Ureteroscopy: The standard of care in the management of upper tract urolithiasis in children

Comparative analysis of ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of childhood proximal ureteral stones

PURPOSE

This study aims to make a comparative analysis of the superiority of ESWL and URS in proximal ureteral stones in children.

METHODS

A total of 155 patients under the age of 15 were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups as Group 1 (n = 80, ESWL) and Group 2 (n = 75, URS) according to the type of procedure performed. The patients in both groups were evaluated in terms of age, gender, lateralization, stone size, stone volüme, stone density, and preoperative hydronephrosis. In addition, both methods used were compared in terms of success rate, time, cost, hospitalization and complications.

RESULTS

The mean age were 7.4 ± 2.1 in Group-1 and 8.1 ± 1.8 in Group-2. Demographic, clinical and laboratory data of both groups were similar. The hospitalization time, procedure time, success rate and cost were significantly higher in Group-2. The complication rate was significantly higher in Group-2 (p < 0.001). There was a significant negative correlation between ESWL success and stone volume (ρ - 0.375, p = 0.001) and stone density (ρ - 0.283, p = 0.011).

CONCLUSION

ESWL can be performed as the first line treatment of proximal ureteral stones in children due to its daily use, low cost, short procedure time and low complication rate. Increasing stone volume and density reduces the success of ESWL.

Multi-class motion-based semantic segmentation for ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy

Ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy has evolved as the most commonly used technique for the treatment of kidney stones. Automated segmentation of kidney stones and the laser fiber is an essential initial step to performing any automated quantitative analysis, particularly stone-size estimation, that can be used by the surgeon to decide if the stone requires further fragmentation. However, factors such as turbid fluid inside the cavity, specularities, motion blur due to kidney movements and camera motion, bleeding, and stone debris impact the quality of vision within the kidney, leading to extended operative times. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first attempt made towards multi-class segmentation in ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy data. We propose an end-to-end convolution neural network (CNN) based learning framework for the segmentation of stones and laser fiber. The proposed approach utilizes two sub-networks: (I) HybResUNet, a hybrid version of residual U-Net, that uses residual connections in the encoder path of the U-Net to improve semantic predictions, and (II) a DVFNet that generates deformation vector field (DVF) predictions by leveraging motion differences between the adjacent video frames which is then used to prune the prediction maps. We also present ablation studies that combine different dilated convolutions, recurrent and residual connections, atrous spatial pyramid pooling, and attention gate models. Further, we propose a compound loss function that significantly boosts the segmentation performance in our data. We have also provided an ablation study to determine the optimal data augmentation strategy for our dataset. Our qualitative and quantitative results illustrate that our proposed method outperforms state-of-the-art methods such as UNet and DeepLabv3+ showing a DSC improvement of 4.15% and 13.34%, respectively, in our in vivo test dataset. We further show that our proposed model outperforms state-of-the-art methods on an unseen out-of-sample clinical dataset with a DSC improvement of 9.61%, 11%, and 5.24% over UNet, HybResUNet, and DeepLabv3+, respectively in the case of the stone class and an improvement of 31.79%, 22.15%, and 10.42% over UNet, HybResUNet, and DeepLabv3+, respectively, in case of the laser class.

Therapeutic ureteroscopy for urolithiasis in children younger than 60 months of age

PURPOSE

The management of urinary tract calculi has evolved dramatically in children with the development of smaller and more durable endoscopic equipment. The indications for therapeutic ureteroscopy in children have significantly expanded with the availability of smaller caliber endoscopes and Holmium:YAG laser. In this paper, we review our experience of the management of urolithiasis and report outcomes of therapeutic ureterorenoscopy (URS) in children younger than 60 months.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the inpatient, outpatient records, and imaging data of our hospital, of all children ≤ 60 months of age undergoing URS for the treatment of urinary stones.

RESULTS

During the study period; 77 children, mostly male (70.1%) presenting with a single calculus and a mean age of 28.97 ± 2.44 months underwent therapeutic URS. A majority of children (71.4%) had lower or mid-ureteric calculi. Pre URS double J (DJ) stenting was necessary for 21 (27.2%) children. A total of 24 (31.1%) children needed ureteric dilatation before the ureteroscopy. Post URS DJ stenting was necessary in 41 (53.2%) children. Stents were retrieved within 10 days of the procedure. Stone clearance rate following a single-stage URS procedure was 94.8%, and 4 (5.2%) children needed additional shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) to achieve stone clearance. Overall complication rate including hematuria and fever was 12.9% (10 patients).

CONCLUSION

Therapeutic ureterorenoscopy in the management of ureteric and selective renal pelvic calculi is safe and effective. It can be considered as the first-line therapy in young children.

Miniature semi-rigid ureteroscopy with holmium-yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser vs shockwave lithotripsy in the management of upper urinary tract stones >1 cm in children

Objective

To compare the efficacy and safety of miniature semi-rigid ureteroscopy (URS) with holmium (Ho)-yttrium-aluminium-garnet (YAG) laser lithotripsy vs shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) for treating upper urinary tract (UUT) calculi >1 cm in children.

Patients and methods

Children with unilateral single UUT ureteric stones of >1 cm were prospectively enrolled in this study. Patients were randomly divided into two groups: Group 1, treated with SWL; and Group 2, treated with URS (6/7.5 F) and laser lithotripsy. The patients’ characteristics, stones demographics, operative time, adjunctive procedures, stone-free rate (SFR), re-treatment rate, and complications were statistically analysed and compared. Success was defined as stone-free status (no stone residual of ≥0.3 cm) at 1 month from the initial treatment without any auxiliary procedures.

Results

In all, 68 patients with UUT stones met our inclusion criteria. There were no significant differences between the two groups for patient or stone demographics. In Group 1, the SFR was 26/34 (76.4%) and in Group 2 it was 33/34 (97.1%) (P = 0.03). A total of 12 auxiliary procedures in Group 1 and two in Group 2 were needed to reach a 100% SFR (P = 0.014). There were no significant differences between the two groups for operative times, adjunctive procedures, number of complicated cases or complications of Grade ≥III (P = 0.65, P = 0.23, P = 0.77, and P = 0.62, respectively).

Conclusion

Miniature semi-rigid URS with Ho-YAG laser lithotripsy for UUT ureteric stones of >1 cm in children was more effective than SWL in terms of SFR and re-treatment rate, with no significant difference in the rate or grade of complications.

Abbreviations

EQ: efficiency quotient; KUB: plain abdominal radiograph of the kidneys, ureters and bladder; RCT: randomised controlled trial; SFR: stone-free rate; SWL: shockwave lithotripsy; URS: ureteroscopy; US: ultrasonography/ultrasound; URS: ureteroscopy; UUT: upper urinary tract; YAG: yttrium-aluminium-garnet

A systematic review of the quality of conduct and reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in paediatric surgery

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to evaluate quality of conduct and reporting of published systematic reviews and meta-analyses in paediatric surgery. We also aimed to identify characteristics predictive of review quality.

BACKGROUND

Systematic reviews summarise evidence by combining sources, but are potentially prone to bias. To counter this, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) was published to aid in reporting. Similarly, the Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) measurement tool was designed to appraise methodology. The paediatric surgical literature has seen an increasing number of reviews over the past decade, but quality has not been evaluated.

METHODS

Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, we performed a systematic review with a priori design to identify systematic reviews and meta-analyses of interventions in paediatric surgery. From 01/2010 to 06/2016, we searched: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, Web of Science, Google Scholar, reference lists and journals. Two reviewers independently selected studies and extracted data. We assessed conduct and reporting using AMSTAR and PRISMA. Scores were calculated as the sum of reported items. We also extracted author, journal and article characteristics, and used them in exploratory analysis to determine which variables predict quality.

RESULTS

112 articles fulfilled eligibility criteria (53 systematic reviews; 59 meta-analyses). Overall, 68% AMSTAR and 56.8% PRISMA items were reported adequately. Poorest scores were identified with regards a priori design, inclusion of structured summaries, including the grey literature, citing excluded articles and evaluating bias. 13 reviews were pre-registered and 6 in PRISMA-endorsing journals. The following predicted quality in univariate analysis:, word count, Cochrane review, journal h-index, impact factor, journal endorses PRISMA, PRISMA adherence suggested in author guidance, article mentions PRISMA, review includes comparison of interventions and review registration. The latter three variables were significant in multivariate regression.

CONCLUSIONS

There are gaps in the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews in paediatric surgery. More endorsement by journals of the PRISMA guideline may improve review quality, and the dissemination of reliable evidence to paediatric clinicians.

[Impact of the acquisition of a flexible ureteroscope on the management of upper urinary tract stones in children]

INTRODUCTION

Firstly reported in the early 1990s for the treatment of upper urinary tract stones in adult patients, flexible ureteroscopy (F-URS) has been used in children during the past 10 years and is now considered as a viable, but still second-line alternative to extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in these patients (ESWL). The aim of this study was to assess the impact of the acquisition of a F-URS on the management of upper urinary tract stones in children.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data of all ESWL, F-URS and percutaneous nephrolithotomy performed for upper urinary tract stones in children from 0 to 18 years old in a single center from 2000 to 2014 have been collected retrospectively. Patients have been divided into two groups: group 1 before the acquisition of the F-URS (2000-2008) and group 2 after the acquisition of the F-URS (2008-2014). Preoperative data and peri-operative outcomes were compared between both groups using the χ(2) test and Fisher exact test for discrete variables and the Mann-Whitney test for continuous variables.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven children have been treated during the first era and 32 during the second one. The two groups were similar in terms of age (7.2 years vs 8.1 years; P=0.54), size of the largest stone (15 mm vs 16.2mm; P=0,56) and number of stones per patient (1.4 vs 2; P=0,07) but the sum of stone diameters was higher in group 2 (16.9 mm vs 24.2mm; P=0,048). The stone-free rates were comparable in both groups (28.1% vs 32.2% after the first procedure; P=0.72), as were the mean number of procedures per patient (2.4 vs 2.5; P=0.78), the total length of stay (2.7 days vs 2.9 days; P=0.77), and the number of patients who experienced at least one complication (37.8% vs 40.6%; P=0.87).

CONCLUSION

The acquisition of a F-URS allowed the treatment of more complex stones with a similar efficacy and without increasing morbidity. Further studies are needed to define the role of F-URS in the management of upper urinary tract stones in children.

Ureteroscopy and stones: Current status and future expectations

Urolithaisis is becoming an ever increasing urological, nephrological and primary care problem. With a lifetime prevalence approaching 10% and increasing morbidity due to stone disease, the role of ureteroscopy and stone removal is becoming more important. We discuss the current status of stone disease and review the ever increasing role that ureteroscopy has to play in its management. We discuss technological advances that have been made in stone management and give you an overview of when, how and why ureteroscopy is the most common treatment option for stone management. We touch on the role of robotic ureteroscopy and the future of ureteroscopy in the next 10 years.