Different treatment modalities for choroidal neovascularization in two eyes of one patient with bilateral type 2A parafoveal telangiectasia

Verteporfin Photodynamic Therapy for the Treatment of Chorioretinal Conditions: A Narrative Review

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) with verteporfin involves intravenous administration of a photosensitizer followed by its laser light activation at the target site to inhibit aberrant choroidal vascularization. This narrative review provides an overview of the role verteporfin PDT plays in the management of chorioretinal conditions. A PubMed literature review of all English-language articles published through October 19, 2023, was conducted to identify relevant references. Verteporfin PDT has been shown to be safe and effective for the treatment of patients with choroidal neovascularization (CNV) due to neovascular age-related macular degeneration and is often used in combination with a vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitor. Additionally, patients with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy, a subtype of neovascular age-related macular degeneration, also benefit from verteporfin PDT combined with a VEGF inhibitor for improving visual acuity. Verteporfin PDT has also been effective in treating patients with peripapillary CNV, as well as eyes with CNV due to ocular histoplasmosis and pathologic myopia. Reduced dose and/or fluence PDT protocols have been effective in patients with central serous chorioretinopathy while reducing adverse effects. In eyes with choroidal hemangioma, tumor regression and visual outcomes have been improved with verteporfin PDT treatment. Photodynamic therapy with verteporfin continues to play an important role in the management of chorioretinal conditions.

Management of Idiopathic Macular Telangiectasia Type 2

Macular telangiectasia type 2 (MacTel) is a relatively rare disease without established treatments. Although MacTel was previously considered a primarily vascular condition, the thinking on its pathogenesis has shifted to it now being considered principally a neurodegenerative disease. This has resulted in a subsequent change in the approach to treatment toward neuro-protection for the non-proliferative phase of this disease. Carotenoid supplementation has had mixed results. Ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF) has demonstrated some promising early results, but further study is necessary to determine its actual effect. Some structural improvements have been seen in the non-proliferative phase with oral acetazolamide but without accompanying functional improvement. Anti-vascular endothelial drugs have been studied and not found to have benefit in the non-proliferative phase of disease but have demonstrated significant structural and functional value in the treatment of secondary neovascularization. There is no level I evidence for the various proposed MacTel treatments, and efforts need to be directed toward conducting multicenter randomized trials to better understand possible treatments for this condition.

Treatment Modalities for Idiopathic Macular Telangiectasia: An Evidence-Based Systematic Review of the Literature

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review was to stratify the literature on the therapeutic approaches for macular telangiectasia (Mactel type 1 and 2) to provide evidenced-based practical guidelines for the optimal standard care of these conditions.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of PubMed was performed using a specific search algorithm. All articles retrieved were carefully screened and their references were manually reviewed for additional relevant data. Level of evidence was provided for each treatment modality, graded as level I, II, III, IV, and V, and indicative of very strong, strong, substantial, relatively weak, and weak evidence, respectively.

RESULTS

1445 abstracts were checked and 123 were found to be relevant. Out of them, 102 were eligible for the purpose of our review and 86 were focused on treatment of macular telangiectasia. Most publications combined cases of Mactel type 1 and type 2, despite their distinct pathophysiology. In Mactel type 1, laser photocoagulation of the telangiectasia remains the mainstay in controlling macular edema, while anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents provide short-term benefits. In Mactel type 2, current treatment options are not effective in the management of the non-proliferative stage, while anti-VEGF agents seem to be effective in the treatment of choroidal neovascularization complicating the disease.

CONCLUSION

It is important to differentiate the type of macular telangiectasia to plan appropriate treatment.

Changing paradigms of anti-VEGF in the Indian scenario

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGF) agents have revolutionized the treatment of retinal diseases. Use of anti-VEGF agents in the Indian Scenario present some unique challenges considering the absence of compounding pharmacies, poor penetrance of health insurance and limited affordability of the citizens of a developing economy. To study the changing paradigms of anti-VEGF use in the Indian scenario, all articles published by Indian authors, data from web-based surveys amongst Indian vitreo-retinal specialists were reviewed. In the paucity of compounding pharmacies in India, fractionation and injection techniques differ from those of developed countries. Frequent anti-VEGF monotherapy offers the best anatomical and visual results, but economics of scale do not allow the same in the Indian scenario, resulting in PRN dosing and combination of anti-VEGF with laser photocoagulation, being the commonly employed treatment protocols.