Sentinel lymph node biopsy in bladder cancer: Systematic review and technology update

Diagnostic Value of the Sentinel Lymph Node Technique in Patients with Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer

BACKGROUND

The optimal limits of the bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) template in bladder cancer treatment remain controversial. This study aimed to investigate whether radio-guided sentinel node (SLN) detection is a reliable technique for the perioperative localisation of potential lymphatic metastasis during cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We studied 54 patients with pT2-pT4 MIBC who underwent cystectomy with extended PLND (ePLND) augmented by the SLN technique. The identification of SLN was performed by preoperative SPECT/CT hybrid lymphoscintigraphy using peritumoral injection of nanocolloid-Tc-99m, followed by intraoperative navigation with a handheld γ-probe. All nodal specimens were collected separately and then fixed in formalin, stained with haematoxylin and eosin, and examined by an experienced uropathologist.

RESULTS

A total of 1414 LNs were resected and examined for the presence of metastases. The mean number of harvested LNs was 26 (range: 11-50) per patient. In 51 of 54 patients, 192 SLNs were resected. In addition, 20/192 (10.4%) SLNs were located outside of the ePLND area. Overall, 72 metastatic LNs (LN+) were found in 22 of 54 patients (40.7%) and in 24/192 SLNs (12.5%). The SLN technique detected LN+ in 14 of 22 (64%) patients. The SLNs were the only sites of metastasis (SLN+ = LN+) in 6 of 22 (27.3%) LN+ patients, including two cases with foci located in the pararectal region. The diagnostic values for the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and false-negative rate for the SLN technique were 66.66%, 4.16%, 28.57%, and 33.33%, respectively. Extended lymphadenectomy and its combination with the SLN technique enabled the correct assessment in 96.3 and 100% of patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of ePLND and SLN provides a better pN assessment compared to ePLND alone. Although the SLN technique has restrictions that limit its diagnostic value, its use as an addition to lymphadenectomy allows for the visualisation of nonstandard lymph drainage pathways that may be potential metastatic routes.

Pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate and bladder cancers

Prostate cancer and bladder cancer accounts for approximately 13.5% and 3% of all male cancers and all newly diagnosed cancers (regardless sex), respectively. Thus, these cancers represent a major health and economic burden globally. The knowledge of lymph node status is an integral part of the management of any solid tumor. In the urological field, pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) is of paramount importance in the diagnosis, management, and prognosis of prostate and bladder cancers. However, PLND may be associated with several comorbidities. In this narrative review, the most recent updates concerning the patterns and incidence of lymph node metastasis, the role of different imaging studies and nomograms in determining patients' eligibility for PLND, and the anatomical templates of PLND in urologic patients with bladder or prostate cancer will be discussed.

Methods of Sentinel Lymph Node Detection and Management in Urinary Bladder Cancer—A Narrative Review

Introduction: Detection of lymph node status in bladder cancer significantly impacts clinical decisions regarding its management. There is a wide range of detection modalities for this task, including lymphoscintigraphy, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, single-photon emission computed tomography, positron emission tomography, and fluoroscopy. We aimed to study the pre- and intraoperative detection modalities of sentinel lymph nodes in urinary bladder cancer. Method: This narrative review was performed by searching the PubMed and EMBASE libraries using the following search terms: (“Transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder” OR “urothelial cancer” OR “urinary bladder cancer” OR “bladder cancer”) AND ((“sentinel lymph node”) OR (“lymphatic mapping”) OR (“lymphoscintigraphy”) OR (“lymphangiography”) OR (“lymph node metastases”)). Studies analysing the effectiveness and outcomes of sentinel lymph node detection in bladder cancer were included, while non-English language, duplicates, and non-article studies were excluded. After analysing the libraries and a further manual search of bibliographies, 31 studies were included in this paper. We followed the RAMESES publication standard for narrative reviews to produce this paper. Results: Of the 31 studies included, 7 studies included multiple detection methods; 5 studies included lymphoscintigraphy; 5 studies included computed tomography and/or single-photon emission computed tomography; 5 studies included fluoroscopy; 4 studies included magnetic resonance imaging; and 5 studies included positron emission tomography. Discussion: Anatomical, radioactive, and functional detection modalities have been studied independently and in combination. The consensus is that preoperative detection with imaging helps guide surgical management and intraoperative detection methods help capture any lymph nodes that may have been missed. Each of these types of detection represent their own set of benefits and drawbacks, but there is currently limited evidence to support any change in overall practice to replace conventional staging.

Use of Minimally Invasive Surgery in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Cancer in Dogs and Cats

Surgical management of neoplastic disease is common in veterinary medicine. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has gained widespread acceptance by veterinary surgeons and is experiencing rapid growth and frequency of use. Many neoplastic diseases in the abdomen and thorax of dogs and cats can be treated as effectively with MIS as with traditional open surgery. Additionally, MIS allows for less invasive options for organ biopsy in cancer patients either for initial diagnosis or for staging to inform prognosis and treatment. Despite the recent increase in MIS, additional research is required to further characterize the benefits to oncology patients and to ensure that surgical oncologic principles and patient outcomes are not compromised by the use of MIS.