Multicentric small cell neuroendocrine neoplasm of the renal pelvis and ureter with concomitant focal high-grade urothelial carcinoma of the ureter: A case report

Ureteral small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma: A case report and short review

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

Primary small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (SCNEC) in the urinary tract represents less than 0.5 % of urinary tract cancers, and bladder or prostate are the most common sites. Early diagnosis and treatment of ureteral SCNECs are challenging due to nonspecific clinical symptoms and radiographic findings.

CASE PRESENTATION

Here, we described a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge of a 56-yearold male with recurrent right flank pain that did not relieve with analgesics alone. The patient underwent several non-invasive to invasive procedures revealing nonspecific inflammation pathology of the ureter that later developed into protruded papillary mucosa resembling polypoid cystitis. Later, an abdominal multi-slice computed tomography examination suggested a malignant mass and was confirmed as SCNEC from the pathological analysis. After several successful chemotherapy cycles and surgical procedures, cancer reoccurred, and the patient's general condition deteriorated. He passed away a year after a radical cystoprostatectomy and nephroureterectomy on his right side.

CLINICAL DISCUSSIONS

The occurrence of primary SCNEC is a highly uncommon phenomenon. As SCNEC arises from pluripotent stem cells that have differentiated into neuroendocrine cells, some patients may exhibit paraneoplastic syndrome. The patient's prognosis of this tumor is poor, even for patients in the earliest phases, because SCNEC is characterized by highly aggressive local invasion and distant metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

This case highlights the importance of accurate early diagnosis and treatment of recurrent flank pain and considering the possibility of a malignant tumor as the cause of obstruction.

Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of the Female Genitourinary Tract: A Comprehensive Overview

Simple Summary

Primary neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a rare, heterogeneous group of tumors that include well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors, poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma, and paraganglioma. NENs in the urinary tract are observed in <0.05% of individuals, in whom the bladder is the most common site. In this review, we described the epidemiology, pathogenesis, imaging, staging, and management of the genitourinary NENs.

Abstract

Primary neuroendocrine neoplasms are a rare heterogeneous group of tumors that include well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors, poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma, and paraganglioma. An extensive literature search was used to compile the data regarding epidemiology, pathogenesis, imaging features, and management of the urinary system NENs. We also included the updated staging of the NENs at various locations of the urinary system.

Successful management of small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the ureter with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant chemoradiation: case report and literature review

Neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) of the urinary tract are rare, and the urinary bladder is the the most common primary site. Primary ureteric NET is rarer with under 80 cases reported in the literature thus far. Most of these tumours are of the high-grade small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma subtype, which has a worse prognosis. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has a proven role in the management of NET of the bladder as it downstages the tumour, which may add to significant recurrence-free survival and overall survival. We report the successful management of a patient with locally advanced small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the ureter, who had a pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with etoposide and cisplatin. He subsequently received adjuvant chemotherapy followed by radiation and is recurrence-free at a follow-up of 1 year.

Incidental finding of a small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the ureter

The ureter is an extremely rare site for small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. We present a case of this disease in a patient who presented without urological symptoms. The multidisciplinary team proposed nephroureterectomy (if fit) or watchful waiting as management. After discussion with the patient a decision in favour of watchful waiting was made. We report her case including a review of the literature, and emphasise that although small cell neuroendocrine carcinomas can be very aggressive, they can remain asymptomatic.

Small cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract and factors associated with progress survival: a systematic review and pooled analysis

INTRODUCTION

Little is known about small cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract (UUT-SCC), the aim of this study is to identify the risk factors in relation to survival of patients with UUT-SCC.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Literature search on UUT-SCC was performed in databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Wangfang, and CNKI. Studies were eligible for inclusion if outcomes of patients with histopathologically confirmed UUT-SCC were reported. The relevant data on clinic, pathology, and therapy were collected. Progress survival was evaluated using the Cox regression model with the robust sandwich estimates of the covariance matrix.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

There were 55 eligible publications identified, contributing 76 patients in total. The median of overall survival (OS) was 14 months. In univariable analyses, pathological stage and platinum-based chemotherapy regimen were associated with OS (pT3-pT4 versus pT1-pT2, HR=3.228, P=0.005; other chemotherapies versus platinum-based, HR=6.249, P=0.035). The median of cancer-specific survival (CSS) was 15 months. In univariable analyses, pathological stage and platinum-based chemotherapy regimen were associated with CCS (pT3-pT4 versus pT1-pT2, HR=3.332, P=0.004; non-platinum based versus platinum-based, HR=7.784, P=0.025).

CONCLUSIONS

In multivariable analyses, no variables were associated with OS and CSS. UUT-SCC is a rare tumor characterized by an aggressive clinical course. Pathological stage and platinum-based chemotherapy regimen are the most important factors related to OS and CSS.

Atypical Carcinoid Neuroendocrine Tumor of the Ureter: A Case Report and Literature Review

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of the ureter are rare, with less than 40 cases described in the literature. A majority of tumors described are poorly differentiated tumors with a poor prognosis. We present the case of a moderately differentiated atypical carcinoid NET of the ureter with a good postoperative outcome. A literature review was also performed to identify similar cases to compare their management and postoperative outcomes.

Systematic review and two new cases of primary upper urinary tract neuroendocrine carcinomas

BACKGROUND

Upper urinary tract neuroendocrine carcinoma (UUT-NEC) is extremely rare and has a poor prognosis. Although a few cases of successful treatment have been reported, no treatment has shown established efficacy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We analyzed 70 UUT-NEC patients, including 68 with small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (SCNEC) and large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) reported between 1985 and 2017 and 2 treated at our hospital.

RESULTS

Median patient age was 66 years, 58.6% were men, and 60% were of Asian descent. Most UUT-NECs were SCNEC (68; 95.7%), whereas LCNEC was very rare (2; 2.9%). More than half of the patients had accompanying other histological components, the most common being urothelial carcinoma (51.5%), whereas 41.4% had NEC alone. Of the 70 patients, 27 underwent additional therapy (e.g., chemotherapy and radiotherapy) along with surgery. Median survival was 15 months. In univariate analysis, stages T1-2 disease showed better prognosis than stages T3-4 (P < 0.001). Additional treatment (e.g., chemotherapy and radiotherapy) significantly improved prognosis (P = 0.014). Moreover, platinum-based chemotherapy also was associated with improved prognosis (P = 0.017). For platinum-based chemotherapy, multicollinearity with additional treatments was strong, and, thus, these data were not included in the analysis. Multivariate analysis revealed pathological stage (T1-2 vs. T3-4; P = 0.003) and additional treatment (P = 0.028) to be independent predictors of improved prognosis.

CONCLUSION

Although UUT-NEC has a poor prognosis, additional treatment along with surgery and therapeutic intervention and stage T1-2 disease are independent factors to improve prognosis.

Primary small cell carcinoma of the ureter: Case report and review of the literature

RATIONALE

Primitive small cell carcinoma of the ureter is extremely rare, in this case report is meticulously described its aggressive clinical course and the pathological clues that help with the diagnosis. Also, a detailed table with the clinico-pathological features of analogous case reports in literature is provided.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 79-year-old female presented with gross hematuria and flank pain.

DIAGNOSES

Small cell carcinoma of the ureter. The surgical specimen showed a mixed histology of small cell carcinoma and transitional cell carcinoma; the common neuroendocrine markers (chromogranin A, synaptophysin, CD56) were positive, and vimentin and thyroid transcription factor 1 were negative. The patient had an advanced stage at presentation with regional nodes involvement (pT3N1).

INTERVENTIONS

Segmental ureterectomy was performed but it was only possible to administer 1 cycle of platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy due to the rapid decline of her clinical parameters.

OUTCOMES

The disease rapidly spread locally and metastasized.

LESSON

The clinicians must be aware of this aggressive tumor with silent clinical course and advanced stages at presentation.

Clinicopathologic characteristics, therapy and outcomes of patients with primary ureteral small cell carcinoma: a case series and systematic review of the literature

Purpose

The aim of this case series was to review the standard diagnosis and treatment procedures of primary small cell carcinoma (SCC) in our institution and discuss the clinicopathologic characteristics, treatments and outcomes of patients with primary ureteral SCC.

Patients and methods

Patients diagnosed with ureteral SCC in Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China, from January 2007 to December 2016 were included. In addition, we performed a systematic literature review, in October 2016, on case reports and case series of ureteral SCC. The clinicopathologic characteristics, treatments and outcomes of this rare disease were analyzed.

Results

A total of 32 patients were included in our analysis (4 cases from our institution and 28 cases from the literature). Most patients (71.0%) were male with an average age of 66.6 years (range 48–80 years). The most common symptoms were hematuria (n=14, 48.3%) and flank pain (n=14, 48.3%). All patients underwent surgery, with 12 (37.5%) patients undergoing multimodality therapy. Regional or distant recurrences developed in 11 patients, among which only 1 patient had bladder recurrence. The overall median survival of the patients was 17 months, with 1- and 3-year survival rates of 51.9% and 30.3%, respectively. In a univariate analysis, female (P=0.009), pure SCC (P=0.03) and advanced T stage (P=0.04) were associated with worse overall survival.

Conclusion

Ureteral SCCs are extremely rare neoplasms with aggressive natural history and poor prognosis. T stage, tumor components and gender may be important factors influencing prognosis. A multimodality treatment is recommended for management. However, further studies are needed to improve the treatment strategy.

Primary Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Ureter: A Short Review

Neuroendocrine tumors represent 0.05% of urinary tract malignancies, and most originate in the bladder. Their pathogenesis is debated, since ureters are thought to lack neuroendocrine cells. Morphologically, most ureteral neuroendocrine tumors demonstrate the typical small cell neuroendocrine appearance, are immunohistochemically positive for synaptophysin/chromogranin A/CD56, and show electron-dense granules by electron microscopy. Clinical presentation is similar to that of other more common ureteral neoplasms. Prognosis is usually dismal, but a multimodal treatment approach including platinum-based adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy seems to be beneficial.

Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the ureter: A case report and literature review

Primary neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) of the ureter is a rare entity, with few cases reported in the literature. These tumors are usually locally aggressive and are associated with a poor prognosis due to the thin walls of the ureter. This is the case report of a 69-year-old male patient who presented with left flank pain and gross hematuria. Following diagnosis of ureteral carcinoma, nephroureterectomy was performed. Postoperatively, the patient refused chemotherapy and radiotherapy, and succumbed to extensive metastases after 12 months of follow-up. The aim of the present study was to provide a literature review of NEC and its clinical and pathological characteristics, diagnostic methods and latest modifications in therapy.

Primary Ureteral Thyroid Transcription Factor 1-Positive Small Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma: Case Report and Review of the Literature

Upper urinary tract neoplasms comprise only 5% of urinary malignancies overall, the overwhelming majority showing an urothelial histology. Nonurothelial lesions represent 1.9% of upper tract neoplasms, and small cell carcinomas (SmCCs) only account for a minute fraction of them, with few cases reported in the literature to date. In the genitourinary tract, these lesions are most frequently found in the urinary bladder, where they tend to show a mixed histology with a characteristic small cell neuroendocrine component that is positive for chromogranin A, synaptophysin, and CD56 immunostains. Urinary SmCCs are almost invariably aggressive, with a propensity to infiltrate surrounding tissues and vascular structures. Unfortunately, clinical stage at presentation is often advanced, with early dissemination to lymph nodes or distant organs in a significant proportion of patients. For the most part, prognosis is dismal and can be predicted by the pathologic stage at diagnosis. Recently, new chemotherapeutic regimens have shown some potential benefit for the treatment of urinary SmCC, albeit not achieving curative results. Here we present the case of a 71-year-old male patient with a history of treated bladder urothelial carcinoma that presented with subacute flank pain and was diagnosed with a primary pure SmCC of the ureter. Besides the usual neuroendocrine immunomarkers, this tumor showed intense positivity for TTF-1 (thyroid transcription factor-1), a phenomenon that has been described for extrapulmonary SmCC of other locations.

Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the ureter: A case report and literature review

Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma arising in the ureter is extremely rare; only a few cases have been previously reported in the literature. The current study reports the case of a 65-year-old female who presented with right-sided back pain. A mass was identified in the right ureter, and a nephroureterectomy was performed. The microscopic examination revealed that the mass was composed of a monotonous population of small cells and that the cells of the carcinoma were positive for cluster of differentiation 56, chromogranin A and synaptophysin. The tumor was diagnosed as a ureteral neuroendocrine small cell carcinoma. The patient returned 4 months later with recurrences in the retroperitoneum. Chemotherapy was administered and following 80 mg/m² intravenous irinotecan on days 1 and 8 and 25 mg/m² cisplatin on days 1–3, every 21 days for 4 cycles, the tumor was considerably smaller. During the regular follow-up examinations, the tumor remained stable.

Small cell carcinoma of the renal pelvis and ureter: clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical features

CONTEXT

Small cell carcinoma (SCC) of the renal pelvis and/or ureter is very rare, with only case reports published in the literature.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical findings in the largest series to date.

DESIGN

A review of a regional cancer registry identified 10 cases diagnosed as SCC from 930 patients with renal pelvic and/or ureteral cancer from 1971 to 1998. The original slides, demographics, treatment, and clinical outcome were reviewed. Representative sections were immunostained for AE1/AE3, cytokeratin 7, cytokeratin 20, CD56, synaptophysin, chromogranin, and thyroid transcription factor 1.

RESULTS

Of the 10 cases, 5 were pure SCC, 2 were mixed (SCC and urothelial carcinoma), 2 were reclassified as poorly differentiated squamous carcinoma, and 1 was reclassified as urothelial carcinoma. The patients with SCC had an age range of 50 to 80 years (median, 72 years) with a female to male ratio of 2.5:1. All patients had non-organ confined disease. Five of 7 patients died of disease; 4 of those 5 had been clinically followed (median survival, 23 months) and 1 was diagnosed at autopsy. The SCC cases revealed positive staining of the SCC component as follows: AE1/AE3 (7 of 7), CD56 (7 of 7), synaptophysin (6 of 7), thyroid transcription factor 1 (5 of 7), chromogranin (4 of 7), and cytokeratin 7 (1 of 7). None were positive for cytokeratin 20 (0 of 7).

CONCLUSIONS

SCC of the renal pelvis/ureter is seen in a predominately female population in Sweden, is clinically aggressive, and has poor survival when presenting at an advanced stage in patients only treated by surgery. An immunostain panel serves as a useful adjunct in classifying these tumors.

Small cell carcinoma of the renal pelvis: a case report and review of the literature

Extrapulmonary small cell carcinoma occurs in nearly all organs except the central nervous system and the liver. We are presenting a case of renal small cell carcinoma (SCC) with two unique characters. A 75-year-old patient was evaluated for back pain with no other complaints. Magnetic Resonance (MR) imaging of the abdomen revealed homogeneous tumor in the left renal pelvis extending beyond the kidney. Metastatic workup was negative. A left nephroureterectomy was performed. Histopathology and immunohistochemistry revealed a small cell carcinoma of the renal pelvis. The patient declined adjuvant therapy and died 2 months after surgery due to unrelated causes. After comprehensive worldwide literature search, we found 13 cases of SCC of the renal pelvis, including the current case. The mean age was 61.6 years (37–83), with a M : F ratio of 1 : 1.8. The average duration of symptoms was 71.4 days (21–168). Gross hematuria was the most common symptom (69.2%) followed by pain (61.5%). Adjuvant chemotherapy was provided to 4 patients (30.7%), and neoadjuvant to 1 patient. The median survival of patients who did and did not receive chemotherapy was 5.5 months (3–8) and 6 months (2–31), respectively, P < .50. In conclusion, renal SCC (both parenchymal and pelvic SCC) is a rapidly fatal disease with a median survival of ≤8 months.

Small cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract (UUT-SCC): report of a rare entity and systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Primary small cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract (UUT-SCC) is an extremely uncommon disease. The current knowledge of these rare tumors is mainly based on case reports or small series.

METHODS

We reported two cases and performed a systematic literature search from 1970 to 2010 for articles on UUT-SCC. Overall, 40 patients with UUT-SCC were reviewed, a database was generated to analyze clinical characteristics, pathological features and therapy outcomes and to attempt in identifying prognostic factors.

RESULTS

For the 39 cases with available data, median age was 66.5 years and male-female ratio was 2:1. An Asian ethnic background was more common (59%). Surgery was the standard treatment given to all patients. In 67% of cases, SCC coexisted with another malignant component, including urothelial carcinoma in 62% of patients. Overall median survival was 15 months and the 1-, 2- and 3-year survival rates were 58.4%, 38.1% and 23.8%, respectively. Of all cases, 53.8% developed detectable metastasis in a median delay of 13 months. Pathological stage was the only significant prognostic factor found (p=0.01). Patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy seem to have a higher median survival comparatively to those who did not receive chemotherapy but this was not statistically significant (24 vs. 12 months, p=0.56).

CONCLUSIONS

UUT-SCC is an extremely rare tumor characterized by an aggressive clinical course. Local or distant metastases are frequent and survival is poor. Pathological stage appeared to be a prognostic factor for overall survival.