Comparison of preoperative nepafenac (0.1%) and flurbiprofen (0.03%) eye drops in maintaining mydriasis during small incision cataract surgery in patients with senile cataract: A randomized, double-blind study

Comparison of pain between bilateral ICL surgeries in patients with myopia

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the preoperative anxiety, aqueous humor monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) concentration, intraoperative pain, and degree of cooperation of the first eye implantable collamer lens (ICL) surgery with the second eye surgery, of the 1-day interval group with the 1-week interval group, and to investigate the possible causes of these differences, as well as to determine the appropriate interval between bilateral eye ICL surgeries.

METHOD

The study was a prospective observational study. A total of 120 patients who underwent bilateral ICL surgery at the Department of Ophthalmology, West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, from July to September 2023, were enrolled. The patients were divided into a 1-day interval group and a 1-week interval group. The ICL surgery was performed on both eyes according to the schedule. Anxiety levels, aqueous humor MCP1, cooperativeness, surgical time, pain and satisfaction, and patients' estimations of the time spent in the operation were recorded for each eye. The patients were instructed to recall the intraoperative pain of the first eye surgery after the operation of the second eye. Statistical analyses (two independent samples t-test,two paired samples t-test, the rank-sum test, the chi-square test, non-parametric test with multiple independent samples) were performed to compare the differences between each score in both eyes and two groups. Furthermore, we examined the relationship between pain levels and the reproductive history of the patients.

RESULTS

In the 1-day interval group, male/female is 22/52, average age is 25.24±5.00. In the 1-week interval group, male/female is 17/29, average age is 25.39±5.57. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. In both groups, patients were less nervous, had significantly more pain, had less surgical satisfaction, had a longer estimated operative time, and had elevated preoperative MCP1 during the second eye operation. In the second eye surgery, the patient's cooperation worsened, but it did not lead to an increase in surgical time. A significant proportion of patients, particularly in the 1-week interval group, recalled experiencing reduced pain during the first eye surgery. The 1-week interval group had a higher difference in all indicators between the bilateral surgeries. In the second eye surgery, patients in the 1-week interval group experienced more severe pain, less cooperation, longer estimated operation duration, and a greater MCP1 than those in the 1-day interval group.

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing second eye ICL surgery had decreased nervousness, increased pain, decreased cooperation, and satisfaction, and increased MCP1 compared to the first eye surgery. It is recommended that an interval of about one week should be avoided between bilateral surgeries when developing a surgical schedule to improve patients' cooperation, satisfaction, and comfort.

Effects of Recombinant Human Epidermal Growth Factor Eye Drops Combined with Phacoemulsification on Short- and Long-Term Visual Acuity Recovery and Related Dry Eye Complications in Patients with Senile Cataract

Objective

To investigate the effects of recombinant human epidermal growth factor eye drops combined with phacoemulsification on short- and long-term visual acuity recovery and related dry eye complications in patients with senile cataract.

Methods

Sixty patients with senile cataract cured from January 2019 to January 2021 were enrolled in our hospital. The patients in the control group were arbitrarily assigned into the control and the research group. The former group received phacoemulsification, and the latter group received recombinant human epidermal growth factor (RhEGF) eye drops combined with phacoemulsification. The curative effect, the incidence of xerophthalmia, short-term and long-term vision improvement, changes of corneal endothelial cells, serum factors, and life quality scores were compared.

Results

The effective rate of the research group was 90.00%, and the effective rate of the control group was 66.67%; the curative effect of the research group was higher than that of the control group (P < 0.05). The incidence of dry eye in the research group was lower than that in the control group (P < 0.05). The short-term and long-term visual acuity improvement effect of the research group was better than that of the control group (P < 0.05). After treatment, the density of corneal endothelial cells in the research group was higher than that in the control group, while the proportion of hexagonal cells and the coefficient of variation of corneal endothelial cells in the research group were lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). After treatment, IL-6 and TNF-α in the research group were lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). Compared with the control group, the physical function, psychological function, social function, and healthy self-cognition scores of the research group were all lower (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Cataract is the leading cause of blindness in the world. With the continuous improvement of cataract phacoemulsification technology, the incidence of some serious complications has gradually lessened. Xerophthalmia is one of the most obvious and predictable complications after cataract surgery and may affect the recovery of postoperative visual acuity. Recombinant human epidermal growth factor eye drops can effectively enhance the visual acuity of patients, promote the curative effect, and strengthen the life quality.

Nepafenac in cataract surgery

The role of topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in routine cataract surgery has been established since decades. Topical NSAIDs have been shown to reduce postoperative ocular inflammation and pain, preserve intraoperative mydriasis, and reduce the risk of postoperative cystoid macular oedema, whilst carrying a very low side-effect profile. Nepafenac is one of the currently available topical NSAIDs. The studies have shown that is has a high ocular penetration, allowing for potentially better results than other NSAIDs. This review gathers the current literature on the role of nepafenac in cataract surgery aiming to help surgeons maximise the benefits of its use to achieve improved surgical outcomes.

Efficacy of Nepafenac versus Flurbiprofen in Maintaining Intraoperative Mydriasis During Phacoemulsification: A Comparative Study

Purpose

To compare the efficacy of topical nepafenac (0.1%) with flurbiprofen (0.03%) in maintaining intra-operative mydriasis during phacoemulsification surgery.

Patients and Methods

This study comprised of 160 patients, who were divided into two arms of 80 each (arms A and B) after randomisation. Pre-operatively, all patients received one drop of tropicamide 0.8% and phenylephrine 5% (combination), 4 times, at an interval of 15 minutes on the day of surgery. Thereafter, Nepafenac drop in arm A/Flurbiprofen drop in arm B was administered 4 times, at an interval of 15 minutes keeping a gap of 10 minutes between tropicamide-phenylephrine and any of the experimental drugs. Phacoemulsification was performed one hour after the administration of last drop. Both vertical and horizontal pupillary diameter were measured at three steps; immediately before the surgical incision (baseline), at the end of emulsification of nucleus (before irrigation and aspiration) and at the end of surgery (after stromal hydration).

Results

The difference in pupillary diameter between two groups, was statistically insignificant for vertical diameter (P = 0.08) and horizontal diameter (P = 0.28) at the start of surgery. On the other hand, pupillary diameter difference was statistically significant after emulsification of nucleus and at the end of surgery as well when both vertical (P < 0.05) and horizontal diameter (P < 0.05) were considered. The total reduction in pupillary diameter (both vertically and horizontally) was significantly less in the Nepafenac as compared to Flurbiprofen group (P < 0.05). Analysis of mean cumulative dissipated energy did not document any appreciable difference between the two groups. Phacoemulsification time analysis yielded statistically significant results (P = 0.004) between the Nepafenac and Flurbiprofen group.

Conclusion

In the present study, topical Nepafenac (0.1%) proved to be more efficacious in maintaining intra-operative mydriasis during phacoemulsification surgery as compared to topical Flurbiprofen (0.03%).

Additive Effect of Topical Nepafenac on Mydriasis in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the additive effect of topical nepafenac on pupil diameter (PD) in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and cataract.

METHODS

This prospective comparative study included the patients having cataract surgery with and without DM. Two consecutive PD measurements were taken using an automatic quantitative pupillometry system (MonPack One, Metrovision). A baseline measurement was taken, then one drop of nepafenac % 0.1 (Nevanac; Alcon, Fort Worth, TX) was instilled only to the eye that will be operated on (study eye). Cyclopentolate 1.0% (Sikloplejin; Abdi İbrahim, İstanbul, Turkey) was instilled to both eyes (study eye/fellow eye) 5 minutes later. The second measurement was taken at 1 hour after this application.

RESULTS

The DM group consisted of 43 patients, and the control group consisted of 39 participants. The baseline PDs of both eyes were similar in the DM group (P=0.070) and the control group (P=0.345). The change in pupil size from baseline to mydriasis was statistically significantly greater in the study eyes (2.69±0.53) than fellow eyes (2.54±0.61) in the DM group (P=0.009), but there was no statistically significant difference in the control group (2.94±0.63 vs. 2.86±0.58). When the groups were compared, the PD changes were similar in the study eyes between groups (P=0.065), while the PD changes in the fellow eyes were lower in the DM group (P=0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

Nepafenac has been shown additive effect on pupil dilation in diabetic patients before cataract surgery.

Impact of topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in prevention of macular edema following cataract surgery in diabetic patients

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy of prophylactic administration of topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) on macular edema following cataract surgery in diabetic patients, and to compare between types of NSAIDs (ketorolac tromethamine 0.4% and nepafenac 0.1%).

METHODS

Group 1 (control) received artificial tears substitute as a placebo group, group 2 (nepafenac) received topical nepafenac 0.1%, and group 3 (ketorolac) received topical ketorolac tromethamine 0.4%. Patients were examined postoperatively after completing one week, one month, two months and three months' intervals for evaluating cystoid macular edema (CME) development. The main study outcomes were achieving the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and change in the central macular thickness (CMT) measured with optical coherence topography (OCT).

RESULTS

Eighty eyes of 76 patients were included in this study. BCVA showed a statistically significant difference at the third month postoperative follow up between the control group and the NSAIDs groups (P=0.04). There was an increase in the CMT in all cases starting from postoperative first week until third month. CMT showed a statistically significant difference between control group and NSAIDs groups from postoperative first month until third month (P=0.008, 0.027, 0.004). There was no statistically significant difference between nepafenac and ketorolac groups in BCVA and OCT CMT.

CONCLUSION

Prophylactic preoperative and postoperative NSAIDs may have a role in reducing the frequency and severity of CME in diabetic eyes following cataract surgery.

Intracameral Use of Nepafenac: Safety and Efficacy Study

PURPOSE

To test the intracameral safety of nepafenac and its efficacy in inhibiting prostaglandin synthesis during phacoemulsification surgery.

METHODS

The safety evaluation was conducted in normal eyes of rabbits, 0.1ml of 0.3% and 1% nepafenac was injected intracamerally. Extensive studies to detect adverse response ranged from a gross examination of eyes under slit lamp biomicroscope, fluorescein dye test, Schirmer tear test, test for corneal sensitivity, intraocular pressure measurement (IOP), specular microscopy, electroretinography(ERG), and histopathological examination of intraocular tissues. Efficacy of nepafenac was studied by intracameral injection of 0.1%, 0.3% nepafenac, nepafenac 0.3%+1% lignocaine, and 1% lignocaine alone, before phacoemulsification surgery and intraoperative mydriasis along with PGE2(ProstaglandinE2) secretion were recorded.

RESULTS

Single 0.1ml of 0.3% or 1% nepafenac did not significantly (p > 0.05) alter physiological parameters and histology of cornea, iris, and retina. Nepafenac 0.3% effectively inhibited PGE2 secretion. No significant (p > 0.05) prevention of miosis was recorded with 0.1% or 0.3% nepafenac. However, a combination of 0.3% nepafenac + 1% lignocaine and 1% lignocaine alone significantly (p < 0.05) arrested miosis during the intraoperative period.

CONCLUSION

An intracameral concentration of up to 1% nepafenac does not adversely affect the rabbit eye. Nepafenac fails to prevent miosis but inhibits prostaglandin release during phacoemulsification surgery.

Ophthalmic nepafenac use in the Netherlands and Denmark

Purpose

To describe nepafenac use in the Netherlands and Denmark with reference to its approved indications. For context, we also describe the use of ketorolac and diclofenac.

Methods

We identified users in the PHARMO Database Network (the Netherlands, 2008–2013) and the Danish national health registers (Denmark, 1994–2014). We described prevalence of cataract surgery and duration of use in patients with cataract surgery with and without diabetes.

Results

In the Netherlands, 9530 nepafenac users (mean age, 71 years; 60% women) contributed 12 691 therapy episodes, of which 21% had a recently recorded cataract surgery. Of 2266 episodes in adult non‐diabetic patients with cataract surgery, 60% had one bottle dispensed (treatment duration ≤21 days). Of 441 episodes in adult diabetic patients with cataract surgery, 90% had up to two bottles dispensed (≤60 days).

Denmark had 60 403 nepafenac users (mean age, 72 years; 58% women) and 73 648 episodes (41% had recorded cataract surgery). Of 26 649 nepafenac episodes in adult non‐diabetic patients with cataract surgery, 92% had one bottle dispensed. Of 3801 episodes in adult diabetic patients with cataract surgery, 99.8% had up to two bottles dispensed.

Use patterns of nepafenac, ketorolac and diclofenac were roughly similar in the Netherlands, but not in Denmark.

Conclusion

Less than half of therapy episodes were related to cataract surgery; around 90% of episodes with surgery were within the approved duration. Underrecording of ophthalmic conditions and procedures was a challenge in this study.

Comparison of Preoperative Topical Dexamethasone Phosphate Versus Ketorolac Tromethamine in Maintaining Intraoperative Mydriasis During Small Incision Cataract Surgery

INTRODUCTION

Intraoperative miosis is one of the many challenges which a surgeon can face during cataract surgery. It may lead to impaired view and difficulty in delivering the nucleus. Also, it increases the chances of more serious intraoperative and postoperative complications. Therefore, maintaining adequate pupillary dilatation is of utmost importance during cataract surgery.

AIM

To study the efficacy of topical dexamethasone phosphate (0.1%) and topical ketorolac tromethamine (0.4%) in maintaining pupillary dilatation during cataract surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 200 patients were studied. These were randomly divided into two groups of 100 each. Group1 was given topical dexamethasone phosphate (0.1%) and Group 2, topical ketorolac tromethamine (0.4%). Medications were started 1-day before surgery in the form of one drop to be instilled every 6 hours. Pupillary diameter was measured in the horizontal meridian; 4 readings were taken - before making the incision, after nucleus delivery, following cortical clean-up and after Intraocular Lens (IOL) implantation.

RESULTS

The two drugs showed no statistically significant difference in pupillary diameter at the commencement of surgery (p=0.435). The difference between the two drugs was statistically significant, for the mean pupillary diameter which changed from the start of surgery to after cortical clean-up. At this stage, ketorolac group showed a tendency towards larger mean pupillary diameter than dexamethasone group (6.70 ± 0.85mm and 6.32 ± 0.84mm, respectively, p=0.002). Again, ketorolac group patients had larger pupillary diameter after IOL implantation than dexamethasone group patients (the mean was 6.16± 0.97mm and 5.75 ± 0.73mm, respectively, p=0.001).

CONCLUSION

Both ketorolac tromethamine (0.4%) and dexamethasone phosphate (0.1%) are effective in maintaining adequate mydriasis during cataract surgery, but the comparative analysis of the two drugs concludes that, ketorolac is definitely a better option in preventing surgically induced miosis.