Gain beyond cosmesis: demonstration of psychosocial and functional gains following successful strabismus surgery using the adult strabismus questionnaire adult strabismus 20

Strabismus Surgery for Psychosocial Reasons-A Literature Review

Introduction

Strabismus surgery may be undertaken for visual benefit, to improve or eliminate diplopia symptoms, or to restore or improve binocular single vision (BSV). In patients without visual symptoms or expected visual benefit, strabismus surgery may still be undertaken if the presence of strabismus causes the patient psychosocial symptoms. To evaluate strabismus surgery undertaken for psychosocial reasons, evidence of postoperative outcomes in this specific cohort is needed.

Methods

A systematic search of the literature was conducted (1946-2023) to identify evidence where postoperative outcomes were reported for adult patients (age 18 years and above) who had undergone strabismus surgery for psychosocial reasons.

Results

Sixty-nine papers were included in the literature review. Most sources of evidence included patients within heterogeneous cohorts of strabismus surgery outcomes, with a range of symptoms and differing surgical aims.

Discussion

In adults who underwent strabismus surgery for psychosocial reasons, improved postoperative ocular alignment and/or improved health related quality of life (HRQoL) were common. Strabismus surgery outcomes appeared to be measured satisfactorily at three months postoperatively. Additional surgical outcomes, including an expanded field of vision, unexpected BSV, improved binocular summation, improved task performance and improved eye movements have been reported, but not fully investigated. There was a lack of consensus on how postoperative success should be defined and measured. A core outcome set for strabismus has been suggested and there is potential to add to the available evidence by investigating which outcome measures are most relevant to those with strabismus and psychosocial symptoms. There is a growing need for robust evidence in this specific subgroup of patients due to a lack of evidence specifically reporting postoperative outcomes in adults with strabismus and psychosocial symptoms.

The impact of strabismus on psychosocial heath and quality of life: a systematic review

Strabismus can hinder an individual's ability to perform daily functions and negatively affect their well-being. I examine the impact strabismus has on psychosocial health and quality of life in children and adults and evaluate the challenges confronted by parents of children with strabismus. Numerous misconceptions exist regarding the impact strabismus has on overall health. Negative attitudes persist toward those affected, resulting in difficulties with self-image. Individuals with strabismus are at increased risk for both visual system and psychiatric disorders. Misinformation regarding available treatment options for children and adults with strabismus continues to exist, resulting in decreased access to care. Improved education of health care providers can increase appropriate referrals and initiation of treatment. Treatment of strabismus is not merely cosmetic and has the potential to improve psychosocial health and quality of life for children and adults with and without diplopia.

Satisfaction with strabismus surgery based on the opinion of expert surgeons

PURPOSE

To assess the perception of strabismus surgeons in Spain regarding patient satisfaction after surgery, by analysing the types of strabismus with the most satisfied patients, as well as the causes of dissatisfaction.

METHODS

A survey was carried out among the members of the Spanish Strabology Society who were over 50 years of age, active in Spain, with more than 20 years of surgical experience, and whose main surgical activity was strabismus. The questionnaire consisted of 18 questions about the perception of patient satisfaction according to the type of strabismus, patient age, as well as the most frequent cause of dissatisfaction after surgery.

RESULTS

The questionnaires were completed by a total of 29 surgeons, with a mean of 31 years of surgical experience. The most frequent cause of perceived dissatisfaction was residual strabismus. No differences were found in the satisfaction index between children and adults. The surgery that was considered to produce greater satisfaction was endotropia, followed by decompensated 4th nerve palsy, and exotropia, while 3rd nerve palsy was the cause of the most dissatisfaction.

CONCLUSIONS

According to strabismus surgeons, endotropia is the most satisfactory surgery for the patient, followed by exotropia, vertical strabismus, and traumatic paralysis of the 4th cranial nerve.

Investigation of factors associated with the success of adult strabismus surgery from the patient's perspective

PURPOSE

To explore factors that influence the success of adult strabismus surgery based on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) criteria.

METHODS

The HRQOL aspect of strabismus surgery was assessed using the Adult Strabismus 20 (AS-20) questionnaire. Adult patients (≥16 years of age) undergoing strabismus surgery between 2014 and 2016 were identified using a treatment register. Pre- and postoperative AS-20 scores were calculated. HRQOL surgical success was defined as a pre- to postoperative change in AS-20 score exceeding previously published 95% limits of agreement. Any relationship between demographic factors (sex, age, and socioeconomic status), presence or absence of diplopia, type and magnitude of deviation, and change in deviation size with HRQOL success was investigated.

RESULTS

A total of 87 patients were included (mean age, 47 years; 53% female). Nondiplopic patients showed significantly lower pre- and postoperative scores on the AS-20 psychosocial subscale compared to diplopic patients. Of 87 surgeries, 54 (62%) were classified as successful based on HRQOL criteria. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed only lower socioeconomic status to be significantly associated with a higher rate of HRQOL success (P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Strabismic patients with a lower socioeconomic status are more likely to achieve HRQOL success following surgery. We also show that nondiplopic patients have more psychosocial concerns than those with diplopia and that this disparity persists even after strabismus surgery.

Measuring Health-Related Quality of Life in Strabismus: A Modification of the Adult Strabismus-20 (AS-20) Questionnaire Using Rasch Analysis

Purpose

To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Adult Strabismus-20 (AS-20)- a health-related quality of life (HRQoL) questionnaire in adults with strabismus, and if flawed, to revise the AS-20 and its subscales creating valid measurement scales.

Methods

584 adults (meanage, 27.5 years) with strabismus were recruited from an outpatient clinic at a South Indian tertiary eye care centre and were administered the AS-20 questionnaire.The AS-20 was translated and back translated into two Indian languages. The AS-20 and its two 10-item subscales – ‘psychosocial’ and ‘function’were assessed separately for fit to the Rasch model, including an assessment of the rating scale, unidimensionality (by principal components analysis), measurement precision by person separation reliability, PSR, targeting, and differential item functioning (DIF; notable > 1.0 logits).

Results

Response categories were not used as intended, thereby, required re-organization and reducing their number from 5 to 3. The AS-20 had adequate measurement precision (PSR = 0.87) but lacked unidimensionality; however, deletion of the six multi-dimensionality causing items and an additional three misfitting items resulted in 11-item unidimensional questionnaire (AS-11). Two items failed to satisfy the model expectations in the ‘psychosocial’ subscale and were deleted – resulting in an 8-item unidimensional scale with adequate PSR (0.81) and targeting (0.23 logits). One item misfit in the ‘function’ subscale and was deleted—resulting in a 9 item Rasch-revised unidimensional subscale with acceptable PSR (0.80) and targeting (0.97 logits).None of the items displayed notable DIF by age, gender and level of education.

Conclusions

The AS-11 and its two Rasch-revised subscales – 8-item psychosocial and 9-item function subscale may be more appropriate than the original AS-20 and its two 10-item subscales for use as unidimensional measures of HRQoL in adults with strabismus in India. Further work is required to establish the validity of the revised rating scale.