on the IGF-1 pathway than other glucocorticoids. MP more significantly affected P-ERK1/2 expression, muscle fiber switching (fast-to-slow), and expression of REDD1 and MyoD genes than other glucocorticoids. Compared to DX and MP, DC had less of an effect on the expression of atrogenes (MURF-1 and Atrogin-1) despite increased MYOSTATIN and decreased IRS-2 genes expression. Conclusions: Different glucocorticoids appears to cause muscle atrophy affecting secondarily different signaling mechanisms. MP is more likely to affect body/muscles mass, MEK/ERK pathway and fiber type transition, DX the IGF-1 pathway and IRS1/2 expression. DC had the smallest effect on muscle atrophic response possibly due a delayed timing on atrogenes response.

Chemistry and Pharmacology of Deflazacort: A Novel Bioactive Compound for the Treatment of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy-A Mini Review

Objective:

Firstly, Deflazacort was synthesized in 1969 and has the structural similarity with cortisol. The present review is an attempt to summarize the updated information related to chemistry and pharmacology of Deflazacort.

Development:

Deflazacort a synthetic compound synthesized by derivatization in the chemical structure of prednisolone with an aim to improve its potency. Deflazacort is under global development with Marathon Pharmaceuticals, was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in year 2017 to treat patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD).

Chemistry and Pharmacology:

DMD is one of the rare and genetic disorders with the symptoms of progressive degeneration of muscle tissue. Chemically, it is deacetylated at position 21 to produce active metabolite 21-desacetyl deflazacort (21-desDFZ), which acts through the glucocorticoid receptor. The predominant side effects are cushingoid appearance, increased appetite, upper respiratory tract infection (URTI), pollakiuria, hirsutism, and nasopharyngitis.

Conclusion:

The present article summarizes the available updated information and work done so far on Deflazacort with special emphasis on its chemistry, pharmacology with detailed mechanism of action, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, metabolism and clinical trials etc.

Effect of pretreatment medication on postendodontic pain: A double-blind, placebo-controlled study

BACKGROUND

Posttreatment endodontic pain has been reported in 25%-40% of all endodontic patients. Effective management of endodontic pain represents a continuing challenge.

AIM

To evaluate and compare the efficacy of preoperative single dose of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, piroxicam (20 mg), with two types of corticosteroid drugs - dexamethasone (4 mg) or deflazacort (30 mg) - for the prevention and control of postendodontic pain.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 132 volunteers selected for nonsurgical root canal therapy were randomly divided into the following four groups (n = 30 each) according to preoperative medication given: Group 1, piroxicam (20 mg); Group 2, dexamethasone (4 mg); Group 3, deflazacort (30 mg); and Group 4, placebo. The preoperative medications were administrated 1 h before the start of standard endodontic treatment. Patients were instructed to complete a pain diary using Visual Analog Scale preoperatively and at 6-, 12-, 24-, 48-, and 72-h intervals after root canal instrumentation.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The correlation between preoperative endodontic pain to postoperative pain and pair-wise comparison of four groups was evaluated by Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance test followed by Mann-Whitney U-test.

RESULTS

Compared to the placebo group, piroxicam, dexamethasone, and deflazacort resulted in a statistically significant reduction in postendodontic pain at 6, 12, and 24 h (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative single oral dose of piroxicam or dexamethasone or deflazacort is equally effective in controlling postendodontic pain.

Corticosteroid treatment in Sydenham's chorea

Sydenham's chorea (SC) is an immune-mediated hyperkinetic movement disorder, developing after group A Beta-hemolytic streptococcal (GABHS) infection. Aside from conventional symptomatic treatment (carbamazepine, valproate, neuroleptics), the use of steroids has also been advocated, mainly in severe, drug-resistant cases or if clinically disabling side effects develop with first line therapies. Based on the description of 5 cases followed in the Child Neurology Unit of Santa Maria Nuova Hospital in Reggio Emilia and on the available medical literature on this topic, we propose considering the use of corticosteroids therapy in children with SC, with the administration of IV methyl-prednisolone followed by oral deflazacort in severe cases and of oral deflazacort alone in mild and moderate degrees of involvement. In our experience this therapy is effective both in the short and long-term period, in different clinical presentations (chorea paralytica, distal chorea, hemichorea, "classic" chorea, association with mood disorder or dyspraxia) and very well tolerated (no significant side effects were recorded).

Deflazacort-induced Acneiform Eruptions

A 38-year-old male suffering from a low backache since 3 months was diagnosed as a case of L4-L5 disc prolapse after magnetic resonance imaging examination. He was treated with tolperisone, aceclofenac, and paracetamol in these drugs deflazacort added later. From the 2^nd day of an addition of deflazacort in the therapy, sharply marginated, infiltrative, and erythematous skin eruptions with discrete itching sensations were seen. It was diagnosed as deflazacort-induced acneiform eruption and treated with doxycycline for 2 months which led to the disappearance of acneiform eruptions.

Deflazacort: therapeutic index, relative potency and equivalent doses versus other corticosteroids

Background

Deflazacort is a synthetic corticosteroid characterized by a favourable pharmacokinetic profile, peculiar pharmacodynamic properties and a good safety profile. However, to the best of our knowledge, no dose-conversion table based on direct comparison of relative potencies between deflazacort and other main corticosteroids is currently available in scientific literature.

Main body

This paper, while reporting a brief review of deflazacort pharmacological properties, its efficacy and tolerability in different clinical areas, has been designed with the specific aim of providing a new dose-conversion table of corticosteroids, including for the first time also deflazacort.

Short conclusion

We suggest that this new conversion table could be a useful tool for physicians who need to select the appropriate dose of deflazacort in their clinical practice.

Deflazacort Versus Prednisolone: Randomized Controlled Trial in Treatment of Children With Idiopathic Nephrotic Syndrome

Background:

Corticosteroids are the main therapy of nephrotic syndrome and goal of corticosteroid therapy is to obtain maximum clinical benefit with minimum adverse effects. Children are more vulnerable to side effects of corticosteroids related to growth and adrenal suppression, so a search for an alternative steroid with fewer side-effects is underway. Deflazacort is an oxazoline derivative and preliminary data suggest reduced osteoporosis, lesser growth retardation and weight gain with deflazacort.

Objectives:

This study was done to compare the effectiveness and safety of deflazacort in idiopathic nephrotic syndrome.

Patients and Methods:

Twenty five children with age between 2 to 12 years, with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome were enrolled. They were randomly assigned to receive deflazacort (Group A, n = 12) or prednisolone (Group B, n = 13) and were followed up for six months.

Results:

All children of group A and 11 of group B had remission. Two children from group B were steroid resistant. Mean time taken to induce remission was significantly (P = 0.012) less in group A (10.25 ± 2.41 days) than group B (12.55 ± 1.44 days). One patient in group A had relapse on follow up as compared to 3 in group B (P = 0.58). Statistically significant difference (P = 0.03) in change in mean height was found between group A (2.13 ± 0.50cm) and B (1.44 ± 0.45 cm), with group B gaining less height.

Conclusions:

Remission rate in both groups was comparable although time taken to induce remission was shorter in deflazacort group and there was a significant difference in change of mean height on follow up with prednisolone group gaining lesser height.

Renal function in children and adolescents with Duchenne muscular dystrophy

Improved life expectancy and the need for robust tools to monitor renal safety of emerging new therapies have fueled the interest in renal function in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) patients. We aimed to establish a methodology to accurately assess their renal function. Twenty DMD patients (5-22 years) were included in this prospective study. After obtaining medical history, all patients underwent a clinical examination, 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, ultrasound of the kidneys, direct GFR measurement ((51)Cr-EDTA, mGFR), complete blood and urine analysis. Seventeen of 20 patients were treated with corticosteroids and 5/20 with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (lisinopril). No patient suffered from urinary tract infections or other renal diseases. Hypertension (systolic or diastolic blood pressure >P95) was found in 9/20 patients (8/9 patients were on steroid treatment) and a non-dipping blood pressure profile in 13/20 subjects (10/13 patients were on steroid treatment). Urinary protein to creatinine ratio was elevated in 17/18 patients, whereas 24-hour urine protein excretion was normal in all subjects. Median interquartile range (IQR) mGFR was 130.4 (29.1) mL/min/1.73 m(2). Hyperfiltration (mGFR >150 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) was found in 5/20 patients. Inverse correlation between mGFR and age was observed (R(2) = 0.45, p = 0.001). Serum creatinine based estimated GFR (eGFR) equations overestimated mGFR up to 300%. eGFR based on cystatin C Filler equation was closest to the mGFR (median eGFR (IQR) of 129.5 (39.7) mL/min/1.73 m(2)). Our study demonstrates a high prevalence of hyperfiltration and hypertension in children and adolescents with DMD. Because the majority of hypertensive patients were under corticosteroid treatment, the iatrogenic cause of hypertension cannot be excluded. Serum or urine creatinine measurements are of no value to evaluate renal function in DMD patients due to the reduced skeletal muscle mass.

Comparative efficacy of tamsulosin versus tamsulosin with tadalafil in combination with prednisolone for the medical expulsive therapy of lower ureteric stones: a randomized trial

PURPOSE

To compare the safety and efficacy of tamsulosin and tamsulosin with the phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor tadalafil in combination with prednisolone as medical expulsive therapies for lower ureteric stones.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between July 2011 and December 2012, 62 adult patients presenting with distal ureteric stones sized 5 to 10 mm were randomized equally to treatment with tamsulosin (group A) or tamsulosin with tadalafil (group B). Therapy was given for a maximum of 6 weeks. In addition, patients in groups A and B were given 5-mg prednisolone once daily (maximum 1 week). The stone expulsion rate, time to stone expulsion, analgesic use, number of hospital visits for pain, follow-up and endoscopic treatment, and adverse effects of the drugs were noted. Statistical analyses were done by using Student t-test and chi-square test.

RESULTS

There was a higher expulsion rate (83.9% in group B and 74.2% in group A) and a lower time to expulsion in both treatment groups than in historical controls used in earlier studies. However, these results were not statistically significant (p=0.349, p=0.074, respectively). Statistically significant differences were noted in hospitalization for colic and analgesic requirement, which were less in group B than in group A. There were no serious adverse events. Another important finding was improvement in erectile function in group B.

CONCLUSIONS

Medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteric stones using tamsulosin and tadalafil with prednisolone is safe and efficacious. Also, the prescription of tadalafil in cases of erectile dysfunction with the development of lower ureteric stones may provide additional advantages.

Management issues with exogenous steroid therapy

Glucocorticoids (GCs) are extensively used for various inflammatory and autoimmune disorders, but long term use of these agents is not without complications. Almost every GC formulations (e.g. oral, topical, inhaled, etc.) can cause systemic side effects. It can range from minor side effects (e.g. weight gain) to life-threatening effects (e.g. adrenal suppression, sepsis, etc.), which may require immediate intervention. Therefore, the decision to institute steroid therapy always requires careful consideration of the relative risk and benefit in each patient. The objectives of this study are to discuss monitoring of patients on GCs and management of the complications of GCs.

Systemic use of non-biologic corticosteroids in orofacial diseases

Systemic non-biologic agents have long been in clinical use in medicine - often with considerable efficacy, albeit with some adverse effects--as with all medications. With the advent of biologic agents, all of which currently are restricted to systemic use, there is a growing need to ensure which agents have the better therapeutic ratio. The non-biologic agents (NBAs) include a range of agents, most especially the corticosteroids (corticosteroids). This study reviews the corticosteroids in systemic use in management of orofacial mucocutaneous diseases; subsequent studies discuss corticosteroid-sparing agents used in the management of orofacial diseases, such as calcineurin inhibitors used to produce immunosuppression; purine synthetase inhibitors; and cytotoxic and other immunomodulatory agents.

Randomized controlled trial to compare the safety and efficacy of naftopidil and tamsulosin as medical expulsive therapy in combination with prednisolone for distal ureteral stones

Purpose

To compare the safety and efficacy of naftopidil and tamsulosin with prednisolone as medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteric stones.

Materials and Methods

Between July 2010 and March 2012, 120 adult patients presenting with distal ureteric stones of size 5 to 10 mm were randomized equally to tamsulosin (group A), naftopidil (group B) or watchful waiting (group C). Tamsulosin or naftopidil was given for a maximum of four weeks. In addition patients in group A and B were given 5 mg prednisolone once daily (maximum one week). Stone expulsion rate, time to stone expulsion, analgesic use, number of hospital visits for pain, follow-up and endoscopic treatment and adverse effects of drugs were noted. Statistical analyses were done using chi-square test, Mann-Whitney test and analysis of variance.

Results

There was a statistically higher expulsion rate in groups A (70%) and B (87.5%) as compared to group C (32.5%) (p<0.001). The expulsion rates were not statistically different between groups A and B (p=0.056). The mean time to expulsion was comparable between groups A and B but longer in group C. Analgesic use was significantly lower in groups A and B. Average number of hospital visits for pain, follow-up and endoscopic treatment was similar in all groups. There was no serious adverse event.

Conclusions

Medical expulsive therapy for the distal ureteric stones using either naftopidil or tamsulosin in combination with prednisolone is safe and efficacious.

Acute and chronic corticosteroid treatment of ten patients with paralytic form of Sydenham's chorea

AIMS

To determine efficacy and safety of corticosteroid treatment in patients with severe Sydenham's chorea paralytic form.

METHODS

This is a 4 years observational study on ten patient with severe paralytic form of Sydenham's chorea unresponsive to neuroleptics and antiepileptics agents, treated with intravenous methylprednisolone followed by oral deflazacort therapy. Chorea paralytica patients were bedridden, unable to take independent steps, showed severe generalized hypotonia and were hospitalized for 3-4 weeks. Additional clinical evaluations were undertaken at 1, 3 and 6 months and 1, 2 and 4 years from onset of chorea. Severity chorea at the onset and during follow up was rated according to Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) Sydenham's Chorea Rating Scale (USCRS). In all children video-recording was performing at onset and during clinical follow-up.

RESULTS

We reported a significant improvement in swallowing and chewing with partial recovery of language 2-3 days after starting intravenous methylprednisolone treatment and complete disappearance of movement disorders after 3-4 weeks of treatment. All our patients were followed for 4 years from onset and none experienced relapse of chorea, other movement disorders or psychiatric disturbances. The treatment with deflazacort was well-tolerated in all children with no significant side effects reported.

CONCLUSION

Our data showed that high dose of methylprednisolone intravenously followed by deflazacort therapy may be effective and well-tolerated in children with severe paralytic form of Sydenham's chorea.

Anti-inflammatory glucocorticoid drugs: reflections after 60 years

This review considers the problem of the serious concomitant side effects of powerful anti-inflammatory drugs modelled upon the principal human glucocorticoid hormone, cortisol. The very nature of the original bio-assays to validate their cortisol-like hormonal and anti-inflammatory activities ensured that pleiotropic toxins were selected for clinical studies. Other complicating factors have been (1) considerable reliance on bio-assays conducted in laboratory animals that primarily secrete corticosterone, not cortisol, as their principal anti-inflammatory adrenal hormone; (2) some differences in the binding of xenobiotic cortisol analogues (vis á vis cortisol) to transport proteins, detoxifying enzymes and even some intra-cellular receptors; (3) the "rogue" properties of these hormonal xenobiotics, acting independently of--but still able to suppress--hormonal mechanisms regulating endogenous cortisol; and (4) problems of intrinsic/acquired "steroid resistance", diminishing their clinical efficacy, but not necessarily all their toxicities. The rather gloomy conclusion is that devising new drugs to reproduce the effect of multi-potent hormones may be a recipe for disaster, in contexts other than simply remedying an endocrine deficiency. Promising new developments include "designed" combination therapies that allow some reduction in total steroid doses (and hopefully their side effects); sharpening strategies to limit the actual duration of steroid administration; and resurgent interest in searching for more selective analogues (both steroidal and non-steroid) with less harmful side effects. Some oversights and neglected areas of research are also considered. Overall, it now seems timely to engage in some drastic rethinking about (retaining?) these "licensed toxins" as fundamental therapies for chronic inflammation.