Nuclear management in manual small incision cataract surgery by snare technique

Evolution of manual small-incision cataract surgery from 8 mm to 2 mm - A comprehensive review

Cataract is the most common cause of reversible blindness worldwide, accounting for approximately 50% of blindness worldwide. Cataract surgery is the most common surgical procedure performed in routine ophthalmic practice. It has undergone tremendous evolution, and the incision size has progressively reduced from 10-12 mm in extracapsular cataract surgery (ECCE) to 6-8 mm for manual small-incision cataract surgery (MSICS) and 2.2-2.8 mm in phacoemulsification. In a developing country like India, with a massive backlog of cataract, everyone cannot afford private surgery like phacoemulsification. Moreover, annual maintenance of the machine, cost of foldable IOLs, need for greater skill, learning curve, and difficulty in performing the surgery in mature and brown cataracts are other barriers. Due to these factors, MSICS is the surgery of choice in the developing world, with profound societal and economic benefits and similar visual recovery compared to phacoemulsification. During the last two decades, MSICS gained popularity in developing countries and has undergone tremendous advances. This article aims to review the various techniques of MSICS and how the surgery has evolved over the years, particularly focusing on the current technique of 2-mm MSICS.

Endothelial cells and central corneal thickness after modified sutureless manual small-incision cataract surgery

PURPOSE

Manual small-incision cataract surgery (MSICS) is a viable method for cataract surgery around the world. We evaluated the impact of a modification of MSICS, in which an anterior chamber maintainer is used throughout the surgery with the addition of ocular viscoelastic device prior to nucleus removal (M-MSICS), on the corneal endothelium.


METHODS

This prospective study comprised patients randomly assigned for cataract surgery who underwent M-MSICS. Patients underwent corneal endothelial counts by a noncontact specular microscopy in the center and at 12 and 6 o'clock position as well as central corneal pachymetry (CCT) preoperatively, and at 1 week and 1 and 3 months postoperatively. 


RESULTS

Twenty-one eyes were included, 16 of which completed the entire follow-up. There was a statistically significant difference in endothelial cell loss at the center of the cornea at 1 week postoperatively (p = 0.003). However, there was no significant difference in endothelial cell measurements between preoperative and other postoperative timepoints at the center of the cornea. In addition, no significant difference was found in the 12 and 6 o'clock measurements at all timepoints. There was a mild but statistically significant increase in CCT at the center of the cornea at 1-week and 1-month postoperative measurements as compared to preoperative measurement (p<0.05). By postoperative month 3, CCT had returned to baseline level. 


CONCLUSIONS

Modified MSICS offers a viable enhancement of MSICS, with mild and transient impact on the corneal endothelial cell density and corneal pachymetry.