The posterior iris-claw lens outcome study: 6-month follow-up

[Secondary implantation of retropupillary fixated iris-claw intraocular lenses]

BACKGROUND

There is no standard for the treatment of functional aphakia in cases with a compromised capsular system. Retropupillary fixation of an Artisan iris-claw IOL ("Intraokularlinse") is one of the established procedures.

OBJECTIVE

Aim of this study was the evaluation of indications, visual and refractive long-term results and complication rates after retropupillary implantation of an iris-claw lens.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective study comprised 366 eyes that received a retropupillary Artisan intraocular lens (IOL) in a single center between January 2009 and December 2019. The mean follow-up period was 249 days (8 months) ±516 days.

RESULTS

IOL dislocation (68%) was the most common reason for a retropupillary iris-claw implantation. Previous vitrectomy was a significant preoperative risk factor for IOL dislocation (p = 0.0001). Best corrected visual acuity improved from 0.65 ± 0.64 (logMAR) preoperatively to 0.57 ± 0.51 (logMAR) 4-6 weeks after the surgery. The mean deviation from the planned refraction was +0.40 ± 1.37 dpt and 73% of the patients had a deviation within ±1 dpt of the planned refraction. Relevant postoperative complications during the first 4 weeks were pupillary distortion (42%), ocular hypotony (15%) and transient hyphema (14%). Late complications (≥4 weeks after the surgery) included persistent pupillary distortion (20%), cystoid macular edema (13%) and iris-claw disenclavation (6%).

CONCLUSION

The retropupillary Artisan implantation is an efficient method for treating aphakia without capsular support and provides good visual and refractive results with an acceptable surgical risk profile.

Retrospective study of secondary implantation of retroiridial fixation lenses in patients without capsular support: functional results and complications

INTRODUCTION

The correction of aphakia when there is no adequate capsular support remains a therapeutic challenge. The use of retroiridial fixation lenses has been extended given their lower complication rate compared to other available options.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective study including all cases operated with an Artisan® retropupillary aphakia implant.

RESULTS

33 eyes were included out of a total of 28 patients. The follow-up period has been 38.55 months (1-96). 32.3% had a lens dislocation and 67.7% had an intraocular lens dislocation. The previous mean best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 1.18 ± 0.79 logMAR and post-intervention 0.36 ± 0.62 (p < 0.01). 93.8% of the patients presented a final BCVA equal to or better and 62.5% an improvement of 3 or more lines. The most frequent complication was corectopia (31.3%) and hypotony in the immediate postoperative period (21.9%). An epiretinal membrane (ERM) developed in 18.8% and cystic macular oedema (CME) in 9.4%. The presence of complications in the postoperative period did not statistically influence the final BCVA.

CONCLUSIONS

The retropupillary Artisan® lens allows the correction of aphakia with satisfactory visual results and a low rate of complications.

Management of traumatic dislocation of crystalline lens: Retropupillary iris-claw versus sutureless intrascleral-fixated intraocular lens

PURPOSE:

The purpose of this study was to compare the long-term efficacy and safety of posterior iris-claw lens and scleral-fixated posterior chamber lens for aphakia after traumatic posterior dislocation of the crystalline lens.

MATERIAL AND METHODS:

Out of 120 evaluated cases, 60 were randomly assigned in each group. A 23G vitrectomy was done and intraocular lens was implanted by two different techniques. Extensive preoperative and postoperative evaluation was performed including optical coherence tomography and Scheimpflug imaging. Follow-up was done on days 1, 7, and 28 at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months.

RESULTS:

A significant improvement was found in uncorrected visual acuity in both the groups. Surgical time in iris fixation was significantly less (P < 0.001), whereas pupil peaking and pigment release were more. Difference in mean intraocular pressure and change in astigmatism in both the groups were insignificant.

CONCLUSION:

Both the techniques had similar good visual results. Although operating time was shorter for iris fixation, it had several disadvantages, including immediate postoperative inflammation and ovalling of the pupil. However, scleral fixation had a better outcome in terms of postoperative complications.

Supporting IOL'S in a Deficient Capsular Environment: The Tale of No "Tails"

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the following three distinct surgical procedures for secondary IOL implantation without capsular support: Iris-claw lens, flanged transscleral fixated IOLs (Yamane technique), and sutureless transscleral hook IOL fixation (Carlevale IOL).

Materials and Methods

In this retrospective comparative study, three different sutureless IOL implantation techniques were compared in patients without any capsular support. Visual acuity and outcomes were analyzed in 24 eyes of 23 patients (14 male and 9 female). Study included 13 iris-claw lenses (Artisan Ophtec), 6 flanged transscleral fixated IOLs (Yamane technique using a MA60MA Alcon Inc IOL), and 5 transscleral Carlevale IOLS (Carlevale IOL, Soleko, Italy).

Results

logMAR mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improved from 0.49 ± 0.19 to 0.19 ± 0.10 at three months after surgery (p < 0.05). Postoperative BCVA was similar in all three groups, and no intergroup difference was noted. Three eyes (12.5%) had a raised IOP >25 mmHg, 2 eyes (8%) presented a subluxated/dislocated IOL, 4 eyes (16%) had corneal edema longer than 7 days, 3 eyes (12.5%) had irregular pupil profile, 2 eyes (8%) had vitreous hemorrhage, 7 eyes had (29%) corneal astigmatism over 3 diopters, and one patient (4%) developed cystoid macular edema (CME).

Conclusions

All three surgical procedures can be considered adequate to correct aphakia in patients without capsular support with significant improvement in visual acuity and low complication.

Refractive Outcomes of Retropupillary Fixated Iris-Claw Lens for Exchange of the Dislocated Intraocular Lens Using Modified Scleral Incisions

Purpose

To evaluate refractive outcomes after retropupillary iris-claw intraocular lens (IOL) implantation and to compare postoperative astigmatism from (1) a conventional 5.5-mm sclerocorneal incision, (2) an L-shaped scleral tunnel incision, and (3) a frown scleral tunnel incision.

Methods

This was a retrospective study of eyes undergoing dislocated IOL exchange for a retropupillary iris-claw IOL. Uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity (UDVA and CDVA) and postoperative complications were evaluated until postoperative months 24. The refractive outcomes and the surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) vector were compared between groups.

Results

The medical records of 107 eyes from 107 patients with mean age of 65.31 ± 12.15 years were reviewed. Eyes with a frown incision showed the best UDVA, followed by those with L-shaped and conventional incisions (P = 0.003). Eyes with an L-shaped incision or frown incision had a lower SIA than that of the conventional incision group at postoperative 6 months (mean ± standard deviation [SD] SIA, 0.86 ± 0.85 D, 0.63 ± 0.37 D, and 1.70 ± 1.27 D for frown incision, L-shaped incision, and conventional incisions, respectively; P = 0.004).

Conclusion

The frown incision and L-shaped incision induced a significantly smaller SIA than the conventional incisions, which was associated with better UDVA postoperatively.

Retropupillary Iris-Claw Intraocular Lenses: A Literature Review

Retropupillary iris-claw intraocular lenses (ICIOLs) have been increasingly chosen by surgeons nowadays as a primary or secondary procedure of IOL implantation in eyes with insufficient capsular or zonular support. They have gained popularity due to their simple fast technique, favourable functional outcomes, and safety. The transition in the ICIOL fixation from prepupillary to a more biologically appropriate retropupillary position and change in the optic design from biconvex to convex-concave have provided better visual outcomes and improved safety. A peer-reviewed literature search was conducted in Medline (PubMed), Embase, and Cochrane Library using the keywords "retropupillary iris claw" and "iris claw". The search yielded 310 articles that were screened. Forty-three articles on retropupillary ICIOLs were finally found to be relevant and reviewed in full-text versions. The functional outcomes following retropupillary implantation of ICIOLs have been acceptable in eyes with no ocular co-morbidities otherwise. However, the indications for surgery may affect the outcomes. The major postoperative complications directly associated with ICIOLs include pupil ovalization and redislocation. Nevertheless, the rate of disenclavation depends on the experience and skill of the surgeon. This review is based on a literature review, and it focuses on the preoperative evaluation, surgical technique, postoperative outcomes, and associated complications. Prospective randomized trials with a larger sample size and longer follow-up are needed for comparison with other techniques of IOL fixation and confirmation of long-term safety profile.

Retropupillary iris-claw intraocular lens implantation in aphakic patients

Purpose:

To evaluate the outcomes of implantation of an iris-claw intraocular lens (IC-IOL) in retropupillary position in aphakic patients.

Methods:

We conducted a prospective interventional study, including 36 aphakic eyes with inadequate capsular support. The postoperative examination included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement, central corneal thickness (CCT), and anterior segment examination with emphasis on the anterior chamber reaction and shape of pupil. Follow-up was done for 3 months.

Results:

Thirty-six eyes of 34 patients, including 22 right eyes and 14 left eyes were included. Indications for surgery were complicated cataract surgery in 38.9% (n = 14), aphakia in 27.8% (n = 10), pseudophakic bullous keratopathy in 16.7% (n = 6), dislocated posterior chamber IOL (PCIOL) in 11.1% (n = 4), IC drop in 2.8% (n = 1), and subluxated PCIOL in 2.8% (n = 1). Postoperatively, the visual acuity improved by at least two lines in 32 (88.9%) and worsened in four (11.1%) eyes at the end of three months. Mean postoperative IOP at the end of the third month was 12.42 mmHg (standard deviation [SD] 2.57; range 11.55–13.29 mmHg). The mean postoperative CCT at the end of the third month was 542.42 microns (SD 13.77; range 537.76–547.07 microns). Sixteen eyes (44.4%) had horizontally oval pupil, eleven eyes (30.6%) had round pupil, and nine eyes (25%) had irregular pupil. Twenty-three eyes (63.9%) presented with significant anterior chamber reaction and seven eyes (19.4%) had corneal stromal edema on postoperative day 1.

Conclusion:

Our study demonstrated that retropupillary IC-IOL implantation in eyes without adequate capsular support is an effective and safe procedure with a good visual outcome and fewer complications.

[Evolution of IOL exchange. Part 2. Modern problems of IOL exchange]

The review discusses modern problems of intraocular lens (IOL) exchange. Making an adequate choice between IOL reposition and IOL exchange in pseudophakic patients with problems of lens fixation remains a largely unsolved issue. The literature data shows a noticeable increase in the number of supporters of retropupillary fixation of an iris-claw lens during the exchange procedure.

Surgical Outcomes of Retropupillary-Fixated Iris-Claw Intraocular Lens

Purpose:

To assess the visual outcome and complications following retropupillary-fixated iris-claw intraocular lens (IOL) implantation.

Methods:

For this retrospective, non-comparative study, chart review of patients who underwent retropupillary iris-claw IOL implantation for the correction of aphakia from July 2014 to October 2018 and had a minimum postoperative follow-up of 2 months was carried out. Postoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), and complications were noted.

Results:

One hundred and twenty-two eyes of 122 patients (mean follow-up: 7.48 ± 5.2 months, range, 2 months-3.5 years) were enrolled in the study. The mean logMAR CDVA improved from 1.36 ± 0.52 preoperatively to 0.5 ± 0.42 postoperatively, at the last follow-up visit (P < 0.0001). The final CDVA improved in 110 eyes (90.2%), remained unchanged in 8 eyes (6.6%), and worsened in 4 eyes (3.3%). In cases of pre-existing cystoid macular edema (CME) or excessive intraoperative manipulations, 0.05 ml of 4 mg intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) was injected at the end of the surgery. Twenty eyes (16.4%) had transient ocular hypertension (OHT), 6 eyes (4.9%) had persistent OHT, and 2 eyes (1.6%) progressed to glaucoma. Choroidal detachment was noted in 2 eyes (1.6%), CME in 6 eyes (4.9%), 2 eyes (1.6%) had retinal detachment, 20 eyes (16.4%) had significant ovalization of pupil, 8 eyes (6.6%) had one haptic disenclavation, 1 eye (0.8%) had corneal decompensation, and 1 eye (0.8%) had endophthalmitis.

Conclusions:

Retropupillary iris-claw IOL provides good visual rehabilitation with a few complications. Its ease of insertion and short surgical time makes it a good option to correct aphakia in patients with an inadequate capsular support.

[Morphofunctional changes and complications after out-of-the-bag intraocular lens implantation]

The article reviews morphofunctional changes and complications after using modern methods of out-of-the-bag implantation of the intraocular lens (IOL). Literature data shows that the smallest morphofunctional changes in intraocular structures and the best results are obtained after retropupillary implantation of an iris-claw lens and transscleral fixation of posterior chamber IOL.

[Long term postural myopic shift assessment after posterior iris-claw aphakic intraocular lens implantation]

PURPOSE

Posterior chamber iris-claw intraocular lens (IOL) is often used in aphakic eyes with inadequate capsular support. Postoperatively, patients may describe better capabilities for near reading in a face-down position. The goal was to evaluate the indications, visual outcomes and complications of this IOL and to compare postoperative spherical equivalent between the prone and the face-down position.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective single-center case series of 31 eyes of 28 patients who underwent surgery between 2007 and 2016. Visual outcomes, early and late complications were analyzed. The refractive measurements were also assessed using a portable refractometer in prone and face-down position for each patient. The spherical equivalents were then compared.

RESULTS

The mean follow up was 29 months (3-73). The final mean corrected visual acuity (0.17±0.5 SD LogMar) was significantly better than preoperatively (0.5±0.50 SD LogMar) (P<0.05). Postoperative refractive error was within±2 diopters of emmetropia in 95 % of patients. The mean spherical equivalents in prone and face down position were different (P<0.05),-0.44 diopters (-4;+2.75) and-1.38 diopters (-5.25; 1) respectively. A mean myopic shift of-0.95 diopters (-5.25; 1.00) was observed in face down position. Cystoïd macular edema (6 %) and IOL disenclavation (9.6 %) were the main complications.

DISCUSSION

A posterior iris-claw intraocular lens appears to be an effective and relatively safe IOL to treat aphakia with poor capsular support. When the patient's head is bent forward, a mean myopic shift of 1 diopter is observed. This may support the idea that this IOL could be considered as an accommodative implant. Anterior movement of the iris-IOL complex due to gravity may be responsible for this myopic shift.

Comparative analysis of retropupillary iris claw versus scleral-fixated intraocular lens in the management of post-cataract aphakia

Purpose:

To compare the visual outcomes and complications between the eyes receiving retropupillary iris claw intraocular lens (IOL) and scleral-fixated IOL (SFIOL) for post-cataract aphakia.

Methods:

Medical records of consecutive patients who had iris claw IOL and SFIOL surgery from January 2010 to March 2015, with > 1 year of follow up were retrospectively analyzed. The surgical technique was based on individual surgeon preference. The best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA), previous surgery, surgical technique, and complications were analyzed.

Results:

Retropupillary iris claw IOL was fixated in 48 eyes (46%) and SFIOL was performed in 56 eyes. Iris claw was performed more frequently at the time of primary cataract surgery (56%) compared to SFIOL (14%) (P < 0.001). At 1 month postoperative, BCDVA was significantly better in the SFIOL group [0.7 ± 0.5 logarithm of minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) in iris claw vs. 0.3 ± 0.2 logMAR in SFIOL, P < 0.001] but this difference did not persist at 1 year (0.4 ± 0.4 logMAR in iris claw vs. 0.3 ± 0.2 logMAR in SFIOL, P = 0.56). Eyes with iris claw IOL experienced significantly more postoperative iritis (17%), intraocular pressure spikes (10%), and ovalization of the pupil (16%).

Conclusion:

Retropupillary iris claw IOL fixation is as safe as SFIOL for visual rehabilitation of post-cataract aphakia. Visual rehabilitation following iris claw IOL might take longer than SFIOL. Ovalization of the pupil is the commonest adverse effect reported with this type of IOL design.

Comparative Analysis of the Safety and Functional Outcomes of Anterior versus Retropupillary Iris-Claw IOL Fixation

Purpose

To compare the functional and clinical outcomes of the iris-claw intraocular lens (IOL) placed on the anterior versus posterior surface of the iris.

Patients and Methods

A multicenter, retrospective study. Data on eyes that underwent anterior or retropupillary iris-claw IOL implantation because of inadequate capsular support secondary to complicated cataract surgery, trauma, and dislocated/opacified IOLs since January 2015 were analyzed. For study inclusion, evaluation results had to be available in the medical records both preoperatively and at 1 and 12 months after implantation. The following parameters were compared between the groups: best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA), spherical and cylindrical refractive error, endothelial cell density (ECD), central macular thickness (CMT), and percentage and type of postoperative complications.

Results

In total, 60 eyes of 60 patients aged 73 ± 13 years were included: 28 eyes (47%) involved anterior, and 32 eyes (53%) retropupillary, iris-claw IOL fixations. Preoperatively, the groups were similar in all parameters except for a significantly higher proportion of retropupillary fixations in patients who had previously experienced a closed-globe trauma (p=0.03). The groups showed comparable improvements in BCDVA after surgery (final BCDVA: 0.34 ± 0.45 vs. 0.37 ± 0.50 logMAR in the anterior and retropupillary placement groups, respectively). During follow-up, no group difference was observed in refractive error or CMT. Both groups experienced similarly marked ECD loss and showed similar incidence of postoperative complications, with cystoid macular edema being the most common complication. Multivariable linear regression showed that BCDVA at 1 month was the best predictor of the final BCDVA.

Conclusions

Anterior chamber and posterior chamber iris-claw IOL fixations proved equally effective and safe for aphakic correction in eyes with inadequate capsular support.