Prevalence of parenterally transmitted hepatitis viruses in clinically diagnosed cases of hepatitis

Prevalence of Hepatitis Delta Virus Infection among Hepatitis B Virus-Infected and Exposed Patients

Background:

Hepatitis delta virus (HDV) infection is a cause of coinfection and superinfection among hepatitis B virus (HBV)-infected patients. The global prevalence of HDV may vary drastically depending on the geographical location. In India, serological techniques form the basis for the determination of HDV prevalence in majority of the studies with very limited literature based on molecular techniques. In addition, sparse data on HDV infection among HBV-exposed group, i.e., patients with total antibodies to core antigen (anti-hepatitis B core [HBc]) positive and negative hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), are available.

Objective:

This study was aimed to determine the prevalence of HDV in both HBV-infected and HBV-exposed groups, utilizing both serological and molecular methods.

Settings and Design:

This was a retrospective cross-sectional study conducted from January till June 2018 where samples of 142 patients were retrieved and were categorized into two groups: Group A included patients with both HBsAg and anti-HBc positivity (n = 120/142 [85%]), i.e., confirmed HBV infection, and Group B included patients with anti-HBc positivity and HBsAg negativity (n = 22/142 [15%]), i.e., exposed to HBV.

Materials and Methods:

All the specimens were retrieved from −80°C and were tested for anti-HDV immunoglobulin (Ig) M (IgM), anti-HDV IgG, and HDV RNA.

Results:

HDV infection was observed in only one patient in Group A and none in Group B, making an overall prevalence of 0.78% (95% confidence interval = 0.02%–3.9%). The infected patient was reactive for both IgM and IgG with a viral load of 2log₁₀IU/ml.

Conclusion:

The present study provides evidence that HDV infection is very low(0.78%) in this part of India. However further prospective studies with larger sample size are warranted.

Prevalence of occult hepatitis B amongst Indian human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infected individuals-a pilot study

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis of hepatitis B is routinely based on the detection of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) only. However, occult hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection (OBI), which is defined as infection with positive hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc) antibodies, positive DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) PCR (polymerase chain reaction), and undetectable HBsAg, as well as anti-HBs antibodies in serum or plasma of HBV infected individuals, will remain undetected using this screening diagnostic approach of detecting HBsAg. The current study aims in studying the prevalence of the OBI amongst human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infected individuals who have not been exposed to anti-retroviral therapy.

METHOD

Estimation of HBsAg, anti-HBs, and anti-HBc total antibody status amongst 100 HIV-1 infected study participants was carried out using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits. Detection of HBV-DNA was carried out by in-house qualitative PCR. CD4 + T lymphocyte counts were analysed using Becton Dickinson's (BD) FACSCount™ system.

RESULTS

The median age of the HIV-1 infected study population was 35 years (range: 22-67), with the gender distribution being 53 males and 47 females. The mean CD4 T lymphocyte count of the study participants was 210/mm(3). Overall, serological evidence of HBV infection was observed in 28% of the HIV-1 infected study participants. There was 5% seropositivity for HBsAg, of which 2% were additionally positive for HBV-DNA-PCR. "Anti-HBc alone" status was seen in 18% of study participants, this being statistically higher in those with CD4 T lymphocyte counts < 200/mm(3). While there was a single specimen with co-positivity for anti-HBc total antibodies and HBV-DNA, 5% of the in the study population exhibited anti-HBs antibodies positivity, with one sample exhibiting dual positivity for HBsAg and anti-HBs antibodies.

CONCLUSION

Occult HBV infections may contribute to chronic liver damage, and associ-ated reactivation amongst immunocompromised individuals, HIV-1 in-fected being a subset of them. "Anti-HBc" testing followed by HBV-DNA detection by PCR can be utilised for such populations to detect OBIs. Early detection of hepatitis B viraemia will be important for deciding the antiviral therapeutic protocol so as to avoid evolution of antiviral resistance in the circulating HBV strains in HIV-1 infected individuals harbouring OBIs.

Seroprevalence of HCV and its co-infection with HBV and HIV among liver disease patients of South Tamil Nadu

AIM

To determine the seroprevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) and its co-infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis delta agent (HDV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) among liver disease patients of south Tamil Nadu.

METHODS

A total of 1012 samples comprising 512 clinically diagnosed cases of liver disease patients and 500 apparently healthy age and sex matched individuals were screened for Hepatitis C virus (anti HCV and HCV RNA), Hepatitis B virus (HBsAg), Hepatitis delta agent (anti HDV) and Human immuno virus (antibodies to HIV-1 and HIV-2) using commercially available enzyme linked immunosorbent assay kits. HCV RNA was detected by RT-PCR. Liver function tests like ALT, AST, GGT, ALP, bilirubin and albumin were also studied.

RESULTS

The seroprevalence of HCV was found to be 5.6% among liver disease patients by ELISA. 27/512, 49/512 and 12/512 patients were positive for HIV, HBV & HDV respectively. Co-infection of HCV & HBV was found in 8 patients, with 6 for HCV & HIV and 4 for HCV, HBV & HIV co-infections. Sex-wise analysis showed that HIV, HCV & HBV and HCV & HIV co-infection was high among females whereas for HBV it was high in males. The mean ALT and AST in HCV positive cases were 42.1 ± 8.3 and 49 ± 10.1. In people co-infected with HCV & HBV or HCV & HIV or HCV, HBV & HIV the mean ALT of 58.0 ± 03.16, 56.78 ± 4.401 and 64.37 ± 4.01 respectively.

CONCLUSION

We strongly recommend routine test of the blood for HCV in addition to HBV and HIV. We also recommend individualized counseling to identify those at risk and testing for those who want it. Improved surveillance and periodic epidemiological studies will have to be undertaken to monitor and prevent these blood-borne viruses.