Risk Factors and Hospitalization Costs of Dementia Patients: Examining Race and Gender Variations

Social and spatial inequalities in healthcare use among people living with dementia in England (2002-2016)

OBJECTIVES

Healthcare services for people living with dementia (PLWD) are stretched, and government promises of increased funding remain undelivered. With the UK dementia population to surpass 1 million by 2024, and dementia care costs predicted to almost treble by 2040, it is essential we understand differences in healthcare use among PLWD. This study aimed to explore social and spatial variations in healthcare use among people diagnosed with dementia (2002-2016).

METHODS

Data were derived from Electronic Health Records of Clinical Practice Research Datalink GP patients in England (n = 142,302). To standardise healthcare contacts, rates of healthcare contacts per year were calculated for three primary (GP observations and medications) and three secondary healthcare types [Accident & Emergency (A&E) attendances and, emergency and elective hospital admissions]. Fully-adjusted generalised linear regression models were used to identify healthcare use variation by social and spatial groups. Twelve models were generated, one for each healthcare type in early- and late-onset populations separately.

RESULTS

This study highlights numerous social and spatial variations in healthcare use among PLWD. Among PLWD, several groups tended to have healthcare service use more closely associated with negative outcomes, including a greater likelihood of A&E attendances and emergency and elective hospital admissions. These groups include: men, people from White ethnicity groups and people from more deprived and rural areas.

CONCLUSIONS

Systemic and social measures are needed to reduce variations in healthcare use inequalities in PWLD. These include greater healthcare continuity, health checks and medicines reviews, culturally appropriate services, better and more accessible treatment and improved infrastructure.

Effects of Part D Star Ratings on racial and ethnic disparities in health care costs

Background

Racial/ethnic minorities are less likely than non-Hispanic White (White) patients to be included in the Medicare Part D Star Ratings measure assessment due to the restrictive inclusion criteria for the measures.

Objective

This paper examined the effects of racial/ethnic disparities in the measure assessment in Part D Star Ratings on disparities in healthcare costs among patients with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD).

Methods

This cross-sectional study analyzed 2017 Medicare data. Proportions of Beneficiaries with ADRD were categorized into the included and excluded groups based on the inclusion criteria for the calculation of medication adherence measures in Star Ratings. Outcomes included costs for medications, physician visits, emergency room (ER) visits, and total costs. A generalized linear model was employed to compare costs across racial/ethnic groups. To explore the differential disparities in healthcare costs between the 2 groups, interaction terms between dummy variables for being excluded from the measure calculation and racial/ethnic minorities were included in the models.

Results

The patterns of racial/ethnic disparities in healthcare costs found in this study were generally consistent with expectations, with some exceptions. For example, compared with White patients, in the hyperlipidemia cohort, the physician visit cost for Black patients among the included group was 31% lower (cost ratio or CR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.67-0.72); in the hypertension cohort, the hospitalization cost for Blacks among the excluded group was 15% higher (CR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.12-1.19). More importantly, exclusion from measurement assessments was associated with differential cost disparities. For example, compared with individuals included in the measure assessment for hypertension, the Black-White disparities in costs for hospitalization and total healthcare were 30% higher (CR = 1.30, 95% CI = 1.26-1.34), and 10% higher (CR = 1.10; 95% CI = 1.08-1.12), respectively, among the excluded group.

Conclusions

Medicare Part D Star Ratings may be associated with aggravated racial/ethnic disparities in healthcare costs in the Medicare Part D population.

Ten-year trends in hospitalizations due to Alzheimer's disease in Brazil: a national-based study

Brazil has the second highest age-standardized prevalence of Alzheimer's disease worldwide. However, information about Alzheimer's disease-related hospitalizations in Brazil is scarce despite its economic and social impact. We described temporal trends in hospitalizations related to Alzheimer's disease in Brazil from 2010 to 2019. We conducted a time-series, retrospective, descriptive, national-based study using data from the DATASUS database of the Brazilian Ministry of Health. Hospitalizations, mean days hospitalized, and economic costs from those hospitalizations were extracted from 2010 to 2019. Hospitalizations by Alzheimer's disease increased 87.7% from 2010 to 2019, with greater increase among men (97.4%), mixed ethnicity (224%), 80 years or older (115.1%), and in the Northeast (172.1%) and Central West (144.2%) regions. Although mean days hospitalized decreased in all subgroups, an increasing time trend in hospital admission was observed in the Central West Region. Costs per hospitalization increased for patients aged 50 years or younger and in admissions related to emergency services. Compared with other non-communicable chronic diseases, Alzheimer's disease had the highest increase in absolute number and rate of hospitalizations in Brazil from 2010 to 2019. AD is a public health problem in Brazil. Strategies to reduce its burden are necessary but only if accompanied by greater equality and awareness of this disease.

The Excess Costs of Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Dementia is one of the costliest diseases for health care systems with growing importance for policy makers.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to systematically review the current literature of excess cost studies for dementia and to analyze excess costs in a meta-analysis.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, EconLit, NHS-EED, and Cochrane Library. 22 studies were included and assigned to one of three subgroups according to the time period that they analyzed during disease progression: the time of diagnosis, the time between diagnosis and death, and the time prior to death. Excess costs were analyzed using the ratio of means (ROM) and meta-analysis was performed by pooling ROMs in a random effects model.

RESULTS

Total costs were significantly higher for demented persons compared to non-demented persons at the time of diagnosis (ROM: 2.08 [1.71, 2.54], p <  0.00001, I2 = 98%) and in the time period between diagnosis and death (ROM: 2.19 [1.97, 2.44], p <  0.00001, I2 = 100%). The ROM was highest for professional home care (ROM: 4.96 [2.62, 9.40], p <  0.0001, I2 = 88%) and for nursing facilities (ROM: 4.02 [2.53, 6.40], p <  0.00001, I2 = 100%) for the time period between diagnosis and death.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis is the first to assess excess costs of dementia by the ROM method on a global scale. We conclude that our findings demonstrate that costs of dementia constitute a substantial economic burden.

Disparities in Physical and Psychological Symptoms in Hospitalized African American and White Persons with Dementia

Objectives: This study examined differences in physical function, delirium, depressive symptoms, and behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) in hospitalized African American and white older adults with dementia. Methods: This secondary data analysis using baseline data from an ongoing trial testing family-centered function-focused care included African American (n = 159) and white persons (n =135) with dementia. Results: A multivariate analysis of covariance showed that controlling for relevant demographic and health characteristics, African Americans with dementia had lower physical function, more delirium, and more depressive symptoms upon admission than white participants. There were no significant differences in BPSD between African American and white persons. Discussion: To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine racial differences in admission symptoms of hospitalized persons with dementia. While the findings are preliminary, they can be used to inform the design of future research, including identifying the causes of disparities.

Access to Health Services in Older Minority Ethnic Groups with Dementia: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

While it is acknowledged that minority ethnic (ME) groups across international settings face barriers to accessing care for dementia, it is not clear whether ME groups access services less frequently as a result. The objective of this review is to examine whether ME groups have longer delays before accessing dementia/memory services, higher use of acute care and crisis services and lower use of routine care services based on existing literature. We also examined whether ME groups had higher dementia severity or lower cognition when presenting to memory services.

DESIGN

Systematic review with narrative synthesis.

SETTING

Nonresidential medical, psychiatric, memory, and emergency services.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty studies totaling 94,431 older adults with dementia or mild cognitive impairment.

MEASUREMENTS

We searched Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, Global Health, and PsycINFO from inception to November 2018 for peer-reviewed observational studies which quantified ethnic minority differences in nonresidential health service use in people with dementia. Narrative synthesis was used to analyze findings.

RESULTS

Twenty studies were included, mostly from the U.S. (n = 13), as well as the UK (n = 4), Australia (n = 1), Belgium (n = 1), and the Netherlands (n = 1). There was little evidence that ME groups in any country accessed routine care at different rates than comparison groups, although studies may have been underpowered. There was strong evidence that African American/Black groups had higher use of hospital inpatient services versus U.S. comparison groups. Primary care and emergency services were less well studied. Study quality was mixed, and there was a large amount of variability in the way ethnicity and service use outcomes were ascertained and defined.

CONCLUSION

There is evidence that some ME groups, such as Black/African American groups in the U.S., may use more acute care services than comparison populations, but less evidence for differences in routine care use. Research is sparse, especially outside the U.S.

Hospital Disparities between Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islanders and Non-Hispanic Whites with Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias

Objective: To compare important indicators of quality of care between Native Hawaiians and other Pacific Islanders (NHOPIs) and non-Hispanic Whites (NHWs) with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD). Methods: We used the Health Care Cost and Utilization Project, Hawaii State Inpatient Databases, 2010-2014. They included 10,645 inpatient encounters from 7,145 NHOPI or NHW patients age ≥ 50 years, residing in Hawaii, and with at least one ADRD diagnosis in the discharge record. Outcome variables were inpatient mortality, length of hospital stay, and hospital readmission. Results: NHOPIs with ADRD had, on average, a hospital stay of .94 days less than NHWs with ADRD but were 1.16 times more likely than NHWs to be readmitted. Discussion: These patterns have important clinical care implications for NHOPIs and NHWs with ADRD as they are important indicators of quality of care. Future studies should consider specific contributors to these differences in order to develop appropriate interventions.