Successful endovascular treatment using a covered stent for artery-ureteral fistula after surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysm

A systematic review of management of uretero-arterial fistula

OBJECTIVE

Uretero-arterial fistula (UAF) is lethal condition. However, there is no consensus regarding diagnosis and treatment of UAF owing to its rarity. The aim of this paper was to present an actual case of UAF and to systematically review the symptoms, risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment of this condition.

METHODS

The case study included a 52-year-old woman who showed a massive hemorrhage during urinary stent replacement. For the systematic review of articles on UAF, those written in English and published from 1939 to 2020 were searched on PubMed using the keywords "uretero-arterial fistula," "arterio-ureteral fistula," and "hematuria".

RESULTS

We included 121 articles and 235 patients (mean age, 66.0 years; women, 139 [59.1%]) in this review. UAF occurred most frequently in the common iliac artery (112 patients [47.7%]). Almost all patients (232 patients [98.7 %]) complained of hematuria. The risk factors for UAF were pelvic surgery (205 patients [87.2%]), long-term use of urinary stents (170 patients [72.3%]), oncologic radiotherapy (107 patients [45.5%]), and malignancy (159 patients [67.7%]). Although computed tomography (CT) can detect various useful findings such as extravasation, pseudoaneurysm, hydronephrosis, and opacification of ureters, it was diagnostically useful in only one-third of the cases. Angiography was useful in diagnosing UAF in 124 (66.3%) of the 187 patients (80.0%) who underwent this procedure. With regard to treatment, endovascular approaches have been widely used in recent years because their invasiveness is lesser than that of open surgical repair. In the era of endovascular therapy, the indications for open surgical repair include ureteral-intestinal fistula, abscess formation, and graft infection after endovascular therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

CT was recommended as the first examination in patients with risk factors for UAF because of its usefulness. Subsequently, angiography should be considered because UAF can be treated using an endovascular approach following diagnostic angiography. Diagnosis and treatment of UAF can often be difficult; therefore, the important first step of diagnosis is suspecting UAF and employing a multidisciplinary approach.

Endovascular Management of Ureteroarterial Fistula: Single Institution Experience and Systematic Literature Review

Background:

Ureteroarterial fistula (UAF) represents an uncommon complication after urological surgery; however, this is a well-documented condition in patients with predisposing risk factors. The aim of the present study is to report and analyze the endovascular management of a series of patients with UAF, treated in authors’ hospital, and to report and analyze the same data concerning patients retrieved from a systematic literature review.

Methods:

Authors conducted a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data and a systematic literature review. The research was carried out through PubMed database searching the following keywords: “uretero arterial fistula” and “uretero iliac fistula.” It includes only articles reporting the endovascular management.

Results:

Forty-six articles were included in the present study for a total of 94 patients. Risk factors were as follows: chronic indwelling ureteral stents, pelvic surgery, radiotherapy, iliac artery pseudo-aneurysm, and chemotherapy. All patients had gross hematuria at presentation. Stent graft placement was performed in 89 patients, embolization in 5 patients, and iliac internal artery embolization combined with stent graft placement was performed in 24 patients. Four postprocedural complications were observed (4.2%). During a median follow-up of 8 months, 10 complications related to UAF were observed (10.6%): rebleeding (7 cases) and stent thrombosis (3 cases). Two patients died for causes related to UAF (2.1%): rebleeding (1) and retroperitoneal abscess (1).

Conclusion:

Based on the present data, endovascular treatment is feasible and safe with low postprocedural complications and mortality rate. Considering the increase in surgery and radiotherapy performed, UAF should be always debated in patients with massive hematuria.