Single access laparoscopic nephrectomy

Magnetically anchored cautery dissector improves triangulation, depth perception, and workload during single-site laparoscopic cholecystectomy

INTRODUCTION

This study evaluated operative outcomes and workload during single-site laparoscopy (SSL) using a magnetically anchored cautery dissector (MAGS) compared with a conventional laparoscopic hook cautery (LAP).

METHODS

Each cautery was used to perform six SSL porcine cholecystectomies. For MAGS, the cautery device was inserted through the umbilical incision, magnetically coupled, and deployed; two graspers and a laparoscope were used. For LAP, two percutaneous retraction sutures, one grasper, a hook cautery dissector, and a laparoscope were used. Operative outcomes, surgeon ratings (scale, 1-5; 1 = superior), and workload (scale, 1-10; 1 = superior) were evaluated.

RESULTS

No significant differences were detected for operative outcomes and surgeon ratings, however, trends were detected favoring MAGS. Surgeon workload ratings were significantly better for MAGS (2.6 ± 0.2) vs. LAP (5.6 ± 1.1; p < 0.05). For MAGS, depth perception and triangulation were excellent and the safe handling protocol was followed with no complications. For LAP, the parallelism of instruments and lack of triangulation hindered depth perception, caused instrument conflicts, and resulted in two minor complications (one superficial liver laceration and one inadvertent burn to the diaphragm).

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that using the MAGS device for SSL cholecystectomy results in equivalent (or better) operative outcomes and less workload compared with LAP.

Early post-operative interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-α levels after single-port laparoscopic varicocelectomy in children

PURPOSE

Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery has recently been described in children and regarded as an improved technology leading to less pain and better cosmetic outcome. Compared to the traditional three-port method, it is not known if the single-port method is less invasive. The aim of this study was thus to investigate the post-operative acute inflammatory response in order to evaluate surgical stress in the two surgical approaches in children.

METHODS

A prospective, single blinded, case-control study was carried out. Thirteen male patients who presented with unilateral varicocele were divided into two groups. Six children underwent single-port laparoscopic procedure, while the other seven children underwent three-port laparoscopic procedure. Pre-operative and post-operative blood samples were taken for the measurement of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin 6 (IL-6) using ELISA. Demographics including the operation time, and complications were recorded. Data between the two groups were analyzed using unpaired t-test and a p value of <0.05 was taken as statistically significant.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients was 14.5 years (range 12-19 years). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of operative time, nor there was any complication recorded. The change in serum TNF-α and IL-6 concentrations pre- and post-operatively between the single-port group and three-port group was not statistically significant. Overall, patients in the two groups showed excellent satisfaction in terms of post-operative cosmesis.

CONCLUSION

Single-port laparoscopic varicocelectomy is safe, effective and produces excellent cosmesis with minimal surgical stress.