Comparison of intramedullary nail and plating in treatment of diaphyseal tibial fractures with intact fibulae: A randomized controlled trial

Effects of intramedullary nailing and internal fixation plates on postoperative wound infection and pain in patients with distal tibia fractures: A meta-analysis

A meta-analysis was performed to assess the effects of intramedullary nailing (IMN) and internal fixation plates (IFP) on postoperative wound infection and pain in patients with distal tibia fractures, to provide evidence for the selection of surgical options for this group of patients. Computerised searches were performed on PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE, CNKI and Wanfang databases from the inception of each library to August 2023. All published randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing IMN with IFP for the treatment of patients with distal tibial fractures were selected. Literature screening, data extraction and literature evaluation were independently completed by two researchers. Data analysis was performed using the Review Manager 5.4 software. Overall, 25 RCTs with a total of 2011 patients were finally included, comprised by 1009 patients in the IMN group and 1002 patients in the IFP group. The rate of wound infection was significantly lower in the IMN group than that in the IFP group (5.05% vs. 9.58%, odds ratio [OR]: 0.52, 95% confidence intervals [CIs]: 0.37-0.73, p < 0.001). Meanwhile, the IMN group had a significantly higher rate of joint pain than that of the IFP group (14.57% vs. 2.90%, OR: 4.93, 95% CIs: 3.02-8.03, p < 0.00001), whereas the difference between the two surgical procedures in terms of operative time was not statistically significant (standardised mean differences: 0.08 95% CIs: -0.58-0.74, p = 0.82). Current clinical evidence suggests that both IMN and IFP are excellent treatments for distal tibial fractures. Although IMN is better in reducing postoperative wound infection, the risk of postoperative pain is higher. Thus, an appropriate surgical procedure should be selected in clinical practice in accordance with the actual situation of the patient, and IFP is used to reduce the incidence of postoperative joint pain when the anterior tibial soft tissue of the distal tibial fracture is in good condition, and vice versa. IMN is used to reduce the risk of infection.

No Difference in Short-Term Complications following Treatment of Closed Tibial Shaft Fractures with Intramedullary Nailing versus Plate Fixation

Objectives

Tibial shaft fractures are treated with both intramedullary nailing (IMN) and plate fixation (ORIF). Using a large national database, we aimed to explore the differences in thirty-day complication rates between IMN and ORIF.

Methods

Patients in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database who had undergone either tibial IMN or ORIF for closed fractures from 2010 to 2018 were identified using current procedural terminology (CPT) codes. After excluding all patients with open fractures, the propensity score was matching. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were used to identify risk factors associated with the thirty-day incidence of complications in the two cohorts.

Results

A total of 5,400 patients were identified with 3,902 (72.3%) undergoing IMN and 1,498 (27.7%) ORIF. After excluding any ICD-10 diagnosis codes not pertaining to closed, traumatic tibial shaft fractures, 2,136 IMN and 621 ORIF cases remained. After matching, the baseline demographics were not significantly different between the cohorts. Following matching, the rate of any adverse event (aae) did not differ significantly between the IMN (7.08% (n = 44)) and ORIF (8.86% (n = 55)) cohorts (p=0.13). There was also no significant difference in operative time (IMN = 98.5 min, ORIF = 100 min; p=0.3) or length of stay (IMN = 3.7 days, ORIF = 3.3 days; p=0.08) between the cohorts.

Conclusion

There were no significant differences in short-term complications between cohorts. These are important data for the surgeon when considering surgical management of closed tibial shaft fractures.

Bioinspired design proposal for a new external bone fixator device

The article presents a new medical device through an authorial and interdisciplinary approach. It consists of a flexible external fixator, whose flexible property may bring advantages over rigid mechanisms. Its design was inspired by the DNA biological mechanism of condensation, while the modeling was based on the pseudo-rigid modeling technique. From the models obtained, this study conducted prototyping and computational tests to obtain a proof-of-concept of the bioinspired theory and dynamic functioning effectiveness. The prototyping relied on hot glue manufacturing and the computational simulations consisted of linear static analysis. The experimental analysis concluded that the prototype with fewer beams and thinner beams delivered better results in all three parameters: flexibility, height variation and rotation arc. In the computational analysis, among the design models with the variation of the number of beams, the model with 8 beams performed better. Concerning thickness variation, the one whose beams measured 8mm in thickness showed better results. Among the models with length variation, the design made with 100 mm long beams better equilibrated the parameters.

The treatment of segmental tibial fractures: does patient preference differ from surgeon choice?

INTRODUCTION

Segmental tibial fractures are complex injuries with a prolonged recovery time. Current definitive treatment options include intramedullary fixation or a circular external fixator. However, there is uncertainty as to which surgical option is preferable and there are no sufficiently rigorous multi-centre trials that have answered this question. The objective of this study was to determine whether patient and surgeon opinion was permissive for a randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing intramedullary nailing to the application of a circular external fixator.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A convenience questionnaire survey of attending surgeons was conducted during the United Kingdom's Orthopaedic Trauma Society annual meeting 2017 to determine the treatment modalities used for a segmental tibial fracture (n=63). Patient opinion was obtained from clinical patients who had been treated for a segmental tibial fracture as part of a patient and public involvement focus group with questions covering the domains of surgical preference, treatment expectations, outcome, the consent process and follow-up regime (n=5).

RESULTS

Based on the surgeon survey, 39% routinely use circular frame fixation following segmental tibial fracture compared to 61% who use nail fixation. Nail fixation was reported as the treatment of choice for a closed injury in a healthy patient in 81% of surgeons, and by 86% for a patient with a closed fracture who was obese. Twenty-one percent reported that they would use a nail for an open segmental tibia fracture in diabetics who smoked, whilst 57% would opt for a nail for a closed injury with compartment syndrome, and only 27% would use a nail for an open segmental injury in a young fit sports person. The patient and public preference exercise identified that sleep, early functional outcomes and psychosocial measures of outcomes are important.

CONCLUSION

We concluded that a RCT comparing definitive fixation with an intramedullary nail and a circular external fixator is justified as there remains uncertainty on the optimal surgical management for segmental tibial fractures. Furthermore, psychosocial factors and early post-operative outcomes should be reported as core outcome measures as part of such a trial.

Interlocking Nailing Versus Plating in Tibial Shaft Fractures in Adults: A Comparative Study

INTRODUCTION

Tibial diaphyseal fractures are the commonest long bone fractures in adults, most commonly managed by intramedullary interlocking nailing. However, several meta-analysis show that locking plate osteosynthesis is equally effective in managing tibial diaphyseal fractures and are associated with less number of complications.

AIM

To compare the results of fixation of tibial fractures following plating and nailing in terms of union, patient satisfaction and complications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A hospital based non randomized clinical trial was performed from September 2013 to August 2016 where closed or open diaphyseal or metaphyseo- diaphyseal fractures of the tibia (closed or open Gustilo Anderson type 1 through 3B) were included. Simple sequential allocation was used for allotting the patients to two groups, one for interlocking nailing and other for plating. The patients were followed up for clinical, radiographic and functional results.

RESULTS

Forty patients with 41 involved limbs completed follow up for one year. The duration of surgery and average blood loss during surgery was 75.45±3.03 minutes and 165.00±5.31 ml respectively in case of nailing and 85.05±2.54 minutes and184.29±5.33 ml respectively in case of plating and their difference was statistically significant. In our study union was achieved in less than 20 weeks in 29 (70.8%) of the patients and 25-30 weeks in nine (22%) cases. The average time of union in our study was 19.55±0.69 weeks in case of interlocking nailing and 20.38±1.39 weeks in case of plating and there was no statistically significant difference between the two. However, there is statistically significant difference in the functional score in between the two groups in terms of Lower Extremity Functional Score (LEFS). Delayed union in one case of nailing and two cases of plating, valgus malunion in one case of nailing and joint stiffness in two cases each of nailing and plating were the major complications observed.

CONCLUSION

There was no difference between the two modalities in terms of fracture union. Complications were lesser but more serious in case of plating. Patient satisfaction was more with plating.