Analysis of results of surgical treatment of posttraumatic stiff elbow

Comparing Options for Heterotopic Ossification Prophylaxis following Elbow Trauma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction  Heterotopic ossification (HO) can be a potentially serious and devastating complication following traumatic injury to the elbow. HO prophylaxis options include nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and radiation therapy (RT) but neither has been proven more effective. The purpose of this review is to compare effectiveness and outcomes between NSAID and RT prophylaxis for HO about the elbow following a traumatic injury. Materials and Methods  We performed a systematic review of PubMed and Cochrane Library for cases of HO prophylaxis following elbow trauma utilizing PRISMA guidelines to determine the most effective form of prophylaxis. Outcomes of interest included recurrence of HO, range of motion (ROM), and Mayo elbow performance index (MEPI). A total of 36 articles and 826 elbows of which 203 received RT and 623 received NSAID were identified and included in the final analysis. Results  Rates of HO formation or recurrence following elbow trauma were similar between radiation and NSAID prophylaxis (15.6% vs. 22.2%, respectively p = 0.457). ROM was similar in flexion and extension arc (109.0 degrees in radiation vs. 112.8 in NSAIDs, p = 0.459) and in pronation and supination arc (118.9 degrees radiation vs. 134.7 degrees NSAIDs, p = 0.322). MEPI scores were 79.19 in the radiation group and 88.82 in the NSAIDs group at the final follow-up. Conclusion  There is no statistical difference in HO development, recurrence, or final ROM between NSAIDs and RT prophylaxis following trauma to the elbow. We recommend the choice of modality based on patient characteristics, cost, and surgeon preference. Level of Evidence  Level III.

Arthroscopic arthrolysis leads to improved range of motion and health-related quality of life in post-traumatic elbow stiffness

BACKGROUND

Post-traumatic elbow stiffness is a frequent and disabling complication after elbow trauma. Surgical release is needed if conservative treatment fails. In contrast to open surgical release, arthroscopic arthrolysis is a good and least invasive option to restore joint mobility. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes, range of motion (ROM), and function of post-traumatic elbow contracture after arthroscopic arthrolysis and to assess health-related quality of life (HRQL).

METHODS

Between 2007 and 2013, 44 patients with post-traumatic elbow stiffness were treated by arthroscopic arthrolysis and followed up in a consecutive series. Clinical (ROM) and functional analyses (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire [DASH], Mayo Elbow Performance Index [MEPI]) were performed at final follow-up 3 (1-7) years postoperatively. Furthermore, HRQL was evaluated (EQ-5D, 36-Item Short Form Health Survey [SF-36]).

DISCUSSION

The average arc of elbow motion increased from 84° ± 28° preoperatively to 120° ± 18° postoperatively. All applied scores significantly improved pre- to postoperatively: the MEPI (59.8 ± 17.3 / 84.3 ± 14.0), DASH (43.5 ± 23.1 / 16.8 ± 15.6), EQ-5D (72.8 ± 16.6 / 84.0 ± 13.6), and SF-36 showed improved results in all categories. Univariate logistic regression revealed that preoperative pain level predicts a poorer postoperative outcome measured with the MEPI score. Revision arthroscopy was needed in 1 case because of persistent pain.

CONCLUSIONS

Arthroscopic arthrolysis leads to good clinical and functional results in post-traumatic elbow stiffness regarding ROM, pain relief, functionality, and quality of life. The complication rate as well as the revision rate is very low.

The timing of open surgical release of post-traumatic elbow stiffness: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Open release of post-traumatic elbow stiffness is effective in restoring elbow function, but there is no guideline on the optimal time point of surgical release so far. The purpose of this article was to summarize the current available literature reporting on the timing of open release of post-traumatic elbow stiffness.

METHODS

The PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE were searched with a set of predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Manual searches for references were performed to find potential relevant studies. Two authors separately extracted data from all the articles selected.

RESULTS

27 articles published between 1989 and 2017 were included with an overall enrollment of 836 patients. We divided all included studies into 3 groups according to the timing of surgical release: group 1 (6-10 months after injury), group 2 (11-20 months after injury), and group 3(>20 months after injury). The mean postoperative Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) and recurrence rate were similar among the 3 groups; however, the mean gain in arc of motion in group 1 was the highest with the lowest complication rate among the 3 groups.

CONCLUSION

There was a trend toward a shorter waiting time from injury to open arthrolysis from 12 months to 6 months. The shorter waiting period of 6 to 10 months yielded better results. Therefore, early surgical release of stiff elbows is recommended for a shorter rehabilitation time and earlier return to work.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, Systematic Review.

Posttraumatic stiff elbow

Posttraumatic stiff elbow is a frequent and disabling complication and poses serious challenges for its management. In this review forty studies were included to know about the magnitude of the problem, causes, pathology, prevention, and treatment of posttraumatic stiff elbow. These studies show that simple measures such as internal fixation, immobilization in extension, and early motion of elbow joint are the most important steps that can prevent elbow stiffness. It also supports conservative treatment in selected cases. There are no clear guidelines about the choice between the numerous procedures described in literature. However, this review article disproves two major beliefs-heterotopic ossification is a bad prognostic feature, and passive mobilization of elbow causes elbow stiffness.

Outcomes of arthroscopic arthrolysis for the post-traumatic elbow stiffness

PURPOSE

Post-traumatic contracture is a common complication after elbow trauma. If conservative therapy fails to restore adequate elbow motion, surgical release is recommended. Increase in arthroscopy knowledge and skills, as well as technological advances in the passed decade of years, has made arthroscopic arthrolysis a safe and reliable treatment for patients with a post-traumatic elbow contracture. The aim of this study was to report on the clinical outcome and improvement of ROM in post-traumatic stiff elbow treated by arthroscopic arthrolysis.

METHODS

Between 2008 and 2012, 34 consecutive patients with post-traumatic stiffness were treated with arthroscopic arthrolysis. Active and passive elbow movement is encouraged the day after operation with the effective pain management. Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) and visual analogue scale were measured.

RESULTS

At the final follow-up, the average arc of elbow motion increased from 48.6 ± 19.3 pre-operatively to 114.5 ± 25.7, with a mean improvement of 65.9°. The MEPI score improved from 68.2 ± 16.4 pre-operatively to 92.4 ± 21.6, with a mean improvement of 24.2 (p < 0.001). Results were good to excellent in 29 patients.

CONCLUSION

Injuries are the most common cause of elbow stiffness requiring surgical release. The procedure of arthroscopic arthrolysis is a good option for the treatment of post-traumatic elbow stiffness as it restores normal elbow function. Early passive/active post-operative rehabilitation is very important.

Improvements in elbow motion after resection of heterotopic bone: a systematic review

Complex elbow trauma, severe burn, or a closed head injury render patients at risk for developing heterotopic ossification around the elbow. When heterotopic ossification restricts elbow motion, some patients request surgical resection. We performed a systematic review of the literature to analyze improvement in elbow motion after resection of heterotopic ossification around the elbow. We found that, on average, etiology had little impact on outcome after resection of heterotopic ossification. Resection of heterotopic bone generally leads to improvement of elbow function.

Clinical results of the excision of heterotopic bone around the elbow: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Heterotopic ossification (HO) of the elbow can occur following direct trauma, brain injury, or burns. Development of elbow HO is sporadic, making levels 1-3 clinical evidence difficult to establish. We systematically reviewed literature regarding management and outcomes of surgically treated elbow HO.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature regarding elbow HO was performed to compare imaging modalities, surgical timing, surgical approaches, and methods of prophylaxis in outcomes of patients treated with excision.

RESULTS

Our systematic review included 24 level 3 or 4 studies investigating 384 post-trauma (158), brain injury (105), or burn (94) patients with elbows complicated by HO that were treated with surgical excision. Average patient age was 36.9 years and there was a 65/35 M/F ratio. For all etiologies, preoperatively elbow flexion/extension averaged 53/83; postoperatively elbow flexion/extension significantly improved to 22/123. Regardless of the etiology, surgical excision of elbow HO significantly improved functional range of motion. Neither total body surface area (TBSA) burned for burn patients or Garland classification for brain-injured patients correlated with outcome. Overall complication rate was 22.6% and included HO recurrence (11.9%), ulnar nerve injury, infection, and delayed wound healing.

CONCLUSION

Surgical treatment of elbow HO leads to improved functional outcome, whether the etiology of bone formation was direct elbow trauma, brain injury, or thermal injury.