Comparison of Postoperative Pain After Epidural Anesthesia Using 0.5%, 0.75% Ropivacaine and 0.5% Bupivacaine in Patients Undergoing Lower Limb Surgery: A Double-Blind Study

Comparative Study of 0.5% Bupivacaine, 0.5% Ropivacaine, and 0.75% Ropivacaine With Fentanyl as a Continuous Intraoperative Epidural Infusion on Post-operative Analgesia

Introduction Persistent postoperative pain leads to impaired patient recovery and delays in discharge of patients. The aim was to compare the efficacy of 0.5% bupivacaine to two varying concentrations of ropivacaine, specifically 0.5% and 0.75%, along with fentanyl as a continuous epidural infusion in providing adequate pain relief for patients subjected to infraumbilical surgeries. Materials and methods A prospective randomized comparative study was carried out on 150 patients and was divided into three groups, namely group B, group R, and group RP. Group B indicates (0.5% bupivacaine), group R means (0.5% ropivacaine), and finally, group RP means (0.75% ropivacaine); the three groups had 50 patients each. Group B was administered an epidural infusion of bupivacaine at a concentration of 0.5%, group R was given 0.5% ropivacaine, and group RP was treated with 0.75% ropivacaine; all three groups included 40 mcg fentanyl. The duration of the motor and sensory blockade and the time needed for the first rescue analgesia after the stoppage of epidural infusion were assessed in all three groups. The data were statistically analyzed using the ANOVA, "post hoc Tukey," and chi-square tests. Results Comparison of the duration of motor and sensory blockade among all three groups showed that group RP (0.75% ropivacaine with 2 mcg/cc fentanyl) had the longest duration of 328.8 and 406 minutes, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Comparison of the time of stoppage of epidural infusion to the requirement of first rescue analgesia showed that the group that received 0.75% ropivacaine with 40 mcg fentanyl had the highest value of 258.6 minutes and was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Conclusion Epidural intraoperative infusion of 0.75% ropivacaine with fentanyl offers better postoperative pain relief as compared to both 0.5% bupivacaine and 0.5% ropivacaine with fentanyl.

Comparison of Efficacy of Epidural Ropivacaine versus Bupivacaine for Postoperative Pain Relief in Total Knee Replacement Surgeries

Background:

Epidural analgesia has become the standard of care for knee replacement surgeries worldwide. Bupivacaine has been used successfully for many years. Epidural ropivacaine is now being used increasingly and seems to have benefits other than just pain relief, in terms of a better safety profile.

Aim:

To compare the efficacy of bupivacaine 0.125% (Group B) versus two concentrations of ropivacaine 0.1% (Group R1) and 0.2% (Group R2), in terms of pain scores, requirement of rescue analgesia, related adverse effects, and duration of postoperative (PO) hospital stay.

Materials and Methods:

A retrospective study was conducted from the acute pain service data of patients who underwent joint replacement surgeries in one or both limbs, over a span of 6 months. Patients were allocated to and analyzed under one of the three groups based on the drug concentration used postoperatively by epidural infusion. Data retrieved were demographic data, daily average visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, rescue analgesia given, adverse effects, and PO hospital stay days for all three groups.

Results:

Demographic data were comparable between the three groups. Daily average VAS pain scores on days 1 and 2 were significantly higher in Group R1. Groups B and R2 were comparable. There was significantly more requirement of rescue analgesia in Group R1 on day 1. Day 2 showed no significant difference in rescue analgesic requirement in all three groups. Days of PO hospital stay were significantly higher in Group R1. Adverse effects such as hypotension and delayed motor block were higher in Group B.

Conclusion:

Ropivacaine 0.2% and bupivacaine 0.125% were equally efficacious in terms of VAS pain scores, rescue analgesic requirement, and duration of PO hospital stay, but ropivacaine had a better safety profile in terms of less hypotension and lesser motor block.