Surgical stabilization for open tibial fractures in children: External fixation or elastic stable intramedullary nail - which method is optimal?

Casting, elastic intramedullary nailing or external fixation in pediatric tibial shaft fractures: which is the most appropriate treatment? A multicenter study

The main objective of this study was to retrospectively evaluate and compare the outcomes and complications of displaced closed tibial fractures in children treated by CRC (closed reduction and casting), elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) or external fixation (EF). One hundred twenty-three consecutive children were treated for displaced closed tibia shaft fracture from July 2014 and January 2020 at two different institutions. Seventy-five of them met the inclusion criteria and were included in the study: 30 (40%) patients were treated with CRC, 33 (44%) with ESIN, and 12 with EF (16%). All clinical and radiographic outcomes and complications were registered and compared. The three groups did not differ with regard to gender, affected side, fracture site and associated fibula fracture. The age at the time of treatment in the CRC group was statistically lower than in ESIN and EF groups (8.43 ± 3.52 years vs. 10.39 ± 2.56 years vs. 11.08 ± 3.55 years, respectively). Immobilization time and time to partial and total weight bearing were significantly reduced in ESIN and EF groups compared to CRC group (P < 0.05). Overall, no statistically significant differences were found between the three groups regarding complication rate and clinical and radiographic outcomes between the three groups. However, in CRC group, 3 patients (10%) had secondary fracture displacement and underwent ESIN. Surgical treatment is not contraindicated in children with displaced tibia shaft fractures. EF and ESIN provide earlier mobilization and weight-bearing recovery than CRC. However, apart from that, nonoperative treatment was as efficacious as surgical treatment.

Outcomes of Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nailing for Surgical Treatment of Pediatric Tibial Shaft Fractures

BACKGROUND

This retrospective study aimed to assess radiographic and clinical outcomes, characterize demographic, injury, and fracture characteristics, and elucidate the rate of postoperative complications and associated factors in a large cohort of children treated with elastic stable intramedullary nail for diaphyseal tibial fractures at two large pediatric referral centers.

METHODS

Medical records were reviewed for demographic clinical and radiographic parameters at injury, surgery, and all subsequent clinical visits until radiographic healing was observed and/or for a minimum of 6 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

A total of 146 patients (79.5% male) were included. The mean (SD) age was 11.8 (63.0) years. Radiographic union occurred by 3 months in 56.6% of patients. Nine patients had delayed union, and four had nonunion. By 3 months postoperatively, 97.2% of patients had progressed to full weight bearing and 92.5% had full range of motion of the knee and ankle. Subgroup analyses revealed that patients with open fractures were found to be more than eight times at increased risk of developing delayed union (.6 months, odds ratio = 8.71).

CONCLUSION

Elastic stable intramedullary nail remains a safe and effective treatment of open and closed pediatric diaphyseal tibial fractures. A small yet notable risk of residual angular deformity, delayed union, and nonunion remains, although rates may be better than previously reported.

Which is the better choice for open tibial shaft fracture in overweight adolescent with open physis: A comparative study of external fixator plus elastic stable intramedullary nail versus external fixator alone

PURPOSE

To compare the clinical outcomes of external fixator + elastic stable intramedullary nail (EF+ESIN) vs. external fixator (EF) in the treatment for open tibial shaft fracture in overweight adolescents.

METHODS

Patients of open tibial shaft fractures younger than 14 years old with body weight over 50 Kg treated with EF + ESIN or EF at our institute from 2010 to 2018 were reviewed. Patients with Gustilo Type III open fractures, pathological fractures, previous fracture or instrumentation in the operative leg were excluded. Baseline information and clinical data were collected from the hospital database and during out-patient visits.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients, including 27 males and 19 females, were included in the EF group, whereas 35 patients, including 18 males and 17 females, were included in the EF + ESIN group (p = 0.527). The incidence of superficial infection was higher in the EF group (26/46, 56.5%) than the EF + ESIN group (12/35, 34.3%), p < 0.001. The frontal and sagittal angulation was higher in the EF group (p < 0.001), but the degrees in both groups were within the acceptable range. The union time was longer in the EF group (68.0 ± 12.7, d) than the EF + ESIN group (61.9 ± 11.9), p < 0.001. The retaining of EF (11.9 ± 3.2, w) was longer in the EF group than the EF +ESIN group (5.7 ± 1.2, w), p < 0.001.

CONCLUSION

EF+ESIN is a safe and alternative choice for selected overweight adolescents with open tibial shaft fracture.

External fixation versus elastic stable intramedullary nailing in the treatment of open tibial shaft fractures in children

Introduction

External fixator (EF) is a popular choice for open tibial fractures, but pin tract infection (PTI) and refracture are common complications. Elastic stable intramedullary nail (ESIN) has been reported in the treatment for open tibial fractures. This study aims to compare the clinical outcomes of EF vs. ESIN in the treatment for open tibial shaft fracture in children retrospectively.

Methods

Patients aged 5–11 years with Gustilo-Anderson II and IIIA tibial shaft fracture treated at our institute from January 2008 to January 2018 were reviewed retrospectively and categorized into EF and ESIN groups. Patients with pathological fracture, neuromuscular disorder, metabolic disease, previous tibial fracture or instrumentation, and polytrauma were excluded. Patients with follow-up < 24 months or incomplete medical records were also excluded.

Results

In all, 55 patients (33 males, 22 females) were included in the EF group, whereas 37 patients (21 males, 16 females) were included in the ESIN group. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups concerning sex, age, body weight, duration from injury to surgery, Gustilo-Anderson (GA) classification, and concomitant injuries. There was no case of nonunion and malunion in either group. The angulation at the latest follow-up was higher in the EF group than the ESIN group (P < 0.01). The radiological union was faster in the ESIN group (7.0 ± 0.9 weeks) than those in the EF group (9.0 ± 2.2 weeks) (P < 0.01). Limb length discrepancy (LLD) was more in the EF group (12.1 ± 4.4, mm) than in the ESIN group (7.3 ± 4.3, mm) (P < 0.01).

Conclusion

ESIN is a viable option in selected patients of GA grade II and IIIA open tibial fractures with comparable clinical outcomes as external fixator. Pin tract infection is the most troublesome complication in the EF group while implant prominence is a nuisance in the ESIN group.

Open tibial shaft fracture in a boy with autism spectrum disorder treated using a ring external fixator: A case report

Autism spectrum disorder covers a group of behaviorally defined disorders that may result in the patient having difficulty staying calm during medical treatments, due to anxiety-related overreactions. Tibial fractures are the third most common pediatric long-bone fracture. Conservative treatment is selected in many cases, but surgical treatment may be selected in cases of open fracture and no treatment policy has been established. We described the case of a 6-year-old boy with autism spectrum disorder who was unable to stay calm due to anxiety and required sedation. We diagnosed open tibial shaft fracture (Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification 42A1, 4F2A; Gustilo classification type 1). On the day of injury, we performed osteosynthesis using a ring external fixator and primary closure of the open wound. Full weight-bearing was permitted from immediately after surgery. No significant complications were observed postoperatively, and the external fixator was removed 84 days postoperatively. No abnormal alignment of the lower leg, leg-length discrepancy or range of motion disorder was identified. To the best of our knowledge, no other reports have described use of a ring external fixator for open tibial shaft fractures in children with autism spectrum disorder. Using a ring external fixator appears helpful for open tibial shaft fractures in children who are unable to stay calm due to autism spectrum disorder, because there is no need to limit weight-bearing immediately after surgery. For Gustilo classification type 1 pediatric open fracture, primary closure of the open wound is safe after sufficient bone fixation.

Treatment of distal metaphyseal tibia fractures using an external fixator in children

INTRODUCTION

Current treatment of pediatric distal metaphyseal tibial/fibular fractures is challenging due to poor skin and soft tissue coverage and limited blood supply to the distal tibia area in children. It remains unknown whether the SK combined external fixator (made by Double Medical Technology Inc., China) is effective for the treatment of distal metaphyseal tibia/fibula fractures in children.

HYPOTHESIS

We hypothesized that SK combined external fixator could achieve satisfying outcomes for pediatric distal metaphyseal tibia/fibula fractures.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 19 pediatric patients with a median age of 6 years (range: 3.8-12.0 years), who had distal tibia/fibula metaphyseal fractures and attended our hospital between January 2017 and November 2017, were evaluated. All patients with tibia fracture had closed reduction and percutaneously fixed SK combined external fixators. Radiographs were taken at an average of every 4 weeks to evaluate the healing of the fracture. Complications were recorded, and the stability of the pin clamp and rod were also checked. Follow-up was conducted for up to 13 months. All patients provided informed consent for publication of the case.

RESULTS

All patients achieved a satisfactory clinical outcome at the final follow-up. Weight-bearing exercises were started at post-operative 2 weeks. Bone union was obtained at 8 weeks post-operation on average. No delayed healing or nonunion was observed, although one case of pin site infection and three cases of pin clamp loosening occurred.

DISCUSSION

Three-dimensional SK combined external fixators are light, easy to apply, minimally invasive, and result in low rates of complications. They provide excellent stability for pediatric distal tibia/fibula metaphyseal fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Management of Orthopaedic Injuries in Multiply Injured Child

Multiply injured child is a unique challenge to the medical communities worldwide. It is a leading cause of preventable mortality and morbidity in children. Common skeletal injuries include closed or open fractures of tibia and femur and pelvic injuries. Initial management focuses on saving life and then saving limb as per pediatric advanced life support and advanced trauma life support. Orthopedic management of open fracture includes splinting the limb, administration of prophylactic antibiotic, and surgical debridement of the wound when safe. However, gross contamination, compartment syndrome, and vascular injuries demand urgent attention.