In-vitro susceptibility to colistin and tigecycline in New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase-1 producing Enterobacteriaceae

Evaluation of in-vitro colistin susceptibility and clinical profile of carbapenem resistant Enterobacteriaceae related invasive infections

PURPOSE

To determine the colistin susceptibility. To compare E-test vs broth-microdilution (BMD) method for invasive carbapenem resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infections. To study treatment options for the CRE. To analyze the clinical profile and outcome of CRE infections.

METHODS

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed for 100 invasive CRE isolates. Gradient diffusion and BMD methods were performed to determine colistin MICs. Essential agreement (EA), categorical agreement (CA), very major error (VME), and major error (ME) were worked out between BMD method and E-test. The clinical profile of patients was analyzed.

RESULTS

The majority of the patients suffered from bacteremia [47(47%)]. Klebsiella pneumoniae was the most common organism isolated overall as well as among bacteremic isolates. 9(9%) CRE isolates were colistin resistant by BMD of which six were Klebsiella pneumoniae. There was 97% CA between E-test and BMD. EA was 68%. VME was found in three out of nine colistin resistant isolates. No ME was found. Among the other antibiotics tested for CRE isolates, the highest susceptibility was seen to tigecycline [43(43%)] followed by amikacin [19 (19%)]. The most common underlying condition was post solid organ transplantation [36(36%)]. A higher survival rate was seen among non-bacteremic CRE infections (58.49%) than bacteremic CRE infections (42.6%). Four out of nine patients with colistin resistant CRE infections survived and had a satisfactory outcome.

CONCLUSION

Klebsiella pneumoniae was the most common organism causing invasive infection. Survival rates were higher in non-bacteremic CRE infections than bacteremic infections. Good CA was seen between E-test and BMD for colistin susceptibility, but the EA was poor. VME was more common than ME when E-tests were used for colistin susceptibility testing resulting in false susceptibility. Tigecycline and aminoglycosides are possible adjunct drugs for the treatment of invasive CRE infections.

Study on MICs of Tigecycline in Clinical Isolates of Carbapenem Resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) at a Tertiary Care Centre in North India

INTRODUCTION

Members of family Enterobacteriaceae are the most common Gram-negative bacteria isolated from clinical samples. Those Enterobacteriaceae which have acquired resistance to all β-lactams antibiotics including the carbapenems are considered as Carbapenem Resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE). These CRE isolates are often resistant to most other classes of antimicrobials as well, making their treatment a great challenge. Tigecycline is one of the last resort antimicrobials against such multidrug resistant bacteria. Decreased tigecycline susceptibility mediated by efflux pump systems is being reported in clinical strains of Enterobacteriaceae. Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) data would prove useful in managing infections by these multidrug resistant bacteria and optimizing use of tigecycline.

AIM

To evaluate the MIC values of tigecycline against carbapenem resistant Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective study was carried out from January 2015 to December 2015 at the Department of Microbiology, Era's Lucknow Medical College and Hospital (ELMCH), Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India. Antimicrobial susceptibility by disk diffusion (Kirby-bauer) was done for 491 E. coli and K. pneumoniae strains isolated from 1606 samples collected from patients admitted in various wards and ICUs. Imipenem, meropenem and ertapenem 10 μg disks were used for testing of sensitivity to carbapenems. In all isolates, Tigecycline 15 μg (Hi-Media) disk was used to screen for tigecycline resistance. In CRE isolates, MICs of tigecycline were determined by E-test (Ezy MIC TM TG strips, Hi Media) and interpreted using European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) 2016 guidelines.

RESULTS

Out of 491 isolates tested, 186 (37.9%) were found to be CRE showing resistance to at least one of the three carbapenems tested and these included 99 E.coli and 87 K. pneumoniae. Sensitivity pattern of these two bacterial isolates shows a high level of resistance to most classes of antimicrobials. MIC testing for tigecycline was carried out in 144 CRE isolates and tigecycline resistance (MIC >2 μg/ml) was seen in 12 (8.3%) isolates (eight K.pneumoniae and four E. coli). Eight other isolates were found to have MIC of 2 μg/ml and thus the overall prevalence of isolates with decreased susceptibility was 20 (13.9%).

CONCLUSION

A high prevalence of carbapenem resistance coupled with high tigecycline MICs in clinical isolates of E.coli and K. pneumoniae highlights the judicious use of a combination of antimicrobials. Routine in vitro sensitivity testing to evaluate the clinical utility of tigecycline against such resistant Enterobacteriaceae is warranted.

The Multidrug-Resistant Gram-negative Superbugs Threat Require Intelligent Use of the Last Weapon

The global emergence and dissemination of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative superbugs, particularly carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii and Klebsiella pneumoniae, lead to the limited effectiveness of antibiotics for treating nosocomial infections. In most cases, polymyxins are the last resort therapy, and these antibiotics must be used intelligently to prolong their efficacy in clinical practice. Polymyxin B and colistin (polymyxin E) were introduced prior to modern drug regulation, and the majority of the 'old' drug information is unreliable. Recent pharmacokinetic data do not support the renal dose adjustment of intravenous (IV) polymyxin B as suggested by the manufacturer, and this drug must be scaled by the total body weight. Whereas IV colistin is formulated as an inactive prodrug, colistin methanesulfonate (CMS) has different pharmacokinetic profiles than polymyxin B. To achieve maximum efficacy, CMS should be administered as a loading dose scaled to body weight and a maintenance dose according to the renal profiles. Polymyxin combination therapy is suggested due to a sub-therapeutic plasma concentration in a significant proportion of patients and a high incidence of polymyxin hetero-resistance among Gram-negative superbugs. In conclusion, polymyxins must be reserved as a last resort and should be wisely used when truly indicated.