Comparison of levobupivacaine and levobupivacaine with fentanyl in infraumbilical surgeries under spinal anaesthesia

Comparison of Postoperative Analgesia Between Intrathecal Nalbuphine and Intrathecal Fentanyl in Infraumbilical Surgeries: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

INTRODUCTION

Spinal anesthesia is a widely used regional anesthesia technique for surgeries below the umbilicus, but postoperative analgesia is of major concern due to the relatively short duration of the local anesthetic. Various drugs were used as an additive to local anesthetic to prolong the duration of postoperative analgesia. This study aims to compare the efficacy of nalbuphine and fentanyl as an intrathecal additive along with local anesthetic.

METHODOLOGY

A total of 166 patients aged between 18 and 65 years belonging to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I and II undergoing elective infraumbilical surgeries were included in the prospective double-blind randomized controlled trial. The patients were allocated into two groups of 83 each. Group N was given 2.5 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine + 1 mg of nalbuphine (0.5 mL), and group F received 2.5 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine + 25 mcg fentanyl (0.5 mL). Both groups were compared for postoperative analgesia, onset and duration of both sensory and motor blockade, intraoperative hemodynamics, and side effects.

RESULTS

All demographic data, hemodynamic parameters, and side effects were not statistically significant among the two groups. However, other parameters, such as the mean duration of analgesia, which was 267.27 ± 172.099 minutes in group N and 161.35 ± 14.957 minutes in group F; meantime for the onset of sensory blockade, which was 3.94 ± 1.769 minutes in group N and 5.94 ± 0.929 minutes in group F; onset of complete motor blockade, which was 7.10 ± 1.858 minutes in group N and 11.61 ± 1.218 minutes in group F; duration of motor blockade, which was 182.57 ± 13.011 minutes in group N and 112.53 ± 7.389 minutes in group F; and mean time taken for two-segment regression, which was 118.20 ± 12.61 minutes in group N and 113.72 ± 8.84 minutes in group F, were all comparable between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Nalbuphine was found to be more efficacious for prolongation of postoperative analgesia with better hemodynamic stability.

Safety and effectiveness of adding fentanyl or sufentanil to spinal anesthesia: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

INTRODUCTION

Spinal infusions of either fentanyl or sufentanil have been reported in international reports, articles, and scientific events worldwide. This study aimed to determine whether intrathecal fentanyl or sufentanil offers safety in mortality and perioperative adverse events.

METHODS

MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE, CENTRAL (Cochrane library databases), gray literature, hand-searching, and clinicaltrials.gov were systematically searched. Randomized controlled trials with no language, data, or status restrictions were included, comparing the effectiveness and safety of adding spinal lipophilic opioid to local anesthetics (LAs). Data were pooled using the random-effects models or fixed-effect models based on heterogeneity.

RESULTS

The initial search retrieved 4469 records; 3241 records were eligible, and 3152 articles were excluded after reading titles and abstracts, with a high agreement rate (98.6%). After reading the full texts, 76 articles remained. Spinal fentanyl and sufentanil significantly reduced postoperative pain and opioid consumption, increased analgesia and pruritus. Fentanyl, but not sufentanil, significantly reduced both postoperative nausea and vomiting, and postoperative shivering; compared to LAs alone. The analyzed studies did not report any case of in-hospital mortality related to spinal lipophilic opioids. The rate of respiratory depression was 0.7% and 0.8% when spinal fentanyl or sufentanil was added and when it was not, respectively. Episodes of respiratory depression were rare, uneventful, occurred intraoperatively, and were easily manageable.

CONCLUSION

There is moderate to high quality certainty that there is evidence regarding the safety and effectiveness of adding lipophilic opioids to LAs in spinal anesthesia.

Comparative evaluation of anaesthetic efficacy and haemodynamic effects of a combination of isobaric bupivacaine with buprenorphine vs. isobaric levobupivacaine with buprenorphine for spinal anaesthesia - A double blinded randomised clinical trial

Background and Aims

Bupivacaine is the most frequently used local anaesthetic for spinal anaesthesia, however, use of levobupivacaine in clinical practice has advanced recently. This study aimed to compare the anaesthetic potency and haemodynamic effects of intrathecal bupivacaine with buprenorphine versus levobupivacaine with buprenorphine in infraumbilical surgeries.

Methods

This prospective randomised double blind study was conducted in seventy patients aged 18-65 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade I-II, scheduled for lower abdominal and lower limb surgery under spinal anaesthesia. The patients either received 0.5% isobaric racemic bupivacaine 3 ml with 2 μg/kg of buprenorphine (Group B) or 0.5% isobaric levobupivacaine 3 ml with 2 μg/kg of buprenorphine (Group L). The time for onset of sensory block between the two groups was the priomary end-point. Other measurements included haemodynamic variables, sensory and motor blockade characteristics, postoperative analgesia, and complications in the first 24 h.

Results

There was no significant difference in the onset of sensory block between the two groups. Sensory and motor blockade characteristics were similar between the two groups. However, there was significant fall in the heart rate at 5 min in Group B compared to Group L. There was statistically significant fall in systolic blood pressure in group B compared to Group L from 5 min up to 60 min and fall in diastolic blood pressure from 10 min to 45 min.

Conclusion

Our study showed that onset of sensory block is similar between isobaric levobupivacaine with buprenorphine 37 38 and isobaric bupivacaine with buprenorphine.

Comparative Study of Constant Dose Intrathecal Hypobaric Levobupivacaine with Varying Baricities in Lower Limb Surgeries

Background:

Hypobaric spinal anesthesia is advantageous for unilateral lower extremity fractures as it obviates pain of lying on fractured limb for performing subarachnoid block.

Aims:

This study compares block characteristics and complications of three different baricities of constant dose intrathecal hypobaric levobupivacaine to determine an optimum baricity.

Settings and Design:

One-twenty American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status 1 and 2 patients aged 18–65 years undergoing unilateral lower limb surgeries were divided into three equal groups for this prospective cohort study.

Materials and Methods:

To 2 mL intrathecal 0.5% isobaric levobupivacaine (10 mg), 0.4 mL, 0.6 mL, and 0.8 mL of distilled water were added in Groups A, B, and C, respectively. Baricities of Groups A, B, and C are 0.999294, 0.998945, and 0.998806, respectively. Development of sensory and motor block was assessed by the pinprick method and Bromage scale, respectively. The total duration of analgesia and complications were noted.

Statistical Analysis Used:

Mean, standard error, one-way ANOVA, and Bonferroni were used to analyze quantitative variables; proportions and Chi-square tests for qualitative variables.

Results:

Demographic parameters, motor block of operated limb, and complications were comparable. Group C had the fastest onset of sensory block (10.10 min) and maximum duration of analgesia (478.97 min; P < 0.001); but high sensory levels in 48.7%. Group B had T₁₀ sensory level in 92.5%; onset comparable to Group C (P = 0.248), and reasonable duration of analgesia (332.50 min). Group A had inadequate sensory levels, slow onset, and early regression.

Conclusions:

Group B (baricity - 0.998945) has better block characteristics among three groups compared.