Partial tears of anterior cruciate ligament: Results of single bundle augmentation

Clinical application of modified Crain classification in the Design of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with remnant preservation

BACKGROUND

To investigate the clinical application of modified Crain classification in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) with remnant preservation.

METHODS

The subjects were 70 patients with ACL injury who underwent ACLR from May 2016 to June 2018, and their general data were recorded. They were randomly divided into modified remnant-preserved ACLR group (group M, n = 35) and non remnant-preserved ACLR group (group N, n = 35). ACLR program with remnant preservation was designed based on modified Crain classification in group M, while ACL remnants were completely cleaned during ACLR in group N. Subsequently, the two groups were compared in terms of operation time, complications, as well as Lysholm score, international knee documentation committee (IKDC) score and positive rate of Lachman test of knee joint before operation and at 3, 6 and 12 months after operation.

RESULTS

Both the groups showed good postoperative efficacy, and none had complications like limited knee extension or cyclops lesion. The comparison results found that group M (72.49 ± 7.64 min) required longer operation time than group N (66.06 ± 6.37 min) (P < 0.05). Lysholm score and IKDC score at 3, 6 and 12 months after operation in the two groups were significantly higher than those before operation (P < 0.05); group M had higher Lysholm score and IKDC score at 3 months and 6 months after operation compared with group N (P < 0.05). Additionally, the positive rate of Lachman test at 3, 6 and 12 months after operation in both groups was significantly lower than that before operation (P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference between group M and group N.

CONCLUSION

With the modified Crain classification, many remnant-preserved reconstruction techniques can be rationally used to completely preserve the remnant ligament tissue during operation and improve knee joint function and joint stability with few complications.

Analysis of partial bundle anterior cruciate ligament tears- diagnosis and management with ACL augmentation

OBJECTIVES

Partial ACL tears are increasingly recognized in young active patients. They can evolve into complete tears. Controversy exists regarding the need to spare intact ACL bundle as it has its advantages considering biomechanical strength, blood supply and proprioception. The current study determined the challenges in partial ACL tear management and assessed the functional outcomes.

METHODS

Twenty consecutive patients with partial ACL tears were studied. Inclusion criteria were: age 16-45yrs and patients operated for partial ACL tear. Exclusion criteria were: combined ACL-PCL injuries, associated collateral injuries, complete ACL tear, chondral defect or bony malalignment and patients with radiographic signs of arthritis. 'Partial' tear was defined as continuous fibers from native tibial ACL footprint to native femoral ACL footprint in arthroscopy. Clinical and radiological assessment was done to evaluate anteromedial(AM) or posterolateral(PL) bundle tears. We used the term "ACL-augmentation" without disturbing the intact bundle or preserving the intact fibers as much as possible. Functional scoring was done using Lysholm score. Standard post-operative protocols were followed. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS software.

RESULTS

Mean age of patients was 31.2 years. Physically active age group (<30yrs) included 62.5% patients. Males were 87.5%. Pain and instability were the presenting complaints in 75% and 70% respectively. Average duration of presentation since injury was 4.2 months. Sports activities were the most common mode of injury (45%) followed by road traffic accidents (37.5%). Anterior drawer test was positive in 40%, pivot shift in 35% and Lachman test was positive in 65%. On arthroscopy, 65% had AM bundle tears and 35% had PL bundle tears. The intact bundle was found lax in 13% cases. Associated meniscal tear was present in 28% patients. Stiff knee was the most common post-operative complaint. Preoperative Lysholm knee score of 74.5 improved to 87.7 at 12months (p < 0.001). Around 97.5% of the patients reported outcomes as good and fair.

CONCLUSION

The treatment strategy needs to be individualized. The ACL augmentation needs more systematic and accurate placement of portals while sparing the intact ACL fibers. For AM bundle, tibial tunnel entry point is about 1-2 cm medial to tibial tuberosity. For PL bundle, it is about 3-4 cm medial to tibial tuberosity to protect the AM bundle. Long term studies with greater number of subjects are required.

Posterior tibial slope modification in osteoarthritis knees with different ACL conditions: Cadaveric study of fixed-bearing UKA

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) in anterior cruciate ligament deficiency (ACLD) has been debated for decades after the development of highly cross-linked polyethylene. This study aims to evaluate the effect of posterior tibial slope on restoring adequate knee stability and flexion after UKA in patients with ACLD. A total of 15 fresh cadaveric knees were divided into three groups: intact ACL, partial ACLD, and complete ACLD. Fixed-bearing UKAs including 3-D-printed tibial inserts with the slopes ranging from 3° to 12° were performed using computer-assisted navigation. Blinded evaluation of knee motion and anterior knee translation with knees flexed 20° and 90° was conducted using KT-arthrometry and stress radiography. A 1° slope increase translated the knees anteriorly by 0.85 mm and 0.76 mm in 20° and 90° of knee flexion for a complete ACLD ( R = 0.7 and 0.8, respectively, p < 0.001) compared to 0.5-0.6 mm for the normal and partial ACLD groups, respectively. Setting a slope of 5-8° of UKA for an intact ACL maintained both the stability and the motion of native knees. No significant changes of knee translation and flexion ability were observed after leveling the slopes at 5-7° and 5-6° for partial and complete ACLD, respectively ( p > 0.05 for all comparisons). In conclusion, UKA in complete ACLD knees is challenging since 1° of slope change nearly doubles the degree of knee translation compared to ACL-intact knees. The optimum posterior tibial slopes for fixed-bearing UKA patients with partial and complete ACLD are 5-7° and 5-6°, respectively.

Anatomic and non-anatomic anterior cruciate ligament posterolateral bundle augmentation affects graft function

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to compare knee laxity and graft function (tissue force) between anatomic and non-anatomic posterolateral (PL) bundle augmentation.

METHODS

Twelve (n = 12) fresh-frozen mature, unpaired porcine knees were tested using a robotic testing system. Four knee states were compared: (a) intact anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), (b) deficient PL and intermediate bundles, (c) anatomic PL augmentation, and (d) non-anatomic PL augmentation. Anterior tibial translation (ATT), internal rotation (IR) and external rotation (ER), and the in situ tissue force were measured under an 89.0-N anterior tibial load and 4.0-N m internal and external tibial torques.

RESULTS

Both anatomic and non-anatomic PL augmentation restored the ER, IR, and ATT of the intact knee at all knee flexion angles (n.s.). Both anatomic and non-anatomic PL augmentation restored the in situ tissue force of the ACL during ER and IR loading and ATT loading at all knee flexion angles except at 60° of knee flexion, where the non-anatomic PL augmentation did not restore the in situ tissue force of the ACL during external rotation loading and the anatomic PL augmentation did not restore the in situ tissue force of the ACL during IR loading. Furthermore, there were no differences in ATT, IR, ER, and in situ tissue force under anterior tibial loading, IR and ER loading between the two reconstruction groups.

CONCLUSION

There were no significant differences between anatomic and non-anatomic PL augmentation using the porcine knee model.

Single-Bundle Augmentation for a Partial Tear of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament

Given the prevalence of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears in young athletes, it is essential to elucidate and illustrate surgical interventions that return the most favorable outcomes. Although most ACL injuries are full-thickness tears, occasionally either the anteromedial (AM) or posterolateral (PL) bundle is torn in isolation, allowing consideration of an ACL reconstruction or augmentation. Because the ACL-deficient knee has been shown to exhibit less proprioceptive feedback, the preservation of the intact bundle may offer an inherent component of stability. After arthroscopy has confirmed a partial ACL tear, the decision to augment the intact bundle can be made. The technique is adapted from principles of the double-bundle reconstruction such that the graft follows the path of either the native AM bundle or the native PL bundle, depending on the location of the partial tear. We present our surgical technique for ACL AM bundle augmentation with PL bundle reconstruction using a semitendinosus tendon autograft.