Posttraumatic stiff elbow

Features of the Rehabilitation of Patients with Fractures of the Humeral Diaphysis after Osteosynthesis

Aim: Determination of the target criteria of physical rehabilitation and the optimal time of their implementation depending on the methods of fixation of fractures of the humeral diaphysis. Materials and methods: The results of treatment of 59 patients with diaphyseal humeral fractures have been studied. All patients underwent extra- or intramedullary osteosynthesis. Results: In the absence of satisfactory stability of fracture fixation (Group A), passive movements and no active movements are recommended, especially in the presence of free bone fragments that serve as a site for muscle insertion (Group A1). The presence of free fragments with stable fixation (Groups B1 and B2) determined the possibility of active adduction and abduction movements of the shoulder. Complexes of physical rehabilitation exercises with the exclusion or prohibition of active rotational movements have been chosen for patients of Groups C1 and C2. Conclusions: The proposed system of distribution of physical load during the rehabilitation period according to the “ABC” type provides a biomechanically based approach to the rehabilitation process.

Elbow Stiffness Imaging: A Practical Diagnostic and Pretherapeutic Approach

Loss of elbow motion can lead to disability in everyday gestures, recreational activities, and work. Unfortunately, the elbow joint is particularly prone to stiffness because of its complex anatomy and biomechanics. The etiology of elbow stiffness is varied and must be diagnosed accurately in order to allow optimal treatment, which may be challenging for surgeons and physiotherapists. Its treatment can be either conservative, arthroscopic or surgical, with a trend for arthroscopic procedures when conservative treatment fails. There is no consensus on the optimal imaging workup for elbow joint stiffness, which may have an impact on patient management. This article reviews the current classification systems of elbow stiffness and the various imaging techniques used for diagnosis. Report checklists and clarifications on the role of each imaging method, as well as the imaging findings of normal and stiff elbows, are presented, leading to a proposed diagnostic algorithm. The main concern in imaging is to determine the cause of elbow stiffness, as many concomitant abnormalities might be present depending on the clinical scenario.

The Prognosis of Arthrofibroses: Prevalence, Clinical Shortcomings, and Future Prospects

Fibrosis is the dysregulated biosynthesis of connective tissue that results from persistent infection, high serum cholesterol, surgery, trauma, or prolonged joint immobilization. As a disease that impacts connective tissue, it is prevalent across the body and disrupts normal extracellular and tissue organization. Ultimately, fibrosis impairs the tissue structural, mechanical, or biochemical function. This review describes the clinical landscape of joint fibrosis, that is, arthrofibrosis, including the risk factors and causes, as well as current clinical treatments and their shortcomings. Because treating arthrofibrosis remains an unmet clinical challenge, we present several animal models used for exploration of the physiopathology of arthrofibrosis and summarize their use for testing novel treatments. We then discuss therapeutics for the prevention or treatment of arthrofibrosis that are in preclinical development and in ongoing clinical trials. We conclude with recent findings from molecular biological studies of arthrofibroses that shed insight on future areas of research for improved treatments.

Arthroscopic arthrolysis leads to improved range of motion and health-related quality of life in post-traumatic elbow stiffness

BACKGROUND

Post-traumatic elbow stiffness is a frequent and disabling complication after elbow trauma. Surgical release is needed if conservative treatment fails. In contrast to open surgical release, arthroscopic arthrolysis is a good and least invasive option to restore joint mobility. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes, range of motion (ROM), and function of post-traumatic elbow contracture after arthroscopic arthrolysis and to assess health-related quality of life (HRQL).

METHODS

Between 2007 and 2013, 44 patients with post-traumatic elbow stiffness were treated by arthroscopic arthrolysis and followed up in a consecutive series. Clinical (ROM) and functional analyses (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire [DASH], Mayo Elbow Performance Index [MEPI]) were performed at final follow-up 3 (1-7) years postoperatively. Furthermore, HRQL was evaluated (EQ-5D, 36-Item Short Form Health Survey [SF-36]).

DISCUSSION

The average arc of elbow motion increased from 84° ± 28° preoperatively to 120° ± 18° postoperatively. All applied scores significantly improved pre- to postoperatively: the MEPI (59.8 ± 17.3 / 84.3 ± 14.0), DASH (43.5 ± 23.1 / 16.8 ± 15.6), EQ-5D (72.8 ± 16.6 / 84.0 ± 13.6), and SF-36 showed improved results in all categories. Univariate logistic regression revealed that preoperative pain level predicts a poorer postoperative outcome measured with the MEPI score. Revision arthroscopy was needed in 1 case because of persistent pain.

CONCLUSIONS

Arthroscopic arthrolysis leads to good clinical and functional results in post-traumatic elbow stiffness regarding ROM, pain relief, functionality, and quality of life. The complication rate as well as the revision rate is very low.

The Measurement Methods of Movement and Grip Strength in Children with a Previous Upper Extremity Fracture: A Comparative, Prospective Research

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Decreased range of motion of the elbow and forearm and decreased grip strength are potential findings following a childhood upper extremity fracture. Clinical follow-up is essential because spontaneous improvement is seen several months after the injury. Freehand measuring with a goniometer and hydraulic dynamometer is used to evaluate clinical result. The new methods are justified in avoiding human typewriting errors, thus improving patient safety. Nevertheless, their feasibility in child patients is unknown. This study aimed to evaluate congruence between the computer-assisted and the free-hand measuring methods.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 59 children with a previous supracondylar humerus fracture were clinically examined by means of free-hand (transparent goniometer and hydraulic dynamometer; Jamar, Lafayette Ltd.) and computer-assisted (E-Link System Packages, Biometrics Ltd.) methods. The range of motion and grip strength were measured separately using both methods. Agreement between the measurements was evaluated using the Bland-Altman method.

RESULTS

The results between the two methods were incongruent and the differences between measurements increased along with the mean of measurements in all categories except elbow extension. Rotational range of motions were smaller and grip strength was weaker while measuring with the computer-assisted method. The mean discrepancy was 0.97° (95% confidence interval = -2.46 to 0.53) for elbow extension and 7.97° (95% confidence interval = 6.60-9.33) for elbow flexion.

CONCLUSIONS

Grip strength is used to evaluate impairment of hand function. The study method showed slightly lower results in grip strength. Range of motion is essential when evaluating the outcome of supracondylar humerus fracture, while >10° of change in elbow range of motion associate with impaired function. As compared with the gold-standard goniometer, the methods were not congruent. However, all differences were under 10° and probably beyond clinical importance. Because of its advantages in recording the outcomes to electronical charts, the computer-assisted method is recommended option in performing the follow-up of complicated pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures.

Intraarticular injection of relaxin-2 alleviates shoulder arthrofibrosis

Arthrofibrosis is a prevalent condition affecting greater than 5% of the general population and leads to a painful decrease in joint range of motion (ROM) and loss of independence due to pathologic accumulation of periarticular scar tissue. Current treatment options are limited in effectiveness and do not address the underlying cause of the condition: accumulation of fibrotic collagenous tissue. Herein, the naturally occurring peptide hormone relaxin-2 is administered for the treatment of adhesive capsulitis (frozen shoulder) and to restore glenohumeral ROM in shoulder arthrofibrosis. Recombinant human relaxin-2 down-regulates type I collagen and α smooth muscle actin production and increases intracellular cAMP concentration in human fibroblast-like synoviocytes, consistent with a mechanism of extracellular matrix degradation and remodeling. Pharmacokinetic profiling of a bolus administration into the glenohumeral joint space reveals the brief systemic and intraarticular (IA) half-lives of relaxin-2: 0.96 h and 0.62 h, respectively. Furthermore, using an established, immobilization murine model of shoulder arthrofibrosis, multiple IA injections of human relaxin-2 significantly improve ROM, returning it to baseline measurements collected before limb immobilization. This is in contrast to single IA (sIA) or multiple i.v. (mIV) injections of relaxin-2 with which the ROM remains constrained. The histological hallmarks of contracture (e.g., fibrotic adhesions and reduced joint space) are absent in the animals treated with multiple IA injections of relaxin-2 compared with the untreated control and the sIA- and mIV-treated animals. As these findings show, local delivery of relaxin-2 is an innovative treatment of shoulder arthrofibrosis.

[Performance control after arthroscopic arthrolysis with capsulectomy in fresh-frozen elbow joints]

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Posttraumatic or postoperative movement restrictions in elbow joints can often occur (including capsular contracture) and can generate everyday limitations. In persistent elbow stiffness, arthroscopic arthrolysis with removal of the dorsal and ventral capsule portions can be carried out. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of arthroscopic capsulectomy by means of an in vitro anatomical study.

METHODS

A standardized elbow arthroscopy with ventral and dorsal capsulectomy was performed and image-documented in five fresh-frozen elbow specimens. Subsequently, open dissection of the elbow joint was performed to analyze the amount of residual capsule by means of photodocumentation of the specimens.

RESULTS

Regardless of the surgeon and surgical experience, anterior and posterior remnants of the capsule remained in all specimens. Dorsal capsule strands around the standard arthroscopy portals were noticed particularly more often in the area of the high dorsolateral camera portal. An incomplete capsulectomy was seen on the ulnar side at the level of the posterior medial ligament (PML) in the immediate vicinity of the ulnar nerve. Ventrally, a capsulectomy was performed from the radial side and also the ulnar side until the brachialis muscle and additionally a complete capsulectomy as far as the anterior medial ligament (AML) and radial collateral ligament (RCL) was achieved. The capsule was completely resected in a proximal direction. Distally, irrelevant capsular remnants were found in the region of the annular ligament and distal of the tip of the coronoid process.

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopic arthrolysis can be performed with a high degree of radicality. The radicality must be self-critically taken into account in one's own action. The radicality of the portal change may even be higher ventrally than with an isolated column procedure. On the other hand, it must be critically considered that posteriorly, the PML cannot be adequately addressed by means of arthroscopy due to the risk of ulnar nerve injury. Portal changes might help to enable a more complete visualization of the joint capsule and may avoid leaving possibly relevant remnants of the capsule. If a release of the PML is required, this may have to be carried out in combination with an ulnar nerve release in a mini-open technique.

Reasons for surgical revision after conservatively treated radial head fractures-retrospective study of 70 patients

Background

An inadequate clinical outcome after conservatively treated radial head fractures is not uncommon. We analyzed the subjective limitations, objective complaints, and surgical procedures for radial head fractures initially treated conservatively.

Patients and method

Between 2007 and 2016, 70 patients (42 men, 28 women) who suffered from fracture sequelae after conservatively treated radial head fractures were examined. Demographic (age, 41.8 years, range, 16–75 years) and clinical data (pain, range of motion, instability) were retrospectively evaluated.

Results

The average time to surgery after trauma was 50 months (range, 5–360 months). In 38 cases, radial head fractures were initially treated with immobilization for 3.4 weeks (range, 1–8 weeks). Physiotherapeutic treatment was performed in 39 cases. In only half of the cases was retrospective Mason classification possible: 20 type I, 8 type II, 5 type III, and 2 type IV. Of the 70 patients, 53 had posttraumatic elbow stiffness; 34 had isolated lateral and four patients isolated medial ligament instability. There were eight cases with a combination of lateral and medial ligament instability and 27 cases of elbow stiffness combined with instability. An average of 1.2 (range, 1–4) surgical procedures per patient were performed. In all, 64 patients underwent elbow arthroscopy with arthrolysis and additional treatment depending on other injuries. The range of motion improved on average from preoperative flexion/extension of 131–15–0° to postoperative flexion/extension of 135–5–0° (gain in flexion: 4.2° and extension: 10.6°).

Conclusion

Conservative treatment of radial head fractures does not always yield good results. Reasons for a poor outcome include chronic instability, cartilage damage, stiffness, or a combination thereof. Improved outcomes can be achieved via arthroscopic arthrolysis.

[Treatment of elbow joint stiffness by open release combined with distal radius fixation hinged external fixation]

Objective

To observe the effectiveness of open release combined with distal radius fixation hinged external fixation for the treatment of elbow stiffness.

Methods

A total of 77 patients with elbow stiffness caused by trauma were enrolled in this study between October 2014 and October 2015. The patients were divided into control group (39 cases) and observation group (38 cases) by random number table method. The patients in the observation group were treated with elbow joint opening and release combined with distal radial fixation hinged external fixation, while the control group was treated with traditional release. There was no significant difference in gender, age, disease causes, original damage diagnosis, the time from injury to operation, preoperative flexion and extension activity of elbow joint, and preoperative Mayo elbow joint function score between 2 groups ( P>0.05). After operation, the function of elbow joint was evaluated by the flexion and extension activity of the elbow joint and the Mayo elbow joint function evaluation standard.

Results

The incisions healed by first intention in 2 groups. In observation group, there were 1 case infection of nail tract, 2 cases ulnar nerve symptoms, 1 case elbow ossification, and 1 case moderate pain in the elbow; while in control group, there were 2 cases of infection of nail tract, 2 cases of ulnar nerve symptoms, and 3 cases moderate pain in the elbow. The patients in 2 groups were followed up 6 weeks to 12 months, with an average of 6 months. The flexion and extension activity of elbow joint and Mayo elbow joint function score at last follow-up were significantly improved when compared with preoperative ones ( P<0.05); at last follow-up, the flexion and extension activity of elbow joint and Mayo elbow joint function score in observation group patients were significantly better than those in control group ( P<0.05). According to the Mayo elbow function evaluation standard, the results were excellent in 27 cases, good in 10 cases, and fair in 1 case, with an excellent and good rate of 97.4% in observation group; and the results were excellent in 12 cases, good in 21 cases, fair in 4 cases, and poor in 2 cases, with an excellent and good rate of 84.6% in control group; showing no significant difference between 2 groups ( P=0.108).

Conclusion

Open release combined with distal radius fixation hinged external fixation can significantly improve the elbow function of patients with traumatic elbow stiffness, its recovery of elbow function was superior to the traditional release.