1
|
Leitsmann C, Uhlig A, Bremmer F, Mohr MN, Trojan L, Leitsmann M, Reichert M. Impact of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy on functional outcomes in patients following robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Front Surg 2023; 10:1305365. [PMID: 38053718 PMCID: PMC10694190 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1305365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 12/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging guided prostate biopsy (mpMRI PBx) leads to a higher rate of successful nerve-sparing in robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (ns-RALP) for prostate cancer (PCa). This study aimed to evaluate the impact of mpMRI PBx compared to standard ultrasound-guided PBx on functional outcomes focusing on erectile function in patients following ns-RALP. Material and methods All RALPs performed between 01/2016 and 06/2021 were retrospectively stratified according to (attempted) ns vs. non ns RALPs and were then categorized based on the PBx technique (mpMRI PBx vs. standard PBx). We compared RALP outcomes such as pathological tumor stage, rates of secondary nerve resection (SNR) and positive surgical margin status (PSM). Furthermore, we explored the association between PBx-technique and patient-reported outcomes assessed 12 months after RALP using the prospectively collected 26-item Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC-26) questionnaire. Chi-square tests and logistic regression analysis were conducted. Results A total of 849 RALPs included 517 (61%) procedures with (attempted) ns. Among these, 37.5% were diagnosed via preoperative mpMRI PBx. Patients with a preoperative standard PBx had a 57% higher association of PSM (p = 0.030) compared to patients with mpMRI PBx and a 24% higher risk of erectile dysfunction (ED) 12 months post RALP (p = 0.025). When ns was attempted, we observed a significantly higher rate of SNR in patients who underwent a standard PBx compared to those who received a mpMRI PBx (50.8% vs. 26.7%, p < 0.001) prior RALP. In comparison, upgrading occurred more often in the standard PBx group (50% vs. 40% mpMRI PBx, p = 0.008). Conclusion The combination of mpMRI PBx for PCa diagnosis followed by ns-RALP resulted in significantly fewer cases of SNR, better oncological outcomes and reduced incidence of ED 1 year after surgery. This included fewer PSM and a lower rate of postoperative tumor upgrading.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Conrad Leitsmann
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
| | - Annemarie Uhlig
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
| | - Felix Bremmer
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
| | - Mirjam Naomi Mohr
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
| | - Lutz Trojan
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
| | | | - Mathias Reichert
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hoeh B, Wenzel M, Hohenhorst L, Köllermann J, Graefen M, Haese A, Tilki D, Walz J, Kosiba M, Becker A, Banek S, Kluth LA, Mandel P, Karakiewicz PI, Chun FKH, Preisser F. Anatomical Fundamentals and Current Surgical Knowledge of Prostate Anatomy Related to Functional and Oncological Outcomes for Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy. Front Surg 2022; 8:825183. [PMID: 35273992 PMCID: PMC8901727 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.825183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Accepted: 12/27/2021] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Context Meticulous knowledge about the anatomy of the prostate and surrounding tissue represents a crucial and mandatory requirement during radical prostatectomy for reliable oncological and excellent replicable, functional outcomes. Since its introduction two decades ago, robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) has evolved to become the predominant surgical approach in many industrialized countries. Objective To provide and highlight currently available literature regarding prostate anatomy and to help in improving oncological and functional outcomes in RALP. Methods/Evidence Acquiring PubMed database was searched using the following keywords: "robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy," "anatomy," "neurovascular bundle," "nerve," "periprostatic fascia," "pelvis," "sphincter," "urethra," "urinary incontinence," and "erectile dysfunction." Relevant articles and book chapters were critically reviewed and if eligible, they were included in this review. Results New evidence in regards to prostatic anatomy and surgical approaches in RALP has been reported in recent years. Besides detailed anatomical studies investigating the meticulous structure of the fascial structures surrounding the prostate and neurovascular bundle preservation, debate about the optimal RALP approach is still ongoing, inspired by recent publications presenting promising functional outcomes following modifications in surgical approaches. Conclusions This review provides a detailed overview of the current knowledge of prostate anatomy, its surrounding tissue, and its influence on key surgical step development for RALP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benedikt Hoeh
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Mike Wenzel
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Lukas Hohenhorst
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jens Köllermann
- Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Markus Graefen
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Alexander Haese
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Urology, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Jochen Walz
- Department of Urology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes Cancer Centre, Marseille, France
| | - Marina Kosiba
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Andreas Becker
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Severine Banek
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Luis A. Kluth
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Philipp Mandel
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Pierre I. Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Felix K. H. Chun
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Felix Preisser
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ou YC, Lu CH, Lin YS, Huang LH, Weng WC, Hsu CY, Tung MC. Complications of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Experience Sharing from 2000 cases involving a single surgeon. UROLOGICAL SCIENCE 2022. [DOI: 10.4103/uros.uros_173_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
|
4
|
Shapiro DD, Davis JW, Williams WH, Chapin BF, Ward JF, Pettaway CA, Gregg JR. Increased body mass index is associated with operative difficulty during robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy. BJUI COMPASS 2021; 3:68-74. [PMID: 35475154 PMCID: PMC8988518 DOI: 10.1002/bco2.110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2021] [Revised: 08/01/2021] [Accepted: 08/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective This study aimed to identify factors associated with surgeon perception of robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) difficulty. Patients and Methods This study surveyed surgeons performing RARP between 2017 and 2018 and asked them to rate operative conditions and difficulty as optimal, good, acceptable, or poor. These answers were stratified as optimal or suboptimal for this study. Associations between surgeon responses and variables hypothesized to affect surgical difficulty, including anatomic factors such as pelvic diameter and prostate volume:pelvic diameter ratio, were assessed. Results Between November 2017 and September 2018, a total of 100 patients were prospectively enrolled in the study of which 58 cases were rated as optimal and 42 were rated as suboptimal. Of the evaluated variables, only increasing clinical T stage (odds ratio [OR] 1.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03–2.15, p = 0.03) and increasing body mass index (BMI) (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.03–1.26, p = 0.01) were associated with increased difficulty; 90‐day complication rates were similar between the optimal and suboptimal cohorts (17.3% vs. 23.8%, respectively; p = 0.5). The number of patients with previous surgery, pelvic diameter, and prostate size:pelvic diameter ratio were not significantly different between cohorts (p > 0.05 for all). Operative time (ρ = 0.23, p = 0.02) and estimated blood loss (EBL) (ρ = 0.38, p = 0.0001) were correlated with suboptimal difficulty. Conclusion The factors associated with surgeon‐reported RARP difficulty were patient BMI and clinical T stage among surgeons with significant RARP experience. These data should be incorporated into surgical decision making and patient counseling prior to performing a RARP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel D. Shapiro
- Department of Urology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA
| | - John W. Davis
- Department of Urology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA
| | - Wendell H. Williams
- Department of Anesthesiology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA
| | - Brian F. Chapin
- Department of Urology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA
| | - John F. Ward
- Department of Urology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA
| | - Curtis A. Pettaway
- Department of Urology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA
| | - Justin R. Gregg
- Department of Urology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Perera M, Divakaran P, Roberts MJ, Chung E. Comparative trial assessing suture techniques and types of urinary catheters in vesicourethral anastomotic tensile strength in a porcine model. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2016; 65:408-414. [PMID: 27643677 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2016] [Revised: 08/30/2016] [Accepted: 09/04/2016] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Vesicourethal anastomosis (VUA) during radical prostatectomy can be achieved using various suture plication techniques. Traditionally, an indwelling urinary catheter remains in-situ to facilitate the healing process of the reconstructed VUA. Compromise or rupture of this anastomosis may lead to acute urinary leak and subsequent urinoma or stricture formation. This ex-vivo porcine model aims to evaluate VUA tensile strength using different suture techniques and catheter types. METHODS Male porcine bladders were obtained and prostatectomy was performed. The specimens were randomized and VUA were created using 3-point interrupted, 6-point interrupted or 6 point continuous 3-0 monocryl suture. 20Fr catheters were utilized, specifically varying manufacturers (A and B) and catheter balloon shapes (round versus oval). The VUA model was placed within a reproducible pulley system and graduated weights were applied until failure of the catheter balloon or the model VUA. Model failure was defined as either 'VUA rupture', 'Catheter passage through VUA' or 'catheter failure'. RESULTS Twenty consecutive porcine bladders were prepared, tested and utilized for analysis. VUA reconstructed with 3-point fixation was more likely to suffer VUA rupture (p=0.025) compared to 6-point interrupted or 6-point continuous VUA. Higher tensile pressure causing catheter balloon rupture (p=0.009) was observed for Manufacturer A. Catheters with oval-balloon shape were more likely to dislodge past the VUA without disruption of the anastomosis (p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS During prostatectomy, anastomotic technique and catheter selection can significantly alter the tensile properties of the VUA. Further research is required to validate our findings in clinical models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marlon Perera
- School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4000, Australia; Department of Urology, Mackay Base Hospital, Mackay, Queensland 4840, Australia; Department of Surgery, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia.
| | - Pranav Divakaran
- School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4000, Australia; Department of Urology, Mackay Base Hospital, Mackay, Queensland 4840, Australia
| | - Matthew J Roberts
- School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4000, Australia; Department of Urology, Mackay Base Hospital, Mackay, Queensland 4840, Australia; The University of Queensland, Centre for Clinical Research, Brisbane, Qld 4006, Australia; Department of Urology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland 4102, Australia
| | - Eric Chung
- School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4000, Australia; Department of Urology, Mackay Base Hospital, Mackay, Queensland 4840, Australia; Department of Urology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland 4102, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Monn MF, Jaqua KR, Calaway AC, Mellon MJ, Koch MO, Boris RS. Impact of Obesity on Wound Complications Following Radical Prostatectomy Is Mitigated by Robotic Technique. J Endourol 2016; 30:890-5. [DOI: 10.1089/end.2016.0282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- M. Francesca Monn
- Department of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Kaitlin R. Jaqua
- Department of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Adam C. Calaway
- Department of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Matthew J. Mellon
- Department of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Michael O. Koch
- Department of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Ronald S. Boris
- Department of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| |
Collapse
|