Unilateral hemorrhagic maculopathy: An uncommon manifestation of hand, foot, and mouth disease

Hand, Foot, and Mouth Disease: A Narrative Review

BACKGROUND

Hand, foot, and mouth disease is a common viral disease in childhood. Because the disease has the potential to reach epidemic levels and mortality is high in some countries, early recognition of this disease is of paramount importance.

OBJECTIVE

This purpose of this article is to familiarize pediatricians with the clinical manifestations and management of hand, foot, and mouth disease.

METHODS

A search was conducted in February 2022 in PubMed Clinical Queries using the key term "hand, foot, and mouth disease". The search strategy included all clinical trials, observational studies, and reviews published within the past 10 years. Only papers published in English were included in this review.

RESULTS

Hand, foot, and mouth disease is characterized by a painful oral enanthem and asymptomatic exanthem on the palms and soles. Children younger than 5 years are most commonly affected. Hand, foot, and mouth disease caused by enterovirus A71 is more severe and has a higher rate of complications than that attributed to other viruses such as coxsackievirus A16. Circulatory failure secondary to myocardial impairment and neurogenic pulmonary edema secondary to brainstem damage are the main causes of death. Fortunately, the disease is usually benign and resolves in 7 to10 days without sequelae. Given the self-limited nature of most cases, treatment is mainly symptomatic and supportive. Intravenous immunoglobulin should be considered for the treatment of severe/complicated hand, foot, and mouth disease and has been recommended by several national and international guideline committees. Currently, there are no specific antiviral agents approved for the treatment of the disease. Drugs such as ribavirin, suramin, mulberroside C, aminothiazole analogs, and sertraline have emerged as potential candidates for the treatment of hand, foot, and mouth disease. Vaccination of susceptible individuals in high-risk areas and good personal hygiene are important preventative measures to combat the disease.

CONCLUSION

Familiarity of the disease including its atypical manifestations is crucial so that a correct diagnosis can be made, and appropriate treatment initiated. A timely diagnosis can help avoid contact with the affected individual and decrease the risk of an outbreak.

The Expanded Clinical Spectrum of Coxsackie Retinopathy

The authors present two cases of coxsackie retinopathy that presented with the classic findings of acute outer retinal disruption that evolved to an outer retinal scar. In these two cases, the classic lesions displayed an extramacular distribution. The authors provide detailed multimodal imaging in both cases highlighting the nature of the lesions. It is important to consider coxsackie virus infection in the differential diagnosis of extramacular lesions with outer retinal disruption. The term "unilateral acute idiopathic maculopathy" should be replaced with "coxsackie retinopathy" to better align with the expanded clinical spectrum and the known etiology of this disorder. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2020;51:529-532.].

Pseudomembranous conjunctivitis with hand, foot and mouth disease in a pregnant woman : a case report

Background

Hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD) is a common systemic infection that is caused by an enterovirus, normally Coxsackie A16. Generally, it affects children or immunocompromised adults. Only a few reports have described pseudomembranous conjunctivitis associated with HFMD. We aim to describe the clinical outcomes and ocular findings of a 37-year-old female with HFMD and concurrent severe pseudomembranous conjunctivitis, who was 28 weeks pregnant.

Case presentation

A female patient who was 28-weeks pregnant was referred for an ophthalmological review due to pain and injection in both eyes. The patient was hospitalized under obstetrics and gynecology and evaluated for Behcet’s disease with oral and perineal ulcers. In an ophthalmic examination, both eyes were observed to have a conjunctival injection. Behcet’s disease-associated conjunctivitis was diagnosed. Topical steroids and antibiotics were administered every 6 h. Two days after her presentation, a maculopapular eruption occurred on her palms. Enterovirus type 71 was detected in a serum virus antibody test, and the patient was diagnosed with HFMD. After 7 days, severe pseudomembranous conjunctivitis and corneal epithelial defects occurred in both eyes. Topical steroids were administered every 3 h, and the pseudomembrane was removed every 2 to 3 days. The pseudomembrane did not occur after 3 weeks, but corneal erosion persisted. After 3 months, the corneal erosion had completely resolved.

Conclusions

HFMD-associated conjunctivitis is a rare complication in adults, however it can appear as a severe pseudomembranous conjunctivitis. In this case, the removal of the pseudomembrane and topical steroids helped improve the symptoms.

Is choriocapillaris the early target in acute maculopathy secondary to hand, foot, and mouth disease? A case report

PURPOSE

To report the case of a 33-year old man who disclosed the first case of bilateral ocular involvement of hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD) with a different stage of the disease in each eye.

METHODS

Retrospective case report.

RESULTS

The study included a patient who incurred in a bilateral HFMD maculopathy. During 6 months follow-up period persistent abnormalities in fundus examination and in OCT scans were reported.

CONCLUSION

We consider that our case shows that choriocapillaris is the primary target of HFMD maculopathy, for this reason we consider that ICGA is mandatory for early diagnosis and an effective treatment.

Bilateral idiopathic retinal vasculitis following coxsackievirus A4 infection: a case report

Background

Coxsackieviruses are members of a group of viruses called the enteroviruses, which may cause respiratory and gastrointestinal symptoms, erythema, meningoencephalitis, myocarditis, pericarditis, and myositis. Unilateral acute idiopathic maculopathy caused by coxsackievirus A16 has been associated with hand, foot, and mouth disease, but only a few reports describe retinitis associated with coxsackievirus serotype B3 or B4. We report a case of bilateral multifocal obstructive retinal vasculitis that developed after coxsackievirus A4 infection.

Case presentation

A 60-year-old woman was referred to our department with bilateral visual disturbance that developed following flu-like symptoms. At the initial examination, best corrected visual acuity was 20/200 in the right eye and 20/50 in the left eye. The critical flicker frequency (CFF) was 23 Hz in the right eye and 27 Hz in the left eye. Fine white keratic precipitates with infiltrating cells were presented in the anterior chamber of both eyes, and multifocal retinal ischemic lesions were observed in the macula and posterior pole of both eyes. The retinal lesions corresponded with scotomas observed in Goldmann visual field test. On spectral domain-optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), retinal lesions were depicted as hyper-reflective regions in the inner retina layers in both eyes, and disruption of ellipsoid line in the left eye., Fluorescein angiography exhibited findings indicative of multifocal obstructive retinal vasculitis. The patient had a history of current hypertension treated with oral therapy and glaucoma treated with latanoprost eye drops. Blood test for coxsackievirus antibody titers revealed that A4, A6, A9, B1, B2, B3, and B5 were positive (titers: 8–32). Abdominal skin biopsy of necrotic tissue suggested vascular damage caused by coxsackievirus. The general symptoms improved after 6 weeks, and the multifocal retinal ischemic lesions were partially resolved with residual slightly hard exudates. Only coxsackievirus A4 antibody titer increased from 4 to 32-fold after 14 months. However, hyper-reflective regions and disruption of the inner retinal layers on SD-OCT persisted especially in the right eye, and residual paracentral scotoma was observed in the right eye.

Conclusion

The present case suggests that coxsackievirus A4 causes bilateral multifocal obstructive retinal vasculitis with irreversible inner retinal damage.