Optimisation and analysis of polymerase chain reaction based DNA sequencing for genotyping polyoma virus in renal transplant patients: a report from South India

Comparative performance evaluation of random access and real-time PCR techniques in the diagnosis of BK virus infections in transplant patients

PURPOSE

The study aims to compare random-access NeuMoDx values with artus qPCR values to validate the accuracy of NeuMoDx as an alternative to qPCR and provide an equation to convert copies/ml to IU/ml measurements.

METHODS

A total of 95 samples, including 61 transplant patient samples (n = 23 urine, n = 38 plasma) as the study group, 28 BKPyV-free samples as the control group, and six quality control samples, were included. One-Way ANOVA, Pearson correlation, Bland-Altman, Passing-Bablok, Deming regression analyses were used for statistical evaluation.

RESULTS

Of 95 samples, 46 (48 %) were positive with NeuMoDx, while 40 (42 %) were positive with artus qPCR. Both techniques were statistically similar (p > 0.05). Deming correlation analysis (r = 0.9590), Passing Bablok and Bland Altman analyses demonstrated a strong correlation between NeuMoDx and artus values. The equation that provides the conversion between NeuMoDx and artus qPCR values was NeuMoDx= (1.12965 x artus qPCR) - 0.55016. BKPyV infections remain a concern for transplant patients globally, and effective new diagnostic methods are required.

CONCLUSIONS

Consistency between the results of NeuMoDx and qPCR confirms that NeuMoDx may be a valuable alternative for detecting BKPyV to prevent viral propagation. Our findings may allow converting copy/ml results to IU/ml for diagnosing and monitoring BKPyV infections in transplant patients.

BK polyomavirus genotypes in renal transplant recipients in the United States: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

In the United States, increasing ethnic diversity has been apparent. However, the epidemiology and trends of BKV genotypes remain unclear. This meta-analysis was conducted with the aim to assess the prevalence of BKV genotypes among kidney transplant (KTx) recipients in the United States.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature review was conducted through October 2018 utilizing MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Database to identify studies that reported the prevalence of BKV subtypes and/or subgroups in KTx recipients in the United States. Pooled prevalence rates were combined using random effects, generic inverse variance method. The protocol for this study is registered with PROSPERO (no. CRD42019134582).

RESULTS

A total of eight observational studies with a total of 193 samples (urine, blood, and kidney tissues) from 188 BKV-infected KTX recipients were enrolled. Overall, the pooled estimated prevalence rates of BKV subtypes were 72.2% (95% confidence of interval [CI]: 62.7-80.0%) for subtype I, 6.8% (95% CI: 2.5-16.9%) for subtype II, 8.3% (95% CI: 4.4-15.1%) for subtype III, and 16.1% (95% CI: 10.4-24.2%) for subtype IV, respectively. While metaregression analysis demonstrated a significant positive correlation between year of study and the prevalence of BKV subtype I (slopes = +0.1023, P = .01), there were no significant correlations between year of study and percentages of BKV subtype II-IV (P > .05). Among KTx recipients with BKV subtype I, the pooled estimated percentages of BKV subgroups were 22.4% (95% CI: 13.7-34.5%) for subgroup Ia, 30.6% (95% CI: 17.7-47.5%) for subgroup Ib1, 47.7% (95% CI: 35.8-59.9%) for subgroup Ib2, and 4.1% (95% CI:1.2-13.3%) for subgroup Ic, respectively.

CONCLUSION

BKV subtype I is the most prevalent subtype among KTx recipients in the United States and its prevalence seems to increasing overtime. Subgroup Ib2 is the most common subgroup among BKV subtype I.