Dysphagia in a psychotic patient: Diagnostic challenges and a systematic management approach

Psychopathological aspects of dysphagia: a systematic review on correlations with eating disorders and other psychiatric conditions

BACKGROUND

The effect of psychopathology on swallowing ability tends to be an overlooked issue in the assessment of dysphagic patients, possibly overshadowed by the given prominence to organic pathologies and the difficulties on the management of these patients. In addition, it should also be kept in mind that a great number of psychotropic drugs can affect swallowing adding problematic clinical issues in this area. Despite this, assessment of dysphagia should be considered as an extremely important issue, due to its impact on basic symptomatology, course of illness and quality of life.

OBJECTIVE

This review aims to be an overview of relevant data on psychopathology associated with dysphagia and impairment of swallowing function.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An extensive bibliographic search was carried out in different medical databases (PubMed and Psycharticles) to comprehensively identify the most relevant publications available on dysphagia in eating disorders published until December 2020, according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis) method. Research articles, either theoretical or empirical-based, published in peer-reviewed journals and in English language, were included. Case reports were also considered in the analysis when it was appropriate for completeness purposes. Titles and abstracts were reviewed according to the eligibility criteria.

RESULTS

In total, 260 published studies were identified and 40 were finally selected after removal of duplicates and relevance. Primarily we investigated the correlation between dysphagia and eating disorders, analysing the complex relationship between the two conditions. Then we provided an overview of the assessment of dysphagic symptoms in other psychiatric syndromes.

LIMITS

No exclusion criteria or statistical methods were applied nor was an assessment of study-level or outcome-level bias applicable for our purpose. The topic is vast and research bias could not be excluded; moreover, data available are heterogeneous and lacking systematic approach.

CONCLUSIONS

With this review, the authors want to provide an overview of the most considerable and clinically useful information about the topic, focusing on some key points to disentangle psychiatric components from the complexity of patient with dysphagia. It should be a relevant concern for all clinicians and should be always thoroughly assessed, considered its frequency in clinical practice and its implications in every kind of patients' morbidity, mortality and quality of life. Special attention should be paid to mentally ill patients, who might display complex and multiple comorbidities, as well as consequences of abnormal eating behaviours, occasionally exacerbated by psychotropic medications. More systematic studies are needed, while it seems clear that a multidisciplinary approach is pivotal in the assessment and management of dysphagic patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I (evidence obtained from at least one properly designed randomized controlled trials; systematic reviews and meta-analyses; experimental studies).

Mental Health Practitioners' Understanding of Speech Pathology in a Regional Australian Community

(1) Background: This study aimed to determine the level of knowledge and the perceptions of speech pathology held by a sample of regional mental health practitioners and to explore factors that facilitate understanding of the roles of speech pathologists in mental health. While mental health is recognised as an area of practice by Speech Pathology Australia, the inclusion of speech pathologists in mental health teams is limited. (2) Methods: An anonymous online survey was created using previously validated surveys and author generated questions and distributed to mental health practitioners in Central Queensland, Australia. (3) Results: Mental health practitioners had difficulty identifying speech pathology involvement when presented with case scenarios. Accuracy was poor for language-based cases, ranging from 28.81% to 37.29%. Participants who reported having worked with a speech pathologist were more likely to demonstrate higher scores on the areas of practice questions, [r(53) = 0.301, p = 0.028], and the language scenarios [r(58) = 0.506, p < 0.001]. They were also more likely to agree to statements regarding the connection between speech pathology and mental health, r(59) = 0.527, p < 0.001. (4) Conclusions: As found in this study, contact with speech pathologists is a strong predictor of mental health providers' knowledge of the speech pathology profession. Thus, the challenge may be to increase this contact with mental health providers to promote inclusion of speech pathologists in the mental health domain.

Systematic review of case reports of oropharyngeal dysphagia following the use of antipsychotics

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this systematic review was to examine the effect of antipsychotic medication on dysphagia based on clinical case reports.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Literature searches were performed using the electronic databases PubMed and Embase. In PubMed, we used the MeSH terms "antipsychotic agents" OR "tranquilizing agents" combined with "deglutition disorders" OR "deglutition". In Embase, we used the Emtree terms "neuroleptic agents" combined with "swallowing" OR "dysphagia". Two reviewers assessed the eligibility of each case independently.

RESULTS

A total of 1043 abstracts were retrieved, of which 36 cases met the inclusion criteria; 14 cases were related to typical antipsychotics and 22 to atypical antipsychotics. Dysphagia occurred together with extrapyramidal symptoms in half of the cases and was the only prominent symptom in the other half. The most common strategy against dysphagia was changing to another antipsychotic (n=13, 36.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

The data from this review indicate that antipsychotics can increase the prevalence of dysphagia.