Endoscopic versus Microscopic Pituitary Adenoma Surgery: A Single-center Study

Surgical outcomes in patients with acromegaly: Microscopic vs. endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery

Transsphenoidal resection of growth hormone-secreting pituitary neuroendocrine tumors remains the first-line treatment for acromegaly. This can be performed through microsurgery or endoscopic surgery. For the past decades, endoscopic surgery has become the preferred technique in an increasing number of centers worldwide. However, whether it offers superior clinical outcomes has yet to be determined. In this paper, we performed a narrative review of the literature comparing both techniques in the treatment of acromegaly. We critically assessed available comparative studies from an objective perspective to determine their suitability for defining superiority of either technique. Available evidence displays substantial methodological variations and reports conflicting findings. Although endoscopic surgery provides a wider exposure and enhanced visibility of the surgical field, this does not consistently translate into better clinical outcomes, as most tumors are equally accessible through both techniques. Postoperative outcomes such as remission and complication rates are similar between both techniques. The management of acromegaly should be performed by experienced pituitary neurosurgeons, regardless of the approach. The involvement of a multidisciplinary team in a dedicated pituitary center is critical to ensure optimal outcomes.

Current and Future Perspectives of Microscopic and Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Surgery for Pituitary Adenomas: A Narrative Review

Transsphenoidal resection remains the standard treatment for most pituitary adenomas. However, the ideal surgical approach to safely access these lesions, either microsurgical or endoscopic, continues to be debated. Since the introduction of endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery, centers around the world have increasingly adopted this technique, experiencing a shift away from the conventional microsurgical approach. Large series reporting the efficacy and safety of endoscopic surgery have fueled a growing interest in comparing clinical outcomes between both approaches. Still, proving superiority of either surgical approach remains an elusive task due to the inherent drawbacks of surgical observational studies, as we are still faced with a growing body of evidence reporting conflicting results. Thus, a comprehensive discussion regarding the reach and limitations of both techniques becomes necessary. In this narrative review, we perform a critical appraisal of the literature and provide an expert opinion on the state-of-the-art in transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenomas. The advantages and limitations of each approach are assessed and compared from a technical standpoint, and their reported outcomes evaluated in the framework of this transition phase. Available evidence should be interpreted in light of individual patient characteristics and within the context of each medical center, taking into consideration the known impact that surgical expertise and multidisciplinary management hold on clinical outcomes.

Fat in the Fossa and the Sphenoid Sinus: A Simple and Effective Solution to CSF Leaks in Transsphenoidal Surgery. Cohort Study and Systematic Review

Objectives  Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak following endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery (TSS) remains a challenge and is associated with high morbidity. We perform a primary repair with f at in the pituitary f ossa and further fat in the s phenoid sinus (FFS). We compare the efficacy of this FFS technique with other repair methods and perform a systematic review. Design, Patients, and Methods  This is a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing standard TSS from 2009 to 2020, comparing the incidence of significant postoperative CSF rhinorrhea (requiring intervention) using the FFS technique compared with other intraoperative repair strategies. Systematic review of current repair methods described in the literature was performed following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Results  In all, there were 439 patients, with 276 patients undergoing multilayer repair, 68 patients FFS repair, and 95 patients no repair. No significant differences were observed in baseline demographics between the groups. Postoperative CSF leak requiring intervention was significantly lower in the FFS repair group (4.4%) compared with the multilayer (20.3%) and no repair groups (12.6%, p  < 0.01). This translated to fewer reoperations (2.9% FFS vs. 13.4% multilayer vs. 8.4% no repair, p  < 0.05), fewer lumbar drains (2.9% FFS vs. 15.6% multilayer vs. 5.3% no repair, p  < 0.01), and shorter hospital stay (median days: 4 [3-7] FFS vs. 6 (5-10) multilayer vs. 5 (3-7) no repair, p  < 0.01). Risk factors for postoperative leak included female gender, perioperative lumbar drain, and intraoperative leak. Conclusion  Autologous fat on fat graft for standard endoscopic transsphenoidal approach effectively reduces the risk of significant postoperative CSF leak with reduced reoperation and shorter hospital stay.

The outcomes of surgical treatment via transsphenoidal approach for patients with nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma: a single institution's experience

BACKGROUND

Nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma is a primary benign brain neoplasm and the transsphenoidal approach is known for a safe and effective first-line surgical treatment for pituitary tumours. The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyse the outcomes of the transsphenoidal approach for nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas treated at a single institute.

METHODS

A total of 181 patients who underwent transsphenoidal approach with nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma at a single institute from March 1998 to November 2018 were included in this study. Ninety-six (53.0%) men and 85 (47.0%) women aged 21-79 years were included. The median outpatient follow-up duration was 58 months, and the median magnetic resonance imaging follow-up duration was 54 months. We assessed the surgical and clinical outcomes, complications, hormonal outcomes and recurrence tendency.

RESULTS

The overall total resection rate of a transsphenoidal approach for nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma was 84.0%. Visual impairment was improved after surgery in 115 (93.5%) of 123 patients. Of the 80 patients who complained of preoperative endocrine dysfunction, 62 (77.5%) patients recovered normal postoperative endocrine function. Diabetes insipidus, which occurred in 22 (12.2%) patients, was the most common complication. A total of 21 (11.6%) patients showed recurrence on average 57.6 months after surgery. The average recurrence period after surgery was 96.3 months in the total resection group of 6 patients and 42.1 months in the subtotal resection group of 15 patients. In multivariate analysis, the extent of resection was identified as a significant predictor of tumour recurrence with a hazard ratio of 6.093 and a p-value of 0.002.

CONCLUSIONS

It is meaningful to report long-term surgical results within a single institution, and through this, it was reconfirmed that transsphenoidal approach is an effective and safe treatment for nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma. Long-term follow-up is required due to the possibility of recurrence. In addition, performing total resection during surgery helps to lower the risk of recurrence.KEY MESSAGESTranssphenoidal approach is an effective and safe treatment modality for pituitary adenoma.Complete resection is a significant predictor for the recurrence of pituitary adenomaLong-term follow-up is necessary for the treatment of nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas.

Low preoperative serum prealbumin levels and risk of postoperative complications after transsphenoidal surgery in nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma

OBJECTIVE

In other specialties, malnutrition has been shown to be closely linked to postoperative complications. However, there is no research on the relationship between nutritional parameters and the complications of transsphenoidal pituitary surgery. This study was designed to identify the relationship between preoperative nutritional markers and postoperative complications in nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas.

METHODS

This observational study included 429 patients whose first transsphenoidal surgery was performed in Shandong Provincial Hospital between January 2015 and July 2020. Preoperative prealbumin, retinol-binding protein (RBP), the prognostic nutritional index, clinicopathological data, and postoperative complication data were collected to investigate outcomes.

RESULTS

After multivariable adjustment, preoperative prealbumin and RBP were inversely associated with risk of complication (p value for trend = 0.006, 0.021). The increase of preoperative serum prealbumin and RBP concentration may decrease the risk of postoperative intracranial infection and hyponatremia (both OR per SD increment, < 1; p < 0.05). The increase of preoperative prealbumin may also decrease the risk of diabetes insipidus (OR per SD increment, 0.591; p = 0.001), but similar results were not obtained for the RBP (p > 0.05). Prealbumin and RBP are both useful in predicting overall complications (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] 0.749, 0.678), especially in intracranial infection (AUC 0.794, 0.738). However, the predictive value of prealbumin was better than that of RBP.

CONCLUSIONS

Low preoperative prealbumin or RBP concentrations may be associated with higher surgical risk, especially for intracranial infection. This study emphasizes the suggestion that preoperative prealbumin and RBP concentrations may be vital factors in predicting operative complications of nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas.

Exoscopic vs. microscopic transsphenoidal surgery for Cushing's disease: a retrospective single-center study on 388 patients

Microscopic and endoscopic transsphenoidal surgeries represent the standard treatment for Cushing's disease (CD). At our institution a new exoscopic approach was implemented. After proof of the general use for transsphenoidal pituitary surgery, the aim of this study was to compare the exoscopic 4K3D video microscope with the microscopic transsphenoidal surgery for patients with CD. We conducted a retrospective analysis on 388 patients with CD treated in our medical center via microscopic transsphenoidal surgery (MTS) between January 2008 and July 2019 or via exoscopic transsphenoidal surgery (ExTS) between May 2019 and May 2021. Parameters investigated included histology, pre- and postoperative MRI with tumor size, pre- and postoperative ACTH and cortisol levels, duration of surgery, perioperative and postoperative complications as well as clinical outcome. Patients who underwent ExTS in CD experienced a lower incidence of SIADH/diabetes insipidus (p = 0.0164), a higher rate of remission (p = 0.0422), and a shorter duration of surgery (p < 0.0001), compared to MTS. However, there was no significant difference regarding new postoperative pituitary insufficiency and intraoperative CSF space opening. We found that ExTS had multiple benefits compared to MTS for tumor resection in case of CD. These results are in line with our previous publication on the general applicability of an exoscope in pituitary surgery. To our knowledge, this is the first clinical study proving the superiority of ExTS in CD. These results are promising, nevertheless further studies comparing exoscopic with the endoscopic approach are necessary to finally evaluate the utility of the new technique.

Analysis of neuroendoscopy for the treatment of macroadenomas and giant pituitary adenomas

Objective

This study investigated the use and effectiveness of endoscopic transnasal, transsphenoidal surgery, a minimally invasive method for the treatment of macroadenomas and giant pituitary a denomas, in a medical setting. The surgical results of 429 patients who received neuroendoscopic treatment of macroadenomas or giant pituitary adenomas were evaluated, and the experiences and lessons learned from treatment complications were assessed.

Patients and methods

From January 2012 to December 2021, 429 patients with macroadenomas or giant pituitary adenomas, including 60 patients with giant adenomas (diameter ≥4 cm) and 369 patients with macroadenomas (diameter 1–4 cm), received a 3D head CT, a MRI with contrast enhancement, and an endocrinology examination prior to surgery. Preoperative clinical and radiological features, visual measurements, hormone levels, length of stay, length of surgery, postoperative stay, visual and hormone outcomes, resection range, complication and recurrence rates, and routine patient information were recorded. The patients were followed up for 6–72 months (median = 40 months).

Results

Of 429 patients with macroadenomas or giant pituitary adenomas who received neuroendoscopic treatment, 348 (81.12%) had gross-total resections (GTR), 53 (12.35%) had near-total resections (NTR), and 28 (6.53%) had subtotal resections. There were 138 cases of post-operative diabetes insipidus (32.17%), including 7 cases of permanent diabetes insipidus (1.63%), 16 cases of nasal hemorrhage (3.73%), 39 cases of intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage (9.09%), 4 cases of intracranial infection (0.9%), 16 cases of hypophysis (3.7%), and 15 cases of anosmia (3.50%). The clinical symptoms and endocrinology indices of the patients improved after surgery, and all patients were discharged 5–18 days (8.36 ± 2.65) postop.

Conclusion

Neuroendoscopy is a safe operation with a short recovery period and hospital stay and is thus an effective method to treat macroadenomas and giant pituitary adenomas. Preoperative evaluation and prediction can help to accurately address possible intraoperative situations and improve GTR.

Endoscopic vs. microscopic transsphenoidal surgery outcomes in 514 nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma cases

Transsphenoidal surgery remains the preference choice for patients with nonfunctioning pituitary tumors at present, but the superiority of surgical modalities is still debated. Moreover, the efficacy of microscopic and endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery has not been fully studied. Therefore, the present study was designed to compare the postoperative outcomes of the two widely used approaches worldwide. This retrospective study included 514 patients with the first transsphenoidal pituitary adenoma resection in Shandong Provincial Hospital from January 2015 to July 2020 and compared the outcomes of microscope transsphenoidal surgery (MTSS) and endoscopy transsphenoidal surgery (ETSS). A total of 514 patients were included in this study, of whom 210 received the ETSS and 304 received the MTSS. The patients in two groups were similar in terms of postoperative hyponatremia (p = 0.229), diabetes insipidus (p = 0.264), the recovery of hormonal axis (p < 0.05), and extent of resection (EOR) (p = 0.067). ETSS was more likely to cause cerebrospinal fluid leakage than MTSS (p = 0.017, 3.6% vs. 8.6%). CSF leakage might be related to tumor size (95% CI = 1.305-2.766, p = 0.001), and the surgeon's transsphenoidal surgery volume < 300 was also a risk factor (95% CI = 1.396-9.067, p = 0.008). The effect of different surgeries on postoperative vision improvement was statistically difference in univariate analysis (p = 0.048) but not after adjustment for confounders (p = 0.112). Furthermore, there were statistical difference in EOR between MTSS and ETSS when adenomas were performed suprasellar extension (p = 0.037) or optic chiasm compression (p = 0.045). Both techniques are valid for the treatment of nonfunctional adenomas. But CSF leakage is more likely after ETSS. In addition, ETSS is more conducive to resection of nonfunctional adenomas with suprasellar extension or optic chiasm compression.

Endoscopic vs. Microscopic Transsphenoidal Surgery for the Treatment of Pituitary Adenoma: A Meta-Analysis

Purpose

Currently, endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery (ETS) and microscopic transsphenoidal surgery (MTS) are commonly applied treatments for patients with pituitary adenomas. This meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ETS and MTS for these patients.

Methods

A computer search of Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane library, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases was conducted for studies investigating ETS and MTS for patients with pituitary adenomas. The deadline is March 01, 2021. RevMan5.1 software was used to complete this meta-analysis after literature screening, data extraction, and literature quality evaluation.

Results

A total of 37 studies including 5,591 patients were included. There was no significant difference in gross tumor removal (GTR) and hormone-excess secretion remission (HES remission) between two groups [RR = 1.10, 95% CI (0.99–1.22), P = 0.07; RR = 1.09, 95% CI (1.00–1.20), P = 0.05]. ETS was associated with lower incidence of diabetes insipidus (DI) [RR = 0.71, 95% CI (0.58–0.87), P = 0.0008], hypothyroidism [RR = 0.64, 95% CI (0.47–0.89), P = 0.007], and septal perforation [RR = 0.32, 95% CI (0.13–0.79), P = 0.01] than those with MTS.

Conclusion

This meta-analysis indicated that ETS cannot significantly improve GTR and HES remission. However, ETS could reduce the incidence of DI, hypothyroidism, and septal perforation without increasing the rate of other complications.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#myprospero, identifier: CRD42021241217.

Pituitary Tumor Surgery: Comparison of Endoscopic and Microscopic Techniques at a Single Center

OBJECTIVE

To understand the transition from microscopic surgery (MS) to endoscopic surgery (ES) on the pituitary across the United States, we assessed a single institution practicing both procedures to discern advantages and disadvantages for each.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective institutional chart review of 534 patients in a large practice over a 6-year period (January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2019) comparing a single MS neurosurgeon with a single ES neurosurgeon operating on the same days.

RESULTS

In this series, 14% (n=75) of patients had a prior operation, there were no carotid artery injuries, the overall risk for a postoperative infection was 0.4% (n=2), and risk for a postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak requiring treatment was 2.0% (n=11). Mean ± SD hospital stay was 1.3±0.04 days; readmission for any reason within 30 days occurred in 3.4% (n=18) of patients. The mean volumetric resection for MS was 86.9%±1.7% and for ES was 91.7%±1.3% (P=.03). There was a higher rate of notable events (P=.015) with MS, but MS had 16% lower cost and operative times were 48 minutes shorter than for ES (83±7 vs 131±6 minutes). The ES required substantially fewer postoperative secondary treatments such as radiation therapy (P=.003).

CONCLUSION

Pituitary surgery is a very safe and effective procedure regardless of technique. The MS has shorter operative times and overall lower cost. The ES results in increased volumetric resection and fewer secondary treatments. Both techniques can be valuable to a large practice, and understanding these niches is important when selecting optimal approaches to pituitary surgery for a given patient.

3D endoscopy shows enhanced anatomical details and depth perception vs 2D: a multicentre study

PURPOSE

The current standard endoscopic technique is a high resolution visualisation up to Full HD and even 4 K. A recent development are 3D endoscopes providing a 3-dimensional picture, which supposedly gives additional information of depth, anatomical details and orientation in the surgical field. Since the 3D-endoscopic technique is new, little scientific evidence is known whether the new technique provides advantages for the surgeon compared to the 2D-endoscopic standard technique in FESS. This study compares the standard 2D-endoscopic surgical technique with the new commercially available 3D-endoscopic technique.

METHODS

The prospective randomized interventional multicenter study included a total of 80 referred patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with and without polyps without prior surgery. A bilateral FESS procedure was performed, one side with the 2D-endoscopic technique, the other side with the 3D-endoscopic technique. The time of duration was measured. Additionally, a questionnaire containing 20 items was completed by 4 different surgeons judging subjective impression of visualisation and handling.

RESULTS

2D imaging was superior to 3D apart from "recognition of details", "depth perception" and "3D effect". For usability properties 2D was superior to 3D apart from "weight of endoscopes". Mean duration for surgery was 26.1 min for 2D and 27.4 min. for 3D without statistical significance (P = 0.219).

CONCLUSION

Three-dimensional endoscopy features improved depth perception and recognition of anatomic details but worse overall picture quality. It is useful for teaching purposes, yet 2D techniques provide a better outcome in terms of feasibility for routine endoscopic approaches.

Comparison of outcomes between endoscopic and microscopic transsphenoidal surgery for the treatment of pituitary adenoma: a meta-analysis

Background

Pituitary tumors are among the most common intracranial tumors. Surgical resection is the most effective treatment for patients with pituitary tumors. Microscopic transsphenoidal surgery has become the first-choice surgical approach to treating this malignancy, although it has certain limitations. Neuroendoscopy has also been widely used for pituitary tumor surgery in recent years. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of these two surgical options for the treatment of pituitary tumors.

Methods

We conducted a literature search of the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Controlled Center Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Web of Science database, Google Scholar, and Baidu Scholar. Relevant articles published up to September 25, 2020 were retrieved and then meta-analyzed using RevMan software 5.1.

Results

A total of 29 case-control studies involving 7,774 patients were included in the meta-analysis. There was no significant difference in gross tumor removal (GTR) (RR =1.11, 95% CI: 0.97-1.26, P=0.12) or hormone excess secretion (HES) remission (RR =1.08, 95% CI: 0.97-1.21, P=0.16) between the two groups. Endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery was associated with a lower incidence of diabetes insipidus (DI) than was microscopic transsphenoidal surgery (RR =0.76, 95% CI: 0.60-0.97, P=0.03).

Conclusions

Endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery does not significantly improve GTR or HES remission, but it can reduce the incidence of DI without increasing the rates of other complications.

Challenges, Learning Curve, and Safety of Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery of Sellar-Suprasellar Lesions in a Community Hospital

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Endoscopic endonasal surgery (EES) for the management of sellar, suprasellar, and anterior skull base lesions is gaining popularity. Our aim was to analyze and present the clinical outcomes of EES for the management of these lesions in a community hospital setting.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 56 patients with sellar, suprasellar, and anterior skull base lesions who underwent EES between 2010 and 2018.

RESULTS

There was male predominance (53.6%) with a mean age of 54.9 ± 13.7 years. Lesions were 45 pituitary adenomas, 5 meningiomas, 3 metastatic, 1 craniopharyngioma, 1 Rathke cyst, and 1 mucocele. Gross total excision was achieved in 57.1%, subtotal excision occurred in 37.5%, and decompression and biopsy were achieved in 5.4% patients. Postoperative vision normalized or improved in 27 patients (86.1%) and was stable in 4 patients (13.9%). Recovery of a preexisting hormonal deficit occurred in 13 (23.2%) patients, and a new hormonal deficit occurred in 9 patients (16.1%). The mean hospital stay was 6.1 ± 4.9 days. Postoperative complications included cerebrospinal fluid leak in 8 patients (14.3%). Four patients (7.1%) had meningitis. Diabetes insipidus was present in 19 patients (33.9%), and postoperative intracranial hematoma requiring evacuation was necessary in 2 patients (3.6%). The mean follow-up duration was 47.5 ± 25.8 months. Lesion progression or recurrence requiring redo surgery occurred in 5 patients (8.9%). Regarding the learning curve, the postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak, meningitis, new hormonal deficits, and diabetes insipidus decreased in the second half of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

EES provides an effective and safe surgical option with low morbidity and mortality for the treatment of sellar, suprasellar, and anterior skull base lesions in a community hospital setting.